Connect with us

Top Stories

Jake Paul vs. Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis shows where boxing ends and sports entertainment begins

Published

on


Boxers of yesteryear used to dream of seeing their name across one of the oversized billboards that decorate the length of Las Vegas Boulevard, otherwise known as The Strip.

Today, the neon dims but the names Jake Paul and Gervonta Davis are still legible.

Advertisement

Their announcement to box on Nov. 14, which Paul confirmed Wednesday, is no longer a Fight Capital banner but a signpost for how far boxing has drifted from sport, and toward sports entertainment.

Since UFC and WWE merged in 2023, industry observers raised concerns that the MMA market-leader would be at risk if Vince McMahon’s playbook infected the booming combat sport.

But, in 2025, it’s not the UFC that is blurring the line of showdown and spectacle. It’s boxing.

One of the sport’s pound-for-pound stars, a thunderous puncher called “Tank” Davis, who had promised to retire after 2025, has chosen to take part in an sideshow bout with the internet sensation Jake Paul, rather than honor a legacy-defining rematch.

Advertisement

Earlier in the year “Tank” took on Lamont Roach Jr. — a super featherweight champion who dared to be great by challenging Davis at lightweight. Roach shook up the world by outworking Davis early. He landed clean combinations, and even wobbled “Tank” with a counter right uppercut in the eighth round of their March 1 fight at Barclays Center in New York City.

So stunned was Davis with Roach’s abilities that he turned his back on the fight in the ninth round, and had referee Steve Willis given a proper count, Roach would have scored one of the more monumental wins of the year.

Instead, judges awarded each man a draw.

A rematch had been tentatively planned for the summer, but Davis’ arrest on July 11 for a domestic battery incident from the prior month scuppered the do-over.

Advertisement

When the case was dismissed on Aug. 12, it paved the way to reignite talks for Davis vs. Roach 2. It would have been a meaningful fight for the 135-pound landscape, and the sport in general.

Instead, we have a fight that very few asked for, on one of the grandest stages imaginable, as Netflix readies to air the event from State Farm Arena in Atlanta to a significant global audience.

Boxing has had crossover fights before.

Notably, in 2017, there was boxing royalty Floyd Mayweather Jr. against Conor McGregor, the former two-weight UFC champion. But this didn’t actually take anything away from the sport. It didn’t hold up a division. Mayweather wasn’t a titleholder at the time. All it did was provide boxing with another date.

Paul has taken part in these kinds of events before, too, when he took on Nate Robinson on the undercard of Mike Tyson’s exhibition with Roy Jones Jr. during the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic. That show, like Mayweather vs. McGregor, didn’t hold the sport up. Again, it provided a date in the calendar when boxing was in desperate need of one due to lockdowns, and the subsequent shuttering of sports.

Advertisement

There is a holdup this time, though.

Davis is the WBA lightweight champion. He’s denied Roach, who arguably already deserved a win against him earlier this year. And he’s denied other fighters in the WBA rankings, like the No. 1-ranked contender Floyd Schofield. He’s even denied a box-office unification with WBC ruler Shakur Stevenson — a fight that fans have demanded for years.

Paul, too, could have more meaningful matchups if he wanted.

In his latest bout, he out-pointed the former middleweight champion Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. on June 28 in Anaheim — the same Southern California card in which Gilberto “Zurdo” Ramirez defeated Yuniel Doricos. Ramirez’s promoter, Oscar De La Hoya of Golden Boy Promotions, even said a fight between his cruiserweight boxer and Paul was “realistic.”

Advertisement

The bout would have provided Paul with legitimacy in boxing, if he does indeed crave that. But an injury Ramirez sustained from that fight, and a subsequent shoulder surgery, curtailed it from being discussed for the time being. An Anthony Joshua fight was also entertained by the heavyweight’s representative Eddie Hearn, and Paul had been linked to IBF cruiserweight champion Jai Opetaia as well.

Instead, we get a fight announcement designed for content, clicks and reach — one that shows it’s the sport of boxing all along, not the UFC, that was prime for WWE treatment.

And, do you want to know the sickest part?

Advertisement

I like it.

Yes, boxing traditionalists will loathe it. I’m not one of them.

Yes, this matchup delays far more meaningful fights, and it blurs the sport’s integrity.

But spectacle is a power in and of itself. This keeps boxing in the news cycle, and pushes Davis into a more mainstream audience than he’s ever been exposed to before. With the right kind of promotion and shoulder-programming, “Tank” can tap into an audience that he can leverage should he unify his WBA title with Stevenson’s WBC belt, next year. The exhibition also keeps Paul on the right track. Perhaps the plan is to challenge Ramirez for his WBC cruiserweight crown next year, too. Even an exhibition with Davis, in what would only be Paul’s 15th boxing event (13 professional fights), is a marked step up than anything the internet content creator has done before.

Advertisement

As much as it may sting purists, this is a money-spinner and an attention-grabber. And it’s already grabbed mine — because, love it or loathe it, Paul vs. Davis isn’t just an exhibition. It’s a spectacle — and the clearest mirror yet of where boxing stands. In 2025, boxing’s biggest fights aren’t for championship titles — they’re for cultural relevance.



Source link

Top Stories

MAGA Blames South Park for Charlie Kirk Assassination as Episode Pulled

Published

on


In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, some conservatives are pointing fingers at South Park for mocking the conservative thought leader in a recent episode, while Comedy Central pulled the episode from a scheduled repeat Wednesday night.

The second episode of the current season of Comedy Central’s satirical hit — titled “Got a Nut” — had Eric Cartman becoming a right-wing podcaster and spouting tropes used by Kirk, who tours college campuses debating progressive students. “Who wants to debate the master debater?” demanded Cartman, who also took on Kirk’s hairstyle and later attended a ceremony giving out “The Charlie Kirk Award for Young Masterdebaters.”

The mockery was pretty tame by South Park standards (certainly kinder than its treatment of Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem in the same episode). After the episode aired, Kirk seemed thrilled by the episode and posted a TikTok (below) reacting by calling the episode “hilarious” and noted “South Park gets this right.” The Turning Point USA founder added, “We have a good spirit about being made fun of. This is all a win. We as conservatives have thick skin, not thin skin, and you can make fun of us and it doesn’t matter.”

But after Kirk’s tragic murder at Utah Valley University while engaged in the same sort of college campus debate the episode poked fun of, some MAGA conservatives are blasting the show.

According to the New York Post, one Turning Point USA staffer posted on Telegram, “Comedy has consequences. Charlie was targeted in the culture before he was targeted in real life” and right-wing radio host Jesse Kelly told his listeners: “South Park thought it was funny to turn Charlie into a cartoon joke. Now his wife is planning a funeral.”

The Daily Beast spotted some other comments on social media: “Let’s blame South Park. Blame the media. Blame leftist rhetoric. These people hate you and want to see you dead.” And: “South Park certainly fomented the hatred necessary to get Kirk assassinated.” And: “[South Park creators] Trey Parker and Matt Stone are responsible for this.” While a popular account called Johnny MAGA dubbed South Park “monsters” for the episode.

That said, many others on the right — perhaps even the majority — were quick to note they do not blame the series. One “MAGA” labeled X account wrote, “I don’t blame South Park. They aren’t our leaders, representatives, mentors, pastors, example setters or societal caretakers. They are satire!”

Comedy Central had no immediate comment on yesterday’s scrapped repeat, and the episode was still available on Paramount+ as of Thursday morning. Pulling episodes that unintentionally intersect with a violent real-life tragedy is a common practice as a respectful effort to not to inflame or take advantage of the situation.

Given South Park has been on a tear going after President Trump and MAGA this season, and frequently pivots at the last minute to tackle current events in their episodes, it will be interesting to see what creators Parker and Stone focus on when the show returns next week amid its new biweekly rollout schedule this season.

On a Reddit thread about the episode being pulled, fans agreed not airing the episode was “the polite thing to do” while also concurring that South Park doesn’t deserve blame for the real-life violence. “Probably a smart decision, no matter your feeling on him; don’t give either side reason to exploit this,” wrote one. While another opined, “You really can’t fault them for not predicting this; I don’t think anyone could have predicted this series of events with him literally talking about gun violence as he was being shot.”

The 31-year-old Kirk built a small conservative student group into America First — one of the most influential forces in Republican politics. Kirk was speaking at a debate Wednesday hosted by his nonprofit political organization. Immediately before the shooting, Kirk was taking questions for an audience member about mass shootings and gun violence. A single shot rang out and Kirk could be seen reaching for his neck with his right hand. The gunman is still at large.

“The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead,” President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social. “No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie. He was loved and admired by ALL, especially me, and now, he is no longer with us. Melania and my Sympathies go out to his beautiful wife Erika, and family. Charlie, we love you!



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

‘South Park’ Episode Pulled From Cable But Not Paramount+

Published

on


Paramount has taken down a recent episode of South Park that mocked Charlie Kirk in the aftermath of the MAGA activist’s assassination on Wednesday – sort of.

While the “Got a Nut” episode is still available on Paramount+, it can no longer be seen in the swath of South Park reruns on Comedy Central.

As the manhunt for 31-year-old Kirk’s killer continues, despite FBI Director Kash Patel at one point yesterday saying online that a “subject” was in custody and then released, some MAGA supporters have partial pointed the finger at South Park for the tragic shooting. Paramount had no comment on the episode being pulled, but sources close to the situation say it likely is “only temporary” until the political temperature comes down.

The show, the second episode of the Trey Parker and Matt Stone created satire’s current 27th Season, was removed from being shown on the cable channel in the hours following the fatal shooting of Kirk at Utah Valley University on September 10. Originally airing on August 6, “Got a Nut,” which parodied Kirk’s Prove Me Wrong debate approach as well as ICE’s masked raids and JD Vance‘s relationship with Donald Trump, was replaced with the Season 27th opener of “Sermon on the Mount.”

RELATED: Stephen Colbert Reacts To “Abhorrent” Charlie Kirk Shooting & Condemns Political Violence

Of note, when “Got a Nut” premiered early last month, Kirk told Fox News on August 7 the episode was a “badge of honor.” That was a very similar reaction to Vice President JD Vance, who said “I finally made it” after he was slammed as leering sycophant to wannabe dictator Trump. Unlike Vance, Kirk even changed his profile pic briefly on his much watched YouTube page to that of South Park’s Eric Cartman as an homage. Kirk also gave South Park a shout out on X on August 6 with a “Not bad Cartman.”

While most of “Got a Nut” deals with fired South Park counselor  Mr. Mackey joining ICE to make his monthly bills after talking to his bank manager and a student Clyde Donovan adopting the role of a provocative right-wing podcaster to make a few bucks. As South Park’s Cartman and Donovan fight it out for who truly is the real podcasting deal, the latter receives the “Charlie Kirk Award for Young Masterdebaters.”

RELATED: Donald Trump Posts Video Message Paying Tribute To Charlie Kirk, Blames “Radical Left Political Violence” For Assassination; Suspect Still At Large

South Park returns with a new episode on September 23 on Comedy Central, and then Paramount+ the next day.

RELATED: Jeremy Clarkson Says He’s “Genuinely Frightened” To Voice His Views After Charlie Kirk’s Death



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

MSNBC fires analyst Matthew Dowd over Charlie Kirk shooting remarks | US news

Published

on


MSNBC fired senior political analyst Matthew Dowd after he suggested on air that slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s own radical rhetoric may have contributed to the shooting that killed him.

During his appearance on Katy Tur Reports, Dowd suggested that Kirk’s rhetoric may have contributed to the violence that claimed his life. Kirk, 31, had a history of rightwing provocation and Christian nationalism, and frequently espoused bigoted rhetoric about Islam, women , LGBTQ+ communities and people of color.

“Hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions,” Dowd said, adding: “You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and then not expect awful actions to take place.”

Dowd also speculated about the circumstances of the shooting, saying: “We don’t know if this was a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration. So we have no idea about this.”

The network issued an apology and announced Dowd’s dismissal, which came shortly after Kirk was shot dead during a question-and-answer session at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, where he was kicking off a nationwide campus debate tour. MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler described Dowd’s comments as “inappropriate, insensitive and unacceptable” in a statement posted to social media.

“We apologize for his statements, as has he,” Kutler wrote. “There is no place for violence in America, political or otherwise.”

The network almost immediately severed ties with Dowd, with Deadline reporting that MSNBC had cut its relationship with the analyst citing “furor over remarks he made in the aftermath of the shooting”.

Dowd, who served as chief strategist for George W Bush’s 2004 presidential campaign and was formerly a political analyst for ABC News, issued his own apology following the controversy.

Writing on Bluesky, he said: “My thoughts & prayers are w/ the family and friends of Charlie Kirk. On an earlier appearance on MSNBC I was asked a question on the environment we are in. I apologize for my tone and words. Let me be clear, I in no way intended for my comments to blame Kirk for this horrendous attack. Let us all come together and condemn violence of any kind.”

Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA and a prominent figure in conservative youth politics who had been credited with boosting the Maga youth vote during the 2024 election, was fatally shot in the neck during the campus event on Wednesday afternoon, with multiple videos of the moment spreading across social media.

Federal authorities are investigating the shooting, with two persons of interest initially taken into custody before being released. Both were briefly detained but released without charge, and a suspect is still at-large.

The killing has drawn sharp criticism from across the political spectrum.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending