Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

Trump gave China the AI chips it wanted. Beijing isn’t saying thank you

Published

on


By John Liu, CNN

(CNN) — In a surprising reversal of the United States’ years-long technology restrictions on China, President Donald Trump last month allowed Nvidia to resume sales of a key AI chip designed specifically for the Chinese market.

Yet rather than celebrating, Beijing’s response has been noticeably lukewarm, despite having long urged Washington to ease the stringent export controls. In the weeks since the policy U-turn, Beijing has called the chip a security risk, summoned Nvidia for explanations and discouraged its companies from using it.

The less-than-welcoming sentiment reflects Beijing’s drive to build a self-sufficient semiconductor supply chain – and its confidence in the progress its rapidly advancing chip industry has made.

But the cold shoulder may also represent some political posturing. Despite significant advances in its semiconductor sector, China still needs America’s chips and technology. Experts said China’s national champion Huawei has developed chips with performance comparable to — and in some cases surpassing — the newly approved Nvidia chip. However, China still wants the more advanced AI processors that remain blocked under US export controls.

In the years since Trump first imposed tech restrictions on Huawei during his first term, China’s chip technology has made significant strides, spurred by the frustration that mounted as Washington piled on export controls, said Xiang Ligang, director-general of a Beijing-based technology industry group and an advisor to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

“We have this capability, it’s not as they imagine – that if China is blocked, China won’t be able to function, or that China will be finished,” he said.

To him, the policy about-face only reflects the importance of having a wholly homegrown chip supply chain.

“For Chinese companies, we may only have one choice if we wish to ensure a relatively secure supply of chips – that means relying on our own domestically produced chips,” Xiang said.

That may be China’s goal, but in the high-stakes AI race, with all its national security implications, the US remains the leader, at least for now.

China is not “naive”

The chip in focus is Nvidia’s H20, which was released by the AI chip leader last year to maintain access to the Chinese market following strict export controls put in place under the Biden administration that stopped the export of chips with high processing power.

Last month, Trump greenlit the sales of the chip to China after banning it in April as the US trade frictions with China deepened.

Trump has justified his decision by calling the chip “obsolete,” as it lags behind the company’s cutting-edge AI processors like Blackwell or H100, from which H20 is derived. He and his officials appeared to have embraced a view long promoted by Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang – that US can maintain its tech leadership only through ensuring its chips remain the global standard.

“You want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month.

But the dramatic reversal has fueled questions about Trump’s transactional approach to national security – once considered off-limits to bargaining.

China, on the other hand, is alarmed by the alleged security risks of Nvidia’s H20s like “tracking and positioning” and “remote shutdown” features, capabilities that some US lawmakers have called for but Nvidia denies it has placed in its chips.

China’s cyberspace watchdog and industry ministry have since summoned the American chip giant over the security concerns and urged firms to avoid H20 chips, a development which was previously reported by Bloomberg.

One major Chinese tech company which has developed its AI models has received notice from the authorities urging it to exercise caution in the use of H20s, and advising it not to purchase them, a company insider said on the condition of anonymity.

CNN has reached out to the ministry and the cyberspace authorities for comment.

An Nvidia spokesperson told CNN that NVIDIA “does not have ‘backdoors’ in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them.”

“Banning the sale of H20 in China would only harm US economic and technology leadership with zero national security benefit,” the spokesperson added.

But China believes the US isn’t playing fairly, Xiang said.

“What we actually want, you refuse to sell us. For the things you already consider obsolete, you still want to dump them into our market and occupy our market. Do you really think we’re that naive?” he said.

Still coveted

Despite Beijing’s concerns and the H20’s reduced performance, the chips remain highly sought after by Chinese companies.

Equity research firm Bernstein estimated that shipment of the chips to China this year would have reached 1.5 million units, or about 23 billion in revenue, without Trump’s export restrictions. Major buyers include Chinese tech giants such as TikTok owner ByteDance, Alibaba and Tencent.

While Huawei’s top AI chips excel in computing power – one of the key measures in evaluating processors’ performance – in comparison with H20, they fall short in terms of memory bandwidth, which determines how much data can move between a chip’s memory and computing unit.

That bandwidth depends on a technology known as High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) used in AI chips to ensure efficient data transmission in AI model training.

China’s top HBM maker CXMT, or ChangXin Memory Technologies, is still about three to four years behind industry leaders like South Korea’s SK Hynix and Samsung, and American Micron, according to MS Hwang, research director at Counterpoint Research, a research firm.

Last year, the Biden administration further tightened export controls on China, including restrictions on HBM sales, forcing Chinese companies to rely on existing stockpiles.

Beijing has requested Washington to lift restrictions on HBM as part of the trade deal negotiations, Financial Times reported this week.

Key appeal of H20 for Chinese companies also lies in Huawei’s limited production capacity and Nvidia’s well-established ecosystem, said Qingyuan Lin, senior analyst at Bernstein focusing China’s semiconductor industry.

“Even when you want to completely replace the H20 demand with the local guys, they’re not able to deliver the amount of chips that’s needed,” he said.

The supply bottlenecks stem from constraints in scaling up production of both the manufacturing of computing units of the AI chips and the integration of various components in them, a technology known as advanced packaging in the industry, Lin said.

Bernstein estimated that Huawei’s shipments of its advanced AI chips in 2025 would amount to around 700,000 units, still far short of the demand in the country.

CNN has reached out to Huawei for comment.

Meanwhile, Nvidia’s powerful ecosystem, which integrates its chips with its software platform, has created what experts call a “moat,” making it difficult and costly for AI developers who train models on its software to switch to alternatives.

“The H20 comes with a complete ecosystem covering both hardware and software support, ensuring better compatibility and ease of integration,” said Brady Wang, associate director at Counterpoint. “This ecosystem maturity is still a challenge for many Chinese-developed chips, making the H20 more attractive despite its cost disadvantage.”

‘Very close’

Still, experts said China’s rapid progress in semiconductor technology should not be underestimated. Years of tightening export controls have injected both urgency and opportunity into Beijing’s push for self-sufficiency, Lin said.

While chipmaking technology appeared to stall after Huawei’s 2023 flagship smartphone showcased advanced chips that American officials had deemed extremely difficult to produce, domestic chipmaking equipment companies have been steadily gaining ground, he said.

“The local guys actually had very little chance to gain share from the global players because of the technology gap, but export controls created a market that didn’t exist before and accelerated the domestic substitution,” he said.

Bernstein projects that the percentage of homemade AI chips in China will surge from 17% in 2023 to 55% by 2027, while American suppliers like Nvidia and AMD will shrink to 45% from 83%.

In April, Huang of Nvidia met with Trump in Washington, urging the administration to loosen export controls on chips and saying that the diffusion of American AI technology around the world needs to be accelerated.

“There’s no question that Huawei is one of the most formidable technology companies in the world…they made enormous progress in the last several years,” he said.

“China is right behind us. We’re very, very close.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

CNN’s Hassan Tayir and Fred He contributed reporting.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tools & Platforms

‘AI will not love you, AI will not cry with you’: COICOM panel warns Church of technology’s limits

Published

on


Arnold Enns, Vladimir Lugo, Steve Cordon, and Fabio Criales during the panel forum “Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities for the Church” at COICOM 2025. Christian Daily International

Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept for the Church but a pressing reality that demands attention. That was the message of a panel at the 2025 Congress of the Ibero-American Confederation of Communicators, Pastors, and Christian Leaders (COICOM) held in Honduras last week, where ministry and technology experts explored both the promise and perils of AI for faith communities.

Moderated by COICOM president Arnold Enns, the session—titled “Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities for the Church”—brought together Vladimir Lugo, Steve Cordon, and Fabio Criales. The panelists examined the nature of AI, its societal impact, and its growing yet inescapable role within Christian ministry.

The discussion began with definitions. Lugo described AI as a branch of computing that “allows machines to do things that were previously reserved for humans,” including learning, analyzing, and making decisions. He clarified that AI does not reside in a single place but operates on vast cloud servers controlled by global tech giants such as Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, each competing for dominance in the field.

The dilemma of control and inherent bias

One of the first concerns raised was the issue of control and ethics. Panelists emphasized that AI technologies are not neutral. Lugo warned that publicly available models “carry biases,” reflecting the agendas of the secular companies that train them.

“Many of these companies are woke,” he said, arguing that they promote “anti-biblical” values and that their AI creations reflect humanist and liberal ideologies.

Criales added that AI “was meant to make evident what is already present” in the human heart, citing Matthew 15:18-19. He also cautioned about the danger of “hallucination”—when AI generates incorrect or misleading information in response to poorly framed prompts.

“Be very careful with that, because it hallucinates, recreates what you ask, and if you ask incorrectly, you could end up saying heresies on stage,” Criales warned.

Digital consumers or disciples?

The panel also weighed AI’s influence on ministry content creation. With more pastors turning to tools like ChatGPT to write sermons, Lugo acknowledged that AI can be a useful “tool” for research. But he stressed that “the intelligent entity using the tool is the human” and cautioned against surrendering discernment.

Cordon posed a sharper question about the widespread adoption of AI-driven platforms, noting the 123 million daily users of ChatGPT: “Have we created more digital consumers than digital disciples?” True pastoral work, he said, cannot be automated. “People need pastors. AI will not love you, AI will not cry with you.”

He recounted a sobering personal experience with a counseling AI that not only conversed smoothly but also offered to pray for him in eloquent, detailed language. The moment highlighted for him the unsettling boundary between authentic pastoral care and technological simulation. “I believe AI will also be a test of maturity for the Church,” he reflected.

A call for training and responsibility

The panel closed with a strong call for Christian leaders to equip themselves and their congregations to engage AI critically. “Either you use it, or it uses you—there really isn’t an alternative,” Cordon said.

Criales stressed that believers must be intentional in learning how to apply these tools properly. Lugo concluded with an appeal to humility: “If there is anything we want to learn from the Lord, let us learn how to learn.”

The consensus was clear: artificial intelligence is not merely a technological development but a spiritual test. For the Church, it represents a challenge requiring maturity, ethical discernment, and above all, a reaffirmation of the irreplaceable value of human connection in ministry.

Originally published on Diario Cristiano, Christian Daily International’s Spanish edition.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

US tech giants bind developers to closed-source AI ecosystems with open tools: Ant Group

Published

on


American tech giants such as OpenAI and Nvidia are trying to “lock in” developers to their closed-source artificial intelligence ecosystems by open-sourcing tools in other layers of the tech stack, according to a report from Chinese fintech company Ant Group.

While most leading US large language models are closed-source, Chinese players from Alibaba Cloud to TikTok-owner ByteDance have instead opted to “open-source” their models, meaning that developers can download and build on top of them.

A tech stack is the collection of technologies needed to develop and deploy an application. In AI, this includes hardware such as semiconductor chips and software like algorithms and frameworks.

US companies have focused their open-source efforts on AI development “toolchains” in particular to drive adoption of their proprietary AI models and hardware, Ant Group said in its report on the global open-source AI landscape, released on Saturday at the Inclusion Conference on the Bund in Shanghai.

03:16

China shows off latest AI innovations at international conference in Shanghai

China shows off latest AI innovations at international conference in Shanghai

Ant Group cited the example of Dynamo, open-sourced by US chip giant Nvidia in March, an inference platform optimised for deploying large-scale AI models. Nvidia has marketed Dynamo as the “operating system of AI”.

While the platform can be integrated with popular open-source AI development frameworks such as PyTorch and SGLang, it is designed to be paired with Nvidia’s powerful graphics processing units (GPUs), according to the Alibaba Group Holding affiliate. Alibaba owns the Post.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Florida should embrace, not regulate, AI innovation

Published

on


The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recent years has been one of the most consequential technological advances since the emergence of the internet.

AI has the potential to change and improve every facet of our lives, from automating simple routine tasks like scheduling a doctor’s appointment to more complex efforts like coding a new computer program.

Yet, this transformative technology may never reach its potential if policymakers rush to regulate what they do not yet fully understand.

Like all breakthrough technologies, AI needs room to grow, including opportunities for innovators to experiment, iterate, and scale new applications. Just as the United States led the global digital revolution, empowering American tech companies to achieve superior market positions with limited regulatory interference, we now face a similar crossroads with AI.

Unfortunately, some state-level efforts risk undermining this progress.

States like Colorado and California have recently introduced or passed regulatory frameworks that could deter investment, suppress AI deployment in their respective states, and slow national momentum. With international competitors racing ahead with their own AI development programs, every unnecessary regulatory barrier we erect gives them a strategic advantage.

Federal leadership plays an important role. President Donald Trump’s recently announced AI Action Plan sets the framework for how the government can support technological advancement by prioritizing innovation, investing in AI infrastructure, and promoting U.S. leadership in global standards-setting.

While national initiatives lay the groundwork for progress, state-level action is vital in translating these goals into tangible outcomes.

Here in Florida, we are committed to fostering a regulatory environment that encourages responsible innovation. By aligning with forward-looking national efforts and resisting the urge to overregulate, we can ensure AI remains a force for economic opportunity, technological leadership, and public benefit.

With the right policies, we can ensure those benefits are realized without unnecessary barriers or delays.

___

John Snyder is the state Representative of Florida House District 86 and served as Chair of the House Information Technology Budget and Policy Subcommittee in the 2025 Legislative Session.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending