Belgium will recognize the State of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly later this month, Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot announced Tuesday, adding that sanctions will be imposed on the Israeli government.

“Palestine will be recognized by Belgium at the UN session! And firm sanctions are being imposed against the Israeli government,” Prevot wrote on X.

There was no comment from Israel regarding the announcement.

The Belgian foreign minister said that the move would send a “strong political and diplomatic signal” to preserve the chances of a two-state solution, and “mark the condemnation of Israel’s expansionist ambitions, with its colonization programs and military occupations.”

Prevot said that Belgium noted “the trauma that the Israeli people have suffered from the terrorist attacks by Hamas on October 7, 2023,” and that therefore “administrative formalization” of the recognition of Palestine will only be declared by royal decree “when the last hostage has been released and Hamas no longer exercises any form of governance over Palestine.”

The announcement averted a political crisis in Belgium that had divided the governing coalition.

In July, French President Emmanuel Macron said France would recognize a Palestinian state at the UN meeting, due to be held from September 9 to 23 in New York.

More than a dozen other Western countries have since said they would do the same. Israeli ministers have lambasted the move as a “reward for terror” in the wake of the October 7 onslaught.

The United States said last week it will not allow Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to travel to New York for the UNGA.

Prevot said the decision to recognize a Palestinian state came “in view of the humanitarian tragedy” unfolding in Gaza amid the war, with pressure needed on both Israel and Hamas.

“In the face of the violence perpetrated by Israel in violation of international law, given its international obligations, including the duty to prevent any risk of genocide, Belgium had to take strong decisions to increase pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas terrorists,” he wrote.

Demonstrators hold signs calling for the release of hostages held in Gaza, at Hostage Square in Tel Aviv, August 30, 2025. (Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90)

“This is not about punishing the Israeli people, but rather about ensuring that its government respects international and humanitarian law and taking action to try to change the situation on the ground,” he added.

Prevot said additionally said that “any antisemitism or glorification of terrorism by Hamas supporters will also be condemned more vigorously.”

Prevot said that 12 steps would be taken regarding sanctions on Israel and detailed a number of them: a ban on the import of products originating from settlements; a review of public procurement policies with Israeli companies; limitation of consular assistance to Belgians living in settlements deemed illegal under international law; possible judicial prosecutions; and bans on overflights and transit.

It was unclear how a ban on overflights and transit would be implemented. According to Bloomberg, the ban was for the Israeli military.

Additionally, Prevot said “two extremist Israeli ministers, various violent settlers and Hamas leaders” would be “persona non gratae” in Belgium. While he did not name the two ministers impacted, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister have been similarly banned from other countries.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, center, and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich at a ‘Victory Conference’ at the International Convention Center in Jerusalem on January 28, 2024. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

In addition, Belgium will support moves within the EU to suspend cooperation with Israel, including the suspension of the association agreement, research programs and technical cooperation. European Union foreign ministers remained sharply divided during a meeting in Copenhagen on Saturday over the war in Gaza, with some urging the bloc to exert significant economic pressure on Israel, while others firmly opposed such measures.

Prevot also wrote that Belgium will join the “New York Declaration,” which sets out a phased plan to end the nearly eight-decade conflict and the ongoing war in Gaza. The plan would culminate in an independent, demilitarized Palestine living side by side peacefully with Israel, and their eventual integration into the wider Middle East region.

In July, Arab and Muslim countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan and Turkey, signed the declaration in which they also condemned for the first time Hamas’s onslaught of October 7, 2023, and called on the terror group to release all the hostages it is holding, disarm and end its rule of Gaza, in a bid to end the devastating war in the Strip. Seventeen countries, plus the 22-member Arab League and the entire European Union, threw their weight behind the text, agreed on at a United Nations conference on reviving the two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians.

Israel has been under mounting pressure to wrap up its campaign in Gaza, where the war has created a humanitarian crisis and devastated much of the territory.

Is The Times of Israel important to you?

Yes, I’ll give

Yes, I’ll give

Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this

You appreciate our journalism

We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

You clearly find our careful reporting valuable, in a time when facts are often distorted and news coverage often lacks context.

Your support is essential to continue our work. We want to continue delivering the professional journalism you value, even as the demands on our newsroom have grown dramatically since October 7.

So today, please consider joining our reader support group, The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6 a month you’ll become our partners while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Thank you,
David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel

Join Our Community

Join Our Community

Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this

In 2018 and 2019, Sanchez-Vidal’s team examined seagrass balls washed up on four beaches on the island of Mallorca, Spain. On the shores of Sa Marina, Son Serra de Marina, Costa dels Pins and Es Peregons Petits, they found plastic debris in half of the loose seagrass leaf samples, up to 600 fragments per kilogram (2.2lb) of leaves.

Only 17% of Neptune balls contained plastic, but where it was found it was densely packed – nearly 1,500 pieces per kilogram. Tighter bundled balls were more effective at trapping plastic.

“After our paper was published, a lot of people started sending me [pictures of] monster Neptune balls,” says Sanchez-Vidal. These are balls that capture larger and more visible pieces of plastic.

“Sometimes they had sanitary towels, tampons, wet wipes – things with a lot of cellulose, so they sink,” she explains: “No, I didn’t really want to receive those pictures from everybody,” she jokes.

Getty Images

WASHINGTON — A government shutdown deadline, a standoff over President Donald Trump’s nominees and a renewed clash over the Jeffrey Epstein files await Congress as it returns Tuesday after a month-long August recess.

The top item on the agenda is the government funding deadline of Sept. 30 to avoid a shutdown. An unusual Republican and Democratic pairing says they believe they’ll have the support they need to force a House vote requiring the Justice Department to release the Epstein files. And Republicans are hatching plans to change Senate rules to speed up confirmation of Trump’s personnel, amid drama over the firing and exodus of top public health officials from the Trump administration.

Shutdown deadline is Sept. 30

The battle over federal funding has intensified in recent days in anticipation of lawmakers’ return to town, with any bill requiring 60 votes, and thus bipartisan support, to pass the Senate.

There’s no framework or “top line” agreement on how much to spend, let alone how to allocate that funding. And with just weeks to go, the division is growing rather than narrowing.

The White House notified lawmakers Friday that it plans to bypass them and slash $4.9 billion in federal funds using a “pocket rescission,” a tactic that the top congressional watchdog calls “illegal.”

The move drew condemnation from Democrats and a top Republican.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called it “unlawful” and said it is “further proof President Trump and Congressional Republicans are hellbent on rejecting bipartisanship and ‘going it alone’ this fall.”

“As the country stares down next month’s government funding deadline on September 30th, it is clear neither President Trump nor Congressional Republicans have any plan to avoid a painful and entirely unnecessary shutdown,” Schumer said.

Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, said: “Any effort to rescind appropriated funds without congressional approval is a clear violation of the law.”

Collins has issued similar warnings in the past, which have been ignored by the White House and GOP leaders, who embraced Trump’s previous round of “rescissions” to undo funding approved by Congress.

Hard-right Republicans are also demanding to keep spending low.

“Spending has got to stay flat or go down. I mean, that’s the deal,” said Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas. “Whatever format that takes … but it needs to stay flat or go down.”

Pressure builds on Epstein files

In July, Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., a conservative Trump antagonist, rolled out a resolution to force the Justice Department to release the Epstein files, predicting pressure would build throughout the August recess and reach a boiling point by the time Congress returns this week.

But Massie and his Democratic co-author of the legislation, Rep. Ro Khanna of California, are leaving nothing to chance. On Wednesday, they plan to host a Capitol news conference featuring sexual abuse survivors of Epstein, the convicted sex offender who took his own life in 2019, and his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for her role in recruiting and trafficking minors for sex.

Khanna said he believes they’ll have the requisite 218 member signatures needed for their discharge petition — a process that would circumvent GOP leadership and force a floor vote to release the files.

“The testimonials from Epstein’s victims are going to be explosive on Sept. 3, and I am confident all 212 Democrats will sign it and we will have more than six Republicans sign,” Khanna told NBC News.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has opposed the discharge push. During an appearance on CNN, he called it a “moot point” and “not necessary” because the House Oversight Committee already has been reviewing a tranche of documents provided by the Justice Department.

But Massie and Khanna say the Trump administration is not moving fast enough. The Oversight panel subpoenaed the DOJ for its investigative files in the Epstein case, which total roughly 100,000 pages. The panel said it received about a third of those documents last Friday and that more would be turned over in the future.

The Oversight Committee has been conducting interviews with high-profile former government officials as part of its probe into Epstein. Former Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, a former federal prosecutor in Florida whose office reached a non-prosecution deal with Epstein in 2008, will appear voluntarily before the panel on Sept. 19.

Will a stock trading ban be successful?

Lawmakers often do not police themselves. But as they return to Washington, there will be a renewed and highly public bipartisan push to ban them from owning and trading individual stocks amid concerns over potential conflicts of interest.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., is vowing to file a discharge petition to force a vote on a bill by Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., to ban congressional stock trading.

“Insider trading, individual stock trades by members of Congress — they’re crooked as a dog’s leg. Everybody knows it,” Burchett said. “It’s going to be hated and loved in both parties.”

And members of both parties have been signing onto the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks or ETHICS Act, legislation authored by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill. The bill would bar lawmakers, their spouses and their dependent children from owning or trading individual stocks, securities, commodities or futures.

Among those who have co-sponsored the bill are GOP Reps. Michael Cloud of Texas, Jen Kiggans of Virginia, and Mike Lawler of New York, and Democratic Reps. Joe Neguse of Colorado, Josh Riley of New York and Khanna.

“Members of Congress should serve the public, not pad their stock portfolios,” said Krishnamoorthi, who is running for the Senate. “A stock trading ban is just common sense — it’s about restoring trust, preventing conflicts of interest, and making sure lawmakers put constituents ahead of their own bottom line.”

Before the summer recess, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, a potential 2028 presidential contender, teamed with Democrats to pass a stock ban for politicians through the Homeland Security Committee, sparking anger from Trump and Hawley’s own Senate GOP colleagues. Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said he would not put the bill, which would prohibit owning or trading stocks for future presidents, vice presidents and lawmakers, on the Senate floor for a vote.

With so many lawmakers owning stocks, it would be an uphill battle to move such a ban through both chambers.

Senate eyes a ‘nuclear’ move and CDC fallout

Meanwhile, Republicans are gearing up to change the rules of the Senate using the so-called “nuclear option” in order to push Trump’s nominees for sub-Cabinet positions through faster.

They blame it on Democratic obstruction in granting speedy votes for Trump’s personnel, saying it has reached new heights as even nominees that have bipartisan support are being slowed down.

“Senate Republicans are determined to confirm Mr. Trump’s qualified nominees one way or another. Republicans are considering changes to the Senate rules to end the most egregious delay tactics,” Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo, wrote in a recent opinion piece under the headline, “Chuck Schumer’s Unprecedented Blockade.”

Schumer responded on X, “Historically bad nominees deserve a historic level of scrutiny by Senate Democrats.”

He alluded to recent Trump nominees whom he fired just weeks or months into the job. That includes CDC Director Susan Monarez and IRS Commissioner Billy Long, who were fired in August after getting confirmed by the Senate in July and June, respectively.

“No matter how fast Trump hires and fires them,” Schumer wrote last week, “Senator Barrasso is always at the ready to rubber-stamp the next one!”

The Monarez firing has drawn additional scrutiny on Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who triggered her removal and the resignations of top health officials who say the administration was manipulating data in unscientific ways to advance a political agenda.

As Democrats demand hearings into what they call Kennedy’s anti-vaccine crusade, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., the chair of the health committee, has promised “oversight” without getting specific. Cassidy provided a pivotal vote to getting Kennedy through committee and confirmed in the Senate.

“We need to know what the data says and where it is coming from, so the CDC and HHS can make the best decisions,” Cassidy wrote on X, saying his goals align with Trump.

Cassidy, a doctor, has also feuded in recent days about the efficacy of vaccines with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., a committee member more aligned with Kennedy on the matter.