Connect with us

Top Stories

How the UFC landed a $7.7 billion deal with Paramount after a whirlwind 48 hours, according to TKO execs

Published

on


Just how big of a surprise was the UFC’s bombshell $7.7 billion deal with Paramount and CBS? So big that even UFC CEO Dana White didn’t see it coming.

“No, I didn’t think this is where we’d end up,” White said Monday during an appearance on “The Pat McAfee Show” to discuss the new broadcast rights deal. “But this is sort of how it played out. I love it. These guys are obviously very smart guys, very aggressive.”

Advertisement

In an interview on CNBC, TKO president and COO Mark Shapiro said he initially expected to make a deal that would bring only the UFC Fight Night events to Paramount. But after Skydance Media completed its deal to purchase control of Paramount last week, Shapiro said, the deal for the entirety of the UFC’s U.S. broadcast rights came together in just 48 hours.

Now, instead of just the 30 UFC Fight Night events per year, Paramount+ will feature all UFC content, including the 13 numbered UFC events each year.

[Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season]

“We’re getting the brand, we’re getting the reach, and they’ll get the signups,” Shapiro said of Paramount’s streaming service.

Advertisement

Possibly the biggest news in all this for fight fans is the end of the UFC’s pay-per-view era. Ever since the very first UFC event in 1993, pay-per-view has been a vital part of the UFC’s strategy. Under the current deal with ESPN, each UFC pay-per-view costs $79.99 in the U.S., plus the cost of the ESPN+ subscription on top of that.

With pay-per-view revenues reportedly in decline, it makes sense for the UFC to finally ditch that model. The fact that it’s doing so as part of a deal that will essentially double the roughly $550 million per year that the UFC currently receives from ESPN likely only made that calculation easier.

“The pay-per-view model is a thing of the past,” Shapiro said on Monday. “What’s on pay-per-view anymore? Boxing? Movies on DirecTV? It’s an outdated, antiquated model. So, it was paramount to us — forgive the pun — where it’s one-stop shopping, especially for our younger fans in flyover states. When they find out, ‘Wait, if I just sign up for Paramount+ for $12.99 a month, I’m going to automatically get UFC’s numbered fights and the rest of the portfolio?’ That’s a message we want to amplify.”

What’s still unclear is exactly how and when UFC events might be included on the CBS network TV lineup. According to Shapiro, Paramount+ will be the home for all 43 UFC events per year — 30 UFC Fight Nights and 13 numbered events — when the deal begins in 2026. But he added that those numbered events, which typically feature the title fights and the biggest names on the UFC roster, could also air on CBS.

Advertisement

“It was important to us to have CBS play a big component in this,” Shapiro said on CNBC. “As they’ve laid out, this is Paramount+ exclusively. But CBS will have simulcast on many of the fights, and likely all of the numbered events, which are formerly the pay-per-view fights.”

For many, it was probably a surprise to see Paramount emerge as the winner in the battle for UFC broadcast rights, especially after months of speculation that pegged Netflix and ESPN as the most likely destinations. After all, Paramount+ is currently known more for TV dramas like “Yellowstone” than it is for live sports.

But, as the UFC CEO White added, many streaming services are looking to bolster their appeal to subscribers with the help of live sports, which create an urgency among viewers that scripted shows can’t match.

Advertisement

“I think all these streaming services, no matter who they are, have to be involved in live sports,” White said. “Any type of sport, you have to watch it live. Nobody’s going to watch a taped or delayed sporting event. So yeah, I think they all have to have it.”



Source link

Top Stories

Peter Mandelson sacked as US ambassador by Keir Starmer over emails to Jeffrey Epstein

Published

on


Jaws drop in Westminster, but No 10 insists due process was followedpublished at 10:41 British Summer Time

Chris Mason
Political editor

This time last week, there was a drip, drip of revelations about the then-deputy prime minister and calls for her resignation.

Fast forward seven days, and there is a drip, drip of revelations about the UK’s ambassador to the United States and calls for his resignation.

A cabinet minister’s jaw drops when I tell them about the story.

For those who have kicked around at Westminster for a while, there is something familiar about it too.

Peter Mandelson twice lost his job in the cabinet two decades ago over his dealings with rich men.

Mandelson’s friendship with the late Epstein has long been publicly known, so the key political questions are actually for the prime minister, in choosing to appoint him.

Downing Street is not currently providing straight answers when we ask whether these most recent revelations are a surprise to them and whether they know what may be still to come.

They insist “due process” was followed before Mandelson’s appointment.

It would appear that either Downing Street was insufficiently curious or sceptical about the extent of Lord Mandelson’s friendship with Epstein before giving him the job, or calculated that he would be so good in the role it would be worth soaking up any embarrassment the connection might cause them.

Or perhaps they hoped the embarrassing stuff would never come out.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

UK fires ambassador to US Peter Mandelson over links to Epstein | Politics News

Published

on


Veteran Labour politician under scrutiny over relationship with the late convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein.

The United Kingdom has fired Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States over his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has said.

Mandelson, a veteran Labour politician who was key to the party’s success under former leader Tony Blair, came under heavy scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein after a birthday book was released, including a letter purportedly from Mandelson describing Epstein as “my best pal”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“In light of the additional information in emails written by Peter Mandelson, the prime minister has asked the foreign secretary to withdraw him as ambassador,” the FCDO said on Thursday.

“The emails show that the depth and extent of Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is materially different from that known at the time of his appointment.”

On Wednesday, The Sun newspaper published emails that it said showed Mandelson telling Epstein to “fight for early release” shortly before he was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

“I think the world of you,” Mandelson told him before he began his sentence for soliciting prostitution from a minor in June 2008.

“I can still barely understand it. It just could not happen in Britain,” Mandelson wrote. “You have to be incredibly resilient, fight for early release and be philosophical about it as much as you can.”

The emails were published after the Democrats on the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released a 50th birthday album compiled in 2003 for Epstein, who at the time was a wealthy and well-connected financier. In that album, Mandelson called Epstein “my best pal” in a handwritten note.

Epstein is believed to have abused hundreds of children during his high-flying career, with charges related to abuse of underage girls dating back to 2006.

The FCDO said the revelation of Mandelson’s suggestion that Epstein’s first conviction was wrongful and should be challenged was “new information”.

Facing questions from Tory leader Kemi Badenoch on Wednesday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer insisted “full due process was gone through” in his appointment, the BBC reported.

Still, Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein was public knowledge for years, with Epstein nicknaming him “Petie”.

Mandelson, 71, has twice been forced to resign as a minister over alleged misconduct in 1998 and 2001. Though he made regular comebacks to politics, his tenure was often marred by controversies, including links to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

Trump’s birthday letter

The tens of thousands of files related to Epstein’s case have meanwhile become a political conundrum for US President Donald Trump, who previously pushed for the release of all files during his re-election campaign amid swirling conspiracy theories about Epstein’s 2019 death by suicide in a New York jail cell.

Trump also faces accusations of penning a birthday letter to the late financier, and was known to socialise with him.

House Democrats released the letter on Monday as part of the birthday album; it contains a sketch of a naked woman with Trump’s signature in place of pubic hair.

The White House has denied the letter’s authenticity, and Trump is separately pursuing a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, which first revealed the letter’s existence in July.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

‘The chaos is the point’: tumult as Covid vaccine boosters deployed under RFK Jr | Coronavirus

Published

on


The first deployment of updated Covid shots under the Trump administration has been plagued by access issues and misinformation amid confusion and chaos at US health agencies.

People attempting to get the vaccines say they have struggled to understand eligibility requirements, book appointments, process insurance claims, battle misinformation from pharmacists and obtain prescriptions from their doctors in some states. Such hurdles will disproportionately affect people of color and low-income people, experts say.

These problems come amid turmoil at US health agencies, with top leaders of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quitting because of reported pressure from the Trump administration to approve unscientific vaccine policies and new limitations placed on the Covid vaccines.

“Anybody can get the booster,” Robert F Kennedy Jr, secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), said at a hearing before a US Senate committee last week – before adding: “It’s not recommended for healthy people.” In an August post on X, Kennedy said the updated Covid vaccine was approved only for people “at higher risk”.

Matt Shipman, a health writer in North Carolina, was eager to receive an updated shot to protect himself against the acute and long-term risks of a Covid infection, especially as the late-summer Covid wave appears to be reaching its peak.

It used to be easy to schedule an appointment at a pharmacy, but now he received a message saying the vaccines will hopefully be available in a few weeks. He had heard some people were getting prescriptions for the shots, but when he called his doctor’s office, they wouldn’t even make an appointment for a prescription.

North Carolina is one of several states where pharmacists are requiring prescriptions before administering any shots.

In some states, pharmacists are prevented by law from administering vaccines that are not recommended by the CDC’s advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). While doctors have liability protections for Covid vaccines under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (Prep) Act, pharmacists may not if the vaccines are not approved by the advisory committee.

Some insurers might also opt not to cover the shots until they are recommended.

The independent advisers are expected to take up Covid recommendations at the next meeting in mid-September, but that meeting has been embroiled in controversy. Senator Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, called for an indefinite postponement given the recent upheaval at health agencies.

Shipman said: “It’s incredibly frustrating, because this has significant consequences for public health, and there is no reason in the world for this to be happening.

“It is an entirely manufactured problem that is going to cost people their health and wellbeing and possibly their lives. It is manifestly clear that people who would like the Covid vaccine are not able to access it.”

Changing the rules to make vaccination easier will depend on the state, said Lindsay Wiley, a professor of law and faculty director of the health law and policy program at UCLA Law.

“In several states, governors and health officials are solving the prescription problem pretty swiftly, so it’s a rapidly evolving situation right now. In other states, the legislature may need to take action to fix the problem,” Wiley said.

Even states that have tried to combat the confusion still have vaccine challenges. The state of Maryland released guidance last week for all residents to access vaccines – without specifying the need to disclose qualifying conditions. Maryland’s governor, Wes Moore, called the federal changes to vaccine policy “harmful for Marylanders and all Americans”.

Yet when Ian Morgan tried to obtain the vaccine in Maryland, the pharmacist said it could only be administered to those over the age of 65 or people with at least one underlying health condition. Morgan tried to make an appointment online, but was told CVS couldn’t schedule his appointment because he did not qualify.

Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow at the National Institutes of Health and a union steward of NIH Fellows United-UAW 2750, said the tumult has been caused by Kennedy’s messaging on vaccines.

“I think the chaos is the point, and that chaos has consequences,” Morgan said. “Creating this confusion, creating this chaos, trying to discredit scientific experts – and we see that every time [Kennedy] goes out there – that in and of itself is causing problems, and that in itself is harming the American people.”

Workers log a shipment of Covid vaccines in Horsham, Pennsylvania. Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP

Morgan is one of 1,000 current and former HHS employees who signed a letter calling for Kennedy’s resignation.

Vaccine availability for children, especially for those under the age of five, has lagged even further behind adults as pediatricians struggle to understand new limitations and potential legal risks.

Joanne Hilden, a retired physician, has been searching for the updated vaccines for her four grandchildren, who are between the ages three and 12, in Minnesota. The local health department, where the youngest two kids were vaccinated in 2021, is only offering vaccines for adults over the age of 65. Pharmacies have not received the pediatric doses yet.

There are also immense structural barriers that make it harder for marginalized people to access the shots.

Julia Lynch, a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, first made plans to get vaccinated in Oakland, New Jersey, a 45-minute drive from her home in Philadelphia, before the state board of pharmacy gave pharmacies the go-ahead to vaccinate Pennsylvanians.

The CVS pharmacies near her home had no appointments, so she ended up driving to a predominantly white suburb.

“I don’t know why it is that the vaccines are getting to those CVSes first,” she said. But that means “if you’re Black or Latino, you are less likely than if you’re white to live close to someplace where you can get a vaccine”.

skip past newsletter promotion

The population of Oakland, for example, is 80% white and had appointments – but neighboring Camden, New Jersey, had no appointments, and its population is 3.5% white.

Transportation is another major issue. Traveling to Oakland by public transit would have taken more than two hours on three buses and one regional train.

“Eligibility right now is obviously limited to people who are over 65 or who have at least one medical condition that puts them at high risk,” Lynch said. “These are exactly the people who are most likely to have trouble traveling four-plus hours on a multimodal public transit journey to get their Covid shot.”

Not everyone has reliable internet access, the technological knowledge to book appointments, or the ability to take time off work or find childcare to locate and travel to appointments.

“For people who are not chronically online, it’s a major undertaking to do all this,” Lynch said.

Fighting to have the shots covered by insurance, or paying out of pocket for the uninsured, is another major hurdle, she said.

Rachel, who lives in Pittsburgh and asked to be identified by her first name to protect her health history, has two autoimmune disorders and a genetic blood clotting disorder that puts her at high risk if she gets sick with Covid. She said she would like to get the latest Covid shot, but is planning to wait for a few weeks.

“The challenges right now for me are just around information, and actually knowing what is the truth and what is going to happen if I try to get it,” she said. She said she had heard of people being turned away from pharmacies even after the Pennsylvania vaccine announcement.

“It just sounds like it’s still a shitshow. It’s still challenging to make an appointment here, so I’m going to wait a little bit.”

Rachel said it reminded her of 2021, when many people scrambled to get their first Covid shots.

“It’s just frustrating to me that based on absolutely zero evidence, and in some cases, just making up lies about evidence, [the] HHS has just decided these are so dangerous that we need to limit them,” she said.

Sarah, who lives in Westchester county, New York, and asked to be identified by her first name so she is not harassed by anti-vaccine activists, said she was finally able to get the shot after days of effort.

In New York, she needed a prescription. That later changed when Kathy Hochul, the governor, opened up access to all New Yorkers.

The faxed prescription never went through, so her health system had to set up an electronic prescription system. Sarah asked that her doctor prescribe any Covid vaccine; she said she overheard the pharmacist denying one prescription because it was for the Pfizer vaccine and they only had Moderna.

Even after the prescription was received, the pharmacist said he needed verbal confirmation from the doctor by phone as well.

Sarah said she paid $250 out of pocket, and has since spent hours on the phone with her insurance company to be reimbursed. After she paid, the pharmacist tried to dissuade her from getting the shot, Sarah said.

“Do you really know what you’re getting into? This is brand new,” she recalls him saying. She responded: “I know – that’s why I want it.” But he told her they “don’t know anything” about the updated vaccines and “we don’t know what’s gonna happen” to her once she received it, she said.

The roadblocks were “wearing me down”, Sarah said. “It’s trying to make it inaccessible, impossible, confusing.”

Shipman in North Carolina was dogged in his search, even looking at appointments in other states. Eventually, he was able to receive the vaccine at an urgent care center.

But not everyone is able to track down the vaccine and overcome these obstacles, Lynch said. “It’s really hard for ordinary people who are very busy and not necessarily paying close attention to this to know what they’re supposed to do to keep themselves or their loved ones safe.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending