Connect with us

Business

Flight of the non-doms: how worried should Labour be about the super-rich leaving the UK? | The super-rich

Published

on


In Chester Square, the exclusive London address that was once home to Margaret Thatcher, multimillion-pound stuccoed townhouses are proving a hard sell.

More than 20 luxury properties in the Belgravia postcode are on the market, says a buying agent. In nearby Montpelier Square in Knightsbridge, less than a 10-minute walk from Harrods department store, nine houses are on the open market.

Huge price reductions do not appear to be working either, with some homes lingering unsold for months and even years despite repeated reductions. One six-bedroom Chester Square townhouse has been on the market since 2022, despite its price being slashed by £4m – almost a quarter of its original £17.5m listing.

One possible reason for this luxury property glut has been echoing loudly in City boardrooms and the offices of Mayfair advisers in recent months: the world’s footloose super-rich are starting to lose interest in the UK, put off by Labour’s tax changes. After Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 halted the flow of wealthy Russians, some claim Labour’s non-doms tax has sent the global elite fleeing the UK for cities such as Milan, Singapore, Geneva and Dubai.

At the heart of their complaint is the abolition of the centuries-old non-dom regime, which allowed wealthy foreign people to avoid paying tax on money they were earning outside the UK, and avoid paying inheritance tax on their global assets.

Chart

Such is the concern that Rachel Reeves is reportedly considering softening changes to the inheritance tax aspect of the non-doms clampdown. But that comes amid speculation about more tax rises in the autumn budget, after Labour’s U-turn on its welfare bill left a £5bn hole in the chancellor’s fiscal plan– with wealth taxes increasingly popular among some campaigners and the left of the party.

A colonial era relic

It was under the last Conservative government that Jeremy Hunt laid out plans to replace the 225-year-old non-doms system, a relic of Britain’s colonial era.

Introduced under King George III in 1799, it allowed subjects who had been born in Britain’s colonies to live in England without paying tax on their foreign rents and stocks so long as the money remained abroad.

After winning last year’s election, Labour went a step further by also exposing their overseas assets to the UK’s inheritance tax. The death duty is levied at a rate of 40% and, although it comes with a basket of allowances and exemptions, it is one of the highest in the world.

Under the new regime, non-doms’ foreign income and gains are subject to UK tax after four years rather than the previous 15. A new residence-based system means also that their global assets are subject to inheritance tax after 10 years.

It is this inheritance tax element that has been the “emotional trigger” for non-doms, tax experts and chief executives say. One financial services CEO said older wealthy clients in particular were relocating abroad to escape the death duty.

Several prominent non-dom departures have captured headlines: Shravin Bharti Mittal, an heir of one of India’s richest families; Nassef Sawiris, the Egyptian investor; and Richard Gnodde, a veteran Goldman Sachs banker.

One Indian non-dom, who has been living in the UK for the past five years, said she was considering moving her family to Switzerland as a result of the tax changes.

“We love England. We feel very much at home here,” she said. “We want to pay fair tax as members of society. But the biggest pain point was inheritance tax … it is not just ours, but my grandfather’s and my parents’ wealth that would now be taxed by the UK. That feels deeply unfair as the money was not made here.

“The current philosophical approach seems to be shrinking everyone’s pie instead of enlarging the pie, bringing more investment, employability and wealth to the country.”

Some claim non-doms are quitting London for cities such as Milan. Photograph: Audrius Venclova/Alamy

Sean Cockburn, of the advisers Forvis Mazars, said while many non-doms were unhappy with the changes, most of his clients were staying in the country.

“There has been an acceptance of higher income and capital gains but the emotional trigger has been inheritance tax. That seems to be the motivator for those moving. But not everyone is leaving the UK entirely.

“Yes some people have left, some people are considering it, but some people have decided to stay and are broadly accepting of the new rules. In the media there have been very high-profile, very wealthy people leaving who receive a lot of coverage. I personally have not had many clients leaving.”

As well as Reeves considering a reversal of her decision to charge UK inheritance tax on global assets of non-doms, Nigel Farage has promised Reform UK would “bring back” wealthy foreigners who have left Britain by giving them a full exemption from taxes on their overseas assets in return for a once-a-decade £250,000 fee.

Is there really an exodus, and what might it cost?

The UK counted about 74,000 non-doms when the regime ended in April. After the government announced its changes to the tax policy, the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated it could lead to a 12% to 25% decrease in the population of non-doms without trusts.

Collectively they paid just under £9bn in tax in 2023, according to figures from HMRC. About £6bn of that came from income tax, £2.3bn from national insurance contributions and £400m from capital gains tax.

Chart

John-Paul Marks, the new permanent secretary and chief executive of HMRC, told MPs in June that official data would only start to come through in January 2027, when self-assessment tax returns were due.

Still, in the absence of official figures, reports with estimates have emerged, often commissioned by interested parties such as the investment migration company Henley & Partners, and campaign groups such as Land of Opportunity and Foreign Investors for Britain.

Research commissioned by Henley found the UK could lose a net 16,500 “dollar millionaires” this year, those with at least $1m (£736,000) in liquid investable wealth, which includes assets such as cash, bonds, stocks and gold. But the figures are disputed, with the campaign group Tax Justice Network criticising the report’s reliance on social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, as a measure of where millionaires live or reside. A spokesperson for Henley & Partners said the report relied on multiple sources, not just LinkedIn.

A spokesperson for New World Wealth, the company that conducted the research, said the report also used sources such as investment migration programme statistics from across the world, its in-house database, company registers and property registers, among others.

Stuart Adam, a senior economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a thinktank, emphasised that until official data from the UK government arrives, there simply is not enough information to draw conclusions about how many non-doms have left, or would leave as a result of the changes.

“Scraping people’s LinkedIn pages and their changed location is extrapolating massively,” he said. “A change in location may not correspond with a change in tax residence.

skip past newsletter promotion

“I have not seen anything that could qualify as proper evidence. It is a hot topic so people will put out what they can. But it will be one or two years, or even longer, when data becomes available.”

A study co-authored by Arun Advani, a tax economist at the University of Warwick, found previous patterns would suggest the loss of the tax break will result in a “significant” but “temporary” exodus.

But he has said he expects a bigger backlash this time, particularly because of the change to inheritance tax rules. Non-doms, who previously did not have to pay inheritance tax on their global assets (including businesses they had built in their homeland), now have to pay the levy on these assets if they have been resident in the UK for 10 of the past 20 tax years.

“It was always a mistake to have the IHT rate for foreigners jump from 0% to 40% overnight when they get to 10 years in the UK,” he told Bloomberg.

The OBR had forecast that the changes to the non-dom regime would generate £33.8bn in revenue for the Treasury over the next five years. However, there is considerable uncertainty around those numbers.

A report from the Centre for Economics and Business Research found that if a quarter of non-doms left the UK, the net gain to the Treasury would be zero. That research was commissioned by Andrew Barclay, the co-founder of the property platform Yopa, grandson of one of the billionaire Barclay brothers.

Barclay now runs the Land of Opportunity Campaign, a lobbying effort that intends to recreate Britain’s economy in the image of the US.

The non-dom lobby group Foreign Investors for Britain has also been highly active in the area, with research conducted by Oxford Economics on its behalf finding that nearly two-thirds of non-doms were planning to leave the UK or considering doing so because of the changes. That was based on surveys responded to by 73 non-doms and 42 tax advisers. It also found that inheritance tax changes was a key motivator for 83% of non-doms in any relocation decision.

Dubai is a popular destination for the super-rich because of its zero personal income tax policy. Photograph: Prashant Naik

Ed Bussey, the chief executive of Oxford Sciences, a builder of UK technology spin-outs from Oxford University, said he was increasingly hearing from non-UK investors, who have historically funded companies in the UK, but who are now leaving the country because of the changes to inheritance tax.

“While they don’t want to leave they can’t justify having their worldwide assets – which they often grew before coming to the UK – now being taxed at 40%, while other European and Middle East countries are charging little or no inheritance tax,” he said.

“There is simply not enough UK domiciled investment capital to fund the innovation-led companies that we’re building and the high dependency on foreign capital is critical.”

He said the same issue was also deterring international entrepreneurs from coming to the UK to build their companies.

“We should be rolling out the red carpet to this highly sought-after global talent pool, not ‘incentivising’ to go to Italy, Greece or Dubai instead – all of which are now seeing substantial inflows of the investment capital that we’ve lost,” he said.

Donald Trump has certainly taken the view that wealthy individuals should be welcomed with open arms. The president has drawn up plans for a “gold card” that rich foreigners can buy for $5m that would grant them permanent US residency.

But Paul Donovan, the chief economist at the wealth management arm of the Swiss bank UBS, added that the population of truly “nomadic” wealth owners is “perhaps smaller than popularly supposed”.

“Certainly in conversations with UK clients, the issue of changing tax rules has come up more often, as you would expect,” he said. “To date there is very little evidence to suggest the idea of an exodus.

“You will always have high-profile nomadic wealth owners who will move and change their location.”

More tax please

For all the noisy departures, there are lower-profile non-doms who wish to stay in the UK, prizing its robust rule of law, elite schools system and world class museums, galleries and restaurants.

Giorgiana Notarbartolo, an impact investor who helps to run her family office, is one former non-dom who plans to stay in the country. Born in Italy, she has been in the UK since 2016. “I have been uncomfortable not paying tax off the wealth I make in Italy,” said Notarbartolo, a member of Patriotic Millionaires. “Who wants to raise their kids in a two-tier system?

“There are many single millionaires, if that, who are also non-doms. Some are staying and some are leaving, but not all are citing tax as their main reason, it’s something that might tip them off the edge if they were thinking about leaving anyway. Education and higher private school fees are a big reason.”

Paolo Fresia, also native to Italy and an impact investor who lives in London, said he has been “appalled by the media coverage” on the subject. In fact, he said, although he claimed non-dom status, he felt “a bit guilty” and now felt “relief” that the system was no longer in place.

“I first moved here for educational reasons, not for tax. There are so many reasons to be here, not just tax, but education, meritocracy and the rule of law. There is even a new four-year regime for people.”

“None of my friends or colleagues are moving,” added Fresia, also a member of Patriotic Millionaires. “Some parents of friends are leaving but those are the ones who are coming to the end of their lives, do not work or invest and were already thinking about leaving. I am happy to pay tax here.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Stock markets shrug off tariff letters after Trump says August 1 tariff deadline ‘not 100% firm’ – business live | Business

Published

on


Introduction: Asia-Pacific markets shrug off new Trump tariff threats

Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy.

The TACO trade is back! Many Asia-Pacific stock markets are rising today, despite Donald Trump’s decision to ramp up his trade war by announcing new tariffs on 14 US trading partners.

There’s relief that Trump has announced a new pause before these new levies kick in – a new three-week reprieve kicks the can down the road to 1 August, rather than tomorrow.

This delay will give countries to negotiate trade deals with the US.

Asked if 1 August deadline was firm, Trump indicated it wasn’t exactly concrete, saying last night:

“I would say firm, but not 100% firm. If they call up and they say we’d like to do something a different way, we’re going to be open to that.”

That has encouraged traders to conclude that Trump Always Chickens Out (TACO).

So while there were losses on Wall Street last night after the first tariff letters were released, markets across Asia are taking the news in their stride.

In Tokyo, the Nikkei 2225 has risen by 0.3%, up 118 points to 39,705 points, even though Japan has been threatened with a new 25% tariff from 1 August (slightly higher than the 24% rate announced back in April, before Trump’s 90-day pause which expires tomorrow).

South Korea’s KOSPI has gained nearly 2%, even though Seoul has also received a letter announcing a new 25% tariff.

China’s CSI300 index has climbed by 0.8%. European markets are expected to open flat.

More letters are expected to be sent later this week.

Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management, says traders are pricing in “delay, maybe even dysfunction”, rather than a resolution of the trade war. But that’s enough to keep them bidding.

Innes writes:

Markets didn’t lurch because they’ve seen this show before. Tariff hike, rhetoric spikes, and then—like clockwork—comes the sudden pivot: “We’re still open to talks.” This is policy by poker tell. And by now, investors are familiar enough with the bluff to call it and fade the fear.

However…Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote Bank, fears there is too much “unexplained optimism”, adding:

The deadline extension is not good news, per se. It simply adds to the uncertainty. It’s yet another sign that the deadline won’t be a line in the sand, and that tariffs set in the coming days and weeks won’t be carved in stone, either.

They will be constantly changed — raised, lowered — and used as a go-to threat in every situation.

The agenda

  • 9.30am BST: UK’s Office for Budget Responsibility to release its latest Fiscal risks and sustainability report

  • 10am BST: Marks & Spencer chair Archie Norman to face business and trade committee to discuss M&S’s cyber attack

  • 11am BST: Office for Budget Responsibility press conference

  • 12pm BST: Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry to release Volume 1 of its Final Report

Share

Updated at 

Key events

European stock markets have also opened higher, led by Germany.

The German DAX index rose by 50 points, or 0.2%, to 24,125, in early trading, amid some relief that European negotiators have another three weeks to reach a trade deal with Washington.

France’s CAC has inched up by 0.1%, with Spain’s IBEX gaining 0.14%.

Jochen Stanzl, chief market analyst at CMC Markets, says:

Donald Trump has once again retreated from imposing tariffs, allowing the DAX to rise above the 24,000-point mark. It appears that investors are eager to test the previous week’s highs once more, but the success of this endeavor will depend on the daily news regarding trade policy, which is expected to remain volatile. The trade issue continues to be a source of uncertainty for the stock market, and without a trade agreement with the U.S., a sustainable continuation of the rally could prove challenging.

This morning, the European Union faces both positive and negative news. On the positive side, the pause on tariffs has been extended until August. Trump seems to be sticking to his pattern of initially making threats before showing a willingness to negotiate. He likely understands that implementing reciprocal tariffs would be more harmful than beneficial to the ongoing discussions.

However, the negative aspect is that sector-specific tariffs on cars, auto parts, aluminum, and steel will remain in effect until August 1. This latest development is not cause for great celebration, as the EU has struggled to effectively counter the already high tariffs that are currently in place during the negotiations.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Company Turns To AI For Cost Cutting, Ends Up Paying US Woman Rs 1.7 Lakh To Fix Errors

Published

on


“Maybe I’m being naive, but I think if you are very good, you won’t have trouble,” she expressed her views about concerns around AI. According to Skidd, AI can be an excellent tool when used correctly. Like her, there are many writers who are earning by fixing AI-generated content.

A digital marketing agency co-owner, Sophie Warner, shared a similar experience, noting how her clients were using ChatGPT for their issues first.

“Earlier, clients would message us if they were having issues with their site or wanted to introduce new functionality,” Warner said. “Now they are going to ChatGPT first.”

She said clients using ChatGPT for website code had reported issues. These include sites crashing down or leaving them vulnerable to hackers. She revealed that such a move cost one of her clients £360 (Rs 42,000) and three days of service disruption, the BBC report added.  

Similar instances have occurred in the past where businesses trying to cut costs with AI have ended up paying more. In June, a Swedish fintech company, Klarna, made headlines for a similar incident. The company announced that it was organising a large-scale recruitment drive to hire staff again, two years after firing more than 700 employees to replace them with AI. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

AI video becomes more convincing, rattling creative industry

Published

on


[NEW YORK] Gone are the days of six-fingered hands or distorted faces – artificial intelligence (AI)-generated video is becoming increasingly convincing, attracting Hollywood, artists, and advertisers, while shaking the foundations of the creative industry.

To measure the progress of AI video, you need only look at Will Smith eating spaghetti.

Since 2023, this unlikely sequence – entirely fabricated – has become a technological benchmark for the industry.

Two years ago, the actor appeared blurry, his eyes too far apart, his forehead exaggeratedly protruding, his movements jerky, and the spaghetti did not even reach his mouth.

The version published a few weeks ago by a user of Google’s Veo 3 platform showed no apparent flaws whatsoever.

“Every week, sometimes every day, a different one comes out that’s even more stunning than the next,” said Elizabeth Strickler, a professor at Georgia State University.

A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU

Friday, 2 pm

Lifestyle

Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself.

Between Luma Labs’ Dream Machine, launched in June 2024, OpenAI’s Sora in December, Runway AI’s Gen-4 in March 2025, and Veo 3 in May, the sector has crossed several milestones in just a few months.

Runway has signed deals with Lionsgate studio and AMC Networks television group.

Lionsgate vice-president Michael Burns told New York Magazine about the possibility of using AI to generate animated, family-friendly versions from films such as the John Wick or Hunger Games franchises, rather than creating entirely new projects.

“Some use it for storyboarding or previsualization” – steps that come before filming – “others for visual effects or inserts”, said Jamie Umpherson, Runway’s creative director.

Burns gave the example of a script for which Lionsgate has to decide whether to shoot a scene or not.

To help make that decision, they can now create a 10-second clip “with 10,000 soldiers in a snowstorm”.

That kind of pre-visualisation would have cost millions before.

In October, the first AI feature film was released, Where the Robots Grow, an animated film without anything resembling live action footage.

For Alejandro Matamala Ortiz, Runway’s co-founder, an AI-generated feature film is not the end goal, but a way of demonstrating to a production team that “this is possible”.

Resistance everywhere

Still, some see an opportunity.

In March, startup Staircase Studio made waves by announcing plans to produce seven to eight films per year using AI for less than US$500,000 each, while ensuring it would rely on unionised professionals wherever possible.

“The market is there,” said Andrew White, co-founder of small production house Indie Studios.

People “don’t want to talk about how it’s made”, White pointed out. “That’s inside baseball. People want to enjoy the movie because of the movie.”

But White himself refuses to adopt the technology, considering that using AI would compromise his creative process.

Jamie Umpherson argues that AI allows creators to stick closer to their artistic vision than ever before, since it enables unlimited revisions, unlike the traditional system constrained by costs.

“I see resistance everywhere” to this movement, observed Georgia State’s Strickler.

This is particularly true among her students, who are concerned about AI’s massive energy and water consumption as well as the use of original works to train models, not to mention the social impact.

But refusing to accept the shift is “kind of like having a business without having the internet”, she said. “You can try for a little while.”

In 2023, the American actors’ union SAG-AFTRA secured concessions on the use of their image through AI.

Strickler sees AI diminishing Hollywood’s role as the arbiter of creation and taste, instead allowing more artists and creators to reach a significant audience.

Runway’s founders, who are as much trained artists as they are computer scientists, have gained an edge over their AI video rivals in film, television, and advertising.

But they are already looking further ahead, considering expansion into augmented reality and virtual reality, for example, creating a metaverse where films could be shot.

“The most exciting applications aren’t necessarily the ones that we have in mind,” said Umpherson. “The ultimate goal is to see what artists do with technology.” AFP



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending