Connect with us

Education

Do Schools Have the Resources to Execute Trump’s Executive Order on AI?

Published

on


(TNS) — A new executive order signed by President Donald Trump calls for infusing artificial intelligence throughout K-12 education. A major focus of that plan is training teachers on how to integrate AI into their instruction and workflows.

This was one of seven executive orders Trump signed on April 23 focused on education, including one on “ensuring commonsense school discipline policies” and a handful focused on higher education institutions.

Some educators and education organizations have welcomed the order, saying that AI literacy for educators and students is important and much needed.


“I’m very excited about it,” said Pam Amendola, an English teacher at Dawson County High School in Dawsonville, Ga. “AI is not the future. AI is right now, and we need direction from the federal government.”

While her district has yet to provide training on AI, Amendola has attended AI trainings on her own time and has started teaching her students what AI is, how it works, and how to use AI-powered tools responsibly.

But other experts and educators are skeptical the federal government will be able to actualize the policy goals of the order, given that so much funding and expertise have been cut from the departments tasked with carrying out this work.

The executive order calls for the secretaries of education and agriculture, as well as the director of the National Science Foundation, to prioritize discretionary grant funds and existing programs for teacher training. The Education Department is tasked with supporting professional development both for teachers of computer science and AI-focused classes, as well as for all educators to integrate the fundamentals of AI into all subjects.

The order also directs the agriculture secretary and the NSF director to leverage existing programs to create teacher-training opportunities to help teachers “effectively integrate AI-based tools” into their classrooms.

“As Artificial Intelligence (AI) reshapes every industrial sector, it is vitally important that the next generation of students is prepared to leverage this technology in all aspects of their professional lives,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement.” The Trump Administration will lead the way in training our educators to foster early and responsible AI education in our classrooms to keep up American leadership in the global economy.”

But it is a tall order given that most teachers have yet to receive any professional development on AI, as the EdWeek Research Center has found in surveys of teachers. In an October 2024 EdWeek Research Center survey, 58 percent of teachers said they had not received any professional development on using generative AI in the classroom, and 68 percent said they are not currently using AI tools in their classrooms.

SCHOOL DISTRICTS NEED HELP WADING THROUGH THE FLOOD OF AI PRODUCTS

Schools are in desperate need of support to train teachers on the rapidly changing technology that is cropping up seemingly everywhere, said Dusty Strickland, the assistant principal at North Murray High School in Chatsworth, Ga.

“My teachers who are doing everything they can to make sure our kids know the standards that they have to know, they don’t have time to dig into just [AI],” he said. “It’s a very fast-moving train, so how can we make sure our teachers can get on it?”

Right now, teachers at Murray High School can volunteer to participate in training from the district’s technology specialists on using the AI technology already embedded in the tools and programs the district uses, Strickland said. And then teachers who participate in the voluntary training often share what they learn with peers.

Strickland said he would like to see the federal government provide schools with more money for AI training for teachers, as well as resources to help administrators like him determine which professional development programs and AI tools are high-quality.

“A lot of people are popping up saying, ‘hi, I’m an expert,’ but I don’t know how to [have them] prove that [they’re] an expert in such a new field,” he said.

While Amendola, the teacher in Georgia, is optimistic about the executive order, she is wary of how much influence ed-tech companies will have on the federal AI task force to be established by the executive order and its responsibilities.

Nationwide, districts have been slow to adopt guidelines and provide training around AI because the technology is evolving so quickly and because of a lack of expertise. As a result, educators’ exposure to AI has come mostly from ed-tech companies that are “shoving their products out there for districts to use,” Amendola said.

That is why she emphasizes that the federal task force should rely on organizations whose primary goal isn’t to sell AI-related products and services.

Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, panned the executive order in a statement, saying it opens up schools to “unaccountable tech companies” and “unproven software.”

“While AI can be a helpful and important tool for educators and students in classrooms, we’ve instead seen systems that produce disinformation, impinge on privacy, and tell inaccurate accounts of history,” Weingarten said.

Instead, Weingarten said, the administration should be “investing in classrooms and instruction designed by educators who work directly with students and who have the knowledge and expertise to meet their needs.”

THE EXECUTIVE ORDER DOESN’T ADDRESS DATA PRIVACY OR BIAS IN AI

The aims of the executive order are largely bipartisan in nature. There’s broad support for giving schools more resources for harnessing this powerful technology.

But there are also significant omissions in the directive and potential hurdles to converting policy into reality, say some experts.

One concern is that money that could have been diverted to supporting the goals of the executive order — as well as many people with expertise in the subject — are being cut from the federal government, said Bernadette Adams, the former senior policy adviser at the U.S. Department of Education’s office of educational technology and an expert in AI. The entire staff at the OET, including Adams, was dismissed as part of the Education Department’s recent staff cuts. The Education Department now has about half the number of staff as it did when Trump took office.

From researchers at the National Center for Education Research to specialists from outside industries who took temporary roles in the government, “those people were also pushed out and dismissed,” said Adams. “So, if you’re talking about how to successfully make these connections from the federal level to the field, I think a lot of that expertise is now gone.”

It’s not just the elimination of the office of educational technology and other people who previously provided AI expertise that will hurt efforts. There are also significant gaps in the directive, said Adams. Most notably absent is any mention of student data privacy or bias in AI — two major issues experts frequently raise about the safety and efficacy of AI.

Finally, Adams said, the executive order focuses on AI as a labor and workforce issue: training today’s students for future jobs. Both Democratic and Republican administrations have had a tendency to view AI this way, and that’s a missed opportunity, she said.

“I feel like the executive order as it’s written, and maybe as the work goes forward people will consider this, but it does sideline, in my view, teaching and learning, which is the heart of education,” she said. “I think there’s real educational opportunities that go untapped when AI is framed only as a content area or a career path.”

© 2025 Education Week (Bethesda, Md.). Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Education

Blunkett urges ministers to use ‘incredible sensitivity’ in changing Send system in England | Special educational needs

Published

on


Ministers must use “incredible sensitivity” in making changes to the special educational needs system, former education secretary David Blunkett has said, as the government is urged not to drop education, health and care plans (EHCPs).

Lord Blunkett, who went through the special needs system when attending a residential school for blind children, said ministers would have to tread carefully.

The former home secretary in Tony Blair’s government also urged the government to reassure parents that it was looking for “a meaningful replacement” for EHCPs, which guarantee more than 600,000 children and young people individual support in learning.

Blunkett said he sympathised with the challenge facing Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, saying: “It’s absolutely clear that the government will need to do this with incredible sensitivity and with a recognition it’s going to be a bumpy road.”

He said government proposals due in the autumn to reexamine Send provision in England were not the same as welfare changes, largely abandoned last week, which were aimed at reducing spending. “They put another billion in [to Send provision] and nobody noticed,” Blunkett said, adding: “We’ve got to reduce the fear of change.”

Earlier Helen Hayes, the Labour MP who chairs the cross-party Commons education select committee, called for Downing Street to commit to EHCPs, saying this was the only way to combat mistrust among many families with Send children.

“I think at this stage that would be the right thing to do,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “We have been looking, as the education select committee, at the Send system for the last several months. We have heard extensive evidence from parents, from organisations that represent parents, from professionals and from others who are deeply involved in the system, which is failing so many children and families at the moment.

“One of the consequences of that failure is that parents really have so little trust and confidence in the Send system at the moment. And the government should take that very seriously as it charts a way forward for reform.”

A letter to the Guardian on Monday, signed by dozens of special needs and disability charities and campaigners, warned against government changes to the Send system that would restrict or abolish EHCPs.

Labour MPs who spoke to the Guardian are worried ministers are unable to explain essential details of the special educational needs shake-up being considered in the schools white paper to be published in October.

Downing Street has refused to rule out ending EHCPs, while stressing that no decisions have yet been taken ahead of a white paper on Send provision to be published in October.

Keir Starmer’s deputy spokesperson said: “I’ll just go back to the broader point that the system is not working and is in desperate need of reform. That’s why we want to actively work with parents, families, parliamentarians to make sure we get this right.”

skip past newsletter promotion

Speaking later in the Commons, Phillipson said there was “no responsibility I take more seriously” than that to more vulnerable children. She said it was a “serious and complex area” that “we as a government are determined to get right”.

The education secretary said: “There will always be a legal right to the additional support children with Send need, and we will protect it. But alongside that, there will be a better system with strengthened support, improved access and more funding.”

Dr Will Shield, an educational psychologist from the University of Exeter, said rumoured proposals that limit EHCPs – potentially to pupils in special schools – were “deeply problematic”.

Shield said: “Mainstream schools frequently rely on EHCPs to access the funding and oversight needed to support children effectively. Without a clear, well-resourced alternative, families will fear their children are not able to access the support they need to achieve and thrive.”

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: “Any reforms in this space will likely provoke strong reactions and it will be crucial that the government works closely with both parents and schools every step of the way.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

The Guardian view on special needs reform: children’s needs must be the priority as the system is redesigned | Editorial

Published

on


Children with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) must be supported through the education system to fulfil their potential as fully as possible. This is the bottom line for the families of the 1.6 million children with a recognised additional learning need in England, and all those who support them. It needs to be the government’s priority too.

There is no question that the rising number of children receiving extra help has placed pressure on schools and councils. There is wide agreement that the current trajectory is not sustainable. But if plans for reform are shaped around the aim of saving money by removing entitlements, rather than meeting the needs of children by improving schools, they should be expected to fail.

If ministers did not already know this, the Save Our Children’s Rights campaign launched this week ought to help. As it stands, there is no policy of restricting access to the education, health and care plans (EHCPs) that impose a legal duty on councils to provide specified support. But ministers’ criticisms of the adversarial aspects of the current system have led families to conclude that they should prepare for an attempt to remove their enforceable rights. Christine Lenehan, who advises the government, has indicated that the scope of EHCPs could be narrowed, while stressing a commitment to consultation. Tom Rees, who chairs the department for education’s specialist group, bluntly terms it “a bad system”.

Mr Rees’s panel has had its term extended until April. The education select committee will present the conclusions of its inquiry into the Send crisis in the autumn. Both should be listened to carefully. But the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, and her team also need to show that they are capable of engaging beyond the circle of appointed experts and parliamentarians. Parents can make their views known through constituency MPs. Their voices and perspectives need to be heard in Whitehall too.

This is a hugely sensitive policy area. There is nothing parents care more about than the opportunities provided to their children, and this concern is intensified when those children have additional needs. Some positive steps have been taken during Labour’s first year. Increased capital spending on school buildings should make a difference to in-house provision, which relies on the availability of suitable spaces. Ministers are right, too, to focus on teacher training, while inclusion has been given greater prominence in the inspection framework. As with the NHS, there is a welcome emphasis on spreading best practice.

But big questions remain. Families are fearful that accountability mechanisms are going to be removed, and want to know how the new “inclusive mainstream” will be defined and judged. Councils are concerned about what happens to their £5bn in special needs budget deficits, when the so-called statutory override expires in 2028. The concerning role of private equity in special education – which mirrors changes in the children’s social care market – also needs addressing.

Schools need to adapt so that a greater range of pupils can be accommodated. The issue is how the government manages that process. The hope must be that the lesson ministers take from their failure on welfare is that consultation on highly sensitive changes, affecting millions of lives, must be thorough. In order to make change, they must build consensus.

  • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

How AI is Transforming Education in Africa

Published

on

By


Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping industries across the globe, and education in Africa is no exception. From personalized learning platforms to AI-driven teacher training, the continent is witnessing a surge in innovative solutions tackling longstanding challenges. In this Q&A Insights piece, we dive into how AI is revolutionizing education, addressing questions from our iAfrica community about its impact, opportunities, and hurdles.

What are the biggest challenges in African education that AI can address?

Africa’s education sector faces issues like limited access to quality resources, teacher shortages, and diverse linguistic needs. AI can bridge these gaps in practical ways. For instance, AI-powered platforms like Eneza Education provide mobile-based learning in local languages, reaching students in remote areas with affordable, interactive content. Adaptive learning systems analyze student performance to tailor lessons, ensuring kids in overcrowded classrooms get personalized attention. AI also supports teacher training through virtual simulations, helping educators refine skills without costly in-person workshops.

“AI can democratize education by making high-quality resources accessible to students in rural areas.” – Dr. Aisha Mwinyi, EdTech Researcher

How is AI being used to improve access to education?

Access is a critical issue, with millions of African children out of school due to distance, poverty, or conflict. AI is stepping in with scalable solutions. Chatbots and virtual tutors, like those developed by Ustad Mobile, deliver bite-sized lessons via SMS or WhatsApp, working on basic phones for low-income communities. In Nigeria, uLesson uses AI to stream offline-capable video lessons, bypassing unreliable internet. These tools ensure learning continues in areas with limited infrastructure, from refugee camps to rural villages.

Can AI help with language barriers in education?

Absolutely. Africa’s linguistic diversity—over 2,000 languages—creates unique challenges. AI-driven translation tools, such as those integrated into Kolibri by Learning Equality, adapt content into local languages like Swahili, Yoruba, or Amharic. Speech-to-text and text-to-speech systems also help non-literate learners engage with digital materials. These innovations make education inclusive, especially for marginalized groups who speak minority languages.

What are some standout African AI education startups?

The continent is buzzing with homegrown talent. M-Shule in Kenya uses AI to deliver personalized SMS-based learning, focusing on primary school students. Chalkboard Education, operating in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, offers offline e-learning platforms for universities, using AI to track progress. South Africa’s Siyavula combines AI with open-source textbooks to provide math and science practice, serving millions of learners. These startups show Africa isn’t just adopting AI—it’s innovating with it.

What concerns exist about AI in education?

While the potential is huge, concerns linger. Data privacy is a big one—students’ personal information must be protected, especially in regions with weak regulations. There’s also the risk of over-reliance on tech, which could sideline human teachers. Affordability is another hurdle; AI solutions must be low-cost to scale. Experts emphasize the need for ethical AI frameworks, like those being developed by AI4D Africa, to ensure tools are culturally relevant and equitable.

“We must balance AI’s efficiency with the human touch that makes education transformative.” – Prof. Kwame Osei, Education Policy Expert

How can policymakers support AI in education?

Policymakers play a pivotal role. Investing in digital infrastructure—think affordable internet and device subsidies—is crucial. Governments should also fund local AI research, as seen in Rwanda’s Digital Skills Program, which trains youth to build EdTech solutions. Public-private partnerships can scale pilots, while clear regulations on data use build trust. Our community suggests tax incentives for EdTech startups to spur innovation.

What’s next for AI in African education?

The future is bright but demands action. AI could power virtual reality classrooms, making immersive learning accessible in underfunded schools. Predictive analytics might identify at-risk students early, reducing dropout rates. But scaling these requires collaboration—between governments, startups, and communities. As iAfrica’s Q&A Forum shows, Africans are eager to shape this future, asking sharp questions and sharing bold ideas.

Got more questions about AI in education? Drop them in our Q&A Forum and join the conversation shaping Africa’s tech-driven future.


Got more questions about AI in education? Drop them in an email to ai@africa.com and join the conversation shaping Africa’s tech-driven future.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending