Education
School for the Digital Future partners with Talkin’ Broncos to debate AI in education
On Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2025, Boise State’s School for the Digital Future and national championship debate team the Talkin’ Broncos will partner for a student-led conversation about artificial intelligence in education.
The event will feature students from the Talkin’ Broncos team in a series of debates centered on topics related to AI in education. Attendees will hear about AI in the classroom, the role of student voices in this discussion and more. The debate format will present arguments representing opposing perspectives, empowering attendees to think critically about the issue.
“The goal is to start that conversation,” said Allie Hampton, Talkin’ Broncos president and a senior majoring in interdisciplinary studies in the School for the Digital Future. “AI is going to be the biggest conversation of our generation.”
The event presents a unique opportunity for students to hear new perspectives and give voice to their own experiences. After the debate portion, students will break out into groups to discuss their thoughts on AI in education.
The event will also have something to offer faculty. “A lot of times faculty say that they want to listen to student voices,” Hampton said. “This is a great opportunity for that to actively happen.”
For Boise State community members unfamiliar with the Talkin’ Broncos, this is a chance to see the national championship-winning scholars in action. Last year, the team emerged as undefeated national champions, besting debaters from over 50 institutions including Rice University, University of Alabama and Arizona State University.
“Debate isn’t a spectator sport,” Hampton said. “I think this is a really cool opportunity for people to see what we actually are.”
The debate is open to all audiences and will include free pizza for in-person attendees. Doors open at 4 p.m. on Wednesday, Sept. 10 in The Space, located on the 2nd floor of the Albertsons Library. There is also a virtual option for those who can’t make it to campus.
Education
We cannot afford to dismantle Head Start, a program that builds futures, strengthens families and delivers proven returns
The first words I uttered after successfully defending my dissertation were, “Wow, what a ride. From Head Start to Ph.D.!” Saying them reminded me where it all began: sitting cross-legged with a picture book at the Westside Head Start Center, just a few blocks from my childhood home in Jackson, Mississippi.
I don’t remember every detail from those early years, but I remember the feeling: I was happy at Head Start. I remember the books, the music, the joy. That five-minute bus ride from our house to the Westside Center turned out to be the shortest distance between potential and achievement.
And my story is not unique. Every year, hundreds of thousands of children — kids whose names we may never know, though our futures depend on them — walk through Head Start’s doors. Like me, they find structure, literacy, curiosity and belonging.
For many families, Head Start is the first place outside the home where a child’s potential is nurtured and celebrated. Yet, this program that builds futures and strengthens families is now under threat, and it’s imperative that we protect it.
Years later, while training for high school cross-country meets, I’d run past the park next to the center and pause, flooded with memories. Head Start laid the foundation for everything that followed. It gave me structure, sparked my curiosity and built my early literacy skills. It even fed my short-lived obsession with chocolate milk.
More than that, Head Start made me feel seen and valued.
Related: A lot goes on in classrooms from kindergarten to high school. Keep up with our free weekly newsletter on K-12 education.
There’s a clear, unbroken line between the early lessons I learned at Head Start and the doctoral dissertation I defended decades later. Head Start didn’t just teach me my ABCs — it taught me that learning could be joyful, that I was capable and that I belonged in a classroom.
That belief carried me through elementary school, Yale and George Washington University and to a Ph.D. in public policy and public administration. Now, as part of my research at the Urban Institute, I’m working to expand access to high-quality early learning, because I know firsthand what a difference it makes.
Research backs up what my story shows: Investments in Head Start and high-quality early childhood education change lives by improving health and educational achievement in later years, and benefit the economy. Yet today there is growing skepticism about the value of Head Start, reflecting an ongoing reluctance to give early childhood education the respect it deserves.
If Head Start funding is cut, thousands of children — especially from communities like mine in Jackson, where families worked hard but opportunities were limited — could lose access to a program that helps level the playing field. These are the children of young parents and single parents, of working families who may not have many other options but still dare to dream big for their kids.
And that is why I am worried. Funding for Head Start has been under threat. Although President Donald Trump’s proposed fiscal 2026 budget would maintain Head Start funding at its current $12.3 billion, Project 2025, the influential conservative policy document, calls for eliminating the program. The administration recently announced that Head Start would no longer enroll undocumented children, which a group of Democratic attorneys general say will force some programs to close.
Related: Head Start is in turmoil
I feel compelled to speak out because, for our family, Head Start wasn’t just a preschool — it was the beginning of everything. For me, it meant a future I never could have imagined. For my mother, Head Start meant peace of mind — knowing her son was in a nurturing, educational environment during the critical developmental years. My mother, Nicole, brought character, heart and an unwavering belief in my potential — and Head Start helped carry that forward.
My mother was just 18 when she enrolled me in Head Start. “A young mother with big dreams and limited resources,” she recounted to me recently, adding that she had “showed up to an open house with a baby in my arms and hope in my heart.”
Soon afterward, Mrs. Helen Robinson, who was in charge of the Head Start in Jackson, entered our lives. She visited our home regularly, bringing books, activities and reassurance. A little yellow school bus picked me up each morning.
Head Start didn’t just support me, though. It also supported my mother and gave her tips and confidence. She took me to the library regularly and made sure I was always surrounded by books and learning materials that would challenge and inspire me.
It helped my mother and countless others like her gain insight into child development, early learning and what it means to advocate for their children’s future.
Twenty-five years after those early mornings when I climbed onto the Head Start bus, we both still think about how different our lives might have been without that opportunity. Head Start stood beside us, and that support changed our lives.
As we debate national priorities, we must ask ourselves: Can we afford to dismantle a program that builds futures, strengthens families and delivers proven returns?
My family provides living proof of Head Start’s power.
This isn’t just our story. It is the story of millions of others and could be the story of millions more if we choose to protect and invest in what works.
Travis Reginal holds a doctorate in public policy and public administration and is a graduate of the Head Start program, Yale University and George Washington University. He is a former Urban Institute researcher.
Contact the opinion editor at opinion@hechingerreport.org.
This story about the Head Start funding was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for Hechinger’s weekly newsletter.
editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links
to our partners.
Learn More
Anthropic has released its third Economic Index, a wide-ranging study of Claude AI usage across countries, US states, and enterprises. The September 2025 report shows coding still accounts for the largest share of activity worldwide, yet education and science are becoming more prominent.
The study also found that automation is increasingly common, with more users trusting Claude to complete entire tasks. Anthropic said the trend offers an early look at how AI is reshaping work and may determine which workers and regions gain the most from the technology.
From debugging code to classroom teaching
Software development remains Claude’s most common use case, making up more than a third of activity globally. But the kind of coding has shifted. New code creation doubled over the past eight months, while debugging declined, suggesting users rely on Claude for more advanced outputs in a single attempt.
Claude AI usage for education and science purposes also expanded. The share of educational tasks rose from about 9% at the start of 2025 to more than 12% by August. Scientific tasks climbed from 6% to over 7%. In contrast, business and financial operations fell from 6% to 3%, and management dropped from 5% to 3%.
Automation vs augmentation in AI tasks
Anthropic tracked not only what tasks Claude handled but also how people worked with the model. Conversations where users gave Claude a job and let it run with minimal input jumped from 27% in late 2024 to 39% in August 2025. For the first time, automation outweighed collaboration overall, making the balance of automation vs augmentation in AI tasks a central trend.
The AI company said two forces may explain the shift: improvements in Claude’s ability to deliver accurate results on the first try, and rising user confidence. That combination has made it more common for people to delegate complex tasks to the AI tool fully, rather than iterating step by step.
Global and enterprise patterns
The US accounted for 21.6% of global usage, far ahead of India, Brazil, Japan, and South Korea. Adjusted for population, smaller high-income countries led per capita. Israel, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea all used Claude far more than expected based on their working-age population.
Within the US, Washington, DC showed the highest per-capita usage, followed by Utah, California, New York, and Virginia. Anthropic said local economies shaped how people used the model, with IT-related requests most common in California and tourism tasks overrepresented in Hawaii.
Enterprise adoption leaned more heavily on automation than consumer use. About 44% of API traffic involved coding, compared with 36% on Claude.ai. Administrative tasks were also frequent, while education and creative work were far less common. Nearly eight in 10 business interactions were automated, showing companies are embedding Claude directly into workflows.
Anthropic said it will continue updating its Economic Index and releasing data to help researchers and policymakers prepare for AI’s economic effects. The findings point to an uneven but accelerating shift: coding still leads, but education, science, and automation are taking a growing share of AI’s early role in the economy.
Read about Anthropic’s recent decision to give Claude power to end harmful conversations and protect “model welfare.”
Education
‘Cricket gave me everything’: South African sports star brings township children into the game | Global development
It’s just after 3pm on a Friday and 22-year-old Sinelethu Yaso is in her happy place. Her spotless cricket whites pop against the synthetic green turf, while the upbeat rhythms of kwaito music waft on the breeze as she ambles in to bowl.
Beyond the boundary, in the Makhaza area of Khayelitsha township, in South Africa’s Cape Flats, laundry flutters on a wire fence and the September sun reflects off a corrugated-iron lean-to.
The tall young woman has been told to go easy on her opponents – an under-13 boys’ team – but Yaso’s impeccable line and length are enough to induce three consecutive swings and misses.
On the fourth ball of the over, the batsman finally makes contact. All he can do is spoon it up to Yaso, who nonchalantly takes the catch.
Watching the game from his plastic chair on the sidelines is Gary Kirsten, an ex-South African test cricketer and international coach. “There’s some incredible talent in the townships,” he says. “What’s lacking is opportunity.”
The players on the pitch are all beneficiaries of a not-for-profit organisation started by Kirsten in 2014. Establishing a charitable foundation after retiring from the game is not unusual – but Kirsten’s approach is.
Instead of trying to find talented players in the townships and then give them scholarships to wealthy schools or universities in privileged areas, the Catch Trust is all about bringing world-class facilities into the townships.
Yaso was first introduced to cricket in 2015. “My dance teacher was also a cricket coach,” she says. “One day I walked past the nets, and he asked me if I wanted to bowl.”
Yaso – who has always been a head taller than her peers – proved to be a natural. Under the tutelage of Babalwa “Babs” Zothe, who has led the women’s programme for four years, Yaso has risen swiftly through the ranks, playing for a string of age-group teams before being chosen to represent the Western Province senior team in 2021.
“At the beginning I felt pressure, like I had to perform,” she says, on playing at Newlands, Cape Town’s international ground. “But after time I got comfortable. I know how the pitch moves … it suits my style actually.”
Yaso comes to Catch almost every day, whether or not she has a practice session: “I can’t imagine my life without cricket.
“It wasn’t a childhood dream,” she says, “but now with the crew around me, it is more than cricket – it’s like I’ve made family.”
after newsletter promotion
It began in 2014, when Kirsten teamed up with Madoda Mahlutshana, then principal of Chris Hani secondary school, to tour eight schools in Khayelitsha, the largest township in Cape Town.
“I’d just finished coaching the Proteas [South Africa men’s cricket team], so I had some time on my hands,” says Kirsten. “I thought there was an opportunity to see how this sport of ours was working in the townships near my home.”
Kirsten was disappointed to discover that none of the schools he visited played cricket – or any sport for that matter. After speaking to the schools’ governing bodies and using his cricketing contacts to secure funding, he got cricket nets built at five schools in the area and three coaches employed.
Over the years, Kirsten has improved the facilities – with the artificial pitch laid in 2020 and a three-lane indoor cricket centre a year later – and expanded the programme to include tutors who help the children with their homework and frequent workshops on topics such as mental and reproductive health and financial wellness. Now, 18 coaches and more than 400 players aged six to 19 make use of the centre six or seven days a week throughout the year.
As Zothe, the girls’ coach, says: “Most of those kids aren’t going to make a living from cricket, but they are all benefiting from cricket. This facility is like a dream … it is a home for all of us.”
Kirsten says: “I was lucky in that cricket gave me everything, now’s my chance to give something back.”
One of the opportunities that cricket gave Kirsten was the chance to tour internationally and experience different countries and cultures. While elite schools in South Africa regularly take cricket teams on tour overseas, township cricketers are lucky if they ever leave their own neighbourhood.
In 2019, during the men’s World Cup, Kirsten took a Catch Trust boys’ team to the UK. “It was one of the highlights of my cricketing life,” says Kirsten – a man who has scored 21 test centuries and coached India to the World Cup title.
Next June, to coincide with the Women’s T20 World Cup, he will be taking a girls’ team to the birthplace of cricket. “I’ve always wanted to go to England, to Lord’s,” says Yaso, who is hoping to be picked as a senior player or mentor. “It’s a dream I have been waiting for … it means everything.”
Zothe is equally excited. “It’s going to be a great cultural exchange. The girls will get to experience British culture and they will also get a chance to share their culture,” she says.
“We cannot wait – it’s going to be the greatest experience for the kids. And for me as well.”
Zothe is also emotional. “As a coach, it’s a privilege to have someone like Gary to call on,” she says. “The fact that Gary built the facilities here, in Khayelitsha, means the world to us. It means that he values a black child and the environment they come from.”
-
Business3 weeks agoThe Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms1 month ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy2 months agoSDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months agoJourney to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers3 months agoMumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months agoHappy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Education3 months agoVEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Education2 months agoMacron says UK and France have duty to tackle illegal migration ‘with humanity, solidarity and firmness’ – UK politics live | Politics
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months agoOpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi
-
Funding & Business3 months agoKayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries