The UK exchequer is chasing about £90m in unpaid taxes after a temporary staffing business was rescued from insolvency proceedings in an £18m deal that reimbursed private funders in full.

The main assets of Challenge Recruitment Group, which counted Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Co-op among its top customers, were acquired from administration in July by the US website swipejobs, in what appears to be the second time the British staffing business has emerged from insolvency while owing tens of millions of pounds to the exchequer.

The levels of debt owed by Challenge to HM Revenue and Customs has emerged as the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is under pressure to announce tax rises in her autumn budget in order to shore up the public finances.

Swipejobs paid £4.9m as part of a “pre-pack” administration deal for the pick of Challenge’s contracts supplying staff to a series of huge UK brands, as well as £12.7m to the collapsed group’s secured lenders, Close Brothers and Praetura Asset Finance, according to a report by administrators FRP.

A pre-pack administration is a restructuring deal agreed in advance of a company entering insolvency – a staged process that frees the acquired business of debt and leaves administrators to use receipts to at least partly pay creditors.

Challenge’s remaining creditors, including HMRC, will probably be repaid a fraction of what they are owed.

When the deal to acquire Challenge assets from administration was announced on 12 July, a statement by the UK group made no mention of the company’s difficulties. It said: “We’re proud to announce that Challenge-trg Group has been acquired by swipejobs … Together, we are in an even better position to deliver exceptional results and enhanced operational efficiency; all underpinned by market-leading technology.”

Four Challenge businesses in administration owe HMRC about £34m, according to the administrator’s report.

A fifth company, TLR White Trading, owes a further £56m to HMRC relating to “five months of VAT and four months of PAYE” incurred by the wider Challenge business. TLR White Trading entered a separate insolvency process in April 2025, six months after being spun out of the Challenge Recruitment Group in October 2024. The new standalone company had the sole function of providing “temporary staffing and payroll services” to the wider Challenge group and was funded by the larger business in order to settle its “payroll costs”.

The latest Challenge insolvency comes after the same recruitment business, then called IF Trade Co, transferred its main contracts to Challenge-trg in 2022, before entering administration with debts to HMRC of about £34m, according to further documents filed with Companies House. Two brothers, Richard and Thomas Cropper, were directors of both IF Trade and Challenge-trg.

The siblings then sold a 75% stake in Challenge to an employee ownership trust for an undisclosed sum in October 2024, nine months before the group companies entered administration.

Swipejobs said it had acquired Challenge assets on a “go-forward basis” and that the brothers have been given a six-month consultancy contract. The Croppers did not respond to efforts to contact them.

HMRC estimates that “phoenixism” – the art of liquidating a company and allowing the directors to rise from the ashes in a new entity, free of debts – cost the exchequer about 22% of the £3.8bn of tax losses reported in 2022 to 2023.

An HMRC spokesperson said: “As the chancellor announced in her spring statement, the government is taking action to improve collaboration between HMRC, Companies House and the Insolvency Service to tackle those using contrived corporate insolvencies and dissolutions – so-called ‘phoenixism’ – to evade tax.”

I know we’re off to a bad start when Jean refuses to board a tube train bound for central London. She plants herself on the platform and will not be moved. In the end I have to pick her up and carry her – squirming in protest and heavy – over the threshold. When the doors slide shut the woman standing next to me in the packed carriage asks if my dog has ever been on a train before.

“No,” I say. “Can you tell?”

“How far are you going?” she says.

“Canary Wharf,” I say, “where we change trains, and then … ” The look of concern – or possibly scorn – on the woman’s face is such that I don’t finish my sentence: and then we’re going to the cinema.

To be honest, I’d rank pet-friendly film-going pretty low on my list of needs. Taking your dog to the cinema strikes me as a bizarre and counterintuitive bit of entitlement. I go to the cinema to get away from my dog.

Dog-friendly screenings first appeared in Britain a decade ago and have been spreading steadily since the end of Covid restrictions. Greenwich Picturehouse in south-east London, where we’re heading, schedules dogs-allowed showings for Sunday mornings, when people are already out with their pets. But why?

“It’s a community thing,” says deputy manager Mike Miles. “It gives people a chance to meet up with their dogs, and come and chill out. For us it’s about providing that experience. And obviously we get to look at the cute dogs as they come in and make a fuss of them.”

I won’t lie: the idea filled me with such dread that I rang up ahead of time for some reassurance. How did it work? Did I need to buy a ticket for my dog, next to me?

“It’s unallocated seating, just choose a seat when you arrive,” the customer service representative said. “And you don’t need to book one for the dog.”

This summer, the photographer Irina Werning, who is from Argentina, wanted to spend a month focused on a very British story. “It had to be dogs,” she says. To her, dog-friendly cinema represents a level of canine indulgence you just don’t see in other countries. “There are 18 cinemas that offer this just in London,” she says, “and more across the UK. I think there is one in Paris.”

Some cinemas restrict dogs to the floor, but the Picturehouse chain allows them on the seats, as long as you use one of the fleece blankets provided. On dog days they restrict sales to half capacity to make sure there’s plenty of space. They also lower the volume of the film slightly and keep the house lights dimly lit, making this not unlike the baby-friendly or “relaxed” screenings cinemas often schedule for autistic people or those with dementia. It opens up film-going to people who might not otherwise have access to it, and is an opportunity to fill cinema seats on an early weekend morning.

Werning spent August photographing dog-friendly screenings, often shooting on her knees to capture the dogs’ perspective. To minimise disruption, she took pictures only in the 15 minutes before the film started and the 15 minutes after it finished. In between, she took a seat and waited. “I saw The Fantastic Four twice, Jurassic Park twice,” she says. “I saw Superman … ”

My dog and I, frazzled after our journey, arrive in good time for the 11am showing of The Fantastic Four: First Steps. There are dogs and owners outside, waiting to be let in. Because we are both still mildly hysterical, we keep a respectful distance until the doors open.

“It’s our first time,” I say to the woman on the refreshment stand.

“Exciting!” she says. I shrug.

“She knows nothing of the Marvel Cinematic Universe,” I say. I don’t say: neither do I.

Picturehouse launched dog-friendly screenings in 2017 and half their sites regularly hold them; here in Greenwich they do one or two a month.

“The next one is The Materialists,” says the man checking tickets.

“Oh, great,” I say.

We walk in as the adverts are beginning. There are about 15 dogs in the room, and I pick two seats as distant from anyone else as possible – fourth row, far right aisle. But the place is filling up; there will be about 30 dogs by the end – mostly poodle crosses and sleepy lurchers. As I predicted, my dog is beside herself: she can’t believe she’s in a room full of dogs, without a ball in sight. I pat the seat beside me and she climbs on to it. Leaning in close, I speak to her in the quiet but commanding tone I plan to adopt for the next two hours.

“I should warn you,” I say, “there might not be any dogs in this film.”

It’s a question I’ve been asking myself: is dog-friendly cinema just for the owners? Do the dogs get anything out of going, apart from not being left home alone?

“It’s for the humans, obviously,” Miles says. “If it’s got a dog in it, great, that’s cute. But you’re bringing your dog along more for the socialising aspect of being around other dogs and doing something new. It’s fun to put a dog-themed film on now and again, but we do find they sell the least tickets, because people are just like: why would I want to come and watch Beethoven?”

But according to Werning, a dog angle can make a real difference. “Superman has a lot of scenes with dogs and people were going wild,” she says. “The dogs were all barking and people were laughing like an orchestra together, looking at each other and enjoying it.”

Just before the lights go down in Greenwich, a couple with a tiny lapdog sit down behind us. Jean, a labrador cross, immediately tries to bound over the seats to introduce herself. The little dog growls. I grip the lead tightly. I want to explain to the couple that they have chosen their seats poorly; that my dog’s interactions with other dogs – especially tiny, hostile dogs – are characterised by a kind of doomed optimism. She will not give up trying to be friends just because the other dog hates her. Unless one of us moves, I want to say, we are in for a long afternoon.

But the film has started and, for the moment at least, it’s blowing my dog’s mind. The opening montage of the Fantastic Four’s past heroics is probably the biggest, strangest thing she has ever seen. She sits bolt upright, her eyes darting all over the screen: explosions, music, people shouting. We’re both gripped, and neither of us has the slightest idea what’s going on.

The dog remains rapt for almost a full minute before turning to look at me in perplexity, and whining softly.

“The woman and the stretchy one are married,” I say. “That’s all I know.”

Jean wheels round and sticks her snout between our seat backs. The little dog behind growls. I pull on the lead. Jean jumps off the seat and prowls around under my feet. The other dogs are silent and still. It’s actually one of the best behaved cinema audiences I have ever seen. There is an occasional yap from the back – perhaps three in all – but that’s it. It occurs to me that all these dogs have been to the cinema before. It feels as if Jean and I are the only ones not following the plot.

Half an hour in, I produce a dog treat, unintentionally letting the dog see that I’ve brought the whole packet with me. For 15 minutes Jean is entirely fixated on my rucksack, until the treats are gone. Then she curls up in her seat and falls asleep. A little later, so do I.

As I’m drifting off, I think: this must be what dog-friendly cinema is all about – a chance for you and your pet to sit in the dark together and sleep through loud noises. Then again, we could do this at home. We often do. Why pay to take your dog to the movies?

“Lots of people I asked why they brought their dogs said: because it’s cheaper than daycare,” Werning says. “And I’m like, what? You leave your dog in daycare every time you leave your house? And they said yes, because the dogs suffer. This, I think, is also something our generation is carrying, this overprotection of pets.”

I am woken by a sharp constriction in my left ankle – the lead is wrapped once round my leg and the dog is in the aisle, trying to get to a lurcher one row up and six seats over. The lurcher has some kind of soft toy, and Jean wants it. I try to calm her down, to coax her back to her seat, but she’s having none of it. After a blissful five-minute nap I’m suddenly back to wondering: what’s the worst thing that could happen, and is it about to?

“There are occasions where dogs don’t get on with each other, little tiffs, shall we say,” Miles tells me later. “But we’ve never had to break anything up, which is good. It’s enough dealing with humans.”

Jean will not retake her seat, or settle anywhere else. At about the hour and 10 minute mark, with my arms aching from holding the lead, I decide we both need a break from the film. I take the dog into the empty lobby, where we sit for a moment to collect ourselves.

“Did you notice that the big stone guy was cousin Richie from The Bear?” I say. The dog stares up at me with a look of boundless urgency, and I decide we are never going to find out how The Fantastic Four ends.

Marmaduke

The Conservative party will aim to “maximise extraction” of oil and gas in the North Sea if it wins power, Kemi Badenoch is expected to announce.

Badenoch will use a speech in Aberdeen in the coming days to set out her plans to extract as much oil and gas as possible instead of shifting away from fossil fuels, the Sunday Telegraph reported.

She will announce the Tories plan to overhaul the North Sea Transition Authority, which oversees the issuing of licences, dropping the word transition and replacing its 12-page mandate with a simple order to extract the maximum possible amount of fossil fuel.

Badenoch said Britain “cannot afford not to be doing everything to get hydrocarbons out the ground” to boost growth.

She said: “We are in the absurd situation where our country is leaving vital resources untapped while neighbours such as Norway extract them from the same seabed.

“Britain has already decarbonised more than every other major economy since 1990, yet we face some of the highest energy prices in the developed world.

“This is not sustainable and it cannot continue. That is why I am calling time on this unilateral act of economic disarmament and Labour’s impossible ideology of net zero by 2050.

“So, a future Conservative government will scrap all mandates for the North Sea beyond maximising extraction.

“It is time that common sense, economic growth and our national interest came first, and only the Conservatives will deliver that. We are going to get all our oil and gas out of the North Sea.”

Last month, the energy and net zero secretary, Ed Miliband, accused the Conservatives of being “anti-science” by abandoning a political consensus on net zero.

In the first of what is promised to be an annual “state of the climate” report, the Labour MP set out the findings of a Met Office-led study that detailed how the UK was already hotter and wetter, and faced a greater number of extreme weather events.

Miliband quoted the former prime minister Theresa May, who put net zero targets into law in 2019 and had argued that the real climate zealots were “populists who offer only easy answers to complex questions”. He added: “I couldn’t put it better myself.”