Tools & Platforms
The Hard Part Won’t Be Exporting US AI—It’ll Be Making It Stick – Center for Data Innovation
Until recently, the United States was not seriously courting AI partners in the Global South. It had been warning them against partnering with China, but had not been offering a compelling alternative to be their economic partner of choice to deploy AI. With President Trump’s AI Action Plan, that posture has changed. The United States plans to win the AI race by “exporting its full AI technology stack—hardware, models, software, applications, and standards—to all countries willing to join America’s AI alliance.” To succeed, it will need to pursue the right partners, make offers that meet their ambitions, and resist the urge to lead with virtue over value.
First, the United States will have to choose its partners carefully because it does not have the resources to create favorable, low-risk conditions for its AI firms everywhere, the way China’s state-backed model does. Every international AI engagement requires financial backing because, while private companies may provide the data centers, fiber networks, and advanced AI tools, they rely on conditions that make massive, long-term, and often risky infrastructure projects commercially viable.
In many countries in the Global South where the United States wants to engage, those conditions don’t exist. China solves for that: Its policy banks offer large, concessional loans to foreign governments to fund entire infrastructure projects, which are then contracted to Chinese firms. That setup not only helps the recipient country, it de-risks the engagement for Chinese firms and makes otherwise risky overseas ventures commercially attractive and scalable.
The U.S. approach is different. Tools such as the Export-Import Bank (EXIM) and the International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) don’t primarily fund comprehensive projects directly. Instead, they offer loan guarantees, insurance, or co-financing to encourage private capital to step in, but the commercial risk still largely sits with the firm. That makes engagement in markets with weak institutions, uncertain returns, or high political risk fundamentally more commercially risky for U.S. companies than their Chinese counterparts.
If the United States tries to match China in creating favorable, de-risked conditions for its AI companies across too many markets, it will spread itself too thin. It should therefore focus its financial support on markets where targeted de-risking can make a real difference—where U.S. companies have something distinctive to offer, and where the strategic returns for the United States are most meaningful.
It can hone in on such countries by identifying those that are already leaning into AI’s promise, and that have strong digital foundations but lack the capital, compute power, or specialized infrastructure to build full, independent AI ecosystems. For example, both Kenya and Nigeria boast burgeoning tech sectors, a growing appetite for AI solutions, and the potential to anchor broader regional ecosystems. What they truly need is a partner capable of helping them scale their vision, and that’s precisely where the United States can take the lead.
Second, the United States will need to offer tailored partnerships that help countries use American AI to advance their specific national priorities and development goals. The AI Action Plan talks about offering “full-stack AI export packages,” a prepackaged bundle of U.S. hardware, software, and models that it can deliver to willing partners. That may sound like a comprehensive offer, but on its own, it risks treating countries as clients rather than economic partners—recipients of American technology rather than co-builders of something lasting.
It also risks sending the signal that the United States values them mainly as pieces in a strategic rivalry with China, rather than as valuable partners with priorities of their own. That model simply won’t work in today’s global landscape, where countries in the Global South are keenly aware of their leverage and are looking for partners who will support development aligned with their national interests, not simply advance what they see as foreign strategic or corporate agendas.
What many countries truly want isn’t just access to advanced AI tools, but a transformative partnership that empowers them to build indigenous capacity, apply AI to their unique challenges, and drive their own long-term economic growth.
China exemplifies this approach: In Kenya’s Konza Technopolis, a flagship government-led smart city project, China financed the initiative through loans, then Huawei stepped in to not only build a national data center and smart ICT network, but also to deliver public safety and traffic management systems. It has invested in training local workers to run and maintain the infrastructure, and has launched extensive programs, including AI literacy hackathons, to build a local workforce capable of developing new AI-powered services and solutions on top of its systems in sectors like agriculture and health care.
If the United States hopes to compete with China in such regions, it will need to offer more than standardized, one-time AI packages. It needs to compete on outcomes and show what American AI can help countries achieve. That means aligning its offering to work with partners to apply AI in ways that unlock local economic value and deliver tangible progress in areas like agriculture, education, and health care.
Third, and equally critical for long-term commitment, the United States will need to address the fear that potential partners have of being cut off from essential technology. Many governments worry that if they rely too heavily on U.S. AI systems, particularly for critical public infrastructure and essential services, access could disappear overnight due to political disputes or shifts in U.S. foreign policy.
To overcome this apprehension and build trust, the United States should establish clear, transparent, and binding agreements that guarantee consistent access to U.S. AI technology and services, even amidst geopolitical shifts. Providing ironclad assurances is vital for securing long-term commitment from partners and demonstrating the reliability of the U.S. technology ecosystem.
Finally, the United States needs to resist any urge to turn its AI efforts into a values contest, focusing instead on pragmatic economic partnership. In recent years, the United States has relied on getting countries to align with U.S. AI priorities by drawing on the residual goodwill of traditional aid partnerships and casting China as the authoritarian boogeyman.
The pitch was clear: “Partner with us because we have democratic values.” However, the sudden changes to aid structures and perceived inconsistencies in U.S. foreign policy have effectively nullified that “ethical AI partner” pitch, and the goodwill has evaporated. China, meanwhile, is still around, actively financing AI projects and, on its face, helping countries move forward on their own terms.
If the United States wants to be taken seriously as a contender, it cannot afford to go back to trying to sell itself as the principled alternative to China. Instead, it should start acting like a credible economic partner and center its counteroffer on economic competition and shared prosperity, not a values crusade.
The Trump administration is right that for the United States to win the AI race, it will have to get other countries to build with it, bet on it, and lock in long-term alignment around its technology stack. But that’ll take more than sermonizing about values or selling its stack. It will require the United States to prove it’s a partner worth building a long-term AI future with.
Image Credits: Generated by DALL-E
Tools & Platforms
Revealed: What our biggest companies worry about when it comes to AI – AFR
Tools & Platforms
Kakao CTO advocates treating AI as operating system, not model competition – 조선일보
Tools & Platforms
Google engineer releases free 400-page guide to agentic AI systems

A Google distinguished engineer has published a comprehensive 400-page technical guide to building autonomous AI systems, offering detailed blueprints for creating sophisticated artificial intelligence agents. Antonio Gulli, Senior Director and Distinguished Engineer in Google’s CTO Office, announced Agentic Design Patterns: A Hands-On Guide to Building Intelligent Systems with a scheduled release date of December 3, 2025.
The publication addresses a critical gap in AI development methodology. According to Gulli, building effective agentic systems requires more than just a powerful language model—it demands structured architectural blueprints. “It’s about moving from raw capability to robust, real-world applications,” Gulli stated in the book’s introduction.
Subscribe PPC Land newsletter ✉️ for similar stories like this one. Receive the news every day in your inbox. Free of ads. 10 USD per year.
The guide presents 21 distinct agentic patterns that serve as fundamental building blocks for autonomous AI systems. These patterns range from foundational concepts such as Prompt Chaining and Tool Use to advanced implementations including Multi-Agent Collaboration and Self-Correction frameworks. Each pattern represents a reusable solution to common challenges encountered when building intelligent, goal-oriented systems.
Technical specifications detailed in the book cover multiple implementation frameworks. The guide utilizes three prominent development platforms: LangChain and its extension LangGraph for building complex operational sequences, CrewAI for orchestrating multiple agents, and the Google Agent Developer Kit for evaluation and deployment processes. This multi-framework approach ensures broad applicability across different technical environments.
The publication structure follows a practical methodology. Each chapter focuses on a single agentic pattern, providing pattern overviews, use cases, hands-on code examples, and key takeaways. According to the table of contents, Part One covers 103 pages of core execution patterns including Prompt Chaining, Routing, Parallelization, Reflection, Tool Use, Planning, and Multi-Agent systems.
Part Two addresses 61 pages of memory management and learning capabilities. This section explores Memory Management, Learning and Adaptation, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and Goal Setting frameworks. The technical depth continues through Parts Three and Four, covering 114 pages of advanced topics including Exception Handling, Human-in-the-Loop patterns, Knowledge Retrieval, and Safety implementations.
Buy ads on PPC Land. PPC Land has standard and native ad formats via major DSPs and ad platforms like Google Ads. Via an auction CPM, you can reach industry professionals.
The book’s technical approach emphasizes practical implementation over theoretical discussion. According to the publication details, the guide includes executable code examples, architectural diagrams, and step-by-step implementation instructions. This hands-on methodology addresses the growing demand for actionable AI development resources in enterprise environments.
Industry validation for the guide emerged through social media discussions among AI practitioners. Multiple technology leaders shared positive assessments of the publication’s practical value. The book received recognition as a “#1 New Release in Probability & Statistics” on Amazon with a December 3, 2025 release date.
Gulli brings extensive technical credentials to the publication. His background includes over 30 years of relevant experience in AI, Search, and Cloud technologies. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Pisa and has previously authored technical publications including “Deep Learning for Keras” across multiple editions and languages.
The economic context for agentic AI development shows significant market potential. Recent research published on PPC Land indicates Google Cloud projects the agentic AI market could reach $1 trillion by 2040, with 90% enterprise adoption expected. This projection reflects growing demand for autonomous AI systems capable of executing complex workflows with minimal human intervention.
The timing of Gulli’s publication coincides with increased industry focus on AI agent development. Major technology companies have recently released comprehensive AI agent guides, marking a shift toward more autonomous systems. Companies including Anthropic, OpenAI, and McKinsey have published complementary resources, though Gulli’s guide stands out for its comprehensive technical depth and practical implementation focus.
The book addresses critical challenges in AI agent reliability and safety. Traditional single-prompt interactions often prove insufficient for complex, multi-step tasks. Agentic patterns provide structured approaches to decomposing complex objectives into manageable components while maintaining coherence across extended workflows.
Pattern composition represents a key advancement outlined in the guide. The publication demonstrates how individual patterns combine to create sophisticated systems. For example, an autonomous research assistant might integrate Planning patterns for task decomposition, Tool Use for information gathering, Multi-Agent Collaboration for specialized analysis, and Reflection for quality assurance.
Memory Management patterns detailed in the book enable agents to maintain context across interactions while learning from experience. These capabilities distinguish true agentic systems from simple reactive models. The technical specifications include both short-term conversational context and long-term knowledge retention mechanisms.
Safety and alignment considerations receive dedicated coverage through specialized “Guardrails/Safety Patterns.” These frameworks address challenges of autonomous operation while maintaining alignment with intended objectives. The patterns include input validation, output filtering, human oversight integration, and graceful degradation capabilities.
The publication includes extensive technical documentation spanning 424 total pages. Appendices provide advanced prompting techniques, framework overviews, and implementation guidelines. A comprehensive glossary defines technical terms and concepts used throughout the guide.
Distribution of the guide follows open-access principles. Google has made the technical documentation publicly available through standard channels, enabling widespread practitioner access. This approach supports broader adoption of structured AI agent development methodologies across the industry.
Why this matters for marketing
The release of this comprehensive guide signals the maturation of agentic AI from experimental technology to practical implementation framework. For marketing professionals, these developments indicate significant opportunities for campaign automation and optimization capabilities that extend far beyond current programmatic advertising approaches.
The emergence of agentic AI capabilities in marketing contexts has already shown measurable impact, with AI search traffic converting at rates 23 times higher than traditional organic search visitors despite representing minimal traffic volume. This pattern suggests that AI-powered systems are fundamentally changing how users discover and interact with content.
Google’s recent introduction of automated calling features demonstrates practical agentic implementations in customer service contexts. The system autonomously contacts businesses to gather pricing and availability information on behalf of users, representing the type of goal-oriented behavior that Gulli’s patterns enable at scale.
The technical frameworks outlined in the guide provide marketing teams with structured approaches to building custom AI agents for campaign management, content optimization, and customer interaction automation. Rather than relying on black-box solutions, these patterns enable transparent, controllable implementations that align with specific business objectives.
Subscribe PPC Land newsletter ✉️ for similar stories like this one. Receive the news every day in your inbox. Free of ads. 10 USD per year.
Timeline
Subscribe PPC Land newsletter ✉️ for similar stories like this one. Receive the news every day in your inbox. Free of ads. 10 USD per year.
Summary
Who: Antonio Gulli, Senior Director and Distinguished Engineer in Google’s CTO Office, with over 30 years of experience in AI, Search, and Cloud technologies and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Pisa.
What: A comprehensive 400-page technical guide titled “Agentic Design Patterns: A Hands-On Guide to Building Intelligent Systems” that presents 21 distinct patterns for building autonomous AI agents, covering everything from basic prompt chaining to advanced multi-agent collaboration frameworks.
When: Announced with a scheduled release date of December 3, 2025, with the book being listed as a “#1 New Release in Probability & Statistics” on Amazon.
Where: Announced through multiple channels including social media and Amazon pre-orders, with Google making the technical documentation publicly available through standard distribution mechanisms.
Why: The guide addresses the critical gap between powerful language models and practical autonomous systems, providing structured architectural blueprints necessary for building reliable, goal-oriented AI agents that can operate with minimal human intervention in real-world applications.
-
Business1 week ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms4 weeks ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy1 month ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers2 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Education2 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Education2 months ago
Macron says UK and France have duty to tackle illegal migration ‘with humanity, solidarity and firmness’ – UK politics live | Politics
-
Funding & Business2 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi