Connect with us

Business

How a £1.5bn ‘wildlife-boosting’ bypass became an environmental disaster | Environment

Published

on


Lorries thunder over the A14 bridge north of Cambridge, above steep roadside embankments covered in plastic shrouds containing the desiccated remains of trees.

Occasionally the barren landscape is punctuated by a flash of green where a young hawthorn or a fledgling honeysuckle has emerged apparently against the odds, but their shock of life is an exception in the treeless landscape.

The new 21-mile road between Cambridge and Huntingdon cost £1.5bn and was opened in 2020 to fulfil a familiar political desire: growth. One of Britain’s biggest infrastructure projects of the past decade, it was approved by the secretary of state for transport over the heads of locally elected councillors.

Map

National Highways, the government-owned company that builds and maintains Britain’s A roads, promised that the biodiversity net gain from the construction project would be 11.5%; in other words, they pledged the natural environment would be left in a considerably better state after the road was built than before.

But five years on from the opening of the A14, the evidence is otherwise, and National Highways has admitted biodiversity and the environment have been left in a worse state as a result of the road project.

Empty plastic tree guards stretch for mile after mile along the new road, testament to the mass die-off of most of the 860,000 trees planted in mitigation for the impact of the road. Culverts dug as a safe route for animals such as newts and water voles are dried up and litter-strewn, while ponds designed to collect rainwater and provide a wildlife habitat are choked with mud and silt.

With concerns that the rollback of environmental protections in Labour’s planning and infrastructure bill will make it easier for developers to destroy nature, Edna Murphy, a Liberal Democrat on Cambridgeshire county council, is calling for MPs on the environmental audit committee to investigate the multimillion-pound failure of the A14 project.

“National Highways has resisted attempts by local representatives to discover what it is up to,” Murphy said.

“We have struggled over years to find out basic facts about the death of nearly all of the 860,000 trees that were originally planted and what has happened subsequently in terms of replanting.

“How can they be allowed to get away with this? How can anyone have confidence in promises about environmental mitigations in any national infrastructure projects in the future?”

Edna Murphy (left) and Ros Hathorn beside the A14. Photograph: Sean Smith/The Guardian

Murphy and her Lib Dem colleague Ros Hathorn believe the failure of the environmental improvements created in mitigation for the A14 are a shocking example of how powerful developers make environmental pledges in order to gain planning permission, which are then not upheld.

They began asking questions of National Highways in 2021 when it became obvious from the scale of the tree die-off that something had gone wrong. They asked for details of how many trees were planted, how many had died, and for regular reports on the tree planting.

A slide presentation in 2022 to Murphy and Hathorn indicated 70% of the 860,000 trees originally planted had died.

In late 2023, Martin Edwards, a National Highways project manager, suggested to local councillors the die-off may have been only 50%. He said two re-plantings had taken place since the die-off, both of which had also subsequently failed. He blamed this on the policy to replant the same tree in the same place “and keep your fingers crossed”.

Edwards insisted that lessons had been learned and that in 2023 National Highways had carried out a full soil survey and a three-month tree analysis.

This revealed they had planted the wrong species in the wrong place, and provided valuable lessons about the most appropriate season in the year to plant a tree, he said.

Nicole Gullan, principal ecologist at the ecology consultancy Arbtech, said she was surprised by the approach: “Tree planting on this scale should have been underpinned by ecological due diligence, including soil sampling, hydrological and geotechnical surveys, and an adaptive management plan to address potential failures. Proper reporting and mapping of planting locations is also essential for long-term monitoring and accountability.”

A third replanting of 165,000 trees – at an estimated cost of £2.9m – took place over the autumn and winter of 2023-2024. National Highways promised to share details of their surveys and a new planting plan with Cambridgeshire council’s biodiversity team.

skip past newsletter promotion

Today, parts of the A14 where trees should be thriving still resemble a desert. Photograph: Sean Smith/The Guardian

But in a report this June, council officers said the information had never been passed to them despite repeated requests.

“Documents that were provided to the group were basic overviews and did not contain the detailed information requested,” the officers said. “The council therefore did not have evidence of where and why the planting had failed, which would be crucial to inform the replanting strategy, ensuring improved planting success.”

Today, parts of the A14 where trees should be thriving still resemble a desert, and the whereabouts of the 165,000 new trees remain a mystery.

“The council does not know where replanting has taken place,” officials said, adding that officers had driven along the route to try to find them, but only found a few limited areas where replanting appeared to have taken place.

Some residents have begun planting their own saplings. Vhari Russell from Brampton said she had grown various different trees in her garden in pots and planted all of those into the A14 embankment. “I think we’ve probably put in 150,” she told local reporters.

National Highways, which has been reprimanded by the office of roads and railways for failing to fulfil a key metric on biodiversity gain, has admitted that the A14 project has left nature worse off despite having pledged to improve it.

In an evaluation report National Highways said the impacts on biodiversity “were worse than expected”, as were the impacts on the water environment. National Highways has faced no sanction for these failures.

From 2026, biodiversity net gain will be mandatory for big infrastructure such as the A14 road. But Becky Pullinger, head of land management for the Wildlife Trusts, said developers had to be held to account once the mandate came in, so that recreated habitats had a fighting chance of survival. A recent report showed that only a third of ecological enhancements promised by housebuilders were fulfilled.

Pullinger said the example of the A14 showed how important it was that harm to wildlife was avoided in the first place, reducing the need for compensation planting.

“The failures highlight the challenges of trying to recreate mature habitats: it takes years, if not decades, for saplings to turn into woodland and provide much needed spaces for the wildlife [affected] by development,” she said.

A National Highways spokesperson said: “We take our responsibility to the environment very seriously. The A14 upgrade project was not limited to just improving the road; our ongoing environmental work remains a long-term project that we will continue to monitor and support. Between October 2023 and April 2024 – the optimum planting season – 165,000 trees and shrubs were planted. These comprised 16 different species specially selected to enhance the surrounding areas and habitats. Our latest survey showed that nearly 90% of these trees have survived. Nationally, we continue to monitor, evaluate and adapt our practices to respond to a rapidly changing climate to meet the challenges that it brings.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Company Turns To AI For Cost Cutting, Ends Up Paying US Woman Rs 1.7 Lakh To Fix Errors

Published

on


“Maybe I’m being naive, but I think if you are very good, you won’t have trouble,” she expressed her views about concerns around AI. According to Skidd, AI can be an excellent tool when used correctly. Like her, there are many writers who are earning by fixing AI-generated content.

A digital marketing agency co-owner, Sophie Warner, shared a similar experience, noting how her clients were using ChatGPT for their issues first.

“Earlier, clients would message us if they were having issues with their site or wanted to introduce new functionality,” Warner said. “Now they are going to ChatGPT first.”

She said clients using ChatGPT for website code had reported issues. These include sites crashing down or leaving them vulnerable to hackers. She revealed that such a move cost one of her clients £360 (Rs 42,000) and three days of service disruption, the BBC report added.  

Similar instances have occurred in the past where businesses trying to cut costs with AI have ended up paying more. In June, a Swedish fintech company, Klarna, made headlines for a similar incident. The company announced that it was organising a large-scale recruitment drive to hire staff again, two years after firing more than 700 employees to replace them with AI. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

AI video becomes more convincing, rattling creative industry

Published

on


[NEW YORK] Gone are the days of six-fingered hands or distorted faces – artificial intelligence (AI)-generated video is becoming increasingly convincing, attracting Hollywood, artists, and advertisers, while shaking the foundations of the creative industry.

To measure the progress of AI video, you need only look at Will Smith eating spaghetti.

Since 2023, this unlikely sequence – entirely fabricated – has become a technological benchmark for the industry.

Two years ago, the actor appeared blurry, his eyes too far apart, his forehead exaggeratedly protruding, his movements jerky, and the spaghetti did not even reach his mouth.

The version published a few weeks ago by a user of Google’s Veo 3 platform showed no apparent flaws whatsoever.

“Every week, sometimes every day, a different one comes out that’s even more stunning than the next,” said Elizabeth Strickler, a professor at Georgia State University.

A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU

Friday, 2 pm

Lifestyle

Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself.

Between Luma Labs’ Dream Machine, launched in June 2024, OpenAI’s Sora in December, Runway AI’s Gen-4 in March 2025, and Veo 3 in May, the sector has crossed several milestones in just a few months.

Runway has signed deals with Lionsgate studio and AMC Networks television group.

Lionsgate vice-president Michael Burns told New York Magazine about the possibility of using AI to generate animated, family-friendly versions from films such as the John Wick or Hunger Games franchises, rather than creating entirely new projects.

“Some use it for storyboarding or previsualization” – steps that come before filming – “others for visual effects or inserts”, said Jamie Umpherson, Runway’s creative director.

Burns gave the example of a script for which Lionsgate has to decide whether to shoot a scene or not.

To help make that decision, they can now create a 10-second clip “with 10,000 soldiers in a snowstorm”.

That kind of pre-visualisation would have cost millions before.

In October, the first AI feature film was released, Where the Robots Grow, an animated film without anything resembling live action footage.

For Alejandro Matamala Ortiz, Runway’s co-founder, an AI-generated feature film is not the end goal, but a way of demonstrating to a production team that “this is possible”.

Resistance everywhere

Still, some see an opportunity.

In March, startup Staircase Studio made waves by announcing plans to produce seven to eight films per year using AI for less than US$500,000 each, while ensuring it would rely on unionised professionals wherever possible.

“The market is there,” said Andrew White, co-founder of small production house Indie Studios.

People “don’t want to talk about how it’s made”, White pointed out. “That’s inside baseball. People want to enjoy the movie because of the movie.”

But White himself refuses to adopt the technology, considering that using AI would compromise his creative process.

Jamie Umpherson argues that AI allows creators to stick closer to their artistic vision than ever before, since it enables unlimited revisions, unlike the traditional system constrained by costs.

“I see resistance everywhere” to this movement, observed Georgia State’s Strickler.

This is particularly true among her students, who are concerned about AI’s massive energy and water consumption as well as the use of original works to train models, not to mention the social impact.

But refusing to accept the shift is “kind of like having a business without having the internet”, she said. “You can try for a little while.”

In 2023, the American actors’ union SAG-AFTRA secured concessions on the use of their image through AI.

Strickler sees AI diminishing Hollywood’s role as the arbiter of creation and taste, instead allowing more artists and creators to reach a significant audience.

Runway’s founders, who are as much trained artists as they are computer scientists, have gained an edge over their AI video rivals in film, television, and advertising.

But they are already looking further ahead, considering expansion into augmented reality and virtual reality, for example, creating a metaverse where films could be shot.

“The most exciting applications aren’t necessarily the ones that we have in mind,” said Umpherson. “The ultimate goal is to see what artists do with technology.” AFP



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Samsung warns of big profit miss from US restrictions on advanced AI chip exports

Published

on


Semiconductor and smartphone giant Samsung Electronic Co. Ltd. said on Tuesday morning in South Korea that it’s anticipating its second-quarter profit to plunge 56% from a year earlier, blaming it on sluggish sales in its chip business and the impacts of U.S. trade restrictions.

The forecast comes in much lower than what analysts had expected. Samsung said in a preliminary earnings statement that it’s expecting a second-quarter operating profit of 4.59 trillion won ($3.4 billion), down sharply from the 10.44 trillion won profit it posted in the year-ago period. Analysts had been targeting a profit of 6.2 trillion won, Reuters reported.

On a sequential basis, Samsung’s profit is expected to drop by around 31%, from 6.69 trillion won. Revenue for the period is expected to come to 74 trillion won, more or less flat from a year earlier.

In a separate press release issued to South Korean media, Samsung blamed the unexpected decline in profit on inventory replacements and the negative impact of the United States’ expanded sanctions on the export of advanced artificial intelligence processors to China.

“The memory business saw a decline in performance due to one-off costs, such as provisions for inventory asset valuation,” the company said. “However, improved HBM products are currently being evaluated and shipped to customers.”

Samsung was referring to its High-Bandwidth Memory chips, which are a critical component of AI processors. The company has struggled to match the progress of its rival memory chipmaker SK Hynix Inc., which currently provides the vast majority of HBM chips to Nvidia Corp. for use in that company’s graphics processing units.

However, Samsung said it expects to see a sharp increase in HBM chip sales to Nvidia in the upcoming quarter, despite recent reports that its products have not yet passed the AI chip leader’s quality tests. It also said its non-memory chipmaking foundry is expected to reduce its losses in the third quarter due to improved utilization rates and a recovery in global chip demand.

Analysts said Samsung’s profits were also hit by a decline in NAND flash prices and a stronger Korean won, and its stock was down 1% in early morning trading in Korea.

Holger Mueller of Constellation Research Inc. told SiliconANGLE it’s notable that Samsung is still growing its chip business, despite not being able to grow its profit. “The most critical challenge is for Samsung to be able to deliver its HBM chips, and if it can do this it will likely show stellar results like its competitors, given the insane hunger for AI chips,” the analyst said.

According to Mueller, investors will be happy to hear that Samsung believes it will soon be able to deliver a significant number of HBM chips to Nvidia, which is the most important customer. If it does do this, it could well see growth of the kind that it hasn’t enjoyed in years.

“But another challenge for Samsung is its smartphone business, which is also struggling right now,” Mueller added. “The flywheel will only come back and deliver as it used to once both of these businesses have strong offerings. Samsung will also need to demonstrate strong execution in production and on the go-to-market side.”

Samsung has not yet disclosed detailed earnings regarding the performance of its individual business units, but analysts estimate that its semiconductor business will deliver an operating profit of around 1 trillion won, based on the company’s preliminary forecast.

The company is also unlikely to see much benefit from the launch of its new flagship smartphone, the AI-powered Galaxy S25, in January. Meanwhile, its television and home appliance businesses are also expected to see a drop in profitability, due partly to the impact of U.S. tariffs on imports.

Although the report was disappointing for investors, Hyundai Motor Securities Co. analyst Roh Geun-chang said the company’s profit is likely to rebound in the third quarter, driven by an expected increase in memory chip prices. “Samsung’s operating profit appears to have bottomed out in the second quarter and is expected to show gradual improvement,” the analyst told Yonhap.

Image: SiliconANGLE/Dreamina

Support our open free content by sharing and engaging with our content and community.

Join theCUBE Alumni Trust Network

Where Technology Leaders Connect, Share Intelligence & Create Opportunities

11.4k+  

CUBE Alumni Network

C-level and Technical

Domain Experts

Connect with 11,413+ industry leaders from our network of tech and business leaders forming a unique trusted network effect.

SiliconANGLE Media is a recognized leader in digital media innovation serving innovative audiences and brands, bringing together cutting-edge technology, influential content, strategic insights and real-time audience engagement. As the parent company of SiliconANGLE, theCUBE Network, theCUBE Research, CUBE365, theCUBE AI and theCUBE SuperStudios — such as those established in Silicon Valley and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) — SiliconANGLE Media operates at the intersection of media, technology, and AI. .

Founded by tech visionaries John Furrier and Dave Vellante, SiliconANGLE Media has built a powerful ecosystem of industry-leading digital media brands, with a reach of 15+ million elite tech professionals. The company’s new, proprietary theCUBE AI Video cloud is breaking ground in audience interaction, leveraging theCUBEai.com neural network to help technology companies make data-driven decisions and stay at the forefront of industry conversations.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending