Education
Brave new classroom: Catholic schools nationwide integrate AI into teaching plans

by Kimberley Heatherington
OSV News
(OSV News) — Reading, writing and arithmetic — and AI.
The modern educational toolkit, of both teachers and students, now includes the use of artificial intelligence. Experts and teachers from coast-to-coast told OSV News AI is poised to transform Catholic education.
“In the Catholic school space, where we’re at right now is trying to build AI literacy among our teachers, and our students, and our parents,” shared Father Nate Wills, a priest of the Congregation of the Holy Cross and director of Higher-Powered Learning, an initiative of the University of Notre Dame’s Alliance for Catholic Education.
Professional development for teachers — introducing them to AI tools and their use — is typically a critical first step.
“I think it’s really important for teachers to know what’s out there so that they both empower their students and transform their assessments,” Wills said. “If a teacher was completely ignorant of the existence of calculators in the 1970s, that would just be silly, right?”
With that paradox firmly in mind, Higher-Powered Learning has hosted user-friendly seminars focusing on AI in the classroom; teacher training; AI policies and guidelines; and more. The initiative’s website also features a wealth of resources and guidance.
Still, it can all perhaps seem a bit overwhelming. “This feels,” Wills admitted, “like a quantum leap for a lot of people.”
RAND Corporation announced in April, 2024, that as of fall 2023, 18% of K-12 teachers reported using AI for teaching and another 15% have tried AI at least once.
A place to start is the articulation of an AI policy — whether for students, employees, or in the classroom. Higher-Powered Learning offers adaptable policy templates, but also helps dioceses tailor them to their own needs and strategy.
“One of the most important things about a document like this is, it’s living,” said Brad Snyder, associate superintendent of Educational Programs for Catholic Schools in the Diocese of Orange, California. “Because AI is doing nothing if not changing constantly. As a diocese, we’ve been meeting for about a year-and-a-half in committees to create a guidance document for our parishes also. So I think we’ve been trying to get ahead of the wave.”
Snyder sees a parallel with another major technological shift — the advent of the world wide web in the early 1990s.
“I would say it’s almost akin to when we first started using the internet,” he said. “When we searched for things before, you’d break out the card catalog, right? We don’t do that anymore. And I think AI is going to propel us forward in a similar manner.”
And rapidly, too.
“It’s just taking off,” Snyder said. “And the next couple years is going to be really transformational in what it can do — and therefore, we have to be informed on how we’re going to use it.”
Educators are keenly aware that AI has the potential to be not just an asset, but a substitute — the oft-heard suspicion that students will use it to generate an assignment instead of doing it themselves.
“One of the things we really try to work with — with our teachers and our principals — is you need to monitor, but you need to make sure you mentor,” Snyder said. “We want to make sure we’re supporting students using it correctly, and in a way that benefits them.”
“Here’s the issue: Students are going to use AI,” he continued. “You might as well be able to show them how to use it in a manner that’s going to support them, and not hurt them. I think that’s critical.”
Nor is AI meant to “replace” anything, Snyder said.
“Catholic education is what? It’s a community, right? It’s relationship building. It’s the whole child,” he emphasized. “Technology can’t replace that — and we don’t want it to. But if it can help make me more effective, reach my students at their level more efficiently, and move them forward in their skill development — that’s the mentorship of using AI.”
So what can AI do, for teachers and students?
“Like Pope Leo said, this is a sea change,” declared Steve Tortorello, director of Partnerships and Special Projects for Catholic Schools in the Archdiocese of Chicago. Echoing Snyder, he added, “This is not a new app. This is not a new program. This is like when the internet came out — that’s the level of change that this is.”
As to its potential, “I talk about how AI can be both the most supercharged teacher’s assistant you could ever imagine,” explained Tortorello, “and a thought partner, like the teacher across the hall.”
He gave a practical example.
“Say you’re working with seventh graders on picking out adjectives in a sentence. And you’ve already done the exercise in the book and you think, ‘Wow, my kids need more practice.’ Well, guess what,” said Tortorello. “AI can make you more practice materials,” — and here Tortorello snapped his fingers — “that quickly.”
He added, “And it can make it on whatever topic your kids are interested in. Do they love Taylor Swift and Minecraft? Well, now you’ve just made 10 more practice sentences on Taylor Swift and Minecraft, and they’re doing that while they’re figuring out learning adjectives.”
Not only are students more engaged — teachers save time.
“If I was teaching seventh grade English — which I’ve done before — and I had to make that extra adjective worksheet, it might take me 45 minutes to come up with different ideas,” Tortorello said. “Now, I can tell Chat GPT, ‘Make me an adjective worksheet at this reading level’ — boom — and it does it in 10 seconds.”
Another example Tortorello cited is AI’s ability to customize, or in educational terms “differentiate,” student materials.
“If I’m teaching fifth grade Reading, and I know in my fifth grade class I’ve got 20 kids — and 10 of them read at fifth grade level, and five read way above the fifth grade level, and five read below the fifth grade level — I used to give them one article,” he explained.
“And the quick kids would be done in five minutes. The average kids would take 10 minutes. The kids who struggle might take 20 minutes. They might not comprehend it. Well, now I can rerun that article at three different reading levels,” Tortorello said. “Every kid can read it at the same time, at the level that best challenges them. This unlocks a ton of things I can do, as far as differentiations. And so to me, that’s magic.”
There’s still a human element, however.
“You generate something with AI, you refine it with more questioning, and then you as the human edit it to make sure it’s exactly what you want,” he added. “And so now that supercharged teacher’s assistant can help you save countless hours.”
Those hours add up, and impact work-life balance.
“It’s not only about efficiency,” Tortorello said. “It’s about preventing burnout for our teachers.”
On July 8, OpenAI and Microsoft announced the bankrolling of new AI training for teachers. The American Federation of Teachers said it would use the $23 million — including $500,000 from the A.I. start-up Anthropic — to create a national training center.
At Union Catholic High School in Scotch Plains, New Jersey, Assistant Principal Noreen Andrews — who, among her other duties, coordinates the school’s Advanced Placement courses — remembers clearly when she realized AI was about to change her world.
In November 2023, Andrews said, a colleague entered her office to announce that AP College Board student exam essay questions would now be written by AI.
“And I’m like, ‘Oh my God, you know, I’m an AP teacher,” recalled Andrews. “Does everybody recognize what’s happening? Do you see what’s happening?” She wanted, Andrews said, “to make sure that we were all understanding what had come into our world, and what was never going to leave us.”
Andrews quoted a now-favorite maxim: “‘AI will not replace you. But people using AI will.’”
“We’ve talked about it amongst ourselves as educators — and when I’m talking to parents and educating them about what we’re doing with AI in education at our school, that’s one of my first cards,” she said. “It’s mind-boggling, because we’re at the beginning of this — but yet it’s moving so fast that we’re well past the beginning.”
Union Catholic took things step by step, explained Andrews, beginning with a robust program of teacher development.
“First it was the teachers — then it was making sure that teachers were putting it in the hands of the students and helping them,” she explained. “And now this year is very focused on AI literacy.”
In January, Union Catholic High School secured the Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Learning (RAIL) endorsement through the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools — a recognition of its commitment to promote responsible, ethical, and safe use of AI in education.
RAIL-certified schools are a select group.
“We’re one of 46 schools in the world,” Andrews proudly shared.
“We’re not about making rules and trying to enforce rules to lock things down, but rather to teach our students how to be responsible with their devices; with AI; with the internet. That’s our focus,” Andrews said. “The most important thing we can do — as teachers, as educators — is to prepare our students to survive in this new world.”
Education
Trump admin illegally froze Harvard funds, Judge says : NPR

Students walk up the steps of the Harry Elkins Widener Memorial Library on the campus of Harvard University.
Elissa Nadworny/NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Elissa Nadworny/NPR
A federal judge in Boston handed Harvard University a legal victory on Wednesday. It’s the latest in a high-profile legal fight over whether the Trump administration acted illegally when it froze more than $2.2 billion in Harvard research funding in response to allegations of campus antisemitism.
In her ruling, Judge Allison D. Burroughs said the administration’s funding freeze was issued without considering any of the steps Harvard had already taken to address the issue.
Burroughs said she found it “difficult to conclude anything other than that [the Trump administration] used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities, and did so in a way that runs afoul of [federal law].”
White House spokesperson Liz Huston said after the ruling: “We will immediately move to appeal this egregious decision, and we are confident we will ultimately prevail in our efforts to hold Harvard accountable.”
The more than $2 billion in federal funding that the administration had frozen supported more than 900 research projects at Harvard and its affiliates. That includes research into the treatment and/or prevention of Alzheimer’s, various cancers, heart disease, Lou Gehrig’s disease and autism. Burroughs also highlighted a program through the Department of Veterans Affairs “to help V.A. emergency room physicians decide whether suicidal veterans should be hospitalized.”
The case has been the subject of intense focus as Harvard has stood largely alone in pushing back against the Trump administration’s efforts to use funding cuts as leverage to win vast ideological and financial concessions from other elite institutions, including Columbia and Brown University.
In a July hearing, a lawyer for the Trump administration said Harvard’s funding had been frozen because the school had violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color and national origin, by failing to address antisemitism on campus.
But Burroughs ruled that it was the administration that had run afoul of Title VI by quickly freezing funding without first following a process clearly laid out in law.
Harvard’s attorneys had argued that the cuts imposed by the Trump Administration threatened vital research in medicine, science and technology.
Burroughs wrote in her decision that, “research that has been frozen could save lives, money, or the environment, to name a few. And the research was frozen without any sort of investigation into whether particular labs were engaging in antisemitic behavior, were employing Jews, were run by Jewish scientists, or were investigating issues or diseases particularly pertinent to Jews (such as, for example, Tay-Sachs disease), meaning that the funding freezes could and likely will harm the very people Defendants professed to be protecting.”
Burroughs underlined that antisemitism is intolerable, and criticized Harvard, saying it “has been plagued by antisemitism in recent years and could (and should) have done a better job of dealing with the issue.” But, the judge concluded, “there is, in reality, little connection between the research affected by the grant terminations and antisemitism.”
President Trump has previously been outspoken in his criticism of Burroughs, writing on Truth Social earlier this year that she is a “Trump-hating Judge,” and “a TOTAL DISASTER.”
Following Wednesday’s ruling, White House spokesperson Liz Huston again criticized Burroughs and said “It is clear that Harvard University failed to protect their students from harassment and allowed discrimination to plague their campus for years. Harvard does not have a constitutional right to taxpayer dollars and remains ineligible for grants in the future.”
“This ruling is huge. It is a big, decisive victory for academic freedom,” said Harvard history professor Kirsten Weld, who is also president of the Harvard chapter of the American Association of University Professors, which was a plaintiff in the lawsuit.
Even though the White House plans to appeal, Weld says she hopes this ruling sends the message “that you cannot break universities in this fashion and that it is worth standing up and fighting back.”
Education
Google Advances AI Image Generation with Multi-Modal Capabilities — Campus Technology
Google Advances AI Image Generation with Multi-Modal Capabilities
Google has introduced Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, marking a significant advancement in artificial intelligence systems that can understand and manipulate visual content through natural language processing.
The AI model represents progress in multi-modal machine learning, combining text comprehension with image generation and editing capabilities. Unlike previous systems focused primarily on creating images from text descriptions, Gemini 2.5 Flash Image can analyze existing images and perform precise modifications based on conversational instructions.
Technical improvements include enhanced character consistency across multiple image generations, a persistent challenge in AI image synthesis. The system can maintain the appearance of specific subjects while placing them in different environments or contexts, indicating advances in computer vision and generative modeling.
The model leverages Google’s large language model knowledge base, allowing it to incorporate real-world understanding into visual tasks. This integration demonstrates progress toward more sophisticated AI agents capable of reasoning across different data types.
Google implemented safety measures, including automated content filtering and mandatory digital watermarking through its SynthID technology. The watermarking addresses growing concerns about the identification of AI-generated content as synthetic media becomes more prevalent.
The launch intensifies competition in generative AI, where companies including OpenAI, Adobe, and Midjourney are developing similar multimodal capabilities. Industry analysts view image generation as a key battleground for AI companies seeking to expand beyond text-based applications.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image is priced at $30 per million tokens. For more information, visit the Google site.
About the Author
John K. Waters is the editor in chief of a number of Converge360.com sites, with a focus on high-end development, AI and future tech. He’s been writing about cutting-edge technologies and culture of Silicon Valley for more than two decades, and he’s written more than a dozen books. He also co-scripted the documentary film Silicon Valley: A 100 Year Renaissance, which aired on PBS. He can be reached at [email protected].
Education
AI in schools: Pros and cons of artificial intlligence in education

SYOSSET, New York (WABC) — Days before school returns, hundreds of teachers on Long Island listened and learned.
“We’re excited to be here to share some of the initial work that we were able to do with AI at the time of this pilot,” teacher Tyler Gentilcore said.
Gentilcore was among dozens of educators with the Syosset School District sharing their approach to teaching artificial intelligence in the classroom.
“It feels pretty cool to be on the forefront of something new like this,” he said.
Gentilcore teaches first grade at Robbins Lane Elementary School.
“They’re little so the pilot was really an opportunity for teachers to engage with different AI programs,” he explained.
Programs like Google’s Gemini are now being used by teachers in the classroom, including Syosset High School English teacher Caroline Polatsidis.
“It was just scary because I was worried that students wouldn’t be learning anymore, that they would be letting AI do the work for them, but now I see that we need to harness this great power,” Polatsidis said.
What about cheating? A recent study by the Pew Research Center found that a quarter of teenagers nationwide have used the app ChatGPT for schoolwork.
Most felt it was wrong to use the advanced AI to write essays and solve math problems.
“I actually think people here in this high school use AI to help them with their assignments, but in ways that our teachers actually condone,” NiKhil Shah, Syossett High School senior, said.
“We don’t have any other choice but to do it now. AI is moving at a pace. The world is moving at a pace faster frankly than we can educate our kids,” Syosset Schools Assistant Superintendent David Steinberg said.
It’s not just the teachers who are embracing using AI in the classroom. Many students are too.
“I really started to understand AI in high school as some of my teachers introduced it to me and kind of started to guide us on how to use AI,” Shah explained.
Shah said using AI in school was introduced last year in his Spanish class.
“We would record speaking in Spanish. In order to improve the way we spoke, we would submit it to AI. It would analyze it and show us where we made mistakes, where we could improve,” he said.
Some students are skeptical.
“Personally, I never really was a fan of AI just because of the environmental costs it has,” senior Janice Opal Kang said.
According to the United Nations, the growing number of data centers that house AI servers use massive amounts of electricity, spurring the emission of global warming greenhouse gases.
Back in the classroom, AI is not only transitioning in schools on Long Island. Teachers at St. Benedict’s Prep Catholic School in Newark, New Jersey, are navigating the new world, too.
“It’s really forcing us to reevaluate what it is that we’re teaching and how we’re assessing what kids have learned. It’s really a pretty transformational thing,” teacher Trevor Shaw said.
* Get Eyewitness News Delivered
* Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts
Submit a tip or story idea to Eyewitness News
Have a breaking news tip or an idea for a story we should cover? Send it to Eyewitness News using the form below. If attaching a video or photo, terms of use apply.
Copyright © 2025 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.
-
Business5 days ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms3 weeks ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy1 month ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers2 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Education2 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Funding & Business2 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi
-
Education2 months ago
AERDF highlights the latest PreK-12 discoveries and inventions