Connect with us

Mergers & Acquisitions

Signs of a pick-up in venture capital exits are finally emerging

Published

on


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

When design software company Figma revealed its plans for a stock market listing this week, it felt like a throwback to an earlier era in the tech financing markets.

Chief executive Dylan Field listed the reasons why an initial public offering would be good for his company, which turned to the stock market after an acquisition by larger rival Adobe was blocked by regulators. It was the kind of paean to going public that is rarely heard these days from tech company founders, most of whom have preferred to stay private.

Listing on the New York Stock Exchange, Field said, was a matter of “good corporate hygiene, brand awareness, liquidity, stronger currency and access to capital markets”, as well as giving Figma’s customers a chance to share in the upside.

Field’s accolade to Wall Street will have warmed the hearts of investment bankers hoping to see a recent uptick in IPOs turn into a steady flow, as well as investors in venture capital firms who have been waiting a long time to cash in on the long venture boom. It comes at a time when “exits” — events where venture investments are realised — are starting to pick up.

Through public listings, acquisitions and buyouts, exits by venture reached $67.7bn in the second quarter of this year. That was a big jump from $38.5bn a year before and the strongest showing since the end of 2021.

This has not come a moment too soon. A dearth of exits has been the venture capital industry’s dirty secret, even as artificial intelligence fuels a new investment boom. Since interest rates started to climb in 2021, putting an end to a brief IPO boom, the value of exits has hit a new nadir.

It would be extremely premature, however, to read too much into this year’s rebound. For a start, it comes from an extremely low level. After peaking at $917bn in 2021, the value of exits fell to only $151bn in 2024.

According to hedge fund Coatue, exits fell to only 40 per cent of the value of new VC investments last year — a measure of just how little the industry was returning to its backers, relative to how much capital it is putting to work. With this year’s partial recovery, they have rebounded to roughly match new investments. But a healthy venture investing market, bringing steady returns for investors, would require the value of exits to reach twice the level of new investments, according to Coatue.

The amounts being returned to investors are also tiny relative to the huge value tied up in illiquid private businesses. Estimates of the aggregate value of private unicorns — companies worth more than $1bn — range from $3.5tn-$6tn. 

The large amounts of capital available in the private market continue to give many tech companies little reason to go public. When OpenAI raised $40bn in March, it didn’t just set a new record for the largest private fundraising: it also exceeded the $29.4bn raised in the biggest stock listing of all time, Saudi Aramco’s 2019 IPO.

After the dearth of exits in the last three years, however, investors are ready to grab at any straws of comfort. The strong performance of a handful of recent IPOs, led by cryptocurrency company Circle, have fed hopes of more new listings — though few notable private tech companies are thought to be ready to go public.

Another encouraging sign has been the willingness of some companies that raised money at the peak of the 2021 venture boom to bite the bullet and accept that they are worth far less today. When online bank Chime went public last month, it priced its shares at $27 each, a large discount to the $69 a share in its last private round in 2021. As more “down-round IPOs” like this occur, venture investors will hope that the stigma normally associated with admitting to a tumbling valuation will pass. 

Meanwhile, some venture capital firms have been trying to co-opt private equity techniques to fuel more deals. As the Financial Times reported this week, several firms have been working on corporate “roll-ups” — buying a number of companies in the same industry, then combining them into a single, larger business and cutting overheads. With less leverage and a friendly venture capital face, the backers hope to persuade tech founders that this represents a solid strategic outcome, rather than the kind of short-term financial engineering associated with private equity.

All of this should bring a steady, if slow, recovery in the real returns to investors. But even as the AI investment boom roars, the venture industry is still heavily reliant on profits that only exist on paper.

richard.waters@ft.com



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mergers & Acquisitions

It’s a bad time to be a graduate

Published

on


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

As they trade the campus for the job market, fresh-faced graduates are quickly turning glum. From North America to Europe, university leavers are struggling to find suitable work. The unemployment rate for recent college graduates in the US has for the first time been consistently above the national level since the Covid-19 pandemic. In the EU, the employment rate of 15- to 25-year-olds has fallen over the past two years. Even the crème de la crème are struggling. The percentage of MBA students from Harvard Business School and MIT Sloan without a job offer three months after graduation has risen sharply since 2021.

The rise of artificial intelligence is a factor. In the US, entry-level tech jobs are coming under pressure as coding tasks are automated. The unemployment rate for computer engineering graduates is 7.5 per cent; the national rate is 4.1 per cent. In Britain, the Big Four accountancy firms have cut back on early-career hires in recent years. Economists and recruiters reckon higher costs are encouraging UK professional services firms to experiment with AI in more administrative tasks usually conducted by juniors.

But the plight of graduates predates the emergence of large language models in the workplace. Other structural developments are at play. As more young people around the world are choosing to go to university, competition for jobs has picked up. In Canada, a popular destination for young graduates, the unemployment rate for those under 25 with post-secondary education was 11.2 per cent in the first quarter. Last year in the UK there were an average of 140 applications per graduate job — the highest in three decades, according to the Institute of Student Employers.

As the supply of learned graduates has risen, demand has come under pressure. Research by Indeed, a job search site, finds that the share of US job postings requiring at least a bachelor’s degree has fallen over the past five years. As for the public sector, civil services are being squeezed across cash-strapped advanced economies. Multinationals with big graduate programmes have also been developing global capability centres in low-cost hubs such as India, where they are outsourcing more skilled roles such as data analytics, rather than just back-office functions.

The recent economic cycle has not been kind to recent graduates either. Many professional services and tech firms overhired in the post-pandemic years, assuming activity would bounce back faster than it did. Recruitment rounds have been subdued since. Demand for investment banking analysts and newly qualified lawyers has also been stunted by subdued global mergers and acquisitions activity. Global economic uncertainty makes it difficult for businesses to plan investments and hiring cycles.

Even if the economic environment improves, graduates will still be contending with the rise of AI in the workplace and competition for entry-level jobs. Ensuring students have a better understanding of post-graduation prospects would help them make wiser course choices. Universities and the private sector will need to collaborate more closely if courses are to evolve with the changing demands of work. Even so, businesses and governments will need to raise support for adult training and life-long learning; three-year degrees can quickly become obsolete. The travails of university graduates should also encourage more investment in non-degree vocational training and apprenticeship opportunities, as businesses have long been calling for.

A surfeit of underemployed elites is bad for society and the economy. To ensure it does not become a feature, education must evolve from being a ticket to a job to a toolkit of skills for a changing world.



Source link

Continue Reading

Mergers & Acquisitions

Apple races to box office glory with Brad Pitt’s F1 blockbuster

Published

on


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

More than three years since Apple’s film CODA won the best picture Oscar, the tech company has hit another Hollywood milestone: its first summer blockbuster.

F1, starring Brad Pitt and Damson Idris, has taken in more than $200mn at the global box office since it opened on June 27 and is expected to pass $300mn this weekend. “This is a movie that will run and run and run,” said Jeff Goldstein, distribution chief at Warner Bros, Apple’s partner on the film. “There’s a lot of gas left in the tank.”  

It gave Pitt the best opening weekend in his 37-year acting career and is by far Apple’s best box office showing. By pairing Jerry Bruckheimer — the producer behind hits Top Gun and Beverly Hills Cop — and Joseph Kosinski, the director of Top Gun: Maverick, Apple showed it was serious about filling cinema seats this summer.

Apple is also nearing another potential milestone: making money from a big-budget movie. F1, co-produced by Pitt’s Plan B Entertainment (now controlled by French media group Mediawan) and Jerry Bruckheimer Films, had a production budget of more than $200mn, and distribution costs are estimated at more than $50mn. 

The company’s decision to release the film as a premium on-demand video before it moves to the Apple TV+ streaming service should bring in additional revenue. 

“With F1, they were looking for something very commercial,” said a person close to the studio. “This has proved that they can do theatrical [releases].”

Apple had a lot to prove on that point. In 2023, chief executive Tim Cook travelled to Cannes for the premiere of Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon before it was rolled out to more than 3,600 cinemas in the US and thousands more worldwide.

Lily Gladstone and Leonardo DiCaprio in Killers of the Flower Moon © Apple TV+

With a budget of more than $200mn, Killers seemed to be a statement of Apple’s intent in the movie business — but it generated only about $160mn in gross box office receipts worldwide. It was followed by two other big-budget releases, Argylle and Ridley Scott’s Napoleon. Both were considered commercial disappointments.  

The performance of those films compounded questions in Hollywood about whether Apple could become a major producer of blockbuster films and streaming shows. Some wondered why it had not bought a Hollywood studio to build up the scale of Apple TV+. As with Amazon, it is viewed by Hollywood studios as something of an outsider, thanks to a corporate culture that remains firmly rooted in tech. 

But with the release of F1, it has followed more Hollywood conventions than in the past. It made Cook and other executives available for a small number of pre-release interviews — the kind of publicity push that is typical for traditional studios but has not previously been employed by Apple. “I think this is a step forward for them in terms of how they want to live in this world,” said an executive at a traditional studio.  

Apple also leaned heavily on its technology and platforms with F1, using iPhone camera tech in real race cars to film high-resolution footage. To encourage people to come and see the film, it offered ticket discounts through Apple Pay and there were special appearances by Cook and Pitt at its flagship retail store in New York. 

Ridley Scott’s Napoleon was a commercial disappointment
Ridley Scott’s Napoleon, starring Joaquin Phoenix​ as Bonaparte, was a commercial disappointment © Aidan Monaghan/Apple TV+

Movie producers describe Apple as aiming for the “elevated mainstream” but dismiss the idea that it only has art house aspirations. The company also appears to be picking up the pace of releases. Spike Lee’s Highest 2 Lowest — a collaboration with indie film studio A24 — will be in cinemas from August 15 and on Apple TV+ from September 5. 

Apple is also working on Matchbox, a live-action feature based on Mattel’s toy car brand and starring John Cena. Matchbox is the first of what is expected to be a number of films based on Mattel products following the massive success of Barbie for Warner Bros. 

Kosinski and Bruckheimer are working together on another as-yet untitled project for Apple. And it is developing Mayday, an adventure film starring Ryan Reynolds and Kenneth Branagh. 

F1 was clearly a step up in its ambitions to create a box office winner, but the movie did not have the easiest of starts: production ground to a halt after a few weeks because of Hollywood strikes in 2023. Restarting the film added extra costs: it was shot on location at racetracks in the UK, US and Abu Dhabi during F1 practice races.

Now, with the success of the film, Apple may have the potential for sequels and its first franchise, said a person close to the studio. Just as importantly, it is expected to increase subscriber numbers on the Apple streaming platform. 

“[F1] really validates what Apple’s doing,” said Kevin Walsh, whose production company has made several films with Apple, including Napoleon and Echo Valley. “They’re in the business to stay and are ready to expand.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Mergers & Acquisitions

ChatGPT — the last of the great romantics

Published

on



Large language models have their limits — but when it comes to writing break-up letters, they are the perfect tool 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending