AI Research
It’s time to retire the ticket: An IT roadmap for agentic AI
The case against the ticket
Let’s call the ticket what it is: a workaround. It’s a relic from a time when humans were the only means of diagnosing and resolving technical problems. It made sense in a human-centered workflow; document the issue, assign it to a team and wait for resolution. But at scale, tickets reveal themselves as friction points.
They cost time. They slow MTTR. They create queues. They burn out staff. They require interpretation, enrichment, triage and escalation, often before resolution even begins. Worse, they reinforce a culture of reactivity: “Did you create a ticket?” becomes the reflex instead of “Did we fix the root cause?”
From what I’ve seen working with global enterprises across telecom, financial services, manufacturing and the public sector, tickets aren’t just operational overhead — they’re opportunity cost. Every minute spent opening, routing or waiting on a ticket is time that could have been spent solving problems or advancing strategic goals. Employees wait for someone to open a ticket, wait for someone else to pick it up, and wait again for someone to act. It’s not just inefficient; it’s momentum lost across the business.
AI Research
The new frontier of medical malpractice
Although the beginnings of modern artificial intelligence (AI) can be traced
as far back as 1956, modern generative AI, the most famous example of which is
arguably ChatGPT, only began emerging in 2019. For better or worse, the steady
rise of generative AI has increasingly impacted the medical field. At this time, AI has begun to advance in a way that creates
potential liability…
AI Research
Radiomics-Based Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approach for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review – Cureus
AI Research
A Real-Time Look at How AI Is Reshaping Work : Information Sciences Institute
Artificial intelligence may take over some tasks and transform others, but one thing is certain: it’s reshaping the job market. Researchers at USC’s Information Sciences Institute (ISI) analyzed LinkedIn job postings and AI-related patent filings to measure which jobs are most exposed, and where those changes are happening first.
The project was led by ISI research assistant Eun Cheol Choi, working with students in a graduate-level USC Annenberg data science course taught by USC Viterbi Research Assistant Professor Luca Luceri. The team developed an “AI exposure” score to measure how closely each role is tied to current AI technologies. A high score suggests the job may be affected by automation, new tools, or shifts in how the work is done.
Which Industries Are Most Exposed to AI?
To understand how exposure shifted with new waves of innovation, the researchers compared patent data from before and after a major turning point. “We split the patent dataset into two parts, pre- and post-ChatGPT release, to see how job exposure scores changed in relation to fresh innovations,” Choi said. Released in late 2022, ChatGPT triggered a surge in generative AI development, investment, and patent filings.
Jobs in wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, information, and manufacturing topped the list in both periods. Retail also showed high exposure early on, while healthcare and social assistance rose sharply after ChatGPT, likely due to new AI tools aimed at diagnostics, medical records, and clinical decision-making.
In contrast, education and real estate consistently showed low exposure, suggesting they are, at least for now, less likely to be reshaped by current AI technologies.
AI’s Reach Depends on the Role
AI exposure doesn’t just vary by industry, it also depends on the specific type of work. Jobs like software engineer and data scientist scored highest, since they involve building or deploying AI systems. Roles in manufacturing and repair, such as maintenance technician, also showed elevated exposure due to increased use of AI in automation and diagnostics.
At the other end of the spectrum, jobs like tax accountant, HR coordinator, and paralegal showed low exposure. They center on work that’s harder for AI to automate: nuanced reasoning, domain expertise, or dealing with people.
AI Exposure and Salary Don’t Always Move Together
The study also examined how AI exposure relates to pay. In general, jobs with higher exposure to current AI technologies were associated with higher salaries, likely reflecting the demand for new AI skills. That trend was strongest in the information sector, where software and data-related roles were both highly exposed and well compensated.
But in sectors like wholesale trade and transportation and warehousing, the opposite was true. Jobs with higher exposure in these industries tended to offer lower salaries, especially at the highest exposure levels. The researchers suggest this may signal the early effects of automation, where AI is starting to replace workers instead of augmenting them.
“In some industries, there may be synergy between workers and AI,” said Choi. “In others, it may point to competition or replacement.”
From Class Project to Ongoing Research
The contrast between industries where AI complements workers and those where it may replace them is something the team plans to investigate further. They hope to build on their framework by distinguishing between different types of impact — automation versus augmentation — and by tracking the emergence of new job categories driven by AI. “This kind of framework is exciting,” said Choi, “because it lets us capture those signals in real time.”
Luceri emphasized the value of hands-on research in the classroom: “It’s important to give students the chance to work on relevant and impactful problems where they can apply the theoretical tools they’ve learned to real-world data and questions,” he said. The paper, Mapping Labor Market Vulnerability in the Age of AI: Evidence from Job Postings and Patent Data, was co-authored by students Qingyu Cao, Qi Guan, Shengzhu Peng, and Po-Yuan Chen, and was presented at the 2025 International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), held June 23-26 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Published on July 7th, 2025
Last updated on July 7th, 2025
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers7 days ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions7 days ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Funding & Business4 days ago
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Astrophel Aerospace Raises ₹6.84 Crore to Build Reusable Launch Vehicle
-
Funding & Business1 week ago
From chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
-
Tools & Platforms6 days ago
Winning with AI – A Playbook for Pest Control Business Leaders to Drive Growth
-
Jobs & Careers4 days ago
Ilya Sutskever Takes Over as CEO of Safe Superintelligence After Daniel Gross’s Exit