Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

What This Superintendent Thinks Vendors Need to Know About The Newest AI Certification

Published

on


As artificial intelligence usage in classrooms expands rapidly, school districts continue to face a tricky issue: The lack of clear standards for AI in K-12.

School districts around the country are exploring how the emerging technology can be used, but they’re also cautious about the risks — in particular data privacy, the accuracy of information, and transparency.

Currently, education companies seeking to bring AI products to market must rely on a hodgepodge of guidelines put forward by an assortment of organizations.

Meanwhile, districts have become increasingly vocal about the standards they require of AI vendors.

One of the latest efforts to bring some clarity to the K-12 marketplace in terms of AI products comes from the tech- and innovation-focused nonprofit Digital Promise.

In April, the nonprofit launched a certification tool for ed-tech companies to allow them to show that the AI in their product was developed “to reduce algorithmic bias, provide transparency about data collection and security … and equip educators with agency while engaging with AI outputs.” The credential is called the “Responsibly Designed AI” certification.

About This Insider

Mario Andrade is superintendent of Nashua Public Schools, where he arrived in 2022. His career in public education spans nearly 25 years, beginning as a special education teacher in Attleboro, Massachusetts in 1998. Since then, he has served as an assistant principal, principal, assistant superintendent, and superintendent in Rhode Island and independent consultant for Learning Science International. He serves on several community, regional, and national boards, including national advisory committees through Digital Promise.

Digital Promise was created by an act of Congress in 2008 and launched a few years later. The organization focuses on pushing for innovations in schools through technology and creating new learning environments, among other strategies.

For the AI certification project, the nonprofit asked more than three dozen superintendents, school and district leaders, technologists, and AI researchers to participate in working group sessions to help come up with a criteria.

“As superintendents, we have to drive the marketplace to say, ‘We want to ensure that what you’re giving us is validated,’” said Mario Andrade, the superintendent of the roughly 10,000-student Nashua School District in New Hampshire. “We need to be stronger as school districts, and require vendors [of AI products] to be certified somewhere.”

Andrade was one of the superintendents involved in the development of Digital Promise’s AI certification.

His work with the nonprofit predates the AI certification effort, when he was superintendent at Bristol Warren Regional School District in Rhode Island. The 2,900-student district was selected to be part of the Digital Promise League of Innovative Schools, a national network of school systems intended to spearhead cutting edge learning practices.

EdWeek Market Brief spoke with Andrade about his work with Digital Promise, how it’s shaped technology usage at his district, and the push to get K-12 AI products certified.

The following has been edited for length and clarity.

How did you get involved with Digital Promise?

I’ve been fortunate enough to be a member of Digital Promise for these last nine years or so. This is my second district that was inducted into the League of Innovative Schools. And if you look back in 2016, early in my superintendent days, really the tech transformation then was around how to use Chromebooks in the classroom.

That seems like so long ago, but we followed a systemic approach to change as opposed to just buying Chromebooks.

Can you elaborate on what those systemic approaches looked like?

We focused the conversations around how this is going to change our teaching and learning, and what kind of professional development we need. How do we budget for the transition? I was really fortunate to get connected with the League of Innovative Schools, who were already having the same kind of conversation.

What was your current district’s biggest tech challenge when you started as superintendent?

Nashua School District, for the size of the district, I found that we were actually behind the curve. Even coming out of COVID, we were still not a 1-to-1 school district. Students didn’t have their own Chromebooks, especially at the secondary level.

We had to do professional development, and that was what really started our conversation around a technology plan and what a standardized classroom looks like from a technology point of view, using all types of technology, so that students can demonstrate proficiency in ways that they couldn’t do before with these tools.

How have things changed over the last couple of years?

We’ve made some investments in our technology to go 1-to-1 at our secondary schools, and it was really a redeployment of our resources. We had the Chromebooks in the district, but they weren’t in the hands of the students on a daily basis.

The work was really with our professional development to use technology in different ways. One key hire that we had in the last couple of years is a director of digital learning.

She has been the liaison between technology and curriculum to provide professional development support to [help] our teachers embed technology into their lessons. Even in 2022, you’d think all this would be a no-brainer. Ed tech isn’t a new concept, but we just weren’t using it in the right way.

Are you seeing a change in attitude from your teachers about using tech in the classroom?

The biggest evolution is really the mindset. I’ll use the last two years of conversation around AI as an example. We took a grassroots approach in doing some research and design on how we incorporate AI in the classroom and create policy.

We had about 50 teachers in a cohort focused on how they might use AI in the classroom. They developed lessons, they worked with kids, and they really worked out the bugs through asking essential questions on how we can use AI in areas like English and math

What was the result of the cohort’s work?

That [work] built their knowledge and understanding of AI — what it is and what it isn’t, and how might students use it in productive ways.

Through that kind of research, we had more and more teachers buy into the concept that AI can be in the classrooms and kids can use it for learning enhancement, as opposed to just cheating or writing a report for students.

How are you expanding the use of AI in your district now?

We’re not 100% across the district [in terms of AI usage]. We actually have some PD coming up. But by having those 50 teachers go through that research and design, we acknowledge that we’re exploring this area, and it isn’t going away. This past year we partnered with Yourway Learning [an AI platform for districts]. All of our secondary teachers have access to the platform, and they can put in their lesson plans, ask questions, and use that for lesson development.

Are teachers using the AI platform?

We saw some good usage. It is starting to scale now that more teachers are using AI to ask better questions around lesson development and planning. We’ll be having our all-admin retreat this summer and will be working with Yourway Learning for our administrators.

What about students in your districts — are they using AI?

We know what kids are using it [for] because we’ve done some focus groups with students. They’re exploring with it, whether it’s ChatGPT, or other tools. But they are using it.

It’s more than just purchasing things. We’re having much better conversations about teaching and learning and what the future of instruction looks like.

We’re learning through our teachers by having conversations about students’ processing skills, critical thinking, and problem solving. We know students might be using AI to help edit a paper or write some stuff.

We are actually looking at the process in which papers, or outcomes, were developed and if students are using the tools appropriately.

What’s the general sense you’re getting from teachers and admins when it comes to AI usage?

There’s still a lot of trepidation. We are not yet using AI to go deep, so I still think the trepidation is that students are going to use it to cut corners and to pass off work that’s not authentic.

I don’t think we’ve touched the power and capability of AI to actually get into critical thinking and deeper learning.

Looking back over the last couple of years, what are some takeaways from your district’s tech journey?

We’re making progress. I don’t think we ever reach our ultimate goal because in five years, it’s probably gonna be a different tool that we’re talking about.

It’s always going to be about how we are adapting. It’s more than just purchasing things. We’re having much better conversations about teaching and learning and what the future of instruction looks like as opposed to just ensuring we have enough Chromebooks and Wi-Fi spots.

What type of work were you doing with Digital Promise in regards to districts and AI products?

The work group was really tasked with trying to come up with a kind of a certification, like a badge, to acknowledge that an AI company is responsible — to make sure there were privacy safeguards in place, that the data they collect is unbiased.

I get a million emails daily, and have people advertising their products … saying ‘We’re the best AI out there.’

From a superintendent’s point of view, how do you know whether what they’re pitching is valid or not? We wanted a trustworthy tool or certification that is going to validate whether an AI vendor is actually trustworthy.

Do you get the sense that AI vendors are going to buy into a voluntary certification process?

I think there’ll be a mixed feeling. It’s almost like data privacy agreements — not all companies want to sign off on a data privacy agreement for whatever reason. It’s going to take a little more momentum from superintendents to say”I want you to be certified.”

Would you bring an AI product into your district that is not certified or vouched for in some way?

I would say I’m hesitant. We are always looking for DPA agreements,, so we go through the contracts really carefully to make sure that those are in place.

I was fortunate enough to educate myself on some of these questions that I should be asking. Even if there’s no certification, we’re looking for what’s in the language of the contract that protects our students and other important data.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tools & Platforms

Yum China Goes High-Tech: KFC and Pizza Hut Boost Efficiency with AI!

Published

on


AI dishes up savings and smiles at KFC and Pizza Hut

Last updated:

Edited By

Mackenzie Ferguson

AI Tools Researcher & Implementation Consultant

Yum China, the operator of popular fast-food franchises like KFC and Pizza Hut, is diving into the AI world to enhance efficiency and profitability. The company is leveraging AI technology to optimize everything from supply chain processes to in-store operations. As a result, customers can expect faster service and more personalized experiences. This tech rollout represents a significant move towards incorporating cutting-edge technology into everyday business operations.

Banner for Yum China Goes High-Tech: KFC and Pizza Hut Boost Efficiency with AI!

Background and Context

Yum China, the operator of well-known fast-food chains such as KFC and Pizza Hut, is leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance efficiency and drive profitability in its operations. By incorporating AI technologies, Yum China aims to streamline processes and optimise various aspects of its business strategies. This move not only highlights the company’s commitment to innovation but also its adaptability in an ever-evolving business landscape. For more details on this initiative, you can check the original source here.

In a rapidly changing market, such technological advancements are indispensable for businesses aiming to stay competitive. Yum China’s integration of AI is a strategic move to not only increase operational efficiency but also enhance customer experience, allowing the company to better respond to consumer needs and preferences. This adoption of AI showcases a growing trend among major corporations to harness technology for maintaining relevance and achieving business goals in a digital age.

The initiative by Yum China to embrace AI technologies is also reflective of the broader shift within the restaurant industry towards automation and data-driven decision-making. As companies look to streamline operations and improve margins, artificial intelligence offers a pathway to achieve these objectives. This transformation is crucial for building resilience against market fluctuations and for ensuring long-term sustainability of business models.

Summary of the Article

Yum China, the operator of fast-food chains KFC and Pizza Hut, is increasingly integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into its operations as part of a strategy to enhance efficiency and profitability. The adoption of AI technologies by Yum China is a significant move in the restaurant industry, aiming to streamline processes and improve customer service dynamics. By leveraging AI, the company can not only predict customer preferences more accurately but also manage supply chains more effectively, ensure food quality, and potentially increase sales figures. This strategic embrace of AI underscores Yum China’s commitment to staying ahead in a competitive market landscape where technological adaptation is crucial for business success.

Related Events

The recent initiatives undertaken by Yum China, the operator of KFC and Pizza Hut, in embracing AI technologies have sparked a series of related events across the business landscape in China. As highlighted in their recent strategies, the integration of AI is not merely about enhancing operational efficiency but also about revolutionizing customer experience. This shift is setting a precedent for other major players in the fast-food industry, encouraging them to explore similar technological advancements.

In response to Yum China’s adoption of AI, various technology firms in China are collaborating with fast-food chains to offer AI solutions tailored to the food and beverage sector. This burgeoning collaboration marks a significant trend in tech-driven partnerships aimed at bringing innovation to everyday consumer experiences. Such alliances are fostering a new era where technology and gastronomy intersect to redefine dining experiences.

Furthermore, this movement is influencing policy discussions at a governmental level, where the focus is increasingly on supporting AI development across different industries. The Chinese government’s enthusiasm for AI as a tool for modernization and efficiency is further emphasized by such corporate moves, thereby reinforcing national goals for technological advancement and self-reliance.

The ripple effects of Yum China’s AI integration are also evident in academic circles, where institutions are emphasizing AI research geared towards practical applications in commercial settings. This academic interest not only fuels future innovations but also ensures a steady supply of skilled professionals ready to meet the demands of a tech-driven economy. In essence, Yum China’s AI strategies are not just operational choices but are contributing to wider societal and economic shifts.

Expert Opinions

In the rapidly evolving landscape of the restaurant industry, particularly in China, expert opinions highlight significant opportunities for leveraging technology to enhance operational efficiency and profitability. Yum China, the operator behind fast-food giants KFC and Pizza Hut, is at the forefront of this transformation. As noted by industry analysts, the company’s strategic integration of AI solutions not only streamlines operations but also personalizes customer experiences. This move is seen as a response to the competitive market pressures and a shift towards more digital-savvy consumer preferences.

Public Reactions

The integration of AI by Yum China, the operator of KFC and Pizza Hut in China, has sparked varied public reactions. Many customers have expressed excitement about the increased efficiency and improved service that AI can bring to their dining experience. Some diners appreciate the novelty and technological advancement, which they believe could streamline operations and enhance their overall experience at these popular food chains.

However, not all reactions have been positive. Some consumers have voiced concerns about privacy and data security, as AI systems often require extensive data collection to function effectively. These customers are wary of how their information might be used or shared and are calling for clearer policies and assurances from Yum China regarding data protection.

Moreover, there is a segment of the public that is apprehensive about the potential impact of AI on employment. With AI taking on tasks traditionally handled by human workers, concerns about job displacement have arisen, leading to discussions on how Yum China plans to balance technology integration with human resource management. This sentiment is shared by many globally, reflecting a broader anxiety about the rise of automation in various industries.

Overall, while the use of AI in Yum China’s operations presents exciting opportunities for innovation and growth, it also highlights significant issues that resonate with a global audience. For an in-depth look at Yum China’s AI strategy and public reaction, the South China Morning Post provides more insights here.

Future Implications

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into business operations is increasingly transforming industries across the globe. Yum China, the operator of fast-food giants like KFC and Pizza Hut, is a prime example of this trend. By leveraging AI to streamline their processes, they are setting a precedent for other companies to follow. This move is expected to significantly enhance their operational efficiency and profitability, as highlighted in a detailed article by the South China Morning Post.

Looking ahead, the adoption of AI by Yum China could have broader implications for the fast-food industry both in China and globally. As other companies observe Yum China’s successful integration of AI technologies, there may be a ripple effect, prompting more industry players to invest in AI solutions to remain competitive. This could lead to a revolution in customer service, supply chain management, and even menu personalization, driven by AI-driven insights.

Moreover, the shift towards AI can potentially reshape employment dynamics within the sector. While automation may reduce certain manual roles, it also opens up new opportunities for tech-savvy professionals who can develop, manage, and optimize these AI systems. This transformation necessitates a recalibration of workforce skills and continued education for employees to adapt to a tech-driven environment, as noted in discussions surrounding similar advancements.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Hangzhou: China’s Emerging AI Powerhouse

Published

on


Hangzhou, the picturesque capital of Zhejiang Province, is quickly emerging as a key pillar in China’s artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. Once known primarily for its cultural heritage and as the headquarters of e-commerce giant Alibaba, the city is now transforming into a powerful AI hub, driven by visionary government policies, a dynamic startup ecosystem, cutting-edge academic institutions, and high levels of private and public investment. Its rapid evolution exemplifies China’s broader strategy to lead the global race in artificial intelligence.

Government Initiatives and Strategic Policy Support

A major driver behind Hangzhou’s AI rise is the strong backing of the Chinese government, both at national and provincial levels. The “Hangzhou AI Industry Chain High-Quality Development Action Plan” has set bold objectives: certifying more than 2,000 new high-tech enterprises, launching over 300 large-scale technological projects, and injecting an impressive 300 billion RMB (approx. US$40 billion) into innovation annually. This funding supports AI research, development of cutting-edge applications, infrastructure, and talent cultivation.

Further cementing Hangzhou’s AI ambitions is the revitalization of “Project Eagle,” a policy initiative that allocates 15% of industrial development funds to future industries, with AI being a priority. These initiatives are not only helping to establish Hangzhou as a hub of AI innovation but are also attracting domestic and international investors eager to tap into this growth.

The Rise of the “Six Little Dragons”

One of the most notable signs of Hangzhou’s AI success story is the emergence of six pioneering startups, collectively referred to as the “Six Little Dragons.” These companies represent the city’s growing diversity and sophistication in AI application:

DeepSeek – Known for its work in natural language processing and large language models.

Game Science – A game development firm leveraging AI in next-gen interactive experiences.

Unitree Robotics – Specializes in agile AI-powered robots for various industrial and consumer applications.

DEEP Robotics – Develops quadruped robots capable of complex navigation and movement, often used for security and research.

BrainCo – Focuses on brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies that merge neuroscience and machine learning.

Manycore Tech – A hardware and software AI solutions provider with strengths in chip design and high-performance computing.

These companies are not only rapidly scaling within China but are also attracting international attention for their technological advancements and commercialization potential. Their presence underscores Hangzhou’s strength in fostering both technical excellence and business scalability.

Academic Foundations and Skilled Talent Pipeline

Hangzhou’s AI ecosystem is further bolstered by a solid academic foundation. Zhejiang University, one of China’s top-tier institutions, plays a critical role in producing AI talent and thought leadership. The university houses cutting-edge research labs and has established partnerships with top tech firms for collaborative innovation.

Graduates from Zhejiang University and other local institutions often go on to found startups or take leadership roles in the AI industry. The close connection between academia and industry ensures a continuous exchange of ideas, innovation, and expertise, which is essential for sustained growth in emerging technologies like AI.

In addition, Hangzhou has invested in AI-focused education and vocational training programs to ensure that its workforce remains competitive. This comprehensive talent strategy allows the city to meet the growing demand for data scientists, machine learning engineers, and AI researchers.

Industry Collaboration and Corporate Investments

Beyond startups and academia, major corporate players are betting big on Hangzhou’s AI future. Most notably, Alibaba, headquartered in the city, has been at the forefront of this transformation. Under the leadership of Eddie Wu, the company has pledged to deepen its involvement in generative AI and has launched internal initiatives aimed at developing new AI products and services.

In parallel, Alibaba has worked to attract foreign capital to Hangzhou’s AI sector, especially in connection with the Six Little Dragons. Following Jack Ma’s involvement in a high-level business symposium with President Xi Jinping, Alibaba’s influence in shaping Hangzhou’s AI roadmap has only increased.

Other corporations and venture capital firms are also taking notice. Investment funds are flowing into AI development zones, incubators, and innovation labs across Hangzhou, helping to establish a robust support system for tech entrepreneurship and research.

Infrastructure, Challenges, and Long-Term Outlook

Despite these promising developments, Hangzhou faces several challenges that come with rapid growth. Talent retention remains a concern, as other Chinese cities like Beijing and Shenzhen compete for the same AI professionals. Furthermore, as AI technology demands powerful computing infrastructure, continued upgrades in data centers, power grids, and 5G connectivity are essential.

Additionally, navigating regulatory uncertainty and ensuring responsible AI development will be key for Hangzhou to maintain sustainable growth. The city must also remain agile in adapting to global shifts, including trade policies, technology standards, and geopolitical tensions that may impact international partnerships and supply chains.

Nonetheless, the city’s proactive governance, talent pool, and innovative momentum offer strong indicators that Hangzhou is well-positioned to become a global AI innovation hub. As China continues to push its national AI ambitions, Hangzhou stands out as a leading example of how a regional city can emerge as a technological powerhouse through visionary planning, strong public-private partnerships, and relentless innovation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

AI is forcing the data industry to consolidate — but that’s not the whole story

Published

on


The data industry is on the verge of a drastic transformation.

The market is consolidating. And if the deal flow in the past two months is any indicator — with Databricks buying Neon for $1 billion and Salesforce snapping up cloud management firm Informatica for $8 billion — momentum is building for more.

The acquired companies may range in size, age, and focus area within the data stack, but they all have one thing in common. These companies are being bought in hopes the acquired technology will be the missing piece needed to get enterprises to adopt AI.

On the surface level, this strategy makes sense.

The success of AI companies, and AI applications, is determined by access to quality underlying data. Without it, there simply isn’t value — a belief shared by enterprise VCs. In a TechCrunch survey conducted in December 2024, enterprise VCs said data quality was a key factor to make AI startups stand out and succeed. And while some of these companies involved in these deals aren’t startups, the sentiment still stands.

Gaurav Dhillon, the former co-founder and CEO of Informatica, and current chairman and CEO at data integration company SnapLogic, echoed this in a recent interview with TechCrunch.

“There is a complete reset in how data is managed and flows around the enterprise,” Dhillon said. “If people want to seize the AI imperative, they have to redo their data platforms in a very big way. And this is where I believe you’re seeing all these data acquisitions, because this is the foundation to have a sound AI strategy.”

But is this strategy of snapping up companies built before a post-ChatGPT world the way to increase enterprise AI adoption in today’s rapidly innovating market? That’s unclear. Dhillon has doubts too.

“Nobody was born in AI; that’s only three years old,” Dhillon said, referring to the current post-ChatGPT AI market. “For a larger company, to provide AI innovations to re-imagine the enterprise, the agentic enterprise in particular, it’s going to need a lot of retooling to make it happen.”

Fragmented data landscape

The data industry has grown into a sprawling and fragmented web over the past decade — which makes it ripe for consolidation. All it needed was a catalyst. From 2020 through 2024 alone, more than $300 billion was invested into data startups across more than 24,000 deals, according to PitchBook data.

The data industry wasn’t immune to the trends seen in other industries like SaaS where the venture swell of the last decade resulted in numerous startups getting funded by venture capitalists that only targeted one specific area or were in some cases built around a single feature.

The current industry standard of bundling together a bunch of different data management solutions, each with its own specific focus, doesn’t work when you want AI to crawl around your data to find answers or build applications.

It makes sense that larger companies are looking to snap up startups that can plug into and fill existing gaps in their data stack. A perfect example of this trend is Fivetran’s recent acquisition of Census in May — which yes, was done in the name of AI.

Fivetran helps companies move their data from a variety of sources into cloud databases. For the first 13 years of its business, it didn’t allow customers to move this data back out of said databases, which is exactly what Census offers. This means prior to this acquisition, Fivetran customers needed to work with a second company to create an end-to-end solution.

To be clear, this isn’t meant to cast shade on Fivetran. At the time of the deal, George Fraser, the co-founder and CEO of Fivetran, told TechCrunch that while moving data in and out of these warehouses seems like two sides of the same coin, it’s not that simple; the company even tried and abandoned an in-house solution to this problem.

“Technically speaking, if you look at the code underneath [these] services, they’re actually pretty different,” Fraser said at the time. “You have to solve a pretty different set of problems in order to do this.”

This situation helps illustrate how the data market has transformed in the last decade. For Sanjeev Mohan, a former Gartner analyst who now runs SanjMo, his own data trend advisory firm, these types of scenarios are a big driver of the current wave of consolidation.

“This consolidation is being driven by customers being fed up with a multitude of products that are incompatible,” Mohan said. “We live in a very interesting world where there are a lot of different data storage solutions, you can do open source, they can go to Kafka, but the one area where we have failed is metadata. Dozens of these products are capturing some metadata but to do their job, it’s an overlap.”

Good for startups

The broader market plays a role here too, Mohan said. Data startups are struggling to raise capital, Mohan said, and an exit is better than having to wind down or load up on debt. For the acquirers, adding features gives them better pricing leverage and an edge against their peers.

“If Salesforce or Google isn’t acquiring these companies, then their competitors likely are,” Derek Hernandez, a senior emerging tech analyst at PitchBook, told TechCrunch. “The best solutions are being acquired currently. Even if you have an award-winning solution, I don’t know that the outlook for staying private ultimately wins over going to a larger [acquirer].”

This trend brings big benefits to the startups getting acquired. The venture market is starving for exits and the current quiet period for IPOs doesn’t leave them a lot of opportunities. Getting acquired not only provides that exit, but in many cases gives these founding teams room to keep building.

Mohan agreed and added that many data startups are feeling the pains of the current market regarding exits and the slow recovery of venture funding.

“At this point in time, acquisition has been a much more favorable exit strategy for them,” Hernandez said. “So I think, kind of both sides are very incentivized to get to the finish line on these. And I think Informatica is a good example of that, where even with a bit of a haircut from where Salesforce was talking to them last year, it’s still, you know, was the best solution, according to their board.”

What happens next

But the doubt still remains if this acquisition strategy will achieve the buyers’ goals.

As Dhillon pointed out, the database companies being acquired weren’t necessarily built to easily work with the rapidly-changing AI market. Plus, if the company with the best data wins the AI world, will it make sense for data and AI companies to be separate entities?

“I think a lot of the value is in merging the major AI players with the data management companies,” Hernandez said. “I don’t know that a standalone data management company is particularly incentivized to remain so and, kind of like, play a third party between enterprises and AI solutions.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending