Like any emerging technology, Artificial Intelligence has triggered debates about the consequences for the digital divide. The debate, here, is not just about access to devices, but about the design of AI systems. Proprietary AI tools, owned and controlled by companies, are behind costly paywalls. In the arena of education, such tools may exacerbate the gap between the “haves” and “have-nots”. On the other hand, free and open-source platforms promise wider reach, but raise concerns about quality and sustainability.
This doesn’t make it the first time in history that policymakers are at a crossroads in choosing between free and proprietary tools. The free software movement, which began in 1983, rejects proprietary software and advocates for complete freedom for users to use the software for any purpose, study how the program works, adapt it to their needs, and share copies with others. The intent was to prevent the creation of an elite digital class, prevent monopolies, profiteering, and rent-seeking. A major problem with open-source platforms is that, in case a problem arises, there is no designated stakeholder to resolve it.
The same choice lies ahead of the government now with AI in education. Should schools rely on free AI tools to democratise access, or push for regulated adoption of proprietary systems? What prescriptions must schools and colleges adopt today to prepare students for an AI-powered world without deepening inequality?
To delve deeper into the topic, The Hindu will host a live webinar titled, ‘Choosing AI for education: Free or proprietary?’, on September 6, at 5:00 p.m. Register now for free to ask questions and interact with the panellists. The three best questions will receive a free online subscription to The Hindu.