Connect with us

Mergers & Acquisitions

Donald Trump halts US-Canada trade talks over Big Tech tax dispute

Published

on


Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump said the US was “terminating” trade talks with Canada in retaliation against a new digital services tax on tech companies, reigniting a bitter North American trade war after months of détente. 

He vowed to use America’s economic heft to hit back and set a new tariff rate on Canadian imports “within the next seven day period”.

Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with . . . has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country,” the US president posted on his Truth Social platform on Friday. 

“Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,” Trump added.

Friday’s announcement plunges the two nations back into a trade war and brings an abrupt end to a period of more cordial relations that followed the election of Mark Carney as Canadian prime minister in March.

“We have a great relationship with the people of Canada,” Trump told journalists in the Oval Office on Friday afternoon. But he added: “We have all the cards, every single one. We don’t want to do anything bad but economically we have such power over Canada.”

Carney — who was propelled to the premiership on a surge of anti-US sentiment — sought to reset relations with Washington that had grown strained under his predecessor Justin Trudeau.

Early meetings between Carney and Trump proved friendly and Carney said this month that the pair had agreed at the G7 summit in the Canadian Rockies “to pursue negotiations towards a deal within the coming 30 days”. But Trump’s outburst threatens to undo that progress.

“The Canadian government will continue to engage in these complex negotiations with the United States in the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses,” the prime minister’s office said. 

The Canadian dollar fell on Trump’s statement as traders reacted to the fresh escalation of the trade dispute, leaving it down 0.7 per cent against the US dollar on the day. The S&P 500 also fell from its highs of the day, but the blue-chip index remained up about 0.3 per cent.

Trump’s broadside comes after Canadian finance minister François-Philippe Champagne said this month that Ottawa was “going ahead” with plans for a digital services tax despite the misgivings of the Trump administration. 

The measure would hit tech groups with a 3 per cent levy on revenue earned from Canadian users and has been opposed by Silicon Valley.

Foreign companies such as Meta, Netflix and Amazon, as well as local businesses, must file a return for the tax by the end of the month or face a fine. The tax will be backdated to 2022.

“Obviously, we think it’s patently unfair to do it retroactively,” US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Friday. “This is something from the Trudeau years so we were hoping as a sign of goodwill that the new Carney administration would at least put a brake on that during the trade talks. They seem not to have.”

Bessent said US trade representative Jamieson Greer would probably launch an investigation into unfair trade practices over the matter that could trigger further tariffs on Canadian products.

The president said Canada’s tax “copied” those imposed in some EU member states. “And it’s not going to work out well for Europe either,” Trump said. But he added negotiations with the EU were still under way.

Trump also hit out at Canadian agricultural policy, a long-standing area of contention between the countries dating back to the president’s first term.

“They have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products,” he wrote in his Truth Social post on Friday.

Canada recently passed legislation on “supply management” measures to protect its dairy industry through price setting and production quotas — a system described by Trump in 2017 as a “disgrace”.

Trump’s return to office sparked a tit-for-tat trade war between Washington and Ottawa after he announced sweeping 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods. Those levies were later amended with carve-outs for goods covered by the USMCA trade deal, but new sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminium have hit Canada hard.

The trade acrimony — alongside the president’s threat to annex Canada as the 51st US state — has triggered a surge of resentment north of the border.

Canadian industry groups slammed the digital services tax on Friday and urged the government to scrap it in order to placate Trump.

“For many years, we have warned that the implementation of a unilateral digital services tax could risk undermining Canada’s economic relationship with its most important trading partner, the United States,” said Goldy Hyder, president of the Business Council of Canada. “That unfortunate development has now come to pass.”

Candace Laing, president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said the tax was “self-defeating in nature” but added that she hoped it would not derail trade talks between the countries.

“Negotiations go through peaks and valleys. With deadlines approaching, some last-minute surprises should be expected,” she added. “The tone and tenor of talks has improved in recent months, and we hope to see progress continue.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mergers & Acquisitions

FTAV’s further reading

Published

on



AI and jobs; Oklahoma and towers; India and retailers; AI and cybercrime; Norway and elections



Source link

Continue Reading

Mergers & Acquisitions

Trump Intel deal designed to block sale of chipmaking unit, CFO says

Published

on


Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

The Trump administration’s investment in Intel was structured to deter the chipmaker from selling its manufacturing unit, its chief financial officer said on Thursday, locking it into a lossmaking business it has faced pressure to offload.

The US government last week agreed to take a 10 per cent stake in Intel by converting $8.9bn of federal grants under the 2022 Chips Act into equity, the latest unorthodox intervention by President Donald Trump in corporate America.

The agreement also contains a five-year warrant that allows the government to take an additional 5 per cent of Intel at $20 a share if it ceases to own 51 per cent of its foundry business — which aims to make chips for third-party clients.

“I don’t think there’s a high likelihood that we would take our stake below the 50 per cent, so ultimately I would expect [the warrant] to expire,” CFO David Zinsner told a Deutsche Bank conference on Thursday.

“I think from the government’s perspective, they were aligned with that: they didn’t want to see us take the business and spin it off or sell it to somebody.”

Intel has faced pressure to carve off its foundry business as it haemorrhages cash. It lost $13bn last year as it struggled to compete with rival TSMC and attract outside customers.

Zinsner’s comments highlight how the deal with the Trump administration ties the company’s hands.

Analysts including Citi, as well as former Intel board members, have called for a sale — and Intel has seen takeover interest from the likes of Qualcomm.

Intel’s board ousted chief executive Pat Gelsinger, the architect of its ambitious foundry strategy, in December, which intensified expectations that it could ultimately abandon the business.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday the deal was being finalised. “The Intel deal is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce. The T’s are still being crossed, the I’s are still being dotted.”

Intel received $5.7bn of the government investment on Wednesday, Zinsner said. The remaining $3.2bn of the investment is still dependent on Intel hitting milestones agreed under a Department of Defense scheme and has not yet been paid.

He said the warrants could be viewed as “a little bit of friction to keep us from moving in a direction that I think ultimately the government would prefer we not move to”.

He said the direct government stake could also incentivise potential customers to view Intel on a “different level”.

So far, the likes of Nvidia, Apple and Qualcomm have not placed orders with Intel, which has struggled to convince them it has reliable manufacturing processes that could lure them away from TSMC.

As Intel’s new chief executive Lip-Bu Tan seeks to shore up the company’s finances, the government deal also “eliminated the need to access capital markets”, Zinsner explained.

Given the uncertainty over whether Intel would hit the construction milestones required to receive the Chips Act manufacturing grants, converting the government funds to equity “effectively guaranteed that we’d get the cash”.

“This was a great quarter for us in terms of cash raise,” Zinsner added. Intel had also recently sold $1bn of its shares in Mobileye, and was “within a couple of weeks” of closing a deal to sell 51 per cent of its stake in its specialist chips unit Altera to private equity firm Silver Lake, he noted.

SoftBank also made a $2bn investment in Intel last week. Zinsner pushed back against the idea that it had been co-ordinated with the government, as SoftBank chief executive Masayoshi Son pursues an ever-closer relationship with Trump.

“It was coincidence that it fell all in the same week,” Zinsner said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Mergers & Acquisitions

Nuclear fusion developer raises almost $900mn in new funding

Published

on


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

One of the most advanced nuclear fusion developers has raised about $900mn from backers including Nvidia and Morgan Stanley, as it races to complete a demonstration plant in the US and commercialise the nascent energy technology.   

Commonwealth Fusion Systems plans to use the money to complete its Sparc fusion demonstration machine and begin work on developing a power plant in Virginia. The group secured a deal in June to supply 200 megawatts of electricity to technology giant Google.

The Google deal was one of only a handful of such commercial agreements in the sector and placed CFS at the forefront of fusion companies trying to perfect the technology and develop a commercially viable machine.

CFS has raised almost $3bn since it was spun out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2018, drawing investors amid heightened interest in nuclear to meet surging energy demand from artificial intelligence.

“Investors recognise that CFS is making fusion power a reality. They see that we are executing and delivering on our objectives,” said Bob Mumgaard, chief executive and co-founder of CFS. 

New investors in CFS’s latest funding round, which raised $863mn, include NVentures, Nvidia’s venture capital arm, Morgan Stanley’s Counterpoint Global and a consortium of 12 Japanese companies led by Mitsui & Co.

Nuclear fusion seeks to produce clean energy by combining atoms in a manner that releases a significant amount of energy. In contrast, fission — the process used in conventional nuclear power — splits heavy atoms such as uranium into smaller atoms, releasing heat.

CFS is also planning to build the world’s first large-scale fusion power plant in Virginia, which is home to the largest concentration of data centres in the world.

BloombergNEF estimates that US data centre power demand will more than double to 78GW by 2035, from about 35GW last year, and nuclear energy start-ups already have raised more than $3bn in 2025, a 400 per cent increase on 2024 levels.

But experts have warned that addressing the technological challenges to the development of fusion would be expensive, putting into question the viability of the technology.

No group has yet been able to produce more energy from a fusion reaction than the system itself consumes despite decades of experimentation.

“Fusion is radically difficult compared to fission,” said Mark Nelson, managing director of the consultancy Radiant Energy Group, pointing to the incredibly high temperatures and pressures required to combine atoms.

“The hard part is not making fusion reactors. Every step forward towards what may be a dead end economically, looks like something that justifies another billion or a Nobel Prize.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending