Gareth Edwards (center; pointing) directing on the set of “Jurassic World Rebirth.”
Jasin Boland/Universal Pictures
SPOILER ALERT: This story discusses major plot points, including the ending for “Jurassic World: Rebirth,” now playing in theaters.
“Jurassic World Rebirth” could have had a very different — and tragic — ending for one of its major characters.
Directed by Gareth Edwards, the film takes place five years after the events of 2022’s “Jurassic World Dominion” and centers on a group of mercenaries (Scarlett Johansson and Mahershala Ali) and scientists (Jonathan Bailey). The crew ventures to the abandoned island Saint-Hubert, which was once home to the InGen research lab for cloning dinosaurs, on a mission to retrieve dino DNA that could lead to a cure for heart disease. Along the way, they encounter the Delgado family — a father (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), his two daughters (Luna Blaise and Audrina Miranda) and the elder girl’s boyfriend (David Iacono)— rescuing them after their sailboat gets sunk by dinosaurs in the open ocean.
And that’s just the first traumatic — albeit, thrilling — run-in with the formerly extinct, and genetically mutated, species which roam freely around the tropical locale. What follows are two more hours of close encounters of the mutant dino kind as the cast of characters races to finish the mission and get off the island alive.
In the film’s epic finale, the characters attempt to escape by boat, but come face-to-face with their most terrifying foe yet — the Distortus rex, which has already savagely chomped their rescue helicopter out of the sky. Ali’s character, Duncan, decides to create a distraction, sacrificing himself so his friends — and in particular, the young kids — will survive. He lights a flare and the D-rex chases him into the water. Then, the flare goes out.
Moments later, another flare shoots into the sky. Duncan lives! And all the survivors are rescued and return home with a new lease on life.
However, that wasn’t always the intended ending. “The draft I first read, he died,” Edwards tells Variety, explaining that, at that point, Ali had not yet signed on to the film. But, once he did board the project, Ali sent in his thoughts. “Mahershala read it, and his only main note was, ‘Can we kill him?’ I agreed with him.”
Read on as Edwards details how he and Ali were ultimately outvoted on the ending by the studio and test-screening audiences, plus all the ways “Rebirth” pays homage to maestro Steven Spielberg — from incorporating the original “Jurassic Park” score to nods to “Jaws,” and how even “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial” factors in — and whether he’s ready to take on more dinosaurs in a sequel.
Gareth Edwards (center; pointing) directing on the set of “Jurassic World Rebirth.”
Jasin Boland/Universal Pictures
The first point was the front cover. It said “written by David Koepp,” [Koepp wrote 1993’s
Jurassic Park” and its sequel, 1997’s “The Lost World.”]
I was hoping I wouldn’t like it because I wanted to have a break — I said to my girlfriend, “I want this to be an easy choice” — ideally, we’d go on holiday. But I disappeared into a room and started reading it, and I was like, “Oh, no. It’s really good.” It’s exactly the playground I want to play in as a filmmaker. There’s this sequence in there of the T-rex attacking the raft with this family in it, and that, on its own, was worth making the movie for.
It’s tricky because you want people to think you’re going to do it. You’ve walked into a family adventure movie with lots of families and their kids. So, can they and will they do this?
A lot of this was in the script, but you start to think of ingredients and ideas that could create interesting dilemmas or visuals. The second you’ve got a raft, and it flips, you think to yourself, “It could land on top of someone.” [Then, you think,] “OK, we’ve got to make that the little girl, and she’s screaming because she doesn’t know where it is.” It’s also a daylight scene. [Scary] scenes are a lot easier to make when it’s night because you can hide things. So having her trapped under the raft allowed that fear of the unknown, the thing you can’t see.
I also remember there was a conversation about the raft. The first raft they got was orange, and because of “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom,” I wanted it to be yellow. These poor guys had to search around the world and find four yellow rafts.
It flipped back and forth a couple of times. In the draft I first read, he died, and I thought, “That’s great!” We started to pursue Mahershala, and for whatever reason, it felt like, well, if we’re going to get Mahershala, we’ve got to keep him alive, right? But then Mahershala read it, and his only main note was, “Can we kill him?” I agreed, so I joined Team Mahershala and we both pushed to have him killed; the script changed back to him dying.
Whilst we were shooting, the studio said, “Look, we haven’t got time to do a pickup shoot or any reshoots. Just to be safe, get some material, just in case we need him to live.” In my mind, I know how this works; whatever we film will be in the movie, so you’ve got to be careful. I thought, “If we can do this, I want it to be the really classy version that I can live with,” so I started trying to imagine it and to picture some shots. The actors gave this amazing performance for this little section, and I really liked it.
But, when we edited the movie and did the director’s cut, I ended up sending the version that had him dying. It went well, but the studio said, “Oh, it’s great. But can we just see the version where he lives?” We hadn’t put it together, so we went back and edited that, and everyone just said, “It’s got to be that.” We did two test screenings, and the reaction to him living, everyone was a lot happier.
Mahershala Ali as Duncan Kincaid in “Jurassic World: Rebirth.”
Jasin Boland/Universal Pictures
I still wasn’t sure about it until the screening in New York. The moment where this flare appears revealing that he’s lived got this massive applause, and I felt a little tear welling in my eye. Hats off to the studio. I’m glad they made me shoot that extra little section because I think it’s probably the strongest part of the film.
I just didn’t want to feel like I was selling out by bringing him back. But if anything, I had to remind myself that there’s this film called “E.T.” where E.T. died, and then when he came back. So I kept reassuring myself: remember that movie you loved did this, it’s not a cop-out.
One of the early things Alexandre said what that we should use the theme. At the time, I was like, “I don’t know. We’re just going to experiment.” We did try a version where we didn’t have the “Jurassic” theme at all, and it felt wrong. It felt like it was missing a bit of magic dust.
Then it was a game of, “If we only play it once, where do we put it?” My problem was that I wanted it in the end credits. When it cuts to the credits, that theme begins, but it’s not really in the movie. So, I thought we can use it twice. The Titanosaur became the obvious contender because that’s where you wanted the awe and majesty. That’s also where you remember and feel it in the original, when the Brachiosaurs are at the lake. It was just trial and error.
When we recorded it, it’s one of the “take to your grave” memories. We were at Abbey Road, and I had to go to CinemaCon during the recordings. I was frustrated because I wanted to be there every day. So, I said, “OK, do me one favor. Just don’t record the “Jurassic” theme whilst I’m away. Please don’t record it. Save it until I get back.” While I was away, I heard via text that they had recorded it, and I was really sad. It was a big misunderstanding, so when I got back, I got to sit, and they did the theme. As Alexandre was conducting, Conrad Pope, the orchestrator of the original “Jurassic Park,” was there, too. You sit on these steps where The Beatles recorded all their best albums and this John Williams theme unfolded, you could feel the orchestra and how they got into this for a living because of John Williams.
Universal Pictures and Amblin Entertainment
I started reading the script, and it talks about them chasing a giant creature in the ocean. They’ve got a rifle, they’re leaning out the front of the boat to try and hit the creature, and it’s got a big fin. You start to go, “I’ve seen another film like this… It’s called ‘Jaws,’” and then you feel trapped. You go, “I don’t know how to do this sequence, and not have that iconography, that visuals of ‘Jaws’ in there.” So, it was a game of trying not to be like “Jaws.” But it was nearly impossible because that movie is obviously a masterpiece.
We tried it with scary music the entire time, and it felt like a really long sequence, so we broke it into two. We made the first half about excitement, fun and adventure, and the second half scary, and, suddenly, it really worked. Even doing that feels like “Jaws” because there’s that section where they have what you might call “happy pirate music.”
This whole job was a love letter to Steven and his early work. And it’s a very fine line between plagiarism and homage, so I was truly trying to be in the homage camp. You can’t be Steven. He’s the master at this stuff.
The honest truth is we haven’t had a single conversation with anyone about it — not the studio, not the producers, not David and not Steven. No one’s said a word. I think it’s because we all don’t want to jinx anything.
You can smell it when you watch a film like this, if everyone’s trying to make it lead to a franchise. I think it’s more when the franchise is given, right? It’s got the word “Jurassic” at the front of it. How will the world receive this movie, to the point where they want it to carry on with these characters? I personally think what the actors have brought to it is amazing. I loved what David wrote, so I think it’s all going to be OK. I’m very happy.
My girlfriend sent me a meme which said, “Gareth Edwards doing ‘Godzilla,’ ‘Star Wars’ and ‘Jurassic’ is the kind of greed they warned us about in the Bible.” I feel like I’ve had it too good, and I should just step away and let someone else have a crack at this stuff. I’ve had a very lucky few years.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
CNN
—
President Donald Trump said Monday he plans to send additional defensive weapons to Ukraine after his administration paused certain shipments last week.
“We’re going to send some more weapons. We have to – they have to be able to defend themselves,” Trump said ahead of a dinner with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.
“They’re getting hit very hard. We’re going to have to send more weapons,” Trump added. “Defensive weapons, primarily, but they’re getting hit very, very hard.”
The president’s latest remarks come after a senior White House official told CNN last week the Trump administration was pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine, including air defense missiles. The decision came after a review of military spending and American support to foreign countries that was signed off by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said at the time that the decision was made “to put America’s interests first.”
Some US officials insinuated the review of aid to Ukraine was related in part to the Pentagon’s push to focus on China and be prepared for potential future conflict in the Pacific – an issue prioritized by the Pentagon’s policy chief, Elbridge Colby.
“The Department of Defense continues to provide the President with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end. At the same time, the Department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving US forces’ readiness for Administration defense priorities,” Colby said in a statement at the time of the pause.
Russia welcomed the halt in certain shipments to Ukraine, claiming – without providing any evidence – it was made because the US did not have enough weapons.
“At President Trump’s direction, the Department of Defense will send additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace,” chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement Monday. “Our framework for POTUS to evaluate military shipments across the globe remains in effect and is integral to our America First defense priorities.”
The US has been the biggest single donor of military aid to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, supplying Ukraine with air defense systems, drones, rocket launchers, radars, tanks and anti-armor weapons, leading to concerns over dwindling US stockpiles.
Trump previously halted all shipments of military aid to Ukraine in March following a heated Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump resumed aid flows to Ukraine about a week later.
The decision to send additional weapons also comes after Trump spoke separately last week with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky. He said afterward his talk with Putin was disappointing and there was “no progress” towards a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, Zelensky in recent weeks has been pleading with Western allies to bolster his nation’s aerial defenses after intensifying Russian airborne attacks. Russia launched a record number of drones at Ukraine overnight on Friday, just hours after the Trump-Putin phone call.
Trump later Friday said the US was considering Ukraine’s request for more Patriot defense systems after a “very good” phone call with Zelensky. The Ukrainian president said on Saturday that latest conversation with Trump was the best and “most productive” he has had.
Trump on Monday reaffirmed his displeasure with the Russian leader, saying: “I’m not happy with President Putin at all.”
This story has been updated with additional information.
CNN’s Kaanita Iyer contributed to this report.
Fireworks are the suspected cause of a brush fire that ignited in a hilly area of Laguna Beach on Monday afternoon, prompting evacuation orders for a few hundred homes, officials said.
The Rancho fire started around 2:15 p.m. near Rancho Laguna Road and Morningside Drive, according to the Laguna Beach Fire Department. Fire crews halted forward progress of the blaze at 5 p.m., at which time the fire was estimated to be four to five acres, according to department spokesperson Chip Gilmore.
Fire officials are continuing to investigate the blaze, including whether fireworks are at the root of its ignition, Laguna Beach Mayor Alex Rounaghi told The Times. No one is in custody at this time, he said.
Evacuation orders were issued for La Mirada Street, Katella Street, Summit Drive and Baja Street, and a temporary evacuation center was opened at the Community and Susi Q Center, at 380 3rd St.
With danger from the fire ebbing, evacuation orders were lifted Monday evening. Gilmore said crews would remain at the scene overnight defending properties from potential flare-ups and bolstering containment lines.
Southern California Edison, which shut off power to nearby homes when the fire began, anticipated restoring service by 9:30 p.m.
Earlier in the day, Laguna Beach Fire Chief Niko King said that four firefighting helicopters, one firefighting aircraft and multiple ground crews were deployed to combat the three-acre fire.
“We think we’ve made the right kind of progress so far. We’re not out of the woods yet, but we think we got a good handle on it,” City Manager Dave Kiff told The Times around 4:30 p.m.
Rounaghi said it appeared that no homes had been damaged thus far but urged residents to continue to heed evacuation orders.
The rush to evacuate the area led to major roads across Laguna Beach being clogged with traffic. A stretch of South Coast Highway between Broadway Street and Crown Valley Parkway was closed because of the fire. Traffic heading south was being diverted to Laguna Canyon Road, according to the city.
Kiff attributed the early success of firefighting efforts to the rapid response of mutual aid partners such as the Orange County Fire Authority and to wildfire safety improvements implemented by the city.
The Fire Department had recently thinned vegetation in the area where the fire ignited in an effort to limit the amount of available fuel for a potential wildfire, Rounaghi said. This proactive thinning is regularly completed in the city’s designated fuel modification zones.
In addition, the city has installed a special water tank in the hills where the Rancho fire is burning, Kiff said. The tank is connected to a high-pressure water line so that it can be refilled rapidly, thereby increasing the rate at which firefighting aircraft can perform water drops.
Over the last several years, the city has spent more than $25 million enacting a fire mitigation plan approved in 2019, Rounaghi said. The city recently updated that plan in the wake of the devastating Palisades and Eaton fires and is working on additional fire safety improvements.
“We know it’s not a question of if but when the next wildfire happens, and certainly today is a perfect example of that,” Rounaghi said. “So we go above and beyond in terms of preparedness.”
The Rancho fire is the latest in a series of blazes believed to be connected to fireworks.
Seven workers were killed after a fireworks warehouse exploded last week in Esparto, a rural area 30 miles northwest of Sacramento.
On Thursday, one person was killed and multiple people injured in a fireworks-related fire that engulfed four homes in Pacoima, and another person was killed in a fireworks explosion at a Simi Valley home.
Passengers at some airports across the U.S. no longer have to remove their shoes during regular preflight security checks, two sources familiar with the change confirmed to CBS News on Monday.
The change appears to be a phased approach, sources said, and the first airports where the no-shoes requirement is expiring include: Baltimore/Washington International Airport, Fort Lauderdale International Airport, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, Portland International Airport, Philadelphia International Airport and Piedmont Triad International Airport in North Carolina.
However, CBS News correspondents at Los Angeles International Airport and New York City’s LaGuardia Airport reported Monday night that they and other passengers didn’t have to take off their shoes.
Travelers with TSA PreCheck already didn’t have to remove their footwear. In order to have PreCheck, travelers must submit an application and go through a clearance process with the TSA.
The change comes amid reports that the Transportation Security Administration has let the security rule expire for fliers going through the standard TSA screening lines.
In a statement to CBS News on Monday, TSA said the agency and the Department of Homeland Security “are always exploring new and innovative ways to enhance the passenger experience and our strong security posture.”
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Kris Van Cleave and
contributed to this report.
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
Astrophel Aerospace Raises ₹6.84 Crore to Build Reusable Launch Vehicle
Telangana Launches TGDeX—India’s First State‑Led AI Public Infrastructure
From chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
Ilya Sutskever Takes Over as CEO of Safe Superintelligence After Daniel Gross’s Exit