Connect with us

Business

What is AI automation, and how can your business use it?

Published

on


What is AI automation, and how can your business use it?

Automation used to be the best way to make software do the work and free up time for more important things. And while AI has since come on the scene, it hasn’t replaced automation—it’s made it better.

Here, Zapier explains what AI automation actually is, why it’s useful, and how you can start using it to offload all the worst parts of your job, so you can focus on the human stuff.

What is AI automation?

AI automation (sometimes referred to as intelligent automation) combines automation technologies with artificial intelligence (AI) to create systems that tackle complex work by learning, adapting, and making smart decisions. These systems can practically think on their feet, analyzing information, learning from experience, and constantly getting better at what they do.

People are also reading…

For your business, this means tackling more complex projects with automation and making your workflows dramatically more efficient and largely self-sufficient.

Benefits of AI automation

Infographic showing six reasons on why AI automation should be used.
Zapier

You’re probably already envisioning all the ways AI automation could make your life easier. Here are some key reasons to implement it.

  • Saves employee time and energy: Automation alone is enough to turn an otherwise seven-hour manual task into a five-minute one. But an automation tool that can also collect new data, learn from it, and handle complex decision-making? That can expedite processes exponentially, allowing your employees to prioritize higher-value tasks that are more deserving of their energy and attention.
  • Reduces the likelihood of errors: When programmed correctly, robots can be far more accurate than humans (sorry, humans). People don’t follow structured algorithms to the T quite like automated tools, and AI can analyze huge amounts of data to inform decisions.
  • Identifies opportunities: When you integrate AI tools into your existing workflows, they can use your data to flag blind spots and possibilities for your business.
  • Improves customer satisfaction: The more streamlined and intelligent your process of delivering your products or services, the happier your customers will be. Plus, imagine chatbots actually understanding your customers’ needs, surfacing relevant answers and resources, and knowing when it’s time to connect them to a human representative. A dream come true.
  • Helps identify and patch security vulnerabilities: When allocated enough processing power, AI automation is a speedy process. It can scan your software, surface potential security risks, and even correct those vulnerabilities far faster and more accurately than a human could.
  • Increases organizational agility: AI automation helps your business keep up with zig-zagging market trends without missing a beat. It can quickly spot changes in customer behavior or supply chain hiccups, then help adjust your operations on the fly.
  • Drives innovation: AI automation is a powerful R&D assistant. It can crunch vast datasets for that aha insight, prototype a web app for a partner, or rapidly test new product features while your team dreams up the next big thing. It’s about turning those “what if” moments into “what’s next” realities faster.

Key components and technologies that AI automation uses

Infographic showing four key components and technologies that AI automation uses.
Zapier

To really get a handle on AI automation, it helps to know the key technologies that work behind the scenes. We’re talking about everything from the workhorses that automate routine tasks to the brains that understand language, interpret images, and even think up new content. Here’s a rundown of some of the essential tools and technologies that power AI automation.

Robotic process automation (RPA)

RPA bots can quickly accomplish repetitive, routine tasks, such as data extraction and transfers, to save you time. These bots follow predefined scripts to do things like fill out forms, shuttle data between spreadsheets and CRMs, process payroll, or generate routine reports. In AI automation, RPA often lays the groundwork by tackling these high-volume, predictable tasks, freeing up the more advanced AI components to focus on complex decision-making and learning.

AI is software that mimics human thinking, and you may have noticed, it’s been getting pretty good at it in recent years. It can learn from previous choices, quickly analyze data to make accurate predictions, and make quick decisions. While many technologies on this list are specific parts of AI, its overarching role in AI automation is to imbue automated processes with these cognitive capabilities. This means these systems can, for example, intelligently route customer support tickets based on their actual content and urgency, dynamically optimize supply chain logistics as conditions change, or provide remarkably accurate sales forecasts by analyzing complex datasets.

Machine learning and deep learning

Machine learning (ML) is a core type of AI that allows systems to learn directly from data, spotting patterns, making predictions, and improving their performance over time without being explicitly programmed for every variation.

Deep learning takes this a step further as an advanced subset of ML, using complex “neural network” structures to decipher highly intricate patterns in massive datasets. These learning capabilities are crucial for AI automation, enabling systems to adapt and get smarter.

Natural language processing (NLP)

Natural language processing is the AI that makes it possible for computers to understand, interpret, and even generate human language, whether it’s written text or spoken words. This is vital for intelligent automation because so much business information is unstructured language.

Thanks to NLP, AI automation systems can engage in (mostly) sensible chatbot conversations with customers, automatically analyze thousands of reviews to gauge overall sentiment, instantly translate documents, or transcribe meeting notes into text, making sense of our primary mode of communication.

Generative AI is a particularly exciting frontier of artificial intelligence, where models don’t just analyze existing information but actually create entirely new, original content. By learning deep patterns from vast datasets, these types of systems can produce novel text, images, audio, software code, and more.

In the realm of AI automation, this opens up powerful possibilities for automating creative and content-heavy tasks. For instance, generative AI can draft initial marketing copy or email campaigns, design unique visuals based on text prompts, compose original music tracks, or even generate segments of code to speed up software development.

Computer vision lets software interpret and understand visual information from images and videos. While a common application in business automation is optical character recognition (OCR), which “reads” text from scanned documents or images and converts it to digital data, the field is actually much more exciting.

Computer vision allows systems to identify objects, recognize patterns, and analyze scenes. In AI automation, this capability means processes can react to visual inputs, automating tasks that previously needed human sight. For example, systems can use computer vision to inspect manufactured goods for quality control, monitor security footage for specific events, assist in analyzing medical scans for anomalies, or identify products and shelving in retail environments.

Intelligent document processing (IDP)

Intelligent document processing technology is designed to tackle the challenge of handling huge volumes of documents by doing much more than just basic text extraction. While it builds on capabilities from computer vision, like OCR, IDP is a distinct solution because it adds a significant layer of artificial intelligence.

Using AI techniques such as machine learning and natural language processing, IDP doesn’t just “read” documents; it aims to understand them. This means it can automatically classify different document types (like an invoice versus a purchase order), intelligently extract specific pieces of information (like names, dates, amounts, or even complex clauses from contracts), validate that data, and then feed it into other business applications.

For example, businesses use IDP to automate their accounts payable by extracting details from supplier invoices and inputting them into accounting systems to speed up insurance claims processing. They do this by accurately pulling information from various claim forms, or to improve customer onboarding by quickly processing application forms and verifying ID documents.

Business process management (BPM)

BPM streamlines workflows to improve company efficiency. It’s a structured way of looking at your end-to-end workflows, finding the kinks, and redesigning them for better results. AI automation often comes into the picture through BPM strategies like process mining.

Process mining uses specialized software to analyze your existing processes as they actually happen, creating a clear map that helps diagnose where things are getting stuck, where tasks are taking too long, or what’s ripe for an automation upgrade. Once these areas are identified, AI automation can then automate specific steps, inject smart decision-making into the flow, or help monitor the improved process, ultimately leading to more streamlined and effective operations, such as faster customer onboarding or more efficient supply chain management.

How to implement AI automation

Implementing intelligent automation isn’t a set-it-and-forget-it kind of deal. It’s something you’ll have to constantly monitor and adjust as your business and the tech itself grow. That said, here are a few key phases to guide you from an initial idea to a fully functioning smart workflow:

  • Find: Think of this as the scouting mission. You’re looking for those processes that are a bit clunky, data-heavy, or involve tricky decisions that could really benefit from an AI boost. This might involve looking at common bottlenecks, listening to what your team says takes up too much time, or using tools like process mining to get a clear picture of where work gets stuck.
  • Analyze: Once a process is selected for review, this is where you put it under the microscope. You’ll map out how it currently runs, identify precisely where it’s causing problems, and figure out if an AI automation solution makes solid business sense. This step is all about clear objectives and knowing what “better” actually looks like.
  • Build: With your analysis done, the next step is designing and constructing your AI automation solution. This involves mapping out the smarter workflow and picking the right technologies. If you have the team, you might map out these core intelligent components in-house. Alternatively, for specialized expertise or faster implementation, you could turn to automation as a service (AaaS), where experts can construct and configure these sophisticated systems for you.
  • Automate and integrate: This is the go-live stage where you bring your intelligent workflow to life. It’s where the theoretical design from the “Build” phase becomes a practical, automated reality that actively runs your business processes. Data will flow cleanly between your automation and core enterprise systems (like a central database or ERP) without causing chaos or data integrity issues.
  • Optimize: Since AI models learn from data, their performance can degrade as the real world changes—a concept known as “model drift.” Optimizing an AI automation system means keeping the AI sharp by monitoring AI-specific metrics, like its confidence level in its own decisions, and periodically retraining it with fresh data. More importantly, it’s about refining the human-AI feedback loop: When a person corrects an AI’s mistake or handles an exception, that action should be used as new training data to make the model smarter for the next time. The goal isn’t just to keep the automation running; it’s to ensure it’s continuously improving its own intelligence.

Examples of AI automation processes

A lot of technical jargon has been thrown at you—here’s how to practically apply it in a business setting.

  • Write emails: Sure, your email app can help you draft a reply, but AI automation can help you simplify the entire process around that email. Instead of just writing, AI can act as a central dispatcher for a shared inbox like support@ or sales@.
  • Analyze leads: Let an AI do the prospecting work for you. When a new lead arrives, an AI agent can automatically investigate them online, visiting their company website to understand the business and finding their job title from public sources to see if they’re a good fit. The tool may deliver a rich summary of its findings right to your CRM, arming your sales team with the intel they need to focus on the best prospects first.
  • Adjust production: AI automation can use data on supply and demand to reconfigure manufacturing equipment, programming it to produce more or less product, minimizing the likelihood of surpluses or shortages. Essentially, the smarter robots tell the automation robots what to do and when to do it.
  • Predict maintenance: For businesses with heavy machinery—think factories or transport companies—AI automation can predict when equipment needs maintenance before it breaks down. Instead of just reacting to a system alert, the data can be fed to AI to analyze the signal, assess its severity against historical data, and even diagnose the probable cause. Based on the AI’s diagnosis, the workflow can then create a highly detailed work order in a maintenance platform, specifying the urgency and required parts, while simultaneously alerting the correct team via their preferred channel.
  • Optimize supply chains: AI automation can make supply chains much smarter and more responsive. For instance, AI can analyze historical sales, current stock levels, and even external factors like shipping forecasts to help businesses make better decisions about ordering and inventory.
  • A/B test: AI automation can compare side-by-side versions of assets, whether it be product prototypes or CTAs, and provide insight into which is more effective in a matter of seconds. It’s the type of tedious process AI was made to replace.
  • Automate document processing: If your team is swamped with invoices, contracts, or forms, AI automation can automate much of that document handling. Tools leveraging AI can “read” these documents and extract key information like dates, amounts, or names, and then route that data exactly where it needs to go.
  • Automate the path from vibe to production code: A nontechnical team member can submit their AI-generated prototype code through a simple form. A business automation tool could then trigger an AI step to perform an initial code review, automatically checking for common issues or bugs. That AI analysis, along with the prototype code itself, could then be used to create a perfectly formatted, detailed ticket in your development team’s project management tool, bridging the gap from a creative “vibe” to a formal, reviewed development task.
  • Automate content creation: You can integrate your favorite generative AI tools to draft initial marketing copy, outline articles, or even generate different versions of ad text based on your prompts—all within your existing workflow automations. It’s a great way to overcome writer’s block and speed up content production, leaving you to refine and add the final human touch.

What’s the difference between AI automation and RPA?

Infographic showing Robotic Process Automation vs. AI Automation.
Zapier

Simply put, RPA is a less intelligent AI automation. RPA replaces manual and repetitive work using automation tools like bots. AI automation introduces cognitive technologies like AI and computer vision into the mix to automate processes that formerly required human thought.

For example, a bot that automatically categorizes users in a CRM based on how they subscribed to a newsletter is a form of RPA. AI automation might involve using subscriber interaction data (clicks, bounce rate, etc.) to add suggestions to a company’s CRM, informing future newsletter content.

How to kickstart your AI automation strategy

Intelligent automation can completely revolutionize your organization’s processes, so it’s important to be strategic when implementing it. Don’t pull the rug out from under your employees without developing a game plan.

  1. Get buy-in from top management: Don’t just bullet out the generic ways AI automation is helpful—explain how your organization can uniquely apply it to improve efficiency and see tangible ROI.
  2. Start slow: Once implementation becomes viable, don’t throw AI automation at everything all at once—take baby steps. Prioritize automating the most time-consuming tasks at your organization before moving into the “it would be nice…” category.
  3. Focus on data governance and quality: Remember the old saying, “garbage in, garbage out?” It’s especially true for AI automation, as your AI systems are only as good as the data they’re fed. Establish solid data governance practices to ensure your data is accurate, consistent, secure, and handled ethically.
  4. Develop an automation-first mindset: Before assigning a person to a specific task or project, ask if it can be completed (and especially if it can be completed better) by AI automation. As AI continues to advance with every passing day, you’ll likely find that there are more and more ways AI automation can make your life easier and your organization more profitable.
  5. Address ethical considerations: AI automation is powerful stuff, and like any new powerful tech, it comes with its own set of ethical questions. Think about things like potential bias in AI decision-making, how customer data is being used, and being transparent about how these systems work. It’s smart to consider these aspects upfront to build and use AI automation responsibly.
  6. Plan for workforce upskilling: As AI automation takes on more tasks, the roles and skills your team needs will likely evolve. Plan ahead to help your employees learn how to work alongside these new AI tools and automated processes. Offering training and development opportunities not only helps your team adapt but also ensures you get the most value out of your AI automation investments.
  7. Implement learnings: At times, AI automation implementation won’t go as planned. That’s fine, but try to avoid making the same mistakes twice by documenting your learnings and applying them. 

AI automation is no longer just a futuristic buzzword; it’s a practical set of tools and strategies you can use today to make your business more efficient, responsive, and innovative.

This story was produced by Zapier and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.



Source link

Business

Immigration law firm making £1.7m in legal aid loses contract over standards | Immigration and asylum

Published

on


An immigration law firm that signed up thousands of asylum seekers and generated income of £1.7m in legal aid in the last year, despite only employing five solicitors to represent them, has had its government contract terminated after concerns about its performance, the Guardian has learned.

The decision leaves many asylum seekers struggling to find new legal representatives at a time when the government is increasing the number of cases it refuses.

In the year ending June 2025 initial asylum grants fell from 58% to 48%, leaving more people having to lodge appeals, something that is difficult to do without a legal representative.

Middlesex Law Chambers’ legal aid income for immigration work dramatically increased from £43,000 in 2021 to £1.7m in 2025. The firm is listed on the Solicitors Regulation Authority website as having 15 offices around the country, many in legal aid deserts such as Peterborough, Plymouth and Crawley.

When the Guardian phoned these offices there was either no reply or a receptionist for the office block where the firm rented a space said it was no longer there.

The director of Middlesex Law Chambers, criminal defence solicitor Sheraz Chowdhry, said the firm had planned to expand into those areas but in most cases had not done so and had now terminated rental arrangements for those office spaces.

It currently has one solicitor employed at its Southall office doing private immigration work, one solicitor at an office in Canary Wharf in east London doing family work and a small team at its Uxbridge office doing criminal defence work. Legal aid contracts continue for those areas of work.

Chowdhry joined the firm at the end of last year just months before the previous lawyer in charge of immigration work, Hina Choudhery, died from complications of cancer.

He said: “Ultimately the firm, obstructed by Hina’s poor health over the last two years or so, has found it difficult to maintain its once very high standards in the immigration department.”

He added he found out about the termination of the legal aid contract for immigration work just weeks ago. “The decision was also only communicated to us via email on 20 August 2025.”

When asked to explain why the firm had expanded its caseload so dramatically and how it was possible to provide adequate legal representation for thousands of asylum seekers with just five immigration solicitors and a mix of 15 junior and more senior caseworkers, he said: “No solicitor was here during the expansion phase. It is difficult for me to explain how the firm suddenly grew so large in such a short space of time. I do not know.”

A typical caseload for a legally aided asylum solicitor or caseworker is 15–20. With the number of staff employed by the firm during its period of rapid expansion each solicitor and caseworker would have had about 164 cases.

Frances Timberlake, of Migrants Organise, which has many migrant members who complained about the service provided by the firm, said: “It is the Ministry of Justice’s duty to ensure that legal advice is available to people who need it. But decades of funding cuts and neglect to the legal aid system have left many people in our communities without any support.

skip past newsletter promotion

“We urgently need funding for good legal advice and for the government to stop pushing migrants into hostile, expensive legal processes just as a charade for Reform,” she said.

Dr Jo Wilding, a researcher and senior lecturer in legal aid at the University of Sussex and an immigration barrister, said: ‘This was completely foreseeable when one small firm with very few accredited staff set up offices in several new areas, including six serious advice desert areas, and started taking on hundreds of cases.

“It should have been obvious that vulnerable people were being exploited but the Legal Aid Agency doesn’t seem to have identified or recognised that there was a problem. The solution to this is to stop treating legal aid for the most vulnerable people as if it was a market, and to pay that money to a reputable expert law firm or not-for-profit to do the work.”

Rami, a former client of Middlesex Law Chambers, said: “It’s good that the government has stepped in and closed this firm. But it feels too late, because a lot of people like me have already suffered because of the work of this firm. I had to do my asylum interview without any real advice beforehand, holding my evidence in my hand that I had translated on Google because the law firm had not done it. I have lost a lot of time in my life because of this. I have grey hair now when before this I did not.

“People seeking asylum face a lot of problems and a lawyer can help us to get through bad situations. But it is very difficult to find a legal aid lawyer and many people don’t speak English so cannot know which is a good law firm and which is not.”

A Legal Aid Agency spokesperson said: “Middlesex Law Chambers’ immigration legal aid contract has been terminated.

“Firms that hold legal aid contracts are subject to annual reviews. These can lead to financial sanctions or, as in this case, contract termination where standards are not met.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Uefa backs off overseas league fixtures but the struggle for power still goes on | Uefa

Published

on


Never underestimate the attraction of a good can-kick. That would appear to be the message coming out of Tirana on Thursday when Uefa announced it had not taken the epochal decision on overseas league fixtures that the world of football had anticipated. Instead, the executive committee decided it would embark on a round of consultation, one that would even take in the considerations of supporters to boot.

This is likely a sensible decision. There has been a fair amount of surprise in some quarters that the question of whether and by how much football leagues should be allowed to move from domestic to international is only now being properly debated in the corridors of power. After all, the first writ in this debate was served by the promoter Relevent against the United States Soccer Federation in 2019. Only with the prospect of La Liga staging a fixture between Barcelona and Villarreal in Miami as soon as December has the issue come into focus. But to have discussion at all will be regarded by many as better late than never. It is also a break with the current way of doing things.

Fifa’s Club World Cup, the biggest and most disruptive new development in the game for some time, is largely viewed as having come about as the result of one man’s determination to drive change (that man being Gianni Infantino). The process Fifa undertook to establish the tournament has, however, led to legal action and no small amount of rancour over a claimed lack of consultation with competition organisers. (It should be noted there has been less complaint from clubs, some of whom pocketed tens of millions of dollars for taking part.) In this instance, by contrast, Uefa appears to have opted for jaw jaw rather than war war.

The president of Uefa, Aleksander Ceferin, flagged this possible direction in an interview conducted before the Champions League draw in Monaco last month. Asked about the plan for overseas fixtures by Politico, Ceferin said: “We’re not happy but, as much as we checked legally, we don’t have much space here, if the federation agrees, and both federations agreed. But I think that for the future we’ll have to discuss this very seriously, because … fans should watch football at home … We will open this discussion also with Fifa, and with all the federations, because I don’t think it’s a good thing.”

If Uefa’s presumably well-remunerated lawyers weren’t wildly wrong in their calculations then deferral with a chance of dialogue was perhaps the best option Uefa could plump for in the short term. It may best serve its interests in the longer term too. With the contest to control the future of the world’s most popular sport continuing to heat up, it is possible to argue that Uefa is among the most vulnerable to any shift away from the current model of the men’s game. Its tournaments – the European Championship, the Nations League, even the Champions League – are likely to be the first to feel the squeeze should the international calendar take on even more matches in the medium term via changes such as a biennial Club World Cup. Faced with this position, being an organisation that is seen to be listening, and perhaps even collaborative, may well be a good idea.

In the Politico interview Ceferin drew a red line against a biennial Club World Cup, saying: “I wouldn’t agree with that, but I don’t think [Fifa] want to.” That last line goes against much of the reporting on the topic but was of a piece with a more emollient tone as Ceferin rolled back on remarks Uefa had made months before condemning Infantino’s “private political interests” after the Fifa’s president arrived late for his own Congress after touring the Gulf with Donald Trump. Ceferin told Politico the language used had been “a bit overemotional” and that relations with Fifa were “absolutely” in a better place.

Gianni Infantino and Donald Trump at the Club World Cup final in New Jersey. Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Again with the conciliation, again another possible sign of where the balance of power lies. But by behaving constructively, by acting less as a rival and more as a facilitator, Uefa will find itself in tune with another player which could yet weigh in on the future of European football (and by extension the game as a whole): Brussels. The European courts are where much of the battles is being played out, with no ruling more consequential than that involving the European Super League, which questioned the ability of sports governing bodies to act as both regulator and competition organiser without the risk of “abusing” their “dominant position”. The European Commission, meanwhile, is taking more and more interest in ensuring the concept of a “European Sports Model” where open competition (ie promotion and relegation) runs alongside financial solidarity from the top to the bottom of the pyramid.

The European commissioner for intergenerational fairness, youth, culture and sport, Glenn Micallef, made the unusual decision to intervene in the debate over international fixtures last week, describing the plans as betraying supporters and putting the European Sports Model at risk. On Thursday, he spoke again, commending Uefa’s decision to pause and discuss. “This is the right and responsible way to do things; through inclusive dialogue and consultation,” he wrote on social media.

The Commission is the body that initiates Europe’s political direction and if it felt it necessary to intervene to protect the European Sports Model, it could. Such an action would likely throw the existing power structures in football up in the air and being on the right side of any such shift would be to any governing body’s advantage. If Ceferin’s remarks on the issue of international fixtures are correct, it may be we see such matches yet. But while it is unfortunate to lose some battles, sometimes they may help you in fighting a war.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Court room or soap opera? Employment tribunals aren’t as boring as they sound | Employment tribunals

Published

on


Usually the forum for humdrum disputes over hourly rates and unpaid overtime – employment tribunals are not the first place you’d look for an eye-catching yarn.

But for dedicated followers of the tribunal service’s list, recent weeks have been a purple patch of zingers, with judges settling the kinds of rows that belong more in a soap opera than in civil proceedings.

Cases have included arguments over whether being called messy is harassment, calling your boss a “dickhead” is a sackable offence – another considered if young chatty workers disturbing older colleagues breaches equality rules.

Employees who soldier on without complaint might be surprised to see such issues litigated, the fact that they are, according to experts, is down to an unusual confluence of factors.

Andrea London, employment partner at Winckworth Sherwood, said some of the headlines are down to selective reporting of much wider claims – but another reason for wide-ranging allegations may be that people are choosing to represent themselves in disputes.

While a lawyer would advise on what to include in a claim, a litigant in person (representing themselves) would be likely to cover everything they thought might be relevant.

“These are the quirky sort of bits that people might be interested in reading about, rather than [the substance of] an entire claim,” London said.

“There are a lot of very serious claims going through but what we tend to find, particularly with claimants in person, is that they will include absolutely everything in a potential claim, from somebody looking at them the wrong way to being spoken to harshly. So tribunal judges then have to go through all of the issues.”

The respective claimants (both unsuccessful) in the messiness accusation case and that alleging age harassment against an older colleague by younger boisterous workers, represented themselves, an increasing occurrence since legal aid for most employment tribunals was abolished in 2013.

London said: “Some people might consider it to be too easy now [to get a case before a tribunal] but that’s for the Ministry of Justice [to decide].”

She said that cases did get sifted out before reaching trial but they tended to be the “completely outlandish” ones or those that were out of time and that throwing out more claims at an early stage would restrict access to justice.

London also stressed that there was more to some of the recent eye-catching tribunal cases than was perhaps obvious at first glance. Commenting on news reports of a woman who was compared with Darth Vader being awarded £30,000, she said the case involved a number of different claims, not just that which related to the Star Wars villain. The former employee was ultimately successful because she suffered detriment as a result of protected disclosures she made which fell within whistleblowing legislation.

In another headline-grabbing case, reported this week, a judge said that a boss would not be breaking employment law, for example, if they rejected a job application from an avid Tottenham Hotspur supporter because the office was full of Arsenal fans.

skip past newsletter promotion

London said: “The team you support is not a protected characteristic (which it would be unlawful to discriminate against) so, provided they’re sensible about it, employers are allowed to choose a candidate that they think would be the best fit among the other members of staff. Particularly if it’s a small company, having somebody that’s going to get on with everybody is potentially very important.”

While the judge in the “dickhead” case ruled that the insult was not a sackable offence, it does not mean employees have free rein to insult their bosses.

“The tribunals do try to be consistent with other cases that come through at that level but generally precedents are set at the EAT (employment appeal tribunal) and court of appeal,” said London. “Employment tribunals are fact dependent so it’s quite tricky for judges.”

John Bowers KC, an experienced employment law barrister and the principal of Brasenose College, Oxford, said: “There are unusual facts in some employment tribunals but all of the cases are carefully considered and the facts weighed. Frivolous cases are rooted out at a preliminary stage although this could be done more rigorously.”

But he said the more serious issue was delays in the system. “At present the tribunals are deluged with work and cases are taking years to be heard,” he said. “This will be made more serious if day one rights (new protections for employees as soon as they start a job) are introduced. More money needs to be made available to the tribunal system.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending