Connect with us

Top Stories

Kennedy vaccines lawsuit: Doctors and public health organizations sue over policy change

Published

on


NEW YORK (AP) — A coalition of doctors’ groups and public health organizations sued the U.S. government on Monday over the decision to stop recommending COVID-19 vaccinations for most children and pregnant women.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Public Health Association and four other groups — along with an unnamed pregnant doctor who works in a hospital — filed the lawsuit in federal court in Boston.

U.S. health officials, following infectious disease experts’ guidance, previously had urged annual COVID-19 shots for all Americans ages 6 months and older. But in late May, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced he was removing COVID-19 shots from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.

Many health experts decried the move as confusing and accused Kennedy of disregarding the scientific review process that has been in place for decades — in which experts publicly review current medical evidence and hash out the pros and cons of policy changes.

The new lawsuit repeats those concerns, alleging that Kennedy and other political appointees at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have flouted federal procedures and systematically attempted to mislead the public.

The lawsuit also notes recent changes to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Kennedy, a leading antivaccine activist before becoming the nation’s top health official, fired the entire 17-member panel this month and replaced it with a group that includes several anti-vaccine voices.

Doctors say Kennedy’s actions are making their jobs harder — with some patients raising doubts about all kinds of vaccines and others worried they will lose access to shots for themselves and their children.

“This is causing uncertainty and anxiety at almost every pediatric visit that involves vaccines,” said Dr. Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

And it’s happening after U.S. pediatric flu deaths hit their highest mark in 15 years and as the nation is poised to have its worst year of measles in more than three decades, she added.

HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said Kennedy “stands by his CDC reforms.”

Also joining the suit are the American College of Physicians, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Alliance and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

The pregnant doctor, who is listed in the lawsuit as “Jane Doe,” works at a Massachusetts hospital. She had difficulty getting a COVID-19 vaccination at a pharmacy and other sites and is concerned the lack of protection will endanger her unborn child, according to the lawsuit.

The suit was filed in Boston because the unnamed doctor and some others in Massachusetts are among those have been affected by Kennedy’s change, said Richard H. Hughes IV, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs.

The state has figured repeatedly in U.S. public health history.

In 1721, some Boston leaders advocated for an early version of inoculation during a smallpox outbreak. Paul Revere was the first leader of Boston’s health commission. And a legal dispute in Cambridge led to a landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld states’ rights to compel vaccinations.

“We think it is significant and very meaningful” that the case is happening there, Hughes said.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.





Source link

Top Stories

Trump says he’ll send new weapons to Ukraine

Published

on




CNN
 — 

President Donald Trump said Monday he plans to send additional defensive weapons to Ukraine after his administration paused certain shipments last week.

“We’re going to send some more weapons. We have to – they have to be able to defend themselves,” Trump said ahead of a dinner with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.

“They’re getting hit very hard. We’re going to have to send more weapons,” Trump added. “Defensive weapons, primarily, but they’re getting hit very, very hard.”

The president’s latest remarks come after a senior White House official told CNN last week the Trump administration was pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine, including air defense missiles. The decision came after a review of military spending and American support to foreign countries that was signed off by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said at the time that the decision was made “to put America’s interests first.”

Some US officials insinuated the review of aid to Ukraine was related in part to the Pentagon’s push to focus on China and be prepared for potential future conflict in the Pacific – an issue prioritized by the Pentagon’s policy chief, Elbridge Colby.

“The Department of Defense continues to provide the President with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end. At the same time, the Department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving US forces’ readiness for Administration defense priorities,” Colby said in a statement at the time of the pause.

Russia welcomed the halt in certain shipments to Ukraine, claiming – without providing any evidence – it was made because the US did not have enough weapons.

“At President Trump’s direction, the Department of Defense will send additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace,” chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement Monday. “Our framework for POTUS to evaluate military shipments across the globe remains in effect and is integral to our America First defense priorities.”

The US has been the biggest single donor of military aid to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, supplying Ukraine with air defense systems, drones, rocket launchers, radars, tanks and anti-armor weapons, leading to concerns over dwindling US stockpiles.

Trump previously halted all shipments of military aid to Ukraine in March following a heated Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump resumed aid flows to Ukraine about a week later.

The decision to send additional weapons also comes after Trump spoke separately last week with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky. He said afterward his talk with Putin was disappointing and there was “no progress” towards a ceasefire.

Meanwhile, Zelensky in recent weeks has been pleading with Western allies to bolster his nation’s aerial defenses after intensifying Russian airborne attacks. Russia launched a record number of drones at Ukraine overnight on Friday, just hours after the Trump-Putin phone call.

Trump later Friday said the US was considering Ukraine’s request for more Patriot defense systems after a “very good” phone call with Zelensky. The Ukrainian president said on Saturday that latest conversation with Trump was the best and “most productive” he has had.

Trump on Monday reaffirmed his displeasure with the Russian leader, saying: “I’m not happy with President Putin at all.”

This story has been updated with additional information.

CNN’s Kaanita Iyer contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Fire threatened hundreds in Laguna Beach, possibly caused by fireworks

Published

on


Fireworks are the suspected cause of a brush fire that ignited in a hilly area of Laguna Beach on Monday afternoon, prompting evacuation orders for a few hundred homes, officials said.

The Rancho fire started around 2:15 p.m. near Rancho Laguna Road and Morningside Drive, according to the Laguna Beach Fire Department. Fire crews halted forward progress of the blaze at 5 p.m., at which time the fire was estimated to be four to five acres, according to department spokesperson Chip Gilmore.

Fire officials are continuing to investigate the blaze, including whether fireworks are at the root of its ignition, Laguna Beach Mayor Alex Rounaghi told The Times. No one is in custody at this time, he said.

Evacuation orders were issued for La Mirada Street, Katella Street, Summit Drive and Baja Street, and a temporary evacuation center was opened at the Community and Susi Q Center, at 380 3rd St.

With danger from the fire ebbing, evacuation orders were lifted Monday evening. Gilmore said crews would remain at the scene overnight defending properties from potential flare-ups and bolstering containment lines.

Southern California Edison, which shut off power to nearby homes when the fire began, anticipated restoring service by 9:30 p.m.

Earlier in the day, Laguna Beach Fire Chief Niko King said that four firefighting helicopters, one firefighting aircraft and multiple ground crews were deployed to combat the three-acre fire.

“We think we’ve made the right kind of progress so far. We’re not out of the woods yet, but we think we got a good handle on it,” City Manager Dave Kiff told The Times around 4:30 p.m.

Rounaghi said it appeared that no homes had been damaged thus far but urged residents to continue to heed evacuation orders.

The rush to evacuate the area led to major roads across Laguna Beach being clogged with traffic. A stretch of South Coast Highway between Broadway Street and Crown Valley Parkway was closed because of the fire. Traffic heading south was being diverted to Laguna Canyon Road, according to the city.

Kiff attributed the early success of firefighting efforts to the rapid response of mutual aid partners such as the Orange County Fire Authority and to wildfire safety improvements implemented by the city.

The Fire Department had recently thinned vegetation in the area where the fire ignited in an effort to limit the amount of available fuel for a potential wildfire, Rounaghi said. This proactive thinning is regularly completed in the city’s designated fuel modification zones.

In addition, the city has installed a special water tank in the hills where the Rancho fire is burning, Kiff said. The tank is connected to a high-pressure water line so that it can be refilled rapidly, thereby increasing the rate at which firefighting aircraft can perform water drops.

Over the last several years, the city has spent more than $25 million enacting a fire mitigation plan approved in 2019, Rounaghi said. The city recently updated that plan in the wake of the devastating Palisades and Eaton fires and is working on additional fire safety improvements.

“We know it’s not a question of if but when the next wildfire happens, and certainly today is a perfect example of that,” Rounaghi said. “So we go above and beyond in terms of preparedness.”

The Rancho fire is the latest in a series of blazes believed to be connected to fireworks.

Seven workers were killed after a fireworks warehouse exploded last week in Esparto, a rural area 30 miles northwest of Sacramento.

On Thursday, one person was killed and multiple people injured in a fireworks-related fire that engulfed four homes in Pacoima, and another person was killed in a fireworks explosion at a Simi Valley home.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Passengers at some U.S. airports no longer have to remove footwear, sources say

Published

on


Passengers at some airports across the U.S. no longer have to remove their shoes during regular preflight security checks, two sources familiar with the change confirmed to CBS News on Monday.

The change appears to be a phased approach, sources said, and the first airports where the no-shoes requirement is expiring include: Baltimore/Washington International Airport, Fort Lauderdale International Airport, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, Portland International Airport, Philadelphia International Airport and Piedmont Triad International Airport in North Carolina.

However, CBS News correspondents at Los Angeles International Airport and New York City’s LaGuardia Airport reported Monday night that they and other passengers didn’t have to take off their shoes.

Travelers with TSA PreCheck already didn’t have to remove their footwear. In order to have PreCheck, travelers must submit an application and go through a clearance process with the TSA.

The change comes amid reports that the Transportation Security Administration has let the security rule expire for fliers going through the standard TSA screening lines.

In a statement to CBS News on Monday, TSA said the agency and the Department of Homeland Security “are always exploring new and innovative ways to enhance the passenger experience and our strong security posture.”

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

and

contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending