Connect with us

Mergers & Acquisitions

European parliament wades into Trump trade deal haggling

Published

on


This article is an on-site version of our Europe Express newsletter. Premium subscribers can sign up here to get the newsletter delivered every weekday and fortnightly on Saturday morning. Standard subscribers can upgrade to Premium here, or explore all FT newsletters

Good morning. Here’s a dark tale to start the week: Russia’s FSB spy service is systematically grooming Ukrainian teenagers, orphans and young adults to spy against their country, a Financial Times investigation has found, handing out cash to kids who take photos of military sites, scope out targets or even plant homemade bombs.

Today, our trade and tech correspondents report on European lawmakers wading into the US trade talks with a pre-emptive warning to negotiators not to offer any leeway on digital rules on US big tech companies. And our finance correspondent brings us an update from the increasingly one-sided Eurogroup leadership race.

Parliamentary oversight

As a deadline to seal a trade deal with the US draws nearer, the European Commission is finding its room for manoeuvre limited not just by US President Donald Trump’s hardline approach but also by EU lawmakers, write Andy Bounds and Barbara Moens.

Contest: To avoid Trumps’ threat of 50 per cent “reciprocal tariffs” across the board, Brussels is offering unspecified concessions on “non-tariff barriers”, EU rules and regulations which the US believes hurt its companies and block imports. Trump has delayed the tariffs until July 9 while the two sides negotiate a deal.

Members of the European parliament, who would have to approve any changes in legislation as well as the final trade deal, are starting to agitate about what the commission might be tempted to offer behind closed doors. A key concern is the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act, the EU’s landmark new digital rules, which is a major flashpoint for Trump. 

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen has made clear that formal changes to the EU’s digital rule book are off the table. But the bloc has some leeway in how far it goes in enforcing the rules, for example when it comes to the amount of the fines for tech companies.

Matthias Jorgensen, a senior trade official in the commission, told a parliamentary committee last week that rule changes were a red line but it would look at how US companies “can comply with our legislation in an easier way”.

Commission executive vice-president Teresa Ribera, who oversees the DMA, has been increasingly vocal in recent weeks that it must not be used as leverage in the trade talks, implying that she fears some inside the EU’s executive think otherwise.

Now, European lawmakers are also urging the commission not to cave in on its enforcement of the digital rules. Twenty-three MEPs sent questions to the commission, warning that concessions on the DMA “would set a dangerous precedent for external interference in EU legislation”, and asking the commission to commit to properly enforcing it without exceptions for US companies.

The lawmakers also include two from von der Leyen’s own group, the European People’s Party.

European parliament president Roberta Metsola reminded leaders at an EU summit last week that the parliament is key for signing off on any upcoming trade deal.

“Parliament will have a choice with a final vote in plenary,” Metsola said.

Chart du jour: Safe haven

Europe’s tourist hotspots are bracing for a record number of visitors this summer as holidaymakers spurn the US and the Middle East.

Euro race

The election of the next president of the Eurogroup in one week seems a foregone affair. But that hasn’t stopped candidates from throwing their hat into the ring, writes Paola Tamma.

Context: The head of the Eurogroup, the council of finance ministers from the 20 Eurozone countries, is elected by a simple majority. The vote is set to take place next Monday.

The incumbent Paschal Donohoe, Ireland’s finance minister, is likely to return for a third two-and-a-half-year term, keeping the conservatives at the helm of yet another top EU job.

But two of Donohoe’s peers entered the arena on Friday: Carlos Cuerpo of Spain, and Lithuania’s Rimantas Šadžius, both of the Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group.

Cuerpo’s bid was made literally at the last minute: his candidature was sent at one minute before midday on Friday, which was the deadline. Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez pushed his candidate at last week’s leaders’ summit.

“It is time for the euro area to seize this opportunity to regain our leadership on the global stage,” Cuerpo said in a statement.

But both he and Šadžius are unlikely to win, as the majority of Eurogroup members are representatives of conservative parties, and the S&D will have to split their already meagre vote between two candidates.

However, the finance ministers of the three largest EU economies are not conservatives: Germany’s belongs to the S&D, France’s to the liberal Renew, and Italy’s is a part of the nationalist rightwing Patriots for Europe grouping.

It is for their votes that candidates are vying.

Spokespeople for the finance ministries of France, Germany and Italy declined to comment.

What to watch today

  1. EU Council president António Costa and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen attend UN conference on financing for development in Seville.

  2. EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas visits Armenia.

Now read these

  • Rare earths: France is emerging as a critical domestic player in the European rare earths market, seeking to exploit China’s move to drastically reduce exports.

  • ‘Overflowing’: Europe’s most important ports are running at maximum capacity as Trump tariffs and low river levels cause huge goods congestion.

  • Proud: Hundreds of thousands of people defied Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s ban and marched at Budapest’s largest ever Pride.

Are you enjoying Europe Express? Sign up here to have it delivered straight to your inbox every workday at 7am CET and on Saturdays at noon CET. Do tell us what you think, we love to hear from you: europe.express@ft.com. Keep up with the latest European stories @FT Europe





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mergers & Acquisitions

FTAV’s further reading

Published

on



AI and jobs; Oklahoma and towers; India and retailers; AI and cybercrime; Norway and elections



Source link

Continue Reading

Mergers & Acquisitions

Trump Intel deal designed to block sale of chipmaking unit, CFO says

Published

on


Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

The Trump administration’s investment in Intel was structured to deter the chipmaker from selling its manufacturing unit, its chief financial officer said on Thursday, locking it into a lossmaking business it has faced pressure to offload.

The US government last week agreed to take a 10 per cent stake in Intel by converting $8.9bn of federal grants under the 2022 Chips Act into equity, the latest unorthodox intervention by President Donald Trump in corporate America.

The agreement also contains a five-year warrant that allows the government to take an additional 5 per cent of Intel at $20 a share if it ceases to own 51 per cent of its foundry business — which aims to make chips for third-party clients.

“I don’t think there’s a high likelihood that we would take our stake below the 50 per cent, so ultimately I would expect [the warrant] to expire,” CFO David Zinsner told a Deutsche Bank conference on Thursday.

“I think from the government’s perspective, they were aligned with that: they didn’t want to see us take the business and spin it off or sell it to somebody.”

Intel has faced pressure to carve off its foundry business as it haemorrhages cash. It lost $13bn last year as it struggled to compete with rival TSMC and attract outside customers.

Zinsner’s comments highlight how the deal with the Trump administration ties the company’s hands.

Analysts including Citi, as well as former Intel board members, have called for a sale — and Intel has seen takeover interest from the likes of Qualcomm.

Intel’s board ousted chief executive Pat Gelsinger, the architect of its ambitious foundry strategy, in December, which intensified expectations that it could ultimately abandon the business.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday the deal was being finalised. “The Intel deal is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce. The T’s are still being crossed, the I’s are still being dotted.”

Intel received $5.7bn of the government investment on Wednesday, Zinsner said. The remaining $3.2bn of the investment is still dependent on Intel hitting milestones agreed under a Department of Defense scheme and has not yet been paid.

He said the warrants could be viewed as “a little bit of friction to keep us from moving in a direction that I think ultimately the government would prefer we not move to”.

He said the direct government stake could also incentivise potential customers to view Intel on a “different level”.

So far, the likes of Nvidia, Apple and Qualcomm have not placed orders with Intel, which has struggled to convince them it has reliable manufacturing processes that could lure them away from TSMC.

As Intel’s new chief executive Lip-Bu Tan seeks to shore up the company’s finances, the government deal also “eliminated the need to access capital markets”, Zinsner explained.

Given the uncertainty over whether Intel would hit the construction milestones required to receive the Chips Act manufacturing grants, converting the government funds to equity “effectively guaranteed that we’d get the cash”.

“This was a great quarter for us in terms of cash raise,” Zinsner added. Intel had also recently sold $1bn of its shares in Mobileye, and was “within a couple of weeks” of closing a deal to sell 51 per cent of its stake in its specialist chips unit Altera to private equity firm Silver Lake, he noted.

SoftBank also made a $2bn investment in Intel last week. Zinsner pushed back against the idea that it had been co-ordinated with the government, as SoftBank chief executive Masayoshi Son pursues an ever-closer relationship with Trump.

“It was coincidence that it fell all in the same week,” Zinsner said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Mergers & Acquisitions

Nuclear fusion developer raises almost $900mn in new funding

Published

on


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

One of the most advanced nuclear fusion developers has raised about $900mn from backers including Nvidia and Morgan Stanley, as it races to complete a demonstration plant in the US and commercialise the nascent energy technology.   

Commonwealth Fusion Systems plans to use the money to complete its Sparc fusion demonstration machine and begin work on developing a power plant in Virginia. The group secured a deal in June to supply 200 megawatts of electricity to technology giant Google.

The Google deal was one of only a handful of such commercial agreements in the sector and placed CFS at the forefront of fusion companies trying to perfect the technology and develop a commercially viable machine.

CFS has raised almost $3bn since it was spun out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2018, drawing investors amid heightened interest in nuclear to meet surging energy demand from artificial intelligence.

“Investors recognise that CFS is making fusion power a reality. They see that we are executing and delivering on our objectives,” said Bob Mumgaard, chief executive and co-founder of CFS. 

New investors in CFS’s latest funding round, which raised $863mn, include NVentures, Nvidia’s venture capital arm, Morgan Stanley’s Counterpoint Global and a consortium of 12 Japanese companies led by Mitsui & Co.

Nuclear fusion seeks to produce clean energy by combining atoms in a manner that releases a significant amount of energy. In contrast, fission — the process used in conventional nuclear power — splits heavy atoms such as uranium into smaller atoms, releasing heat.

CFS is also planning to build the world’s first large-scale fusion power plant in Virginia, which is home to the largest concentration of data centres in the world.

BloombergNEF estimates that US data centre power demand will more than double to 78GW by 2035, from about 35GW last year, and nuclear energy start-ups already have raised more than $3bn in 2025, a 400 per cent increase on 2024 levels.

But experts have warned that addressing the technological challenges to the development of fusion would be expensive, putting into question the viability of the technology.

No group has yet been able to produce more energy from a fusion reaction than the system itself consumes despite decades of experimentation.

“Fusion is radically difficult compared to fission,” said Mark Nelson, managing director of the consultancy Radiant Energy Group, pointing to the incredibly high temperatures and pressures required to combine atoms.

“The hard part is not making fusion reactors. Every step forward towards what may be a dead end economically, looks like something that justifies another billion or a Nobel Prize.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending