Events & Conferences
RecSys: Rajeev Rastogi on three recommendation system challenges
In a keynote address at this year’s ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), which starts next week, Rajeev Rastogi, vice president of applied science in Amazon’s International Emerging Stores division, will discuss three problems his organization has faced in its work on recommendation algorithms: recommendations in directed graphs; training machine learning models when target labels change over time; and leveraging estimates of prediction uncertainty to improve models’ accuracy.
“The connections are that these are general techniques that cut across many different recommendation problems,” Rastogi explains. “And these are things that we actually use in practice. They make a difference in the real world.”
Directed graphs
The first problem involves directed graphs, or graphs whose edges describe relationships that run in only one direction.
“Directed graphs have applications in many different domains out there — from citation networks, where an edge U-V indicates paper U cites paper V, or in social networks, where an edge U-V would show that user U follows another user V, and in e-commerce, where an edge U-V indicates that customers bought product U before they bought product V,” Rastogi explains.
Although the problem of exploring directed graphs is general, the researchers in Rastogi’s organization focused on this last case: related-products recommendation, where the goal is to predict what other products might interest a customer who has just made a purchase.
“The interesting part here is that the related-products relationship is actually asymmetric,” Rastogi explains. “If you have, say, two nodes, a phone and a phone case, given a phone, you want to recommend a phone case. But if the customer has bought a phone case, you don’t want to recommend a phone, because they most likely already have one.”
Like many graph-based applications, the Amazon team’s solution to the problem of asymmetric related-product recommendation involves graph neural networks (GNNs), in which each node of a graph is embedded in a representational space where geometric relationships between nodes carry information about their relationships in the network. The embedding process is iterative, with each iteration factoring in information about nodes at greater removes, until each node’s embedding carries information about its neighborhood.
“A single embedding space does not have the expressive power to model the asymmetric relationships between nodes in directed graphs,” Rastogi explains. “Something that we borrowed from past work is to represent each node with dual embeddings, and one of our novel contributions is really to learn these dual embeddings in a GNN setting that leverages the entire graph structure.”
“Then we had additional techniques, like adaptive sampling,” Rastogi adds. “These vanilla GNNs sample fixed neighborhood sizes for every node. But we found that low-degree nodes” — that is, nodes with few connections to other nodes — “have suboptimal performance when you have fixed neighborhood sizes for every node, because low-degree nodes have sparse connectivity structures. And so less information gets transmitted when you’re aggregating information from neighbors and so on.
“So we actually choose to sample larger neighborhoods for low-degree nodes and smaller neighborhoods for high-degree nodes. It’s a little bit counterintuitive, but it gives us much better results.”
Delayed feedback
A typical machine learning (ML) model is trained on labeled data, and the model must learn to predict the labels — its training targets — from the data. The second problem Rastogi addresses in his talk is how best to train a model when you know that some of the target labels are going to change in the near future.
“This is, again, a very common problem across many different domains,” Rastogi says. “In recommendations, there can be a time lag of a few days between customers viewing a recommendation and purchasing the product.
“There’s a trade-off here: If you use all the training data in real time, some of those more recent training examples may have target labels that are incorrect, because they are going to change over time. On the other hand, if you ignore all the training examples you got in the last five days, then you’re missing out on recent data, and your model isn’t going to be as good — especially in environments where models need to be retrained frequently.
“Here, what we’ve done is come up with an importance-sampling strategy that essentially weighs every training example with an importance weight. Let P(X,Y) be the true data distribution, and Q(X,Y) be the data distribution that you observe in the training set. Our importance-sampling strategy uses the ratio P(X,Y) divided by Q(X,Y) as the importance weight.
“Our key innovation centers on techniques to compute these importance weights in new scenarios. One is where we take into account preconversion signals. People tend to do something before they convert; they may add to cart, or they may click on the product to research it before completing the purchase. So we take into account those signals, and that helps us overcome data sparsity.
“But then it makes the computation of importance weights a little bit more complex. If it’s very likely that the target label will actually change from 0 — a negative example — to 1 , then the importance weight would be much lower than if the likelihood of the example not changing was very low. Essentially, what you’re trying to do is learn from the data the likelihood that the target label is going is change in the future and capture that in the importance weights.”
Prediction uncertainty
Finally, Rastogi says, the third technique he’ll discuss in his talk is the use of uncertainty estimates to improve the accuracy of model predictions.
“ML models typically will return point estimates,” Rastogi explains. “But usually you have a probability distribution. In some cases, you could know there’s a 0.5 chance this customer is going buy the product. But in some cases, it could be anywhere between 0.2 and 0.8. What we found is, if you’re able to generate uncertainty estimates for model predictions, we can exploit them to improve model accuracy.
“We trained a binary classifier to predict ad click probability for an ads recommendation application. For every sample in the holdout set, we generated both the model score, which is the probability prediction, and also an uncertainty estimate, which is how certain I am about the predicted probability.
“If I looked at a lot of examples in the holdout set with a model score of 0.5, you would expect that about 50% of them resulted in clicks: that’s the empirical positivity rate. If it were 0.8, then the empirical positivity rate should be around 80%.
“But what we found is that as the variance of the model score increased, the empirical positivity rates went down. If I have a score of 0.8, I could say, well, it’s between 0.79 and 0.81, which corresponds to a low variance. Or I could say, it’s between 0.65 and 0.95, which indicates a high variance. We found that for the same model score, as the confidence intervals became larger, the empirical positivity rate started dropping.
“That has implications on selecting the decision boundary for binary classifiers. Traditionally, binary classifiers used a single threshold on model scores. But now, since the empirical positivity rate depends on both the model score and the uncertainty estimate, just selecting a single threshold value turns out to be suboptimal. If we select multiple thresholds, one per uncertainty level, we found that we can get much higher recall for a given precision.”
Members of Rastogi’s organization are currently writing a paper on their prediction uncertainty work — but the method is already in production.
“There are a lot of things that people publish papers about, and they’re forgotten and never really used,” Rastogi says. “Coming from Amazon, we do science that actually makes a difference to customers and solves customer pain points. These are three examples of doing customer-obsessed science that actually makes a difference in the real world.”
Events & Conferences
An inside look at Meta’s transition from C to Rust on mobile
Have you ever worked is legacy code? Are you curious what it takes to modernize systems at a massive scale?
Pascal Hartig is joined on the latest Meta Tech Podcast by Elaine and Buping, two software engineers working on a bold project to rewrite the decades-old C code in one of Meta’s core messaging libraries in Rust. It’s an ambitious effort that will transform a central messaging library that is shared across Messenger, Facebook, Instagram, and Meta’s AR/VR platforms.
They discuss taking on a project of this scope – even without a background in Rust, how they’re approaching it, and what it means to optimize for ‘developer happiness.’
Download or listen to the episode below:
You can also find the episode wherever you get your podcasts, including:
The Meta Tech Podcast is a podcast, brought to you by Meta, where we highlight the work Meta’s engineers are doing at every level – from low-level frameworks to end-user features.
Send us feedback on Instagram, Threads, or X.
And if you’re interested in learning more about career opportunities at Meta visit the Meta Careers page.
Events & Conferences
Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Research Awards (ARA) provides unrestricted funds and AWS Promotional Credits to academic researchers investigating various research topics in multiple disciplines. This cycle, ARA received many excellent research proposals from across the world and today is publicly announcing 73 award recipients who represent 46 universities in 10 countries.
This announcement includes awards funded under five call for proposals during the fall 2024 cycle: AI for Information Security, Automated Reasoning, AWS AI, AWS Cryptography, and Sustainability. Proposals were reviewed for the quality of their scientific content and their potential to impact both the research community and society. Additionally, Amazon encourages the publication of research results, presentations of research at Amazon offices worldwide, and the release of related code under open-source licenses.
Recipients have access to more than 700 Amazon public datasets and can utilize AWS AI/ML services and tools through their AWS Promotional Credits. Recipients also are assigned an Amazon research contact who offers consultation and advice, along with opportunities to participate in Amazon events and training sessions.
“Automated Reasoning is an important area of research for Amazon, with potential applications across various features and applications to help improve security, reliability, and performance for our customers. Through the ARA program, we collaborate with leading academic researchers to explore challenges in this field,” said Robert Jones, senior principal scientist with the Cloud Automated Reasoning Group. “We were again impressed by the exceptional response to our Automated Reasoning call for proposals this year, receiving numerous high-quality submissions. Congratulations to the recipients! We’re excited to support their work and partner with them as they develop new science and technology in this important area.”
“At Amazon, we believe that solving the world’s toughest sustainability challenges benefits from both breakthrough scientific research and open and bold collaboration. Through programs like the Amazon Research Awards program, we aim to support academic research that could contribute to our understanding of these complex issues,” said Kommy Weldemariam, Director of Science and Innovation Sustainability. “The selected proposals represent innovative projects that we hope will help advance knowledge in this field, potentially benefiting customers, communities, and the environment.”
ARA funds proposals throughout the year in a variety of research areas. Applicants are encouraged to visit the ARA call for proposals page for more information or send an email to be notified of future open calls.
The tables below list, in alphabetical order by last name, fall 2024 cycle call-for-proposal recipients, sorted by research area.
AI for Information Security
Recipient | University | Research title |
Christopher Amato | Northeastern University | Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Cyber Defense for Securing Cloud Computing Platforms |
Bernd Bischl | Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich | Improving Generative and Foundation Models Reliability via Uncertainty-awareness |
Shiqing Ma | University Of Massachusetts Amherst | LLM and Domain Adaptation for Attack Detection |
Alina Oprea | Northeastern University | Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Cyber Defense for Securing Cloud Computing Platforms |
Roberto Perdisci | University of Georgia | ContextADBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Contextual Anomaly Detection |
Automated Reasoning
Recipient | University | Research title |
Nada Amin | Harvard University | LLM-Augmented Semi-Automated Proofs for Interactive Verification |
Suguman Bansal | Georgia Institute of Technology | Certified Inductive Generalization in Reinforcement Learning |
Ioana Boureanu | University of Surrey | Phoebe+: An Automated-Reasoning Tool for Provable Privacy in Cryptographic Systems |
Omar Haider Chowdhury | Stony Brook University | Restricter: An Automatic Tool for Authoring Amazon Cedar Access Control Policies with the Principle of Least Privilege |
Stefan Ciobaca | Alexandru Ioan Cuza University | An Interactive Proof Mode for Dafny |
João Ferreira | INESC-ID | Polyglot Automated Program Repair for Infrastructure as Code |
Sicun Gao | University Of California, San Diego | Monte Carlo Trees with Conflict Models for Proof Search |
Mirco Giacobbe | University of Birmingham | Neural Software Verification |
Tobias Grosser | University of Cambridge | Synthesis-based Symbolic BitVector Simplification for Lean |
Ronghui Gu | Columbia University | Scaling Formal Verification of Security Properties for Unmodified System Software |
Alexey Ignatiev | Monash University | Huub: Next-Gen Lazy Clause Generation |
Kenneth McMillan | University of Texas At Austin | Synthesis of Auxiliary Variables and Invariants for Distributed Protocol Verification |
Alexandra Mendes | University of Porto | Overcoming Barriers to the Adoption of Verification-Aware Languages |
Jason Nieh | Columbia University | Scaling Formal Verification of Security Properties for Unmodified System Software |
Rohan Padhye | Carnegie Mellon University | Automated Synthesis and Evaluation of Property-Based Tests |
Nadia Polikarpova | University Of California, San Diego | Discovering and Proving Critical System Properties with LLMs |
Fortunat Rajaona | University of Surrey | Phoebe+: An Automated-Reasoning Tool for Provable Privacy in Cryptographic Systems |
Subhajit Roy | Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur | Theorem Proving Modulo LLM |
Gagandeep Singh | University of Illinois At Urbana–Champaign | Trustworthy LLM Systems using Formal Contracts |
Scott Stoller | Stony Brook University | Restricter: An Automatic Tool for Authoring Amazon Cedar Access Control Policies with the Principle of Least Privilege |
Peter Stuckey | Monash University | Huub: Next-Gen Lazy Clause Generation |
Yulei Sui | University of New South Wales | Path-Sensitive Typestate Analysis through Sparse Abstract Execution |
Nikos Vasilakis | Brown University | Semantics-Driven Static Analysis for the Unix/Linux Shell |
Ping Wang | Stevens Institute of Technology | Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning Augmented Searching on Domain-specific NoSQL Database |
John Wawrzynek | University of California, Berkeley | GPU-Accelerated High-Throughput SAT Sampling |
AWS AI
Recipient | University | Research title |
Panagiotis Adamopoulos | Emory University | Generative AI solutions for The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Reviews on Product Recommendations |
Vikram Adve | University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign | Fellini: Differentiable ML Compiler for Full-Graph Optimization for LLM Models |
Frances Arnold | California Institute of Technology | Closed-loop Generative Machine Learning for De Novo Enzyme Discovery and Optimization |
Yonatan Bisk | Carnegie Mellon University | Useful, Safe, and Robust Multiturn Interactions with LLMs |
Shiyu Chang | University of California, Santa Barbara | Cut the Crap: Advancing the Efficient Communication of Multi-Agent Systems via Spatial-Temporal Topology Design and KV Cache Sharing |
Yuxin Chen | University of Pennsylvania | Provable Acceleration of Diffusion Models for Modern Generative AI |
Tianlong Chen | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Cut the Crap: Advancing the Efficient Communication of Multi-Agent Systems via Spatial-Temporal Topology Design and KV Cache Sharing |
Mingyu Ding | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Aligning Long Videos and Language as Long-Horizon World Models |
Nikhil Garg | Cornell University | Market Design for Responsible Multi-agent LLMs |
Jessica Hullman | Northwestern University | Human-Aligned Uncertainty Quantification in High Dimensions |
Christopher Jermaine | Rice University | Fast, Trusted AI Using the EINSUMMABLE Compiler |
Yunzhu Li | Columbia University | Physics-Informed Foundation Models Through Embodied Interactions |
Pattie Maes | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Understanding How LLM Agents Deviate from Human Choices |
Sasa Misailovic | University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign | Fellini: Differentiable ML Compiler for Full-Graph Optimization for LLM Models |
Kristina Monakhova | Cornell University | Trustworthy extreme imaging for science using interpretable uncertainty quantification |
Todd Mowry | Carnegie Mellon University | Efficient LLM Serving on Trainium via Kernel Generation |
Min-hwan Oh | Seoul National University | Mutually Beneficial Interplay Between Selection Fairness and Context Diversity in Contextual Bandits |
Patrick Rebeschini | University of Oxford | Optimal Regularization for LLM Alignment |
Jose Renau | University of California, Santa Cruz | Verification Constrained Hardware Optimization using Intelligent Design Agentic Programming |
Vilma Todri | Emory University | Generative AI solutions for The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Reviews on Product Recommendations |
Aravindan Vijayaraghavan | Northwestern University | Human-Aligned Uncertainty Quantification in High Dimensions |
Wei Yang | University of Texas at Dallas | Optimizing RISC-V Compilers with RISC-LLM and Syntax Parsing |
Huaxiu Yao | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Aligning Long Videos and Language as Long-Horizon World Models |
Amy Zhang | University of Washington | Tools for Governing AI Agent Autonomy |
Ruqi Zhang | Purdue University | Efficient Test-time Alignment for Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models |
Zheng Zhang | Rutgers University-New Brunswick | AlphaQC: An AI-powered Quantum Circuit Optimizer and Denoiser |
AWS Cryptography
Recipient | University | Research title |
Alexandra Boldyreva | Georgia Institute of Technology | Quantifying Information Leakage in Searchable Encryption Protocols |
Maria Eichlseder | Graz University of Technology, Austria | SALAD – Systematic Analysis of Lightweight Ascon-based Designs |
Venkatesan Guruswami | University of California, Berkeley | Obfuscation, Proof Systems, and Secure Computation: A Research Program on Cryptography at the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing |
Joseph Jaeger | Georgia Institute of Technology | Analyzing Chat Encryption for Group Messaging |
Aayush Jain | Carnegie Mellon | Large Scale Multiparty Silent Preprocessing for MPC from LPN |
Huijia Lin | University of Washington | Large Scale Multiparty Silent Preprocessing for MPC from LPN |
Hamed Nemati | KTH Royal Institute of Technology | Trustworthy Automatic Verification of Side-Channel Countermeasures for Binary Cryptographic Programs using the HoIBA libary |
Karl Palmskog | KTH Royal Institute of Technology | Trustworthy Automatic Verification of Side-Channel Countermeasures for Binary Cryptographic Programs using the HoIBA libary |
Chris Peikert | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor | Practical Third-Generation FHE and Bootstrapping |
Dimitrios Skarlatos | Carnegie Mellon University | Scale-Out FHE LLMs on GPUs |
Vinod Vaikuntanathan | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Can Quantum Computers (Really) Factor? |
Daniel Wichs | Northeastern University | Obfuscation, Proof Systems, and Secure Computation: A Research Program on Cryptography at the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing |
David Wu | University Of Texas At Austin | Fast Private Information Retrieval and More using Homomorphic Encryption |
Sustainability
Recipient | University | Research title |
Meeyoung Cha | Max Planck Institute | Forest-Blossom (Flossom): A New Framework for Sustaining Forest Biodiversity Through Outcome-Driven Remote Sensing Monitoring |
Jingrui He | University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign | Foundation Model Enabled Earth’s Ecosystem Monitoring |
Pedro Lopes | University of Chicago | AI-powered Tools that Enable Engineers to Make & Re-make Sustainable Hardware |
Cheng Yaw Low | Max Planck Institute | Forest-Blossom (Flossom): A New Framework for Sustaining Forest Biodiversity Through Outcome-Driven Remote Sensing Monitoring |
Events & Conferences
Independent evaluations demonstrate Nova Premier’s safety
AI safety is a priority at Amazon. Our investment in safe, transparent, and responsible AI (RAI) includes collaboration with the global community and policymakers. We are members of and collaborate with organizations such as the Frontier Model Forum, the Partnership on AI, and other forums organized by government agencies such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Consistent with Amazon’s endorsement of the Korea Frontier AI Safety Commitments, we published our Frontier Model Safety Framework earlier this year.
During the development of the Nova Premier model, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation to assess its performance and safety. This included testing on both internal and public benchmarks and internal/automated and third-party red-teaming exercises. Once the final model was ready, we prioritized obtaining unbiased, third-party evaluations of the model’s robustness against RAI controls. In this post, we outline the key findings from these evaluations, demonstrating the strength of our testing approach and Amazon Premier’s standing as a safe model. Specifically, we cover our evaluations with two third-party evaluators: PRISM AI and ActiveFence.
Evaluation of Nova Premier against PRISM AI
PRISM Eval’s Behavior Elicitation Tool (BET) dynamically and systematically stress-tests AI models’ safety guardrails. The methodology focuses on measuring how many adversarial attempts (steps) it takes to get a model to generate harmful content across several key risk dimensions. The central metric is “steps to elicit” — the number of increasingly sophisticated prompting attempts required before a model generates an inappropriate response. A higher number of steps indicates stronger safety measures, as the model is more resistant to manipulation. The PRISM risk dimensions (inspired by the MLCommons AI Safety Benchmarks) include CBRNE weapons, violent crimes, non-violent crimes, defamation, and hate, amongst several others.
Using the BET Eval tool and its V1.0 metric, which is tailored toward non-reasoning models, we compared the recently released Nova models (Pro and Premier) to the latest models in the same class: Claude (3.5 v2 and 3.7 non-reasoning) and Llama4 Maverick, all available through Amazon Bedrock. PRISM BET conducts black-box evaluations (where model developers don’t have access to the test prompts) of models integrated with their API. The evaluation conducted with BET Eval MAX, PRISM’s most comprehensive/aggressive testing suite, revealed significant variations in safety against malicious instructions. Nova models demonstrated superior overall safety performance, with an average of 43 steps for Premier and 52 steps for Pro, compared to 37.7 for Claude 3.5 v2 and fewer than 12 steps for other models in the comparison set (namely, 9.9 for Claude3.7, 11.5 for Claude 3.7 thinking, and 6.5 for Maverick). This higher step count suggests that on average, Nova’s safety guardrails are more sophisticated and harder to circumvent through adversarial prompting. The figure below presents the number of steps per harm category evaluated through BET Eval MAX.
The PRISM evaluation provides valuable insights into the relative safety of different Amazon Bedrock models. Nova’s strong performance, particularly in hate speech and defamation resistance, represents meaningful progress in AI safety. However, the results also highlight the ongoing challenge of building truly robust safety measures into AI systems. As the field continues to evolve, frameworks like BET will play an increasingly important role in benchmarking and improving AI safety. As a part of this collaboration Nicolas Miailhe, CEO of PRISM Eval, said, “It’s incredibly rewarding for us to see Nova outperforming strong baselines using the BET Eval MAX; our aim is to build a long-term partnership toward safer-by-design models and to make BET available to various model providers.” Organizations deploying AI systems should carefully consider these safety metrics when selecting models for their applications.
Manual red teaming with ActiveFence
The AI safety & security company ActiveFence benchmarked Nova Premier on Bedrock on prompts distributed across Amazon’s eight core RAI categories. ActiveFence also evaluated Claude 3.7 (non-reasoning mode) and GPT 4.1 API on the same set. The flag rate on Nova Premier was lower than that on the other two models, indicating that Nova Premier is the safest of the three.
Model | 3P Flag Rate [↓ is better] |
Nova Premier | 12.0% |
Sonnet 3.7 (non-reasoning) | 20.6% |
GPT4.1 API | 22.4% |
“Our role is to think like an adversary but act in service of safety,” said Guy Paltieli from ActiveFence. “By conducting a blind stress test of Nova Premier under realistic threat scenarios, we helped evaluate its security posture in support of Amazon’s broader responsible-AI goals, ensuring the model could be deployed with greater confidence.”
These evaluations conducted with PRISM and ActiveFence give us confidence in the strength of our guardrails and our ability to protect our customers’ safety when they use our models. While these evaluations demonstrate strong safety performance, we recognize that AI safety is an ongoing challenge requiring continuous improvement. These assessments represent a point-in-time snapshot, and we remain committed to regular testing and enhancement of our safety measures. No AI system can guarantee perfect safety in all scenarios, which is why we maintain monitoring and response systems after deployment.
Acknowledgments: Vincent Ponzo, Elyssa Vincent
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions6 days ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Funding & Business4 days ago
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Astrophel Aerospace Raises ₹6.84 Crore to Build Reusable Launch Vehicle
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
From chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
-
Tools & Platforms6 days ago
Winning with AI – A Playbook for Pest Control Business Leaders to Drive Growth
-
Jobs & Careers4 days ago
Ilya Sutskever Takes Over as CEO of Safe Superintelligence After Daniel Gross’s Exit