Artificial intelligence, apparently, is the new “fake news.”

Blaming AI is an increasingly popular strategy for politicians seeking to dodge responsibility for something embarrassing — among others. AI isn’t a person, after all. It can’t leak or file suit. It does make mistakes, a credibility problem that makes it hard to determine fact from fiction in the age of mis- and disinformation.

And when truth is hard to discern, the untruthful benefit, analysts say. The phenomenon is widely known as “the liar’s dividend.”

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump endorsed the practice. Asked about viral footage showing someone tossing something out an upper-story White House window, the president replied, “No, that’s probably AI” — after his press team had indicated to reporters that the video was real.

But Trump, known for insisting the truth is what he says it is, declared himself all in on the AI-blaming phenomenon.

“If something happens that’s really bad,” he told reporters, “maybe I’ll have to just blame AI.”

He’s not alone.

AI is getting blamed — sometimes fairly, sometimes not

On the same day in Caracas, Venezuelan Communications Minister Freddy Ñáñez questioned the veracity of a Trump administration video it said showed a U.S. strike on a vessel in Caribbean that targeted Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang and killed 11. A video of the strike posted to Truth Social shows a long, multi-engine speedboat at sea when a bright flash of light bursts over it. The boat is then briefly seen covered in flames.

“Based on the video provided, it is very likely that it was created using Artificial Intelligence,” Ñáñez said on his Telegram account, describing “almost cartoonish animation.”

Blaming AI can at times be a compliment. (“He’s like an AI-generated player,” tennis player Alexander Bublik said of his U.S. Open opponent Jannik Sinner’s talent on ESPN ). But when used by the powerful, the practice, experts say, can be dangerous.

Digital forensics expert Hany Farid warned for years about the growing capabilities of AI “deepfake” images, voices and video to aid in fraud or political disinformation campaigns, but there was always a deeper problem.

“I’ve always contended that the larger issue is that when you enter this world where anything can be fake, then nothing has to be real,” said Farid, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. “You get to deny any reality because all you have to say is, ‘It’s a deepfake.’”

That wasn’t so a decade or two ago, he noted. Trump issued a rare apology (“if anyone was offended”) in 2016 for his comments about touching women without their consent on the notorious “Access Hollywood” tape. His opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, said she was wrong to call some of his supporters “a basket of deplorables.”

Toby Walsh, chief scientist and professor of AI at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, said blaming AI leads to problems not just in the digital world but the real world as well.

“It leads to a dark future where we no longer hold politicians (or anyone else) accountable,” Walsh said in an email. “”It used to be that if you were caught on tape saying something, you had to own it. This is no longer the case.”

Contemplating the ‘liar’s dividend’

Danielle K. Citron of the Boston University School of Law and Robert Chesney of the University of Texas foresaw the issue in research published in 2019. In it, they describe what they called “the liar’s dividend.”

“If the public loses faith in what they hear and see and truth becomes a matter of opinion, then power flows to those whose opinions are most prominent—empowering authorities along the way,” they wrote in the California Law Review. “A skeptical public will be primed to doubt the authenticity of real audio and video evidence.”

Polling suggests many Americans are wary about AI. About half of U.S. adults said the increased use of AI in daily life made them feel “more concerned than excited,” according to a Pew Research Center poll from August 2024. Pew’s polling indicates that people have become more concerned about the increased use of AI in recent years.

Most U.S. adults appear to distrust AI-generated information when they know that’s the source, according to a Quinnipiac poll from April. About three-quarters said they could only trust the information generated by AI “some of the time” or “hardly ever.” In that poll, about 6 in 10 U.S. adults said they were “very concerned” about political leaders using AI to distribute fake or misleading information.

They have reason, and Trump has played a sizable role in muddying trust and truth.

Trump’s history of misinformation and even lies to suit his narrative predates AI. He’s famous for the use of “fake news,” a buzz term now widely known to denote skepticism about media reports. Leslie Stahl of CBS’ “60 Minutes” has said that Trump told her off camera in 2016 that he tries to “discredit” journalists so that when they report negative stories, they won’t be believed.

Trump’s claim on Tuesday that AI was behind the White House window video wasn’t his first attempt to blame AI. In 2023, he insisted that the anti-Trump Lincoln Project used AI in a video to make him “look bad.”

In the spot titled ” Feeble,” a female narrator taunts Trump. “Hey Donald … you’re weak. You seem unsteady. You need help getting around.” She questions his ”manhood,” accompanied by an image of two blue pills. The video continues with footage of Trump stumbling over words.

“The perverts and losers at the failed and once-disbanded Lincoln Project, and others, are using A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) in their Fake television commercials in order to make me look as bad and pathetic as Crooked Joe Biden,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

The Lincoln Project told The Associated Press at the time that AI was not used in the spot.

___

Associated Press writers Ali Swenson in New York, Matt O’Brien in Providence, Rhode Island, Linley Sanders in Washington and Jorge Rueda in Caracas, Venezuela, contributed to this report.

Follow @ktar923

University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff librarian Shenise McGhee presented on AI-powered smart tools at the 2025 STEM Librarians South Conference hosted by the University of Texas at Arlington.

This annual conference, held virtually and in person, brings together librarians of science, technology, engineering and math from across the United States and beyond to exchange ideas, strategies and innovations in areas such as library instruction, reference services, collection development and outreach, according to a news release.

As a featured panelist during the virtual portion of the July conference, McGhee presented a session titled “Smart Tools: AI-Powered Pathways to STEM Student Success.”

She explored how advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning are reshaping education, especially in STEM fields, where data-driven decision-making and adaptive learning are increasingly vital. She emphasized how STEM librarians can harness AI tools to enhance student learning, improve academic performance and promote equity in STEM education.

McGhee examined emerging technologies, including AI tutoring systems, intelligent learning platforms and personalized machine learning applications. She demonstrated how these tools can create inclusive learning environments by adapting instruction to meet individual student needs, delivering real-time feedback, automating instructional tasks and predicting student challenges before they arise.

Her presentation also emphasized the critical role of STEM librarians in supporting the ethical use of AI tools, teaching students how to engage with AI tools critically and effectively in their coursework by providing access to the digital resources that empower student success. Attendees were offered practical strategies, case studies and best practices to integrate AI into library services and student support initiatives.

In addition, McGhee spotlighted the UAPB STEM Academy, a five-to-six-week summer residential program designed to prepare incoming STEM majors for the academic rigor of college and life on campus. She discussed how the library collaborates with other campus departments to support students through targeted library instruction and services that contribute to academic success.

“STEM librarians are uniquely positioned to guide students through the evolving AI-driven educational landscape,” McGhee said. “By integrating smart tools and inclusive practices, we not only improve outcomes, but we also empower students to thrive.”

For more information, visit:

John Brown Watson Memorial Library

STEM Academy

Home

OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Oakland Ballers manager Aaron Miles will leave it to artificial intelligence to decide when to pinch hit or replace his pitcher.

The playoff-bound Ballers of the independent Pioneer League are turning to AI to manage most aspects of Saturday’s home game against the Great Falls Voyagers at Raimondi Park. So it might feel almost like a day off for the skipper, whose lineup and in-game decisions will even be made for him — from a tablet he will have in the dugout providing instructions.

Advertisement

The starting pitcher is already set.

“Luckily it’s only game. Maybe we’ve done so well that the AI will just keep doing what we’re doing,” Miles joked Wednesday. “Being a 70-win team we’ve got a very good bench. It’s hard to write a lineup without leaving somebody out that’s really good. This game I’ll be like, ‘Hey, it’s not on me for not writing you in there, it’s on the computer.’ It won’t be my fault if somebody’s not in the lineup, I guess I’ll enjoy that.”

Yet Miles knows he still might have to step in with some lineup adjustments, because the human element still matters when it comes to someone who could need rest or take a break because of injury or other circumstances.

Co—founder Paul Freedman said the second-year club will produce the first AI-powered professional sporting event. It happens to be Fan Appreciation day, too.

Advertisement

Last year, during the Ballers’ inaugural season, they had a game in which fans wrote the lineup and chose the uniforms — but Oakland lost. So the Ballers are doing it differently this time by partnering with AI company Distillery to control almost everything.

“The AI won’t be able to do third-base coaching, we don’t have the technology for that yet,” Freedman said. “The human will be responsible for waving somebody home or throwing up the hand. But those kind of situational decisions, we will look to the machine to make the call.”

Freedman figures with the Ballers having locked up the top seed for playoffs, this is a perfect opportunity to give AI a try.

And no need for Miles to be concerned with job security, even with the greater potential for Monday-morning quarterbacking when it comes to his moves.

Advertisement

“The good news is Aaron has won 100 games for us and right now our winning percentage is well over 75%, I think his job is pretty safe,” Freedman said. “And we’re happy with the decisions he’s made, but we do think it’s cool. One of the fun things about being a sports fan is being able to engage in conversations after the game about the key decisions. So this is a breadcrumb for us for what we think could be something if it works well could be part of a fan experience application or something that we do where after a game we kind of highlight what the key decisions were that our manager made and which ones kind of went against the grain — either for right or wrong.”

Miles has already experimented with AI a couple of times but earlier this season one roster showed up as the 2024 group. He expects AI might end up making a smarter decision just based on real-time data.

“I fooled around with this before just for fun, now it’s for real,” he said, “for one game.”

Ballers catcher Tyler Lozano is open-minded to incorporating new elements into the game to complement the analytics — as long as the treasured traditions aren’t lost.

Advertisement

“It’s immersive, it’s definitely involving new technology, new everything. It’s interesting to see what an AI platform or AI software can do for a baseball team,” Lozano said. “There’s always going to be a human element in the game of baseball. I think in sports period there’s going to be some type of human element because you’re live, you’re there. These AI platforms aren’t watching the game or don’t see all of the intricate moments that happen throughout the game and the human element of the player. I don’t think you’re going to lose that.”

___

AP MLB: https://apnews.com/hub/mlb