Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

Tennis Player Says ‘They Stole the Game’

Published

on


eWEEK content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

Wimbledon’s line calling system for the Grand Slam tennis tournament in London was deactivated for approximately seven minutes during Sunday’s match between Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Sonay Kartal, sparking confusion among players and fueling a wider debate over the reliability of AI technology.  

This year marks Wimbledon’s first full implementation of AI-powered Electronic Line Calling (ELC) systems, replacing human line judges. However, recurring malfunctions during several matches have prompted doubts over whether the technology is prepared to serve as a complete substitute for human officials.  

The All England Lawn Tennis & Croquet Club (AELTC) has apologized, attributing the mistake to “human error” and announced that measures have been implemented to prevent similar issues in the future.

AI line-calling chaos on Centre Court

The match between Russia’s Pavlyuchenkova and Britain’s Kartal saw significant ELC errors after the system was deactivated for six minutes and 49 seconds, causing three points to be judged incorrectly.

At 4-4 in the first set, with Pavlyuchenkova holding game point, the ELC missed an out call on Kartal’s backhand. Chair umpire Nico Helwerth paused the match to investigate, explained the system failure to players, and ordered the point to be replayed. Kartal seized the moment to break Pavlyuchenkova’s serve and take a 5-4 lead.  

During the change of ends, Pavlyuchenkova could be heard accusing the officials of stealing the game from her, saying to Helwerth, “You took the game away from me. … They stole the game from me. They stole it.”

Wimbledon’s ELC also failed to detect two more shots landing out, requiring Helwerth to make manual calls. Although Pavlyuchenkova recovered, winning 7-6, 6-4 and advancing to the quarterfinals, the incident highlighted persistent doubts over the dependability of fully automated officiating.  

More concerns about AI line judges

Wimbledon’s transition to AI line call technology has been a big talking point in the tennis world, with many players criticizing ELCs.

The men’s British No. 1 player Jack Draper voiced concerns about inaccurate line calls, stating that he did not think the AI technology was “100 percent accurate.”

Even when functioning correctly, ELCs can still impact players’ performance. Player Ben Shelton had to accelerate his match after being warned that the ELC might stop operating as daylight faded.

Other players have complained about the system’s quiet automated announcements and that the lack of visual signals can cause confusion, especially for hard-of-hearing players.

Wimbledon defends ball-tracking tech

An AELTC spokesperson provided a statement to CNN maintaining that the ELC system is accurate. “We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball tracking technology.”AI tech is showing up in other sports, such as the fully AI-generated ad that aired during the NBA Finals.



Source link

Tools & Platforms

Terror Groups Exploit AI and Emerging Tech as Domestic Attacks Surge 357% HS Today

Published

on


Domestic terrorism incidents in the United States surged by 357% between 2013 and 2021, as terrorist organizations began leveraging artificial intelligence, drones, and other advanced technologies for recruitment and attack planning. During this eight-year period, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documented 230 domestic terrorism incidents, with racially and ethnically motivated attacks proving to be the most lethal and destructive.  

The alarming statistics come as federal agencies grapple with significant coordination challenges and emerging technologies that experts warn are creating unprecedented security vulnerabilities across critical infrastructure.  

“We’re seeing attacks against hospitals, water supply systems, rural schools—targets that would have been unthinkable in previous conflicts,” said Nitin Natarajan, former Deputy Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). “The rules are changing in what we’re seeing nation-states and cyber criminals do.”  

Digital Weapons in Terrorist Hands 

The convergence of accessible technology and extremist ideology has created what security professionals describe as a “perfect storm” for modern terrorism. Unlike traditional threats that required extensive resources and training, today’s digital weapons can be deployed by amateur users with devastating effect.  

“The beauty of cyberattacks is they don’t require boots on the ground; they can be executed globally, without borders, from anywhere,” Natarajan explained during a recent gathering of experts convened by Homeland Security Today to discuss evolving cyber, technology, weapons of mass destructions (WMDs), and tactics in the digital age. “Many can be low-cost yet still have disruptive impacts and effects.”  

Terrorist groups like ISIS have established sophisticated cyber units, including the United Cyber Caliphate, conducting everything from website defacements to denial-of-service attacks. While these may seem like small-scale operations, experts warn that advancing technology will enable more destructive capabilities with fewer resources.  

Federal Agencies Face Coordination Crisis 

Despite the growing threat, federal agencies tasked with combating domestic terrorism are struggling with fundamental coordination problems. A Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and DHS agents often don’t know when or with whom to share critical threat information.  

“When we spoke with agents on the ground, they said they didn’t always know who to share the threat information with and when to do it,” said Triana McNeil, Director of GAO’s Homeland Security and Justice Team. “That’s an issue when you’re trying to counter these threats.”  

The coordination problems extend beyond federal agencies. The nation’s first-ever domestic terrorism strategy, released in 2021, lacked: clear roles for state and local partners, performance measures to track progress, and identified resources to achieve its goals – all considered essential elements of effective national strategies – according to GAO’s report examining the National Strategy on Countering Domestic Terrorism.  

Private Sector Partnerships Under Strain 

Social media and gaming companies have become unlikely frontlines in the fight against domestic terrorism, with 33% of mass attack perpetrators posting content online and 20% of adult gamers exposed to extremist material. However, government partnerships with these companies remain haphazard.  

“There was no strategy, there were no clear goals about what you’re trying to achieve when you’re making these connections with different companies,” McNeil noted, describing the current approach as scattered and ineffective.  

The GAO found that while FBI and DHS have developed various tools to share and receive threat information from private companies, the efforts lack coordination and strategic direction.  

Next Generation Vulnerabilities 

Perhaps most concerning is how the next generation approaches cybersecurity. At a recent New York City event, college students shocked security experts when asked, “Are they thinking about cybersecurity in their day-to-life as they are using technology?” by declaring they “don’t care about privacy and we don’t care if people take our personal information theft.  

As Natarajan relayed this story, he warned. “We’d be remiss if we didn’t factor in how the next generation is looking at cybersecurity as part of their day-to-day life—it’s very different from how we look at it.”  

Critical Infrastructure in Crosshairs 

The water sector represents the next major vulnerability, with 141,000 utilities nationwide, many lacking basic cybersecurity protections. Iranian hackers recently exploited water systems using default passwords of “1111”—attacks that could have been prevented by changing passwords to “2222.”  

“When those victims were notified, they didn’t even know how to change the default password,” Natarajan revealed. “Some said the person who installed the system left five years ago and doesn’t work here anymore.”  

Food and agriculture systems face similar risks, with modern tractors now containing two million lines of code and extensive data flows that could be manipulated to disrupt everything from seeding to harvesting.  

Resource Constraints Amid Growing Threats 

These mounting challenges come as security agencies face potential budget cuts. CISA, which grew from 2,100 to 3,400 employees over four years with strong bipartisan support, now faces proposed reductions of 25-33%.  

“We are already outnumbered 50 to 1” against Chinese cyber operations alone, Natarajan pointed out, citing FBI Director Christopher Wray’s testimony. “That situation is only getting worse as we see reductions in funding and government workforce.”  

The intersection of emerging technologies, resource constraints, and evolving terrorist tactics creates an unprecedented challenge for homeland security. As experts noted, the threat landscape will only grow more complex as artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies become more accessible to those seeking to cause harm.  

“We need to make sure we’re doing more to build resilience into our nation’s critical infrastructure,” Natarajan emphasized, “and continue to take the lead internationally in setting standards that reflect our values and those of like-minded allies.”  

This article is based on key insights shared at Homeland Security Today’s COUNTERTERRORISM2025 summit. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Many SMBs say they can’t get to grips with AI, need more training

Published

on



  • Small businesses are less confidence with AI than larger ones
  • Half of businesses say AI has become critical
  • Training and policies should be more comprehensive

New research has claimed barely one in 10 (12%) SMEs have invested in AI-related training for their staff.

The report from The Institute of Coding revealed nearly one in three (29%) SMEs now see a lack of training as their biggest obstacle to AI tools adoption, with a further one in two (52%) citing a lack of internal skills and knowledge as the main battier.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Apple’s Top AI Engineer Leaves for Meta with Jaw-Dropping Pay

Published

on


Apple’s Top AI Engineer Leaves for Meta

Key Highlights:

  • Apple’s top AI leader, Ruoming Pang, is leaving for Meta with a multi-million dollar salary offer.
  • Pang led a large team working on AI models powering Siri and other Apple features.
  • Several other Apple AI engineers are expected to follow him to Meta or other companies.
  • Meta is investing heavily in AI and aggressively hiring top talent to compete with rivals.

Apple has lost one of its top artificial intelligence (AI) executives, Ruoming Pang, who led the company’s important AI models team. He is now joining Meta, the company behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

Ruoming Pang was a key engineer managing Apple’s foundation models, which help power many AI features in Apple devices, such as Siri and Apple Intelligence. He joined Apple in 2021 from Google’s parent company, Alphabet. Now, Meta has offered him a very attractive salary package worth tens of millions of dollars per year, which led to his decision to leave Apple.

This move highlights the fierce competition among big tech companies like Apple, Meta, Google, and OpenAI to hire the best AI talent. Meta has been aggressively recruiting AI experts recently, including people from OpenAI and other startups, to build advanced AI systems they call “superintelligence.”

At Apple, Ruoming Pang was in charge of a team of about 100 people working on large language models — the technology behind many AI-powered apps. Recently, Apple announced it would open these models for third-party app developers to create new AI-based iPhone and iPad apps.

However, Apple’s AI team has been facing challenges and internal changes. Some engineers are reportedly planning to leave, and the company is considering using AI technology from outside companies like OpenAI or Anthropic to improve Siri, its voice assistant.

Apple’s AI efforts have also seen leadership changes, with some teams moving away from Ruoming Pang’s group. Now, Zhifeng Chen will lead the foundation models team, with a new structure of managers to help run the work.

Apple is still investing heavily in AI, with top executives like Craig Federighi and Mike Rockwell focusing on new AI features. But losing a top leader like Pang shows how competitive and difficult it is for Apple to keep pace in the fast-moving AI field.

Meta, led by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is spending billions on AI and making it a top priority. Zuckerberg has personally been involved in recruiting top AI engineers to build the future of AI at Meta.

In summary, Apple’s loss of Ruoming Pang to Meta is a major sign of the ongoing “war for AI talent” among tech giants. It remains to be seen how Apple will respond and strengthen its AI efforts going forward.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending