Is AI a job-killer? Here’s the grim outlook – The Berkshire Eagle

Published

2 months ago

July 17, 2025

Clarence Fanto

Is AI a job-killer? Here’s the grim outlook The Berkshire Eagle

Source link

PH kicks off 2025 Development Policy Research Month on AI in governance

Published

60 minutes ago

September 6, 2025

The Manila Times

THE Philippines cannot rely on new technology alone to thrive in the age of artificial intelligence. Strong governance policies must come first — this was the central call of the 2025 Development Policy Research Month (DPRM), which opened on Sept. 1 with a push for AI rules that reflect national realities.

“Policy research provides the guardrails that help governments adopt technology responsibly,” said PIDS president Dr. Philip Arnold Tuano. Without such guardrails, he warned, the benefits of AI may never outweigh the risks.

CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHT The 2025 Development Policy Research Month kicked off with a push for AI rules that reflect the country’s realities. PHOTO FROM PIDS

Established under Proclamation 247 (2002), DPRM highlights the role of policy research in shaping evidence-based strategies. This year’s theme, “Reimagining Governance in the Age of AI,” underscores that while AI offers tools for efficiency and transparency, policies must come first to address risks such as digital exclusion, bias, cybersecurity threats, and workforce displacement.

PIDS, as lead coordinator, works with an interagency steering committee that includes the BSP, CSC, DBM, DILG, legislative policy offices, PIA, PMS, and now the Department of Science and Technology, which joins for the first time, given its role in AI research and governance.

The highlight is the 11th Annual Public Policy Conference on Sept. 18 at New World Hotel Makati, featuring global experts. Activities nationwide will amplify the campaign, supported by the hashtag #AIforGoodGovernance.

Learn more at https://dprm.pids.gov.ph.

Source link

AI Research

Can artificial intelligence be helpful in school?

Published

2 hours ago

September 6, 2025

The Editors

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the classroom has been a major topic for the past few years.

Source: Youtube

Source link

AI Research

Nvidia says ‘We never deprive American customers in order to serve the rest of the world’ — company says GAIN AI Act addresses a problem that doesn’t exist

Published

2 hours ago

September 6, 2025

Anton Shilov

The bill, which aimed to regulate shipments of AI GPUs to adversaries and prioritize U.S. buyers, as proposed by U.S. senators earlier this week, made quite a splash in America. To a degree, Nvidia issued a statement claiming that the U.S. was, is, and will remain its primary market, implying that no regulations are needed for the company to serve America.

“The U.S. has always been and will continue to be our largest market,” a statement sent to Tom’s Hardware reads. “We never deprive American customers in order to serve the rest of the world. In trying to solve a problem that does not exist, the proposed bill would restrict competition worldwide in any industry that uses mainstream computing chips. While it may have good intentions, this bill is just another variation of the AI Diffusion Rule and would have similar effects on American leadership and the U.S. economy.”

Earlier this week, U.S. legislators introduced the GAIN AI Act of 2025 as part of their defense policy package, aiming to restrict the export of advanced AI GPUs and prioritize access for domestic buyers. If passed into law, this measure would enforce strict export licensing conditions for AI accelerators to D:5 countries of concern (read: China), particularly targeting sales to China and nations closely aligned with it.

The bill outlines specific technical thresholds to classify a chip as ‘advanced,’ taking a page from the Biden administration’s 2023 book when it comes to benchmarks, but making them stronger when it comes to memory bandwidth. Any GPU with a total processing performance (TPP) of 2,400 or higher, a performance density over 3.2 (TPP divided by die area), or bandwidth exceeding 1.4 TB/s (DRAM), 1.1 TB/s (interconnect), or 1.7 TB/s combined would be subject to export controls. Products exceeding a TPP of 4,800 would be outright barred from export to restricted countries, which include Nvidia’s H100 (TPP 16,000) and B300 (TPP 60,000), as well as AMD’s Instinct MI308.

In accordance with new rules, exporters (i.e., AMD and Nvidia) would need to certify that U.S. buyers were given the first opportunity to purchase, that there are no pending domestic orders, and that the export will not slow local shipments or favor foreign clients with better pricing or contract terms. Additionally, they must ensure that foreign buyers will not use the hardware to compete against American firms globally. If any of these conditions are unmet, the export license must be denied.

The new export rules would obviously apply even to older AI GPUs — assuming they are still in production, of course — like Nvidia’s HGX H20 or L2 PCIe, which still meet the defined performance thresholds set by the Biden administration. Although Nvidia has claimed that H20 shipments to China do not interfere with the domestic supply of H100, H200, or Blackwell chips, the new legislation could significantly formalize such limitations on transactions in the future.