Top Stories
Netanyahu: Israel to take military control of all of Gaza, but ‘we don’t want to keep it’

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday, ahead of a key cabinet meeting on the next stage of the Gaza war, that Israel intends to take control of the entire Strip, then hand it over to an unspecified Arab governing force.
The premier said a “detailed plan” will be developed for this post-Hamas government, and that it will not place Israel in control of the Strip as a civil government, nor allow the Palestinian Authority to play a role.
Asked in a Fox News interview if Israel will take over the entire 26-mile strip, Netanyahu said: “We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza (sic), and to pass it civilian governance.” But, he stressed, “We don’t want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter, but we don’t want to govern it. We don’t want to be there as a governing body.”
The prime minister said that Israel wants to “hand it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly, without threatening us, and giving the Gazans a good life.”
Netanyahu also told a group of visiting Indian journalists, according to the English-language CNN-News18, that, “Our plan is not to occupy or annex Gaza. Our goal is to destroy Hamas and get our hostages back, and then hand over Gaza to a transitory government.”
“We will never hand [Gaza] over to the Palestinian Authority or Hamas. We will provide overall security. There will be a security perimeter provided by us,” the premier added.
“We want to end the war very soon. It will be over speedily. If Hamas concedes and lays down their arms and frees hostages, it will be over tomorrow. Even Palestinians in Gaza are fighting Hamas,” the prime minister said.
Netanyahu’s comments were met with wholesale rejection from the Hamas terror group and led Jordan to stress that it would only accept any decisions on the future of Gaza agreed to by the Palestinians.
While Arab states have expressed willingness to assist in the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, they have long conditioned their involvement on the inclusion of the PA, viewing Ramallah’s role as critical to establishing a diplomatic horizon for a two-state solution, by having the same governing body in charge of both the West Bank and Gaza.
But Netanyahu’s rejection of a role for the PA has stopped any Arab country from expressing interest in playing the post-war role in Gaza that the Israeli premier is seeking.
In addition to rejecting a role for the PA, Netanyahu has refused for much of the war to advance a viable alternative to Hamas, which his critics say has allowed the war to drag out endlessly as the terror group has managed to remain the most dominant Palestinian force in Gaza.
For his part, Netanyahu has argued that no alternative to Hamas will be able to survive in Gaza before the terror group has been defeated.
The prime minister’s remarks came shortly before the security cabinet convened Thursday evening to discuss a controversial plan to take over and occupy the entire Gaza Strip.
Israel currently controls about 75% of the enclave, but has stayed out of areas where the Hamas terror group is believed to be holding hostages, and has refrained from asserting any civilian governance over the Strip’s population, who have been ordered to evacuate from all of the areas where ground troops are operating.
Speaking to Fox News’s Bill Hemmer immediately before the cabinet meeting, Netanyahu said: “We want to liberate ourselves and liberate the people of Gaza from the awful terror of Hamas.”
Netanyahu denied any intent to cause civilian suffering, noting Israel’s efforts to get humanitarian aid into the Strip.
He also explained to Fox that “the reason you see the flattened buildings [in Gaza] is because Hamas booby traps every single building,” and that when the terror group’s underground tunnels are detonated, they take down buildings above them, emphasizing that all such buildings are empty, following broad evacuation orders.
PM: US, Israel agree on ‘certain principles’ for ‘day after’
When Hemmer asked if US President Donald Trump had given Jerusalem a green light to take control of the whole Strip, Netanyahu declined to give a clear yes, responding: “He just says, ‘I know Israel will do what it has to do.’”
“We haven’t got into that kind of discussion,” Netanyahu continued, but he said the US and Israel had discussed a humanitarian surge leading up to a major operation, and certain principles, but not a detailed plan, for a post-Hamas Gaza.
US President Donald Trump speaks during an event with Apple CEO Tim Cook (not in picture) in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on August 6, 2025. (Win McNamee/Getty Images/AFP)
Regarding the humanitarian surge, Netanyahu told Fox, “I want the population to be in safe zones, to have food, water, sewage, electricity, medical help.”
With respect to the day after, he said Jerusalem and Washington agree it “has to have certain principles,” but added, “I’m not talking about a detailed plan yet, because I think that will be developed.”
Netanyahu listed five principles: Hamas’s disarmament; Gaza’s demilitarization; the release of all the hostages; Israeli security responsibility; and a non-Israeli civilian governing authority “that basically is willing to live in peace with Israel and give Gazans a different future.”
Hamas, in a statement, called Netanyahu’s comments “a blatant coup” against the negotiation process.
“Netanyahu’s plans to expand the aggression confirm beyond any doubt that he seeks to get rid of his captives and sacrifice them,” the statement said.
The terror group added that it would view any governing force formed in line with Netanyahu’s proposal as an “occupying force linked to Israel.”

Illustrative: Hamas terrorists carry their guns in Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip, ahead of the release of Israeli hostages on February 22, 2025. (Bashar Taleb/AFP)
A Jordanian official told Reuters on Thursday, following Netanyahu’s comments, that Amman “will only support what Palestinians agree and decide on.”
“Security in Gaza must be done through legitimate Palestinian institutions,” the source said. “Arabs will not be agreeing to Netanyahu’s policies nor clean his mess.”
Lapid: PM proposing more dead hostages, fallen soldiers
Opposition Leader Yair Lapid decried Netanyahu’s comments Thursday, saying in a statement: “What Netanyahu is proposing is another war, more dead hostages, more [fallen soldiers] and tens of billions of shekels of taxpayer money that will be poured into the delusions of [National Security Minister] Itamar Ben Gvir and [Finance Minister Bezalel] Smotrich.”
The Netanyahu-backed Gaza occupation plan would reportedly begin with taking over Gaza City, in the north of the Strip, as well as camps in the central Strip, driving around half of the enclave’s population southward toward the Mawasi humanitarian zone.
Despite a few ministers potentially opposed to the plan, reports have said Netanyahu will likely secure a majority within the high-level security cabinet to support it.
The Israel Defense Forces brass are said to be against the plan, with IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir reportedly warning that “occupying the Strip will drag Israel into a black hole.”
Some hostage families have also sounded an alarm, noting that expanded operations would put the surviving captives in jeopardy.

Israelis attend a protest calling for the end of the war in Gaza and the release of all Israeli hostages, in Jerusalem where Netanyahu convened the war cabinet, August 07, 2025. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
The ongoing war in Gaza started with the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, massacre, in which some 5,600 terrorists invaded Israel, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages to the enclave.
The Hamas-run Gaza health ministry says more than 60,000 people in the Strip have been killed or are presumed dead in the fighting so far, though the toll cannot be verified and does not differentiate between civilians and fighters. Israel says it has killed some 20,000 combatants in battle as of January and another 1,600 terrorists inside Israel during the October 7 onslaught.
Israel has said it seeks to minimize civilian fatalities and stresses that Hamas uses Gaza’s civilians as human shields, fighting from civilian areas including homes, hospitals, schools and mosques.
Israel’s toll in the ground offensive against Hamas in Gaza and in military operations along the border with the Strip stands at 459. The toll includes two police officers and three Defense Ministry civilian contractors.
Top Stories
Craig Jones puts Chael Sonnen to sleep twice in CJI 2 superfight

Chael Sonnen stepped in as a late replacement for Gable Steveson at Sunday night’s Craig Jones Invitational 2 in Las Vegas and did his best to survive against Craig Jones.
In a match scheduled for three five-minute rounds, Sonnen managed to get tapped twice with the same move.
A former UFC middleweight and light heavyweight title challenger, Sonnen immediately took Jones to the ground to find himself locked in a buggy choke. The choke was tight, and Sonnen apparently went to sleep.
Sonnen regained his senses, and both athletes agreed to go at it again. Sonnen took Jones down again, going for a leg lock with no real danger to a grappler of Jones’ caliber. The CJI founder against attacked with the buggy choke, again having Sonnen go lights out.
McCarthy couldn’t help but laugh as Sonnen tried to make it best three out of five — and the crowd chanted to get the two go at it again —, but the referee called the end of the contest.
The official result was read as Jones being victorious via double buggy choke.
Watch the second finish below.
Top Stories
Liverpool agrees to British-record deal for Alexander Isak, sources say

Liverpool have agreed to a British-record deal to sign striker Alexander Isak from Newcastle United, sources told ESPN.
The Premier League champions have had a £125M bid accepted to sign the Sweden international, who is expected to undergo a medical ahead of Monday’s transfer deadline.
It brings an end to one of the summer’s most-protracted transfer sagas, with Isak having spent more than a month agitating for a move away from Newcastle. The 25-year-old did not join the club on their preseason tour of the Far East and has not featured for Eddie Howe’s side this season.
He also released a sensational statement earlier this month in which he claimed promises had been “broken” by the Newcastle hierarchy and insisted a move this summer would be in the best interests of all parties.
Isak is now set to become the most expensive signing in Premier League history, surpassing Chelsea’s Moisés Caicedo who joined the London club for £115M from Brighton & Hove Albion in the summer of 2023. It marks the second time this summer that Liverpool have broken their transfer record, with Arne Slot’s side having committed spending an initial £100M (plus a potential £16M in add-ons) to sign Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen in June.
Top Stories
Donald Trump as the wildcard and other takeaways for India-China relationship

Vikas PandeyIndia editor and
Stephen McdonellChina correspondent

The view from India
Just a few months ago, the armed forces of India and Pakistan were locked in a brief but deadly conflict.
The conflict indirectly involved a third nation – China. Pakistan’s armed forces heavily used China-made equipment, including fighter jets and radar systems.
A senior army officer in Delhi said Beijing also provided “live inputs” to Pakistan on Indian positions.
India didn’t take a public stand against China, but this left many asking if Delhi should continue on the path of normalising relations with Beijing.
Less than six months later, peace talks between the two Asian giants have been turbocharged by decisions taken thousands of miles away in Washington DC.
The Trump administration has imposed 50% tariffs on Indian imports, saying Delhi was being punished for its refusal to stop buying oil from Russia.
Delhi had two clear choices after this stunning onslaught from a trusted ally.
The first was to cave in and stop buying Russian oil. But it has refused to do so, largely because Russia is an “all-weather” ally and giving into pressure doesn’t suit Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s strongman image.
The second was to stand firm and seek other opportunities and India appears to have to chosen this option for now.
It’s also pragmatic to look no further when your neighbour is the world’s second-largest economy and a global manufacturing powerhouse.
It was in this context, that Modi met Chinese President Xi Jinping in Tianjin over the weekend.
Statements from the two sides were not heavy on details, though they promised to work through their differences to benefit their collective population of 2.8 billion people.
The immediate takeaway from the meeting was the resumption of direct flights between the two countries and making the process of issuing visas simpler.
But beyond the promise of “the elephant and the dragon” coming together, the two countries still have major roadblocks to clear before they are able to engage meaningfully.
Their first challenge comes from their immediate history.
Modi has invested personally in the India-China relationship since coming to power in 2014, visiting the neighbouring country five times until 2018.
But the 2020 border clash put brakes on this momentum and it has taken seven long years for Modi to visit China again.
The key to making further progress will depend on how the two countries deal with their border issues.
Tens of thousands of troops from both countries are still deployed at their contested borders – though there are ongoing talks between their civilian and military leaders to ease the situation.

Both Chinese and Indian readouts after the meeting this weekend talked about maintaining peace at the border and “not turning their differences into disputes”.
For India, there is the issue of a burgeoning trade deficit with China, amounting to more than $99bn (£73bn).
Both countries still have high tariffs and duties against each other in many sectors.
Beijing would want India to open its market of 1.4 billion people to Chinese products, but Delhi would be wary of doing that without addressing the deficit.
The outreach to China, which started with Modi meeting Xi in Kazan last year, may have been supercharged by Trump tariffs, but ground realities for India remain unchanged.
The Modi-Xi meeting is being seen as part of India’s policy of “strategic autonomy” but it will also cause more geopolitical challenges for Delhi.
India is due to host the Quad (which includes Japan, Australia and the US) summit later this year. The forum was largely seen as a challenge to China’s dominance in the Indo-Pacific region.
It’s not clear if Trump will attend, but if he does and says something against China, it will immediately test the renewed synergy between Delhi and Beijing.
Delhi is also part of several other multilateral forums that are perceived as anti-China and anti-Russia.
How Delhi plays its strategic autonomy in the next few months will very much influence the direction India-China ties take.
For now, it’s clear that India-US ties are at an all-time low. A Trump aide recently called the Russia-Ukraine conflict “Modi’s war”.
Delhi has also consistently denied that Trump played any role in the ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May – this has become a constant irritant for the US president.
Despite this, India has refrained from imposing retaliatory tariffs against the US and has left the door ajar for further negotiations. After all, the US is India’s biggest trading partner.
Will going closer to China help India’s negotiations with the US or will it have the opposite impact?
This is the question that will likely dominate geopolitical discussions in Delhi and beyond in the coming months.

The view from China
When Xi Jinping met Narendra Modi he used what has become his favourite catchphrase for China-India relations: “The dragon and the elephant should come together”.
During “this period of transformation,” he added that it was vital for the world’s most populous nations to be friends and good neighbours.
In a case of spectacular timing, Prime Minister Modi’s visit has coincided with Donald Trump’s tariffs of up to 50% on India exports to the US.
This represents quite a hit on the country’s economy so New Delhi would be looking around for other business partners.
Look no further than right here, Xi may well say, as his administration attempts to rebuild from the wreckage of China-India relations following years of tension between the two.
And, if their official readouts are anything to go by, Modi’s attendance at the Tianjin Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation seems to have paid off.
His published comments to Xi were much more specific than the those coming the other way.
There is now a very good window for Beijing and New Delhi to repair their strained relationship.
China’s leader knows that Donald Trump’s tariff onslaught is pushing India away from the United States and that this great economic rival needs other partnerships.
Considerable obstacles remain.
They include China’s backing of India’s key rival Pakistan; interaction of all types has been in the doldrums; angry rhetoric from both governments (over many years) has created a climate of suspicion between the Asian heavyweights and their high-mountain border dispute has stirred nationalist sentiment on both sides of the frontier.
However, with the latter of these, this meeting would appear to confirm that pressure has already eased.
Last Thursday China’s Defence Ministry spokesman was talking up the success of discussions between the representatives of China and India aimed at stopping the clashes along their disputed border.
He spoke of “win-win cooperation” and celebrating the 75th anniversary of ties between the two nations.
Xi also knows that the symbolism of having Modi in China right now is considerable, that images of them shaking hands and standing side-by-by side – as the Trump tariffs on India kick in – can be a powerful propaganda tool which is made even more significant by the fact that this is a multilateral gathering.
The two will not only be joined by Vladimir Putin but by the other SCO governments like Turkey (a member of Nato), Saudi Arabia (a key US ally), Iran (a key enemy of the US) as well as Qatar, Egypt and Pakistan.
And all of this in the days before Beijing holds a massive display of military might with a parade through the heart of the capital.
-
Tools & Platforms3 weeks ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Business3 days ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Ethics & Policy1 month ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences3 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers2 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Funding & Business2 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Education2 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Mergers & Acquisitions2 months ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi