Connect with us

Education

Experts warn that education systems must change in the age of AI

Published

on


Rows of desks and timed tests once suited factory-age education systems, yet teenagers now share classes with chatbots that can summarize a chapter in seconds.

In addition, one in seven adolescents worldwide lives with a mental disorder, a signal that the old setup is creaking under modern pressure.

The job picture is shifting just as fast, with employers predicting 69 million new roles and 83 million losses within five years, a net fall that exposes how blunt academic rankings have become.

The warning comes from education researchers Yong Zhao of the University of Kansas and RuoJun Zhong of YEE Education, whose June 19, 2025 paper argues that schools must abandon a winner‑takes‑all mindset or risk leaving graduates ill‑equipped for a world that operates on partnerships.

Why education systems struggle

“Meritocracy turns education into a race,” Zhao and Zhong state. Meritocracy once promised fairness, yet it often masks how money, networks, and geography load the dice before the first quiz is graded.

Competitive stress is tangible, and the U.S. Surgeon General has linked heavy social‑media comparison culture to rising youth anxiety.

Teamwork matters more than winning

“Excellence in the age of interdependence is not about being better than others. It is about becoming better with others,” explain Zhao and Zhong.

They swap the track‑meet metaphor for human interdependence, a frame that values shared strength over solo wins. 

Evidence for this shift is visible outside school walls, where 64 million Americans earned pay through freelance work in 2023, trading standardized résumés for niche expertise.

Co‑agency asks students to work with tools powered by artificial intelligence, not against them.

Large language models have already met or cleared the passing bar on parts of the U.S. Medical Licensing Exam, proof that rote recall is now cheap silicon labor.

When algorithms handle routine analysis, classrooms can pivot toward creativity, ethics, and empathy, talents a chatbot cannot reliably fake.

Education systems focused on strengths

Uniform syllabi give way to interest‑driven routes that honor each learner’s jagged profile of strengths.

Personal growth, social contribution, and wellbeing replace class rank, turning the report card into a portfolio rather than a scoreboard.

Research on team performance shows that psychological safety, not constant ranking, drives collaboration and deeper understanding.

Zhao and Zhong outline practical steps: mixed‑age studios, community projects, and assessments that ask what value a student created for others.

When learning works best

When students work on problems they care about, learning becomes internalized. They stop asking what will be on the test and start asking how their strengths can improve someone else’s life.

Zhao and Zhong argue that real engagement happens when learners find problems that matter to them and that also have social or environmental relevance.

These challenges draw out personal gifts while pushing students to think about others, anchoring them in shared responsibility.

Skills matter more than college degrees

Employers are steadily moving away from requiring four-year degrees for most roles. In 2024, over half of U.S. job postings no longer asked for formal education credentials, favoring proven skills instead.

State governments are following suit. In early 2024, Massachusetts removed degree requirements for most public jobs, and Minnesota had already done the same for 75% of its roles the year prior. This shift signals that what a person can do is finally outweighing where they went to school.

The push toward interdependence only works if differences are seen as assets, not problems. Research shows that teams with diverse skills, backgrounds, and thinking styles outperform more uniform groups on creative and analytical tasks.

Cognitive diversity isn’t just a social value, it’s an economic advantage. McKinsey found that companies in the top quartile for diverse leadership were 25% more likely to have above-average profitability.

Education systems can prepare students

Teachers become coaches who curate real‑world problems, then step back while learners form teams around their individual talents.

Policymakers can help by dialing down high‑stakes testing, freeing hours for the messy work of project design and reflection.

The authors frame their model as preparation for a labor market where collaboration beats competition and where empathy can earn as much as code.

If education accepts that premise, tomorrow’s graduates may see classmates not as obstacles but as essential partners in a shared experiment.

The study is published in ECNU Review of Education.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Education

Digital Learning for Africa: Ministers, Practitioners and Pathways

Published

on


Frameworks for the Futures of AI in Education.

Countries are using UNESCO’s Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM) to map weaknesses and opportunities and to guide national AI strategies ; two latest additions being Namibia and Mozambique. 

The DRC is prioritizing digital transformation projects, investment partnerships for infrastructure, AI adapted to local languages, and personalized learning, organized around governance, regulation of human capital, and industrialization. RAM has supported startups, scholarships and capacity-building—pointing toward sovereign digital infrastructures and talent retention. 

Dr. Turyagenda notes that youth are already using AI and need a structured framework; its National AI Strategy and Digital Agenda Strategy align with UNESCO, AU and East African frameworks, with teachers involved from the start.

Preparing learners for an AI-driven economy.

Namibia—among the first in Southern Africa to launch a RAM process—is developing a national AI strategy and a National AI Institute. Hon. Mr. Dino Ballotti, Deputy Minister of Education, Innovation, Youth, Sports, Arts and Culture of Namibia underscores that the national approach is “humanity first” and context-specific—“Namibian problems require Namibian solutions”—with priorities in school connectivity, teacher and learner readiness, and data availability. Indigenous communities are actively involved in developing tools and digital technologies. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

ATEC to provide long-term stewardship and shape international education growth

Published

on


The Australian Tertiary Education Commission (ATEC), created in response to last year’s Australian Universities Accord, has begun interim operations and will act as an independent steward for the system, overseeing implementation of reforms aimed at lifting participation, improving equity, and strengthening links between vocational and higher education.

Addressing an audience gathered at the Australian Student Equity Symposium in Sydney, Australia’s education minister Jason Clare said ATEC will ensure long-term reform of the sector and prevent policy momentum from being lost to shifting political cycles.

Clare said reform agendas often lose focus when governments or ministers change. “Almost always, when a big piece of thinking is done to reform or transform a part of the economy, governments will pick off parts of it and then the caravan moves on,” he said.

“I want to make sure that’s not the case here,” he said, reinforcing that ATEC will provide continuous oversight, keeping governments focused on both the unfinished business of the Accord and emerging sector challenges.

While the Accord laid the foundations, Clare stressed it cannot answer every question for the future. “The Accord is a product of a big piece of work in 2023 and it doesn’t necessarily have all the answers for 2030 or 2035,” he said. “This gives us a living process to constantly provide feedback… not just what haven’t we done in the Accord that we need to do, but what else should we be thinking of doing.”

ATEC will negotiate compacts with universities covering funding, purpose, and institutional mission. “At the nitty gritty level, it’s about money, but it’s also about purpose and focus,” said Clare.

“In the future, we do have an ecosystem which looks different than it does today, not worse, better, but different and potentially a little bit more specialised.”

ATEC will also play a central role in Australia’s international education sector, according to assistant minister for international education Julian Hill.

Speaking at the Education Consultants Association of Australia, Hill said the Commission will oversee mission-based compacts requiring institutions to outline their own strategies for international enrolments, rather than imposing one-size-fits-all caps.

Institutions will need to show how they are diversifying, how they’re contributing to national priorities, and how their growth is sustainable
Jason Clare, education minister

“Institutions will need to show how they are diversifying, how they’re contributing to national priorities, and how their growth is sustainable,” said Hill.

The Commission will monitor reliance on specific markets, regional provision, student housing, and overall sustainability, ensuring international growth aligns with broader national objectives.

ATEC is currently operating in an interim capacity and, subject to the passage of legislation, is expected to be fully operational by 2026. The Commission is designed to support a more coordinated and sustainable higher education system, ensuring that reforms progress steadily and that institutions balance domestic and international priorities in line with national policy objectives.



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

UM Today | Faculty of Education

Published

on


September 11, 2025 — 

The Digital Literacies Lab in the Faculty of Education, in collaboration with the Media Lab in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Manitoba, presents a hybrid speaker series (in-person and online) that will explore the potential and ethical challenges of generative artificial intelligence technologies in education, and the role of digital literacies in this context.

Through engaging talks and workshop-style discussions, this series aims to foster critical dialogue, inspire innovation, and support educators, researchers, and students in navigating the evolving role of AI in teaching, learning, and educational policy. Join us as we delve into opportunities and complexities of artificial intelligence and the role of digital literacies in education and beyond.

Join in-person viewing in the Digital Literacies Lab (RM 328, Education Building) or the Faculty of Arts Media Lab (233 University College) with post-workshop discussions.

All workshops will be streamed on Zoom, with three of the four presenters joining online. Complete event information for each workshop and registration for online viewing can be found here.

Workshops include: 

Sept 23 (6:00pm – 7:30pm) – “Generative AI: Implications and Applications for Education” with Bill Cope & Mary Kalantzis

Oct 21 (6:00pm – 7:30pm) – “The End of the World as We Know It? AI, Post-Literate Society and Education” with Allan Luke

November 25 (6:00pm – 7:30pm) – “Assessment Literacy in the Age of AI” with Michael Holden (in person presentation at 328 Education building)

Dec 2 (6:00pm – 7:30pm) – “Digital Literacies as Literacies of Repair” with Rodney H. Jones



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending