Top Stories
Workers fired, placed on leave for Charlie Kirk comments after assassination

The killing of Charlie Kirk is sparking debate about political violence in the U.S., as well as the kinds of professional repercussions employees who speak out about the conservative activist’s death — and other hot- button issues — might face.
A number of businesses and other organizations have shown employees the door this week because of their public remarks about Kirk, who was assassinated on Wednesday while giving a speech at Utah Valley University. Among those to lose their jobs or face other sanctions: a political pundit, a university employee, a sports reporter and a U.S. secret service agent.
Private employers have the law on their side when it comes to removing a worker who makes public statements that the business views as potentially harmful, according to legal experts.
“A private company can generally fire an employee for public comments, even political ones, if those comments are deemed to harm the company’s reputation, violate workplace policy or disrupt the business,” workplace attorney Marjorie Mesidor told CBS MoneyWatch.
Multiple firings
Employees in a range of industries, as well as in academia, are finding themselves in hot water over remarks they made about Kirk’s death or his political beliefs.
PHNX Sports, an online sports news site focused on Arizona, announced the firing of reporter Gerald Bourguet after he said on social media on Wednesday, in a since-deleted post, that “Refusing to mourn a life devoted to that cause is not the same thing as celebrating gun violence.”
“Truly don’t care if you think it’s insensitive or poor timing to decline to respect an evil man who died,” he added.
Bourguet declined to comment when reached by CBS MoneyWatch.
MSNBC said it cut ties with analyst Matthew Dowd after he said in an on-air conversation that Kirk had pushed incendiary speech and that “hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions.” In a public statement, Comcast accused Dowd of making “an unacceptable and insensitive comment about this horrific event.”
“That coverage was at odds with fostering civil dialogue and being willing to listen to the points of view of those who have differing opinions. We should be able to disagree, robustly and passionately, but, ultimately, with respect. We need to do better,” Comcast executives said.
Dowd, the former chief strategist for Republican President George W. Bush, apologized in a Substack post on Friday, saying he hadn’t meant to imply Kirk was to blame for the violence that killed him, the AP reported. But Dowd, a long-time political analyst at ABC News before joining MSNBC in 2022, also accused the network of caving to pressure to fire him.
“The right wing media mob ginned up, went after me on a plethora of platforms, and MSNBC reacted to that mob,” he wrote on Substack. “Even though most at MSNBC knew my words were being misconstrued, the timing of my words forgotten … and that I apologized for any miscommunication on my part, I was terminated by the end of the day.”
Middle Tennessee State University said in statement that it had fired a university employee over “inappropriate and callous comments on social media concerning the horrific and tragic murder of Charlie Kirk.”
Nasdaq, in a statement posted on X, said it dismissed an employee over social media posts related to Kirk’s shooting that the stock exchange said “were a clear violation of our policy.”
In a Facebook post, the U.S. Secret Service said it placed an agent who it said expressed negative opinions about Kirk on leave. “The U.S. Secret Service will not tolerate behavior that violates our code of conduct. This employee was immediately put on administrative leave, and an investigation has begun,” a U.S. Secret Service spokesperson said in a statement.
United Airlines told CBS News that it took action against employees who the company said had publicly commented on Kirk’s death. “Our mission at United Airlines is to connect people and unite the world. So we’ve been clear with our customers and employees that there’s zero tolerance for politically motivated violence or any attempt to justify it,” the carrier said in a statement to CBS News.
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy applauded United for “for doing what’s right by placing pilots celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk out of service. They must be fired,” in a statement on X.
“There’s no room for political violence in America and anyone applauding it will face the consequences. ESPECIALLY those we count on to ensure the safety of the flying public,” Duffy wrote.
Few protections
First Amendment protections are generally limited for workers in the private sector, according to attorneys.
“Employers often have a strong legal basis to terminate an employee if their public comments, especially on a high-profile and sensitive topic like a murder, cause reputational damage or customer backlash,” Mesidor said.
Some states — California, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina and West Virginia — do have laws to protect employees from being fired for their conduct off the job, including their political speech and activity, but most do not. Maynard Nexsen attorney Andrew Kragie told CBS MoneyWatch that workers at private employers typically have little protection from punishment for their public comments.
“If someone says, ‘Thank goodness this person was assassinated,’ then generally their employer can fire them,” he said. That’s because most workers are employed at-will, meaning either party can terminate the contract at any time, for any reason, he explained.
“So, most employees in the private sector can be disciplined based on what you say on social media, even if your account doesn’t identify you as an employee,” Kragie added.
contributed to this report.
Top Stories
President Donald Trump’s Air Force One due to land soon in UK for second state visit – follow live
Why Trump’s visit is mired with diplomatic flashpointspublished at 18:45 BST
James Landale
Diplomatic correspondent

This state visit is designed to improve UK-US relations and
cement the government’s relationship with an at-times-unreliable ally.
Diplomats say the president will focus on royal pageantry and avoid
controversy.
But the potential for disagreement remains.
Peter Mandelson: The sacking of Lord Mandelson as the UK’s man in Washington, for his links to the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, will cast a pall.
Questions about this may dominate Thursday’s news conference.
The risk for
ministers is that the focus shifts from Prime Minister Starmer’s competence to President
Trump’s links to Epstein.
Middle East: The UK is expected to recognise Palestinian statehood at the
United Nations next week to keep alive the idea of a two-state solution.
The US is fiercely
opposed to this, saying the move would reward terrorism and encourage Israel to
annex parts of the West Bank.
Free speech: The White House claims UK regulation of the Internet
threatens free speech, which is something ministers reject.
US officials say the issue
may come up, as it is something “we
in this administration are very much focused on”.
Protests: This state visit will take place behind a ring of steel away
from the public.
But anti-Trump demonstrations are planned and the president
could push back angrily if he watches coverage of the protests on television.
Top Stories
This Liquid Glass Optical Illusion on iOS 26 Is Driving Me Insane

My colleagues didn’t believe me when I told them all my app icons looked slightly crooked after updating my iPhone 16 Pro to iOS 26 and getting Apple’s new Liquid Glass user interface.
I told our staff reporter Kyle Barr—an all-round consumer tech guru, mind you—to look at my home screen and tell me that my icons were tilting slightly to the left, like the Leaning Tower of Pisa. “I don’t see it,” he said, trying to convince me there was no slanting. He checked his own newly updated iPhone 14 Pro and didn’t see any tilted icons, either.
Turns out we are both correct.
To create the effect of glass and all of its reflective and shimmering properties, iOS 26 forces every icon on your iPhone home screen to have a slight glow to them in the top left and lower right corners. This gives the subtlest parallax effect when you tilt your iPhone, creating the illusion that they’ve got the thinnest layer of depth.
Against most home screen wallpapers—particularly more colorful ones—app icons do not appear skewed to the eye. All the hues draw attention away from the refractive app corners. But that’s not the case with many dark wallpapers, or solid black like I have on my iPhone. On top of a pure black wallpaper and with the icons set to “Dark,” “Clear,” or “Tinted,” everything looks tilted. I’ve found it just a little bit disorienting and kind of frustrating if I look at my home screen for more than a few seconds.
I’m not the only one bothered by this optical illusion. A post on r/ios has over 2.5K upvotes and nearly 500 comments at the time of writing. “The frame glow effect makes apps look tilted, and it’s really distracting for me (I even feel a bit dizziness),” wrote user tantunidevourer.
People who hadn’t noticed it after updating their iPhones confirmed the tilted icons. “I hadn’t noticed it at the first glance, but now I can’t unsee the tilted app icons,” wrote user Silacko. Another Reddit user, OrganicCoffeeBean, said, “This update is making me feel drunk.”
Some users have suggested turning off the parallax effect buried within the Accessibility section within the Settings app. Apple added a “Reduce Motion” setting after users complained about the zooming in/out icon animations in iOS 7 causing dizziness and nausea. (I was one of those users who felt nauseous at the zooming icon effect.) Turning on Reduce Motion kills the animations, and the additional “Prefer Cross-Fade Transitions” setting further helps “reduce the motion for user interface controls that slide in when appearing and disappearing,” according to Apple’s description. I turned on both settings and can confirm that it doesn’t remove the refractive app icon corners. Maybe Apple will add another toggle to the ever-growing section under Accessibility in a future software update. At this point, why not just let users decide how liquidy and glassy they want iOS 26 on their devices with some kind of slider setting that lets you adjust the transparency?
With Liquid Glass, Apple was going for a unified design language that runs across all of its products, from the iPhone to iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, and Apple TV. Some people like the fluid-like interface; others hate it. If you’re the latter, you can make Liquid Glass less liquidy and glassy with a few Accessibility tweaks.
I wouldn’t go as far as to say all of iOS 26 is an “optical nightmare,” like Reddit user demenghi, but I do think there’s room for improvement, or at the very least, more customization needs to be added.
Top Stories
Ghana says African immigrants deported by the US have returned home

ACCRA, Ghana (AP) — Authorities in Ghana pushed back Tuesday on claims that four African immigrants recently deported by the U.S. remain in Ghanaian detention, reiterating their assertion that all such migrants have been returned to their home countries.
The government said Monday that all 14 of the deportees had been returned to their countries of origin in West Africa. On Tuesday, Ghana’s presidential spokesperson Felix Kwakye Ofosu said in an interview with The Associated Press that 13 Nigerians were sent home on a bus and that one Gambian was sent home on a plane.
Lawyers for four of the Nigerians said in U.S. court filings Monday and in interviews with the AP that the four were still being held in a facility in Ghana. The lawyers said the Nigerians faced persecution in their home country, but a judge rejected their request for a court order to return them to the U.S., though she expressed alarm over the deportations.
The Ghanaian government spokesperson denied knowledge of such a facility. “None of them are staying in this country. Nobody is being held in any camp and nobody’s right has been abused,” Ofosu said of the deportees in a phone interview.
The AP could not independently verify the current location of the deportees. However, a lawyer for the Gambian individual, from a different law firm, confirmed that their client was in Gambia.
Nigerian and Gambian government officials told the AP they were neither notified about the deportations nor involved in the process.
US judge won’t intervene in the deportations
Meanwhile, a U.S. judge said that she was powerless to prevent Ghana from returning deportees in its custody to their home countries, declining to intervene in the case, in a victory for the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said that although five of the African deportees had been barred from being sent directly from the U.S. to their home countries because of a likelihood of persecution, her “hands are tied” once they are in Ghana.
Still, she said that the deportations appeared to be against an international treaty on torture, saying she was “alarmed and dismayed” by the “government’s cavalier acceptance of Plaintiffs’ ultimate transfer to countries where they face torture and persecution.”
Chutkan distinguished it from the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deemed by courts to have been wrongly sent by the administration to a prison in his native El Salvador. In the Africa case, unlike in Abrego Garcia, she wrote, the administration could legally send the deportees to Ghana.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Trump administration has been seeking ways to deter immigrants from entering the U.S. illegally and remove those who already have done so, especially those accused of crimes and including those who cannot easily be deported to their home countries.
The administration, faced with court decisions that people can’t be sent back to their home countries, has increasingly been trying to send them to third countries under agreements with those governments.
Ghana has joined Eswatini, Rwanda and South Sudan as African countries that have received migrants from third countries who were deported from the U.S.
The lawsuit filed on behalf of some of the migrants said they were held in “straitjackets” for 16 hours on a flight to Ghana on Sept. 5 and detained for days in “squalid conditions” after they arrived there. It said Ghana was doing the Trump administration’s “dirty work.”
——
Riccardi reported from Colorado and Asadu from Dakar, Senegal. Associated Press writer Abdoulie John in Banjul, Gambia, contributed.
-
Business3 weeks ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms1 month ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy2 months ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers3 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Education3 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Education2 months ago
Macron says UK and France have duty to tackle illegal migration ‘with humanity, solidarity and firmness’ – UK politics live | Politics
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi
-
Funding & Business3 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries