Connect with us

Top Stories

Lithium may help protect aginc brains from Alzheimer’s disease, new animal research shows

Published

on


In a major new finding almost a decade in the making, researchers at Harvard Medical School say they’ve found a key that may unlock many of the mysteries of Alzheimer’s disease and brain aging — the humble metal lithium.

Lithium is best known to medicine as a mood stabilizer given to people who have bipolar disorder and depression. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1970, but it was used by doctors to treat mood disorders for nearly a century beforehand.

Now, for the first time, researchers have shown that lithium is naturally present in the body in tiny amounts and that cells require it to function normally — much like vitamin C or iron. It also appears to play a critical role in maintaining brain health.

In a series of experiments reported Wednesday in the journal Nature, researchers at Harvard and Rush universities found that depleting lithium in the diet of normal mice caused their brains to develop inflammation and changes associated with accelerated aging.

In mice that were specially bred to develop the same kinds of brain changes as humans with Alzheimer’s disease, a low-lithium diet revved the buildup of sticky proteins that form plaques and tangles in the brains that are hallmarks of the disease. It also sped up memory loss.

Maintaining normal lithium levels in mice as they aged, however, protected them from brain changes associated with Alzheimer’s.

If further research supports the findings, it could open the door to new treatments and diagnostic tests for Alzheimer’s, which affects an estimated 6.7 million older adults in the United States, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The research provides a unifying theory that helps explain so many of the puzzle pieces scientists have been trying to fit together for decades.

“It is a potential candidate for a common mechanism leading to the multisystem degeneration of the brain that precedes dementia,” said Dr. Bruce Yankner, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, who led the study. “It will take a lot more science to determine whether this is a common pathway… or one of several pathways,” to Alzheimer’s, he added. “The data are very intriguing.”

In an editorial published in Nature, Dr. Ashley Bush, a neuroscientist who directs the Melbourne Dementia Research Center at the University of Melbourne in Australia, said the researchers “present compelling evidence that lithium does in fact have a physiological role and that normal aging might impair the regulation of lithium levels in the brain.” He was not involved in the study.

Close examination of human and animal brain tissues, along with genetic investigations in the study, found the mechanism that appears to be at play: Beta amyloid plaques — the sticky deposits that gum up the brains of Alzheimer’s patients — bind to lithium and hold it, including the type that’s normally present in the body, as well as the commonly prescribed form. This binding depletes lithium available for nearby cells, including important scavengers known as microglia.

When the brain is healthy and functioning normally, microglia are waste managers, clearing away beta amyloid before it can accumulate and can cause harm. In the team’s experiments, microglia from the brains of lithium-deficient mice showed a reduced ability to sweep away and break down beta amyloid.

Yankner believes this creates a downward spiral. The accumulation of beta amyloid soaks up more and more lithium, further crippling the brain’s ability to clear it away.

He and his colleagues tested different lithium compounds and found one — lithium orotate — that doesn’t bind to amyloid beta.

When they gave lithium orotate to mice with signs of Alzheimer’s in their brains, these changes reversed: Beta amyloid plaques and tangles of tau that were choking the memory centers of the brain were reduced. Mice treated with lithium were once again able to navigate mazes and learn to identify new objects, whereas those who got placebos showed no change in their memory and thinking deficits.

In its natural form, lithium is an element, a soft, silvery-white metal that readily combines with other elements to form compounds and salts. It’s naturally present in the environment, including in food and water.

Scientists have never fully known how it works to improve mood — only that it does. The original formula for 7Up soda included lithium — it was called 7Up Lithiated Lemon Soda — and touted as a hangover cure and mood lifter “for hospital or home use.” Some hot springs known to contain mineral water brimming with lithium became sought out wellness destinations for their curative powers.

Still, people who take prescription doses of lithium — which were much higher than the doses used in the new study — can sometimes develop thyroid or kidney toxicity.

Tests of the mice given low doses of lithium orotate showed no signs of damage.

That’s encouraging, Yankner said, but it doesn’t mean people should try to take lithium supplements on their own.

“A mouse is not a human. Nobody should take anything based just on mouse studies,” Yankner said.

“The lithium treatment data we have is in mice, and it needs to be replicated in humans. We need to find the right dose in humans,” he added.

The normal amounts of lithium in our bodies, and the concentrations given to the mice, are small — about 1,000 times lower than doses given to treat bipolar disorder, Yankner notes.

Yankner said he hoped toxicity trials of lithium salts would start soon. Neither he nor any of his co-authors have a financial interest in the outcome of the research, he said.

The National Institutes of Health was the major funder of the study, along with grants from private foundations.

“NIH support was absolutely critical for this work,” Yankner said.

The new research corroborates earlier studies hinting that lithium might be important for Alzheimer’s. A large Danish study published in 2017 found people with higher levels of lithium in their drinking water were less likely to be diagnosed with dementia compared with those whose tap water contained naturally lower lithium levels. Another large study published in 2022 from the United Kingdom found that people prescribed lithium were about half as likely has those in a control group to be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, suggesting a protective effect of the drug.

But lithium’s use in psychiatry caused it to become type cast as therapeutic, Yankner said. No one realized it might be important to the body’s normal physiology.

That happened in part because the amounts of lithium that typically circulate in the body are so small, they couldn’t be quantified until recently. Yankner and his team had to adapt new technology to measure it.

In the first stage of the research, the scientists tested the brain tissue and blood of older patients collected by the brain bank at Rush University for trace levels of 27 metals. Some of the patients had no history of memory trouble, while others had early memory decline and pronounced Alzheimer’s. While there was no change in the levels of most metals they measured, lithium was an exception. Lithium levels were consistently lower in patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s compared to those with normal brain function. The brains of patients Alzheimer’s disease also showed increased levels of zinc and decreased levels of copper, something scientists had observed before.

Consistently finding lower lithium levels in the brains of people with memory loss amounted to a smoking gun, Yankner said.

“At first, frankly, we were skeptical of the result because it wasn’t expected,” said Yankner.

But it held up even when they checked samples from other brain banks at Massachusetts General Hospital, Duke and Washington universities.

“We wanted to know whether this drop in lithium was biologically meaningful, so we devised an experimental protocol where we could take lithium selectively out of the diet of mice and see what happens,” Yankner said.

When they fed the mice a low-lithium diet, simply dropping their natural levels by 50%, their brains rapidly developed features of Alzheimer’s.

“The neurons started to degenerate. The immune cells in the brain went wild in terms of increased inflammation and worse maintenance function of the neurons around them, and it looked more like an advanced Alzheimer patient,” Yankner said.

The team also found the gene expression profiles of lithium-deficient mice and people who had Alzheimer’s disease looked very similar.

The researchers then started to look at how this drop in lithium might occur. Yankner said in the earliest stages there’s a decrease in the uptake of lithium in the brain from the blood. They don’t yet know exactly how or why it happens, but it’s likely to be from a variety of things including reduced dietary intake, as well as genetic and environmental factors.

The major source of lithium for most people is their diet. Some of the foods that have the most lithium are leafy green vegetables, nuts, legumes and some spices like turmeric and cumin. Some mineral waters are also rich sources.

In other words, Yankner said, a lot of the foods that have already proven to be healthy and reduce a person’s risk of dementia may be beneficial because of their lithium content.

“You know, oftentimes one finds in science that things may have an effect, and you think you know exactly why, but then subsequently turn out to be completely wrong about why,” he said.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Stories

Prelim Results | Noche UFC – ufc.com

Published

on


  1. Prelim Results | Noche UFC  ufc.com
  2. Expert picks, best bets: Will Silva end the Fighting Nerds’ losing streak at Noche UFC?  ESPN
  3. Noche UFC predictions, odds, full card picks: Can Diego Lopes vs. Jean Silva steal the weekend?  Yahoo Sports
  4. LIVE! Noche UFC Results: Lopes vs. Silva  MMA Fighting
  5. Live Now! Noche UFC ‘Lopes vs. Silva’ Play-by-Play, Results & Round Scoring  Sherdog



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Clemson Tigers vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Live Score and Stats – September 13, 2025 Gametracker

Published

on






Clemson Tigers vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Live Score and Stats – September 13, 2025 Gametracker – CBSSports.com






















site: media | arena: collegefootball | pageType: stories |
section: | slug: | sport: collegefootball | route: gametracker |
6-keys: media/spln/collegefootball/reg/free/gamecenter_recaps





Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Wisconsin Football: 3 quick takeaways from the 38-14 loss to Alabama

Published

on


The Wisconsin Badgers had their first big test of the season, and it was a major disappointment on Saturday, as they lost 38-14 to the No. 19 Alabama Crimson Tide at Bryant-Denny Stadium.

Wisconsin was shut out in the first half and struggled throughout the afternoon defensively, giving up five straight touchdown drives and six consecutive scores overall. Overall, they conjured up just 209 yards of offense, and now fall to 2-1 on the season with conference play coming up next week.

Here are three quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s 38-14 loss to Alabama.

The Badgers constantly shot themselves in the foot early in Saturday’s game, starting from the opening drive.

Wisconsin went three-and-out to start the game, as an offensive pass interference penalty on third down wiped out a potential conversion, forcing the Badgers to punt after a third & long instead.

Getting great field position on the ensuing drive, Wisconsin immediately turned it over on a poor decision from quarterback Danny O’Neil. Targeting Vinny Anthony on a curl route, O’Neil just didn’t see safety Bray Hubbard in the flat in zone coverage, throwing the ball right at him for an interception.

Back-to-back sacks on second and third down killed their next drive, while a 15-yard penalty by left guard Joe Brunner near midfield killed Wisconsin’s following drive.

It seemed that Wisconsin would have a mental error, execution issue, or a combination of both, drive after drive, for the first half, leading to a scoreless 30 minutes.

Down 21-0 and in need of a serious spark, the Badgers had an opportunity for a two-minute drill with 45 seconds left in the half. It made sense to be aggressive, given how all the momentum had shifted to Alabama’s side and given that the Crimson Tide would start the second half with the ball. But, Wisconsin just ran the clock out, and was killed by a touchdown on the first play coming out of the half defensively.

In the second half, the Badgers finally got on the board with a Vinny Anthony kick return for a touchdown. And, they nearly reached the red zone on their first offensive drive with an 11-play drive. But, on 2nd & 6 at the Alabama 21-yard line, quarterback Danny O’Neil threw his second interception to safety Bray Hubbard. O’Neil was targeting tight end Lance Mason, who was jammed by Hubbard at the top of his stem and never got open. But, the quarterback threw the pass anyway, staring his tight end down and throwing his second pick of the day.

It was a rough day for the Badgers offense. There’s no way to put it. Some of the creativity and the vision were there, but Wisconsin just didn’t run the ball well enough, and never got the chance to commit to the run.

After recording 17 rushing yards in the first half last weekend against Middle Tennessee, Wisconsin had 15 rushing yards in the first half on Saturday. On designed runs (not including sacks/scrambles), the Badgers rushed for just 26 yards on eight carries.

Wisconsin is going to need to find some consistency on the ground if it’s going to be a successful offense in 2025. That starts with the offensive line, which is a clear work-in-progress at the moment with the youth and shuffling in the group.

At the moment, it’s also clear that the Badgers can’t run the full scope of their offense with O’Neil under center, especially their play-action stuff. The quarterback is still working on improving his processing speed and getting rid of the ball quickly. But, he’s also struggling to play behind a leaky offensive line that allows too much pressure.

Hopefully, the Badgers will get Billy Edwards back next week against the Maryland Terrapins. But, they’re going to need to improve the run game and get more consistency up front at the line of scrimmage.

It was a day to forget for the Badgers defense. After a 4th & 2 stop on their opening drive, Alabama scored on six straight drives, including five consecutive touchdowns.

The Crimson Tide especially had their way in the air, where Ty Simpson was automatic, throwing for 382 yards on 24/29 passing. If the Badgers were in man coverage, they couldn’t get much pressure on the quarterback, and receivers were consistently beating Wisconsin cornerbacks.

If the Badgers went to zone, Simpson took advantage of Wisconsin’s linebackers and soft zones, making throws between windows, in the intermediate part of the field, and at the sticks to move the chains.

Ultimately, Wisconsin was manhandled at the line of scrimmage. They couldn’t generate much push rushing the passer, and Alabama even had quality success running the ball. But, the Badgers just couldn’t adjust at all.

As I mentioned in this week’s preview, Wisconsin’s defense has required quite a lot from its secondary to hold up in coverage this season. They couldn’t keep up on Saturday, and it didn’t help that Simpson had clean pockets for much of the afternoon.

As the second half went along, Wisconsin’s defense was clearly tired and the effort level diminished, which led to even more explosive plays for the Crimson Tide.

Defensive coordinator Mike Tressel is going to need to figure things out with this group and find a way to make in-game adjustments. Because Saturday’s game was embarrassing on all fronts defensively.

Wisconsin has had an issue with slow starts under Luke Fickell.

After the head coach stressed the importance of playing better in the first half last Saturday, the Badgers struggled to start fast yet again.

Now, it wasn’t all bad for the Badgers. They had a fourth-down stop and fought hard on their second defensive drive, albeit still giving up a touchdown.

But, Wisconsin continued to make mental errors that you absolutely cannot make against an opponent of Alabama’s caliber. They had a (controversial?) offensive pass interference that killed their first drive. Danny O’Neil had a poor interception that killed their second drive. And sacks and penalties hurt their chances for the rest of the first half.

After that first drive defensively, Wisconsin proceeded to give up five straight touchdown drives, including three in the first half.

Whether it’s an execution issue, a preparation issue, an effort issue, or a combination of certain factors, Wisconsin continues to dig itself into holes early in games, making it tougher for them to be competitive, especially against tougher opponents.

0 Comments



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending