When asked to choose who he trusts more between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, AI “godfather” Geoffrey Hinton offered a different kind of answer. The choice seemed so difficult that Hinton didn’t use an analogy from science. Instead, he recalled a quote from Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, when asked to pick between two presidential candidates.He remembered a moment from the 2016 presidential race when Graham was asked to choose between Donald Trump or Ted Cruz. Graham’s response, delivered with a wry honesty, was a line Hinton had never forgotten: “It’s like being shot or poisoned.”

Hinton’s warning on potential of AI technology in destruction

Hinton was speaking to The Financial Times during an interview where he sounded the alarm about AI’s potential dangers. Once a key figure in accelerating AI development, Hinton has shifted to expressing deep concerns about its future. He believes that AI poses a grave threat to humanity, arguing that the technology could soon help an average person create bioweapons.“A normal person assisted by AI will soon be able to build bioweapons and that is terrible,” Hinton said, adding, “Imagine if an average person in the street could make a nuclear bomb.”During a two-hour interview, Hinton discussed various topics, including AI’s “nuclear-level” threats, his own use of AI tools, and even how a chatbot contributed to his recent breakup. He also recently warned that AI could soon surpass human abilities, including the power to manipulate emotions by learning from vast datasets to influence feelings and behaviors more effectively than people.Hinton’s concerns stem from his belief that AI is genuinely intelligent. He argues that “by any definition of intelligence, AI is intelligent.” Using several analogies, he explained that an AI’s experience of reality is not so different from a human’s.“It seems very obvious to me. If you talk to these things and ask them questions, it understands,” Hinton stated. He added that there is “very little doubt in the technical community that these things will get smarter.”

An abrupt decision by American artificial intelligence firm Anthropic to restrict service to Chinese-owned entities anywhere in the world has cast uncertainty over some Claude-dependent overseas tools backed by China’s tech giants.

After Anthropic’s notice on Friday that it would upgrade access restrictions to entities “more than 50 per cent owned … by companies headquartered in unsupported regions” such as China, regardless of where they are, Chinese users have fretted over whether they could still access the San Francisco-based firm’s industry-leading AI models.

While it remains unknown how many entities could be affected and how the restrictions would be implemented, anxiety has started to spread among some users.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

Singapore-based Trae, an AI-powered code editor launched by Chinese tech giant ByteDance for overseas users, is a known user of OpenAI’s GPT and Anthropic’s Claude models. A number of users of Trae have raised the issue of refunds to Trae staff on developer platforms over concerns that their access to Claude would no longer be available.

Dario Amodei, CEO and cofounder of Anthropic, speaks at the International Network of AI Safety Institutes in San Francisco, November 20, 2024. Photo: AP alt=Dario Amodei, CEO and cofounder of Anthropic, speaks at the International Network of AI Safety Institutes in San Francisco, November 20, 2024. Photo: AP>

A Trae manager responded by saying that Claude was still available, urging users not to consider refunds “for the time being”. The company had just announced a premium “Max Mode” on September 2, which boasted access to significantly more powerful coding abilities “fully supported” by Anthropic’s Claude models.

Other Chinese tech giants offer Claude on their coding agents marketed to international users, including Alibaba Group Holding’s Qoder and Tencent Holdings’ CodeBuddy, which is still being beta tested. Alibaba owns the South China Morning Post.

ByteDance and Trae did not respond to requests for comment.

Amid the confusion, some Chinese AI companies have taken the opportunity to woo disgruntled users. Start-up Z.ai, formerly known as Zhipu AI, said in a statement on Friday that it was offering special offers to Claude application programming interface users to move over to its models.

Anthropic’s decision to restrict access to China-owned entities is the latest evidence of an increasingly divided AI landscape.

In China, AI applications and tools for the domestic market are almost exclusively based on local models, as the government has not approved any foreign large language model for Chinese users.

Anthropic faced pressure to take action as a number of Chinese companies have established subsidiaries in Singapore to access US technology, according to a report by The Financial Times on Friday.

Anthropic’s flagship Claude AI models are best known for their strong coding capabilities. The company’s CEO Dario Amodei has repeatedly called for stronger controls on exports of advanced US semiconductor technology to China.

Anthropic completed a US$13 billion funding round in the past week that tripled its valuation to US$183 billion. On Wednesday, the company said its software development tool Claude Code, launched in May, was generating more than US$500 million in run-rate revenue, with usage increasing more than tenfold in three months.

The firm’s latest Claude Opus 4.1 coding model achieved an industry-leading score of 74.5 per cent on SWE-bench Verified – a human-validated subset of the large language model benchmark, SWE-bench, that is supposed to more reliably evaluate AI models’ capabilities.

This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the most authoritative voice reporting on China and Asia for more than a century. For more SCMP stories, please explore the SCMP app or visit the SCMP’s Facebook and Twitter pages. Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

Copyright (c) 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.