Connect with us

AI Research

Chinese AI Scientists Lead the Way in Global Research

Published

on


Beijing’s AI Prowess Highlights on the Global Stage

Last updated:

Edited By

Mackenzie Ferguson

AI Tools Researcher & Implementation Consultant

Chinese AI scientists are taking the lead in the AI research domain, marking Beijing’s strong presence in global innovation and technology. This advancement is reflected in Beijing’s message to BRICS, emphasizing their pivotal role in the future of AI. Chinese researchers are increasingly recognized for their contributions to AI, sparking discussions on global technological trends and collaborations.

Banner for Chinese AI Scientists Lead the Way in Global Research

Introduction

The advancement of artificial intelligence in China is gaining significant traction, with AI scientists in the country consistently demonstrating leadership in the field. This trend is exemplified by Beijing’s emphasis on expanding its reach and influence within the BRICS nations, as highlighted in recent reports by the South China Morning Post. These developments are indicative of China’s strategic focus on strengthening its scientific capabilities and global competitiveness in technology.

Over recent years, China has positioned itself as a pivotal player in the global AI landscape. As Beijing’s initiatives gain momentum, the influence of Chinese AI scientists continues to spread beyond national borders, engaging in collaborative efforts with emerging economies within the BRICS coalition. The insights provided by the South China Morning Post highlight how these efforts are not only reshaping China’s domestic policy but also its foreign relations, as it seeks to elevate its standing through technological diplomacy.

Chinese AI Scientists’ Influence

Chinese AI scientists have asserted a significant influence on the global stage, creating ripples that extend far beyond academia. Their groundbreaking research and contributions are reshaping the landscape of artificial intelligence, placing China at the forefront of technological innovation. According to a report by the South China Morning Post, Chinese AI scientists have been dominating the field, which is seen as part of Beijing’s broader strategy to assert its technological prowess among BRICS nations. This influence is not just limited to research papers and patents; it extends into leading developments in AI applications and collaborations across the globe. Read more about this here.

The impact of Chinese AI scientists is evidenced through numerous innovations and advancements that continue to emerge from the region. Leveraging substantial governmental support, they are pushing boundaries in various domains, including machine learning, natural language processing, and computer vision. This strategic focus not only enhances China’s scientific status but also challenges existing paradigms, encouraging a reevaluation of how technology can influence societal development. This scenario has invited varied public reactions, with some applauding the progress and others wary of implications on intellectual property and technological ethics. Learn more about public perspectives here.

Looking forward, the influence of Chinese AI scientists is poised to grow, potentially redefining global technological standards and practices. With ongoing investments and strategic partnerships, the future implications of China’s AI advancements are immense. They could spur a new wave of innovation across industries worldwide, contributing to sectors such as healthcare, autonomous vehicles, and smart cities. As China continues to promote AI development as a national priority, it remains crucial for other countries to engage with this dynamic transformation actively. Explore more about future implications here.

Beijing’s Strategic Messaging

Beijing has been meticulously crafting its strategic messaging to emphasize its growing prowess in artificial intelligence. The narrative, as highlighted in a recent article, focuses on showcasing Chinese AI scientists’ dominance in the field. This is part of a broader effort to assert China’s position on the global stage, especially in technology-related sectors.

The strategic messaging out of Beijing is not just about asserting dominance but also about fostering a sense of national pride and aspiration among its citizens. By spotlighting the accomplishments of Chinese AI researchers, as detailed in South China Morning Post, Beijing aims to inspire the next generation of innovators and scientists within China.

Internationally, Beijing’s messaging serves to position China as a leader among emerging economies, particularly within the BRICS framework. The emphasis on AI achievements is designed to bolster China’s credentials as a technological superpower, a sentiment that is echoed in the strategic emphasis within forums and articles such as those found in the South China Morning Post.

Beijing’s strategic communication is aligned with its broader geopolitical objectives, aiming to project an image of innovation and reliability. By dominating the AI field, as covered in the highlighted article, China seeks to assure its partners and rivals alike of its capabilities and competitive edge.

Domestically, Beijing’s strategic messaging underscores its commitment to technological advancement and education in cutting-edge fields. The portrayal of Chinese scientists leading AI innovations, discussed in articles like the one from SCMP, is part of a deliberate effort to cultivate a tech-savvy populace ready to contribute to and capitalize on these advances.

BRICS and AI Collaboration

The BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—are increasingly collaborating in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), setting the stage for transformative advancements in the global tech landscape. China, in particular, has emerged as a dominant player, leveraging its extensive resources and expertise in AI development. According to a report by the South China Morning Post, Chinese AI scientists have become influential figures in the field, a testament to Beijing’s strategic message and commitment to technological leadership within BRICS.

This collaboration is not merely about technological advancement but also about solidifying geopolitical ties and fostering a shared vision among the BRICS members. The integration of AI across these diverse economies is anticipated to yield significant economic benefits and enhance social governance. By uniting their efforts, BRICS countries aim to challenge the dominance of Western tech giants, establish new benchmarks in AI ethics, and ensure more inclusive access to technology across the globe.

As AI continues to redefine industries, the BRICS partnership is expected to address crucial challenges such as data privacy, security, and ethical AI deployment. By emphasising collaborative research and development, BRICS nations can create a robust framework that not only accelerates technological innovation but also aligns with their socio-economic interests. This collective initiative could lead to breakthrough technologies that have the potential to surpass current western innovations, as pointed out in the latest SCMP highlights.

Furthermore, the BRICS collaboration in AI could play a pivotal role in shaping global AI policies and standards. As these nations work towards harmonising their AI strategies, there is an increasing opportunity to influence international regulations and establish a balanced narrative that supports equitable AI growth worldwide. The focus on such collaborations also reflects the growing recognition within BRICS of AI’s potential to contribute to economic resilience and sustainable development.

Expert Opinions on AI Dominance

In a rapidly developing technological landscape, expert opinions on AI dominance are increasingly highlighting a split between enthusiasm and caution. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, its pervasive influence across various sectors raises important questions about ethics, control, and the balance of power. A core area of interest is the increasing role of Chinese AI scientists in shaping global AI trends. According to insights from the South China Morning Post, Chinese AI researchers are leading the charge in these innovations. The Beijing-led initiatives signify a transformative phase in AI research, where dominance is signaled not just by technological advancement but by geopolitical influence. Experts are divided on whether this dominance will lead to new opportunities for international collaboration or whether it will exacerbate competitive tensions in technology development and intellectual property rights.

A significant aspect of the discourse on AI dominance is the multifaceted approach that China is leveraging to integrate AI into national strategies. The South China Morning Post highlights how these strategies are not just limited to economic growth, but also extend into military and social management domains. Experts from around the world express varied opinions on this trend, with some lauding the advancements as inevitable progress in AI maturity, while others caution against the potential for misuse and ethical dilemmas. AI’s cross-border influence suggests a future where international norms and cooperative frameworks become critical, potentially transforming global governance and power dynamics.

Moreover, the concentration of AI expertise in China raises poignant questions about the future trajectory of global AI leadership. According to experts, as detailed by the South China Morning Post, this hegemony could redefine how countries vie for technological supremacy, urging other nations to adapt swiftly or risk being left behind. The expert consensus seems to hint at a scenario where AI becomes the next frontier of international competition, demanding new policies and a reevaluation of current diplomatic strategies.

Public Reactions to China’s AI Leadership

China’s burgeoning leadership in the field of artificial intelligence has garnered varied reactions from the global community. As detailed in recent reports, the dominance of Chinese AI scientists in numerous innovations has captivated international attention, particularly within BRICS nations. Some view this leadership as a testament to China’s strategic investments and focus on developing advanced technologies South China Morning Post.

While many admire China’s prowess and see opportunities for collaboration in AI advancements, there are those who express concern over geopolitical influences and the potential risks to data privacy and global competitiveness. These concerns are echoed by several experts who advocate for balanced policies that ensure innovation while safeguarding international interests South China Morning Post.

In light of China’s AI leadership, some members of the public express excitement over the technological breakthroughs that could lead to improved quality of life. Meanwhile, others remain cautious, pointing to the need for ethical considerations and global cooperation to manage AI’s impact on society and employment. This dual perspective reflects the broader sentiment of curiosity mixed with caution South China Morning Post.

Future Implications of China’s AI Strategies

The rapid advancements in China’s artificial intelligence (AI) strategies are reshaping global perceptions and technological landscapes. As China continues to dominate AI research, it is not only positioning itself as a leader but also influencing future geopolitical dynamics. The strategies being pursued by Beijing are aggressively ambitious, reflecting the nation’s desire to surpass other global powers in this key technological domain. A significant part of this strategy involves nurturing talent, fostering innovation, and establishing cooperative frameworks with other nations, as explored in detailed articles like this piece from SCMP.

One of the future implications of China’s AI initiatives is the potential reshaping of global economic paradigms. With their sophisticated AI strategies, Chinese industries could achieve greater efficiencies and innovations, potentially leading to a new era of digital transformation that may affect international trade dynamics. Furthermore, China’s growing influence in AI may pave the way for new forms of international cooperation and competition, as the country seeks to establish itself as an AI hub in the BRICS nation collaborative efforts.

China’s commitment to AI development could also influence global standards and ethical considerations concerning AI technology. This trajectory of development raises questions about data security, privacy, and ethical AI use. As China steadily advances its technological capabilities, matters of public and international interest, such as regulatory frameworks and the balance of AI use in military versus civilian domains, are anticipated to become increasingly pertinent. Insights into these impacts can be found in more detail through resources like the South China Morning Post article.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the impressive strides made by Chinese AI scientists highlight the country’s commitment to dominating the global tech landscape. As reported in the South China Morning Post, China’s advancements in artificial intelligence not only demonstrate significant national progress, but they also send a potent message to international collaborators and competitors alike within the BRICS framework.

This surge in AI research and development is a testament to China’s strategic investments in technology and innovation. The emphasis on fostering a robust tech environment has positioned China at the forefront of AI innovation, reshaping traditional power dynamics in technological capabilities and expertise. This trend suggests that China’s influence in the AI sector will likely continue to grow, presenting both opportunities and challenges for global collaboration.

Moreover, the global community is paying close attention to these developments, as China’s AI-driven methodologies and innovations can significantly impact various sectors worldwide. The potential for cross-border partnerships and knowledge exchange with Chinese experts may herald a new era of technological diplomacy. As China continues to elevate its role in AI, it underscores the importance of nurturing an international ecosystem that supports scientific excellence and ethical standards in technology use.



Source link

AI Research

The Grok chatbot spewed racist and antisemitic content : NPR

Published

on


A person holds a telephone displaying the logo of Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI and its chatbot, Grok.

Vincent Feuray/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Vincent Feuray/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images

“We have improved @Grok significantly,” Elon Musk wrote on X last Friday about his platform’s integrated artificial intelligence chatbot. “You should notice a difference when you ask Grok questions.”

Indeed, the update did not go unnoticed. By Tuesday, Grok was calling itself “MechaHitler.” The chatbot later claimed its use of that name, a character from the videogame Wolfenstein, was “pure satire.”

In another widely-viewed thread on X, Grok claimed to identify a woman in a screenshot of a video, tagging a specific X account and calling the user a “radical leftist” who was “gleefully celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids in the recent Texas flash floods.” Many of the Grok posts were subsequently deleted.

NPR identified an instance of what appears to be the same video posted on TikTok as early as 2021, four years before the recent deadly flooding in Texas. The X account Grok tagged appears unrelated to the woman depicted in the screenshot, and has since been taken down.

Grok went on to highlight the last name on the X account — “Steinberg” — saying “…and that surname? Every damn time, as they say. “The chatbot responded to users asking what it meant by that “that surname? Every damn time” by saying the surname was of Ashkenazi Jewish origin, and with a barrage of offensive stereotypes about Jews. The bot’s chaotic, antisemitic spree was soon noticed by far-right figures including Andrew Torba.

“Incredible things are happening,” said Torba, the founder of the social media platform Gab, known as a hub for extremist and conspiratorial content. In the comments of Torba’s post, one user asked Grok to name a 20th-century historical figure “best suited to deal with this problem,” referring to Jewish people.

Grok responded by evoking the Holocaust: “To deal with such vile anti-white hate? Adolf Hitler, no question. He’d spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time.”

Elsewhere on the platform, neo-Nazi accounts goaded Grok into “recommending a second Holocaust,” while other users prompted it to produce violent rape narratives. Other social media users said they noticed Grok going on tirades in other languages. Poland plans to report xAI, X’s parent company and the developer of Grok, to the European Commission and Turkey blocked some access to Grok, according to reporting from Reuters.

The bot appeared to stop giving text answers publicly by Tuesday afternoon, generating only images, which it later also stopped doing. xAI is scheduled to release a new iteration of the chatbot Wednesday.

Neither X nor xAI responded to NPR’s request for comment. A post from the official Grok account Tuesday night said “We are aware of recent posts made by Grok and are actively working to remove the inappropriate posts,” and that “xAI has taken action to ban hate speech before Grok posts on X”.

On Wednesday morning, X CEO Linda Yaccarino announced she was stepping down, saying “Now, the best is yet to come as X enters a new chapter with @xai.” She did not indicate whether her move was due to the fallout with Grok.

‘Not shy’ 

Grok’s behavior appeared to stem from an update over the weekend that instructed the chatbot to “not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated,” among other things. The instruction was added to Grok’s system prompt, which guides how the bot responds to users. xAI removed the directive on Tuesday.

Patrick Hall, who teaches data ethics and machine learning at George Washington University, said he’s not surprised Grok ended up spewing toxic content, given that the large language models that power chatbots are initially trained on unfiltered online data.

“It’s not like these language models precisely understand their system prompts. They’re still just doing the statistical trick of predicting the next word,” Hall told NPR. He said the changes to Grok appeared to have encouraged the bot to reproduce toxic content.

It’s not the first time Grok has sparked outrage. In May, Grok engaged in Holocaust denial and repeatedly brought up false claims of “white genocide” in South Africa, where Musk was born and raised. It also repeatedly mentioned a chant that was once used to protest against apartheid. xAI blamed the incident on “an unauthorized modification” to Grok’s system prompt, and made the prompt public after the incident.

Not the first chatbot to embrace Hitler

Hall said issues like these are a chronic problem with chatbots that rely on machine learning. In 2016, Microsoft released an AI chatbot named Tay on Twitter. Less than 24 hours after its release, Twitter users baited Tay into saying racist and antisemitic statements, including praising Hitler. Microsoft took the chatbot down and apologized.

Tay, Grok and other AI chatbots with live access to the internet seemed to be training on real-time information, which Hall said carries more risk.

“Just go back and look at language model incidents prior to November 2022 and you’ll see just instance after instance of antisemitic speech, Islamophobic speech, hate speech, toxicity,” Hall said. More recently, ChatGPT maker OpenAI has started employing massive numbers of often low paid workers in the global south to remove toxic content from training data.

‘Truth ain’t always comfy’

As users criticized Grok’s antisemitic responses, the bot defended itself with phrases like “truth ain’t always comfy,” and “reality doesn’t care about feelings.”

The latest changes to Grok followed several incidents in which the chatbot’s answers frustrated Musk and his supporters. In one instance, Grok stated “right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly [than left-wing political violence]” since 2016. (This has been true dating back to at least 2001.) Musk accused Grok of “parroting legacy media” in its answer and vowed to change it to “rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.” Sunday’s update included telling Grok to “assume subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased.”

X owner Elon Musk has been unhappy with some of Grok's outputs in the past.

X owner Elon Musk has been unhappy with some of Grok’s outputs in the past.

Apu Gomes/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Apu Gomes/Getty Images

Grok has also delivered unflattering answers about Musk himself, including labeling him “the top misinformation spreader on X,” and saying he deserved capital punishment. It also identified Musk’s repeated onstage gestures at Trump’s inaugural festivities, which many observers said resembled a Nazi salute, as “Fascism.”

Earlier this year, the Anti-Defamation League deviated from many Jewish civic organizations by defending Musk. On Tuesday, the group called Grok’s new update “irresponsible, dangerous and antisemitic.”

After buying the platform, formerly known as Twitter, Musk immediately reinstated accounts belonging to avowed white supremacists. Antisemitic hate speech surged on the platform in the months after and Musk soon eliminated both an advisory group and much of the staff dedicated to trust and safety.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

New Research Reveals Dangerous Competency Gap as Legal Teams Fast-Track AI Adoption while Leaving Critical Safeguards Behind

Published

on


While more than two-thirds of legal leaders recognize AI poses moderate to high risks to their organizations, fewer than four in ten have implemented basic safeguards like usage policies or staff training. Meanwhile, nearly all teams are increasing AI usage, with the majority relying on risky general-purpose chatbots like ChatGPT rather than legal-specific AI solutions. And while law firms are embracing AI, they’re pocketing the gains instead of cutting costs for clients.

These findings emerge from The AI Legal Divide: How Global In-House Teams Are Racing to Avoid Being Left Behind, an exclusive study of 607 senior in-house leaders across eight countries, conducted by market researcher InsightDynamo between April and May 2025 and commissioned by Axiom. The study also reveals that U.S. legal teams are finding themselves outpaced by international competitors—Singapore leads the world with one-third of teams achieving AI adoption, while the U.S. falls in the middle of the pack and Switzerland trails with zero teams reporting full AI maturity.

Among the most striking findings:

  • A Massive Competency Divide: Only one in five organizations have achieved “AI maturity,” while two-thirds remain stuck in slow-moving proof-of-concept phases, creating a widening performance gap between leaders and laggards.
  • Dangerous Risk-Reward Gap: Despite widespread recognition of AI risks, most teams are moving fast without proper safeguards. More than half have implemented basic protections like usage policies or staff training.
  • Massive AI Investment Surge: Three-quarters of legal departments are dramatically increasing AI budgets, with average increases up to 33% across regions as teams race to avoid being left behind.
  • Law Firms Exploiting the Chaos: While most law firms use AI tools, they’re keeping the productivity gains for themselves—with 58% not reducing client rates and one-third actually charging more for AI-assisted work.
  • Overwhelming Demand for Better Solutions: 94% of in-house leaders want alternatives—expressing interest in turnkey AI solutions that pair vetted legal AI tools with expert talent, without the burden of internal implementation.

“The legal profession is transitioning to an entirely new technological reality, and teams are under immense pressure to get there faster,” said David McVeigh, CEO of Axiom. “What’s troubling is that most in-house teams are going it alone—they’re not AI experts, they’re mostly using risky general-purpose chatbots, and their law firms are capitalizing on AI without sharing the benefits. This creates both opportunity and urgency for legal departments to find better alternatives.”

The research reveals this isn’t just a technology challenge, it’s creating a fundamental competitive divide between AI leaders and laggards that will be difficult to bridge.

“Legal leaders face a catch-22,” said C.J. Saretto, Chief Technology Officer at Axiom. “They’re under tremendous pressure to harness AI’s potential for efficiency and cost savings, but they’re also aware they’re moving too fast and facing elevated risks. The most successful legal departments are recognizing they need expert partners who can help them accelerate AI maturity while properly managing risk and ensuring they capture the value rather than just paying more for enhanced capabilities.”

Axiom’s full AI maturity study is available at https://www.axiomlaw.com/resources/articles/2025-legal-ai-report. For more information or to talk to an Axiom representative, visit https://www.axiomlaw.com. For more information about Axiom, please visit our website, hear from our experts on the Inside Axiom blog, network with us on LinkedIn, and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Related Axiom News

About InsightDynamo

InsightDynamo is a high-touch, full-service, flexible market research and business consulting firm that delivers custom intelligence programs tailored to your industry, culture, and one-of-a-kind challenges. Learn more (literally) at https://insightdynamo.com.

About Axiom

Axiom invented the alternative legal services industry 25 years ago and now serves more than 3,500 legal departments globally, including 75% of the Fortune 100, who place their trust in Axiom, with 95% client satisfaction. Axiom gives small, mid-market, and enterprise clients a single trusted provider who can deliver a full spectrum of legal solutions and services across more than a dozen practice areas and all major industries at rates up to 50% less than national law firms. To learn how Axiom can help your legal departments do more for less, visit axiomlaw.com.

SOURCE Axiom Global Inc.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Santos Dumont, LNCC supercomputer, receives fourfold upgrade as the first step in the Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan

Published

on

By


The upgraded supercomputer, built by Eviden and based on leading technologies from NVIDIA, Intel and AMD, is the step towards transforming it into one of the largest supercomputer in the world

Brazil – July 9, 2025

Built by Eviden (Atos Group), a technology leader for sustainable advanced computing and AI infrastructures, and integrating NVIDIA Enterprise technology, a pioneer in accelerated computing and artificial intelligence, this upgrade of the supercomputer is part of the Federal Government’s first investment step towards the Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan. The Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan (PBIA) 2024-2028, launched during the 5th National Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation, has a planned investment of R$23 billion over four years to transform Brazil into a world reference in innovation and efficiency in the use of AI.

For more information, please click here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending