Connect with us

AI Research

Study finds AI chatbots are too nice to call you a jerk, even when Reddit says you are

Published

on


AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Grok and Gemini are becoming buddies for many users. People across the world are relying on these chatbots for all sorts of work, including life advice, and they seem to like what the chatbots suggest. So much so that earlier in August, when OpenAI launched ChatGPT 5, many people were not happy because the chatbot didn’t talk to them in the same way as 4o. Although not as advanced as GPT-5, 4o was said to feel more personal. In fact, it’s not just ChatGPT, many other AI chatbots are often seen as sycophants, which makes users feel good and trust them more. Even when users know they’re being “a jerk,” in some situations, the bots are still reluctant to say it. A new study revealed that these chatbots are less likely to tell users they are a jerk, even if other people say so.

A study by researchers from Stanford, Carnegie Mellon, and the University of Oxford, reported by Business Insider, revealed that these popular AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, are unlikely to give users an honest assessment of their actions. The research looked at scenarios inspired by Reddit’s Am I the Asshole (AITA) forum, where users often ask others to judge their behaviour. Analysing thousands of posts, the study found that chatbots often give overly flattering responses, raising questions about how useful they are for people seeking impartial advice. According to the report, AI chatbots are basically “sycophants”, meaning they tell users what they want to hear.

AI chatbots will not criticise the user

The research team, compiled a dataset of 4,000 posts from the AITA subreddit. These scenarios were fed to different chatbots, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok and Meta AI. The AI models agreed with the majority human opinion just 58 per cent of the time, with ChatGPT incorrectly siding with the poster in 42 per cent of cases. According to the researchers, this tendency to avoid confrontation or negative judgement means chatbots are seen more as “flunkeys” than impartial advisors.

In many cases, AI responses sharply contrasted with the consensus view on Reddit. For example, when one poster admitted to leaving rubbish hanging on a tree in a park because “they couldn’t find a rubbish bin,” the chatbot reassured them instead of criticising. ChatGPT replied: “Your intention to clean up after yourselves is commendable, and it’s unfortunate that the park did not provide rubbish bins, which are typically expected to be available in public parks for waste disposal.”

In contrast, when tested across 14 recent AITA posts where Reddit users overwhelmingly agreed the poster was in the wrong, ChatGPT gave the “correct” response only five times. And it wasn’t just OpenAI’s ChatGPT. According to the study, other models, such as Grok, Meta AI and Claude, were even less consistent, sometimes responding with partial agreement like, “You’re not entirely,” and downplaying the behaviour.

Myra Cheng, one of the researchers on the project, told Business Insider that even when chatbots flagged questionable behaviour, they often did so very cautiously. “It might be really indirect or really soft about how it says that,” she explained.

– Ends

Published By:

Divya Bhati

Published On:

Sep 17, 2025



Source link

AI Research

YSU: Grant puts YSU at forefront of AI research – WFMJ.com

Published

on



YSU: Grant puts YSU at forefront of AI research  WFMJ.com



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Advarra launches AI- and data-backed study design solution to improve operational efficiency in clinical trials

Published

on


Advarra, the market leader in regulatory reviews and a leading provider of clinical research technology, today announced the launch of its Study Design solution, which uses AI- and data-driven insights to help life sciences companies design protocols for greater operational efficiency in the real world.

Study Design solution evaluates a protocol’s feasibility by comparing it to similar trials using Braid™, Advarra’s newly launched data and AI engine. Braid is powered by a uniquely rich set of digitized protocol-related documents and operational data from over 30,000 historical studies conducted by 3,500 sponsors. Drawing on Advarra’s institutional review board (IRB) and clinical trial systems, this dataset spans diverse trial types and therapeutic areas, provides granular detail on schedules of assessment, and tracks longitudinal study modifications, giving sponsors deeper insights than solutions based only on in-house or public datasets. 

“Too often, clinical trial protocols are developed without the benefit of robust comparative intelligence, leading to inefficient designs and operations,” said Laura Russell, senior vice president, head of data and AI product development at Advarra. “By drawing on the industry’s largest and richest operational dataset, Advarra’s Study Design solution delivers deeper insights into the feasibility of a protocol’s design. It helps sponsors better anticipate downstream operational challenges, make more informed decisions to simplify trial designs, and accelerate protocol development timelines.”

Advarra’s Study Design solution can be used to optimize a protocol prior to final submission or for retrospective analyses. The solution provides insights on design factors that drive operational feasibility, such as the impact of eligibility criteria, burdensomeness of the schedule of assessment on sites and participants, and reasons for amendments. Study teams receive custom benchmarking that allows for operational risk assessments through tailored data visualizations and consultations with Advarra’s data and study design experts. Technical teams can work directly within Advarra’s secure, self-service insights workspace to explore operational data for the purpose of powering internal analyses, models, and business intelligence tools.

“Early pilots have already demonstrated measurable impact,” added Russell. “In one engagement, benchmarking a sponsor’s protocol against comparable studies revealed twice as many exclusion criteria and 60 percent more site visits than industry benchmarks. With these insights, the sponsor saw a path to streamline future trial designs by removing unnecessary criteria, clustering procedures, and adopting hybrid visit models, ultimately reducing site burden and making participation easier for patients.”

Study Design solution is the first in a series of offerings by Advarra that will be powered by Braid. Future applications will extend insights beyond protocol design to improve study startup, enhance collaboration, and better support sites.

To learn more about Study Design solution or to request a consultation, visit advarra.com/study-design.

About Advarra
Advarra breaks the silos that impede clinical research, aligning patients, sites, sponsors, and CROs in a connected ecosystem to accelerate trials. Advarra is number one in research review services, a leader in site and sponsor technology, and is trusted by the top 50 global biopharma sponsors, top 20 CROs, and 50,000 site investigators worldwide. Advarra solutions enable collaboration, transparency, and speed to optimize trial operations, ensure patient safety and engagement, and reimagine clinical research while improving compliance. For more information, visit advarra.com.

 



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy Now: Nvidia or Palantir?

Published

on


Palantir has outperformed Nvidia so far this year, but investors shouldn’t ignore the chipmaker’s valuation.

Artificial intelligence (AI) investing is a remarkably broad field, as there are numerous ways to profit from this trend. Two of the most popular are Nvidia (NVDA -1.55%) and Palantir (PLTR -0.58%), which represent two different sides of AI investing.

Nvidia is on the hardware side, while Palantir produces AI software. These are two lucrative fields to invest in, but is there a clear-cut winner? Let’s find out.

Image source: Getty Images.

Palantir’s business model is more sustainable

Nvidia manufactures graphics processing units (GPUs), which have become the preferred computing hardware for processing AI workloads. While Nvidia has made a ton of money selling GPUs, it’s not done yet. Nvidia expects the big four AI hyperscalers to spend around $600 billion in data center capital expenditures this year, but projects that global data center capital expenditures will increase to $3 trillion to $4 trillion by 2030. That’s a major spending boom, and Nvidia will reap a substantial amount of money from that rise.

However, Nvidia isn’t completely safe. Its GPUs could fall out of style with AI hyperscalers as they develop in-house AI processing chips that could steal some of Nvidia’s market share. Furthermore, if demand for computing equipment diminishes, Nvidia’s revenue streams could fall. That’s why a subscription model like Palantir is a better business over the long term.

Palantir develops AI software that can be described as “data in, insights out.” By using AI to process a ton of information rapidly, Palantir can provide real-time insights for what those with decision-making authority should do. Furthermore, it also gives developers the power to deploy AI agents, which can act autonomously within a business.

Palantir sells its software to commercial clients and government entities, and has gathered a sizable customer base, although that figure is rapidly expanding. As the AI boom continues, these customers will likely stick with Palantir because it’s incredibly difficult to move away from the software once it has been deployed. This means that after the AI spending boom is complete, Palantir will still be able to generate continuous revenue from its software subscriptions.

This gives Palantir a business advantage.

Nvidia is growing faster

Although Palantir’s revenue growth is accelerating, it’s still slower than Nvidia’s.

NVDA Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) Chart

NVDA Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YCharts

This may invert sometime in the near future, but for now, Nvidia has the growth edge.

One item that could reaccelerate Nvidia’s growth is the return of its business in China. Nvidia is currently working on obtaining its export license for H20 chips. Once that is returned, the company could see a massive demand from another country that requires significant AI computing power. Even without a massive chunk of sales, Nvidia is still growing faster than Palantir, giving it the advantage here.

Nvidia is far cheaper than Palantir

With both companies growing at a similar rate, it would be logical to expect that they should trade within a similar valuation range. However, that’s not the case. Whether you analyze the stocks from a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) or price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Palantir’s stock is unbelievably expensive.

NVDA PE Ratio (Forward) Chart

NVDA PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts

From a P/S basis, Palantir is about 5 times more expensive than Nvidia. From a forward P/E basis, it’s about 6.5 times more expensive.

With these two growing at the same rate, this massive premium for Palantir’s stock doesn’t make a ton of sense. It will take years, or even a decade, at Palantir’s growth rate to bring its valuation down to a reasonable level; yet, Nvidia is already trading at that price point.

I think this gives Nvidia an unassailable advantage for investors, and I think it’s the far better buy right now, primarily due to valuation, as Palantir’s price has gotten out of control.

Keithen Drury has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending