SANTA CLARA, Calif. — After wide receiver Jauan Jennings returned to practice Monday and participated again Wednesday, the San Francisco 49ers bolstered his earning potential for 2025.

Jennings’ agents, Drew and Jason Rosenhaus, told ESPN’s Adam Schefter on Wednesday night that the Niners and Jennings have agreed to add $3 million in play-time incentives to his contract for this season.

Jennings, who is entering the final season of the two-year contract he signed last offseason, can now earn up to $10.5 million. He is slated to become an unrestricted free agent after the season, as he and the Niners didn’t come to an agreement on a long-term extension.

Earlier Wednesday, Niners coach Kyle Shanahan said he didn’t think “there’s totally a resolution” with Jennings in terms of his contract, though he reiterated that the team would like to keep Jennings for 2025 and beyond. It was an indication that at least some contract modification could be coming, however.

“There’s a business side but it’s something that I think both sides would love to get worked out,” Shanahan said. “Just don’t know if we can.”

While much was made of Jennings’ contract situation during the 36 days of camp and the preseason he missed, he also was dealing with a calf injury that he suffered in the fourth practice of camp.

Shanahan said Wednesday that Jennings had imaging done before the team returned to practice Monday and that it showed the wideout is “good to go.” Jennings was listed as a limited participant in Wednesday’s practice, though Shanahan said Jennings will be ready to play in Sunday’s regular-season opener against the Seattle Seahawks.

“Having him back on the practice field Monday was awesome,” Shanahan said. “We love J.J. When he is not there, he is greatly missed. The way he carries himself, the energy he plays with and how good of a player he is makes everyone very excited.”

San Francisco general manager John Lynch acknowledged last week that Jennings had requested a trade “a while ago” but said the team and player had moved past that, adding that the Niners had no interest in trading Jennings and that he would be expected to play once his calf healed.

That, apparently, happened in recent days, clearing the path for Jennings to return to practice and for him and the Niners to find a way to bolster his contract for this season. It’s a similar playbook the Niners have followed for other players who have requested trades in the past.

Running back Raheem Mostert, receiver Deebo Samuel and kicker Robbie Gould have all requested trades in recent years, with the 49ers declining to deal them before either signing them to an extension (Samuel, Gould) or adjusting their contract (Mostert).

Jennings is coming off his best professional season. In 2024, he was the team’s most productive wideout, posting 77 receptions for 975 yards and six touchdowns, all career highs. The Niners also view Jennings as an elite run blocker for his position.

“I’m obviously super happy [he’s back],” defensive end Nick Bosa said. “He came back on whatever our last practice was and already looked great making plays, so obviously that’s huge for us.”

In other receiver news Wednesday, the 49ers signed Marquez Valdes-Scantling to the active roster and re-signed veteran Russell Gage Jr. to the practice squad. Shanahan indicated that Valdes-Scantling and Gage will be active against the Seahawks on Sunday to go along with Jennings, Ricky Pearsall and Skyy Moore at the position.

Senator Mark Warner said on Wednesday that a meeting he had scheduled at the headquarters of a US intelligence agency was cancelled following online attacks by the far-right activist and conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer.

Warner, the Democratic vice-chair of the Senate intelligence committee, was set to visit the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency in Virginia in what he described part of his “responsibility to provide oversight and support to our intelligence community”.

The administration rescinded the invitation after Loomer initiated a “campaign of baseless attacks” against him and the agency’s director, Trey Whitworth, he said.

“I can’t overstate how unprecedented and dangerous this is,” Warner said in a fundraising email. “This administration is taking its marching orders from Laura Loomer – a wackjob with a long history of outlandish fringe views, including 9/11 denialism, anti-Muslim harassment campaigns, and associations with white supremacists.”

Loomer posted on social media in recent days complaining that the director of an intelligence agency was hosting a “rabid ANTI-TRUMP DEMOCRAT SENATOR”. She celebrated the cancellation, calling Warner a threat to national security and arguing he should be removed from the Senate committee.

“He weaponized our intelligence agencies to push the debunked Russia Collusion Hoax,” she wrote.

She told the New York Times Warner should “be removed from office and tried for treason”.

Warner told reporters that the decision to cancel the previously unpublicized meeting was made by the office of the defense secretary.

The incident illustrates Loomer’s enduring influence within Donald Trump’s administration. The 32-year-old, who has previously described herself as “a proud Islamophobe”, has acted as a national security and foreign policy adviser to the president. In April, Trump fired six staffers after Loomer gave him a list of people she believed were not sufficiently loyal to the president.

Last month, the administration announced it was planning to stop issuing visas to children from Gaza seeking medical care after complaints from Loomer.

Warner argued that Loomer is “basically a cabinet member at this point” and that Trump and his administration were “caving to whatever she wants”.

“This nakedly political decision undermines the dedicated, nonpartisan staff at [the] NGA and threatens the principle of civilian oversight that protects our national security,” Warner said in a statement.

“Members of Congress routinely conduct meetings and on-site engagements with federal employees in their states and districts; blocking and setting arbitrary conditions on these sessions sets a dangerous precedent, calling into question whether oversight is now allowed only when it pleases the far-right fringe.”