Connect with us

Top Stories

Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over Epstein claim

Published

on


First Lady Melania Trump has threatened to sue Hunter Biden for more than $1bn after he claimed she was introduced to her husband by sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Lawyers acting on behalf of the first lady, who married US President Donald Trump in 2005, described the claim as “false, disparaging, defamatory and inflammatory”.

Biden, son of former US President Joe Biden, made the comments during an interview earlier this month, in which he strongly criticised the president’s former ties to Epstein.

Donald Trump was a friend of Epstein, but has said the pair fell out in the early 2000s because the financier had poached employees who worked at the spa in Trump’s Florida golf club.

A letter from the first lady’s lawyers and addressed to an attorney for Hunter Biden demands he retract the claim and apologise, or face legal action for “over $1bn in damages”.

It says the first lady has suffered “overwhelming financial and reputational harm” because of the claim he repeated.

It also accuses the youngest Biden son of having a “vast history of trading on the names of others”, and repeating the claim “to draw attention to yourself”.

During a wide-ranging interview with filmmaker Andrew Callaghan published earlier this month, Hunter Biden claimed unreleased documents relating to Epstein would “implicate” President Trump.

He said: “Epstein introduced Melania to Trump – the connections are so wide and deep.” The first lady’s legal letter notes the claim was partially attributed to Michael Wolff, a journalist who authored a critical biography of the president.

In a recent interview with US outlet the Daily Beast, Wolff reportedly claimed that the first lady was known to an associate of Epstein and Trump when she met her now-husband.

The outlet later retracted the story after receiving a letter from the first lady’s attorney that challenged the contents and framing of the story.

There is no evidence the pair were introduced to each other by Epstein, who took his own life in prison while awaiting trial in 2019.

In the first lady’s legal letter, Hunter Biden is accused of relying on a since-removed article as the basis of his claims, which it describes as “false and defamatory”.

A message on the archived version of the Daily Beast online story reads: “After this story was published, The Beast received a letter from First Lady Melania Trump’s attorney challenging the headline and framing of the article.

“After reviewing the matter, the Beast has taken down the article and apologizes for any confusion or misunderstanding.”

Asked about the legal threat, the first lady’s lawyer, Alejandro Brito, referred BBC News to a statement issued by her aide, Nick Clemens.

It read: “First Lady Melania Trump’s attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods.”

A January 2016 profile by Harper’s Bazaar reported the first lady met her husband in November 1998, at a party hosted by the founder of a modelling agency.

Melania Trump, 55, told the publication she declined to give him her phone number because he was “with a date”.

The profile said Trump had recently separated from his second wife, Marla Maples, whom he divorced in 1999. He was previously married to Ivana Trump between 1977 and 1990.

The BBC has contacted Hunter Biden’s attorney.

The legal letter comes after weeks of pressure on the White House to release the so-called Epstein files, previously undisclosed documents relating to the criminal investigation against the convicted paedophile.

Before being re-elected, Trump said he would release the records if he returned to office, but the FBI and justice department said in July that no “incriminating” client list of Epstein associates existed.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Stories

‘Someone needs to answer for what happened’: Lisbon reacts to streetcar crash that killed 16 | Portugal

Published

on


António Azevedo was in central Lisbon early on Wednesday evening, waiting to gather enough tourists for a ride in his tuk-tuk, when he heard what sounded like dozens of glass containers being dropped into rubbish trucks.

The driver looked around Restauradores Square but saw no trucks, only smoke rising from the lower station of the Elevador da Glória funicular railway, 100 metres from where his vehicle was parked.

Azevedo and other local business owners dashed to the scene to find that one of the Glória trams had derailed and crashed into a building in Avenida da Liberdade, Lisbon’s main artery.

Shocked, disoriented and unsure of what to do amid all the screaming and crying, the helpers began picking up metal pieces from the ground, wondering if they should try to lift what remained of the car’s main structure in case survivors were trapped beneath it.

Police officers inspect the wreckage of the derailed streetcar . Photograph: Armando França/AP

One fellow rescuer passed a bleeding young boy to Azevedo, who held him as he cried for his father. Soon after, police and firefighters arrived at the scene and ordered Azevedo and the others not to touch or move anything.

“I remember looking around – the crying and the screaming gave way to complete silence,” said the 45-year-old driver. “There was a mountain of bodies that were not asking for help. They no longer moved; some were torn apart. I had never seen anything like it.”

Mohammad Farid rushed down from his souvenir store in Restauradores Square to help. But for many, it was already too late.

“We wanted to rescue people, to save lives,” Farid said. “But no one was asking for help because they were dead. They were dead in seconds.”

By Thursday morning, the scene of the accident – in which 16 people died and 21 were injured – was filled with flowers and candles to honour the dead and mark the national day of mourning declared by the Portuguese government.

Onlookers stand behind a police line, taking photographs of the wreckage on their phones. Photograph: Patrícia de Melo Moreira/AFP/Getty Images

The list of people caught up in the disaster reflected its international dimension. As well as Portuguese citizens, those being treated in hospital included people from Canada, Cape Verde, France, Germany, Italy, Morocco, South Korea, Spain and Switzerland. Prosecutors said on Thursday evening that the dead included five Portuguese citizens, two Koreans and one Swiss national.

A group of local people standing close by the site were discussing what could have caused the tragedy. In the 1970s, Argentina Pereira, now 80, used to work in the Suisso Atlântico Hotel in Rua da Glória, where the tram derailed.

She talked of the strain the funicular had been under since Lisbon began to establish itself as one of Europe’s biggest tourist magnets over the past decade.

“I used to take the funicular four times a day [in the 1970s],” she said. “It was a beautiful time, and a different time. Now they allow more than 40 people aboard, but back then, no more than 20 people could travel at the same time. I think 40 is probably too much, and if they want it that way, they should do periodic inspections every two weeks.”

A graphic showing how Lisbon’s Elevador da Glória works, with overhead electric cables powering the two cars, while electric motors on each axle drive the wheels

Azevedo also felt the tragedy should lead to increased checks.

“I think that cities that receive a lot of tourists must guarantee high safety [standards] with this kind of infrastructure,” he said. “This is old infrastructure, and someone needs to answer for what happened.”

Although Carris, the municipal public transport company that operates the service, said “all maintenance protocols” had been carried out – including daily inspections and monthly and weekly service programmes – some visitors to Lisbon said they had been put off by the appearance of the funicular.

John Heron, a 75-year-old Australian who was on holiday in the Portuguese capital with his wife, Brenda, said he had thought the trams looked “dodgy” when he spotted them from the top of the hill of Rua da Glória a few days before the accident.

Tourists approach the wreckage of the derailed streetcar Photograph: Miguel A Lopes/EPA

“In Australia, we have very high-quality regulation systems, and I am not so sure the same is true here in Portugal and for a lot of older infrastructures in Europe,” he said. “When I first saw the Glória funicular, it looked very unsafe, but I am not an engineer; it was just a feeling. When I saw the news, I thought, ‘Lucky we ended up staying at the hotel yesterday afternoon, or who knows if we would have ended up deciding to take the ride’.”

Others were also counting their blessings. Cristián Morgado, a 31-year-old tourist from neighbouring Spain, had been planning to ride the route on Wednesday afternoon with his partner, Soraya Navarro. In the end, they decided to do it in the morning.

“Since we saw what happened, we can’t stop thinking that it could have been us if we hadn’t changed our minds,” said Navarro, 30.

Despite Wednesday’s crash, which Portugal’s prime minister, Luís Montenegro, described as “one of the biggest tragedies in our recent history”, Morgado doubts tourists will be put off from visiting Lisbon.

Onlookers watch as police inspect the wreckage of the derailed funicular Photograph: Horacio Villalobos/Getty Images

“I don’t think this will affect tourism much,” he said. “Spain has a similar situation with overtourism, and now we are having a serious issue with pickpocketing, and foreigners know and that hasn’t stopped them.”

In a few weeks, he said, foreigners would probably have forgotten about all this. “Portuguese people won’t, but tourists will.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Lululemon (LULU) Q2 2025 earnings

Published

on


Sign at the entrance to the Lululemon store in Midtown Manhattan.

Erik Mcgregor | Lightrocket | Getty Images

Lululemon shares plunged in extended trading Thursday after the company gave a much worse than expected full-year outlook.

The company topped second-quarter earnings estimates but slightly missed revenue expectations. But it said it expected tariffs to hit its full-year profits by $240 million.

Lululemon said it expects full fiscal year earnings of $12.77 to $12.97 per share, well below Wall Street estimates of $14.45 per share. It also anticipates full-year revenue of $10.85 billion to $11 billion, compared with Wall Street expectations of $11.18 billion.

“We are facing yet another shift today within the industry related to tariffs and the cost of doing business,” CEO Calvin McDonald said on a call with analysts. “The increased rates and removal of the de minimis provisions have played a large part in our guidance reduction for the year.”

Here’s how the company did for its second quarter compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

  • Earnings per share: $3.10 vs. $2.88 expected
  • Revenue: $2.53 billion vs. $2.54 billion expected

Shares of the company sank more than 10% after the bell Thursday. The stock is down more than 45% this year.

Programming note: Lululemon CEO Calvin McDonald will be interviewed exclusively on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” on Friday.

The company reported second-quarter net income of $370.9 million, or $3.10 per share, compared to $392.92 million, or $3.15 per share, in the year-ago period. Gross margin decreased 1.1 percentage points to 58.5%, and operating margin decreased 210 basis points to 20.7%.

Same-store sales in the Americas were down 4%. Overall comparable sales increased just 1% compared to Wall Street estimates of 2.2%. Lululemon said it added 14 net new stores during the second quarter, bringing its total to 784 stores.

It projects third-quarter revenues will be between $2.47 billion and $2.50 billion compared to Wall Street estimates of $2.57 billion. The company said it expects earnings per share in the next quarter to be between $2.18 and $2.23 per share, compared to an estimate of $2.93 per share.

McDonald said on the Thursday call that he believes the company has let its product lifecycles “run too long,” particularly in its lounge and social categories.

“We have become too predictable within our casual offerings and missed opportunities to create new trends,” he said.

“Our lounge and social product offerings have become stale and have not been resonating with guests,” McDonald added.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

The new Street Fighter movie Hadokens into theaters in October 2026

Published

on


The new Street Fighter movie, which has been in the works since 2023, now has a cast and a release date. The film hits theaters on October 16th, 2026, and the cast includes some big names like Jason Momoa, 50 Cent, Orville Peck, and Eric André, according to a series of posts from an X account for the movie.

Here is the cast revealed in those posts:

The Hollywood Reporter also shared the film’s logline:

Set in 1993, estranged Street Fighters Ryu (Andrew Koji) and Ken Masters (Noah Centineo) are thrown back into combat when the mysterious Chun-Li (Callina Liang) recruits them for the next World Warrior Tournament: a brutal clash of fists, fate, and fury. But behind this battle royale lies a deadly conspiracy that forces them to face off against each other and the demons of their past. And if they don’t, it’s GAME OVER!



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending