Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

As Big Tech builds AI data centers at record pace, carbon emissions are set to skyrocket

Published

on


Welcome to Eye on AI! In this edition...Ilya Sutskever says he is now CEO of Safe Superintelligence…Chinese AI companies erode U.S. dominance…Meta’s AI talent bidding war heats up…Microsoft’s sales overhaul goes all-in on AI.

As an early-summer heat wave blanketed my home state of New Jersey last week, it felt like perfect timing to stumble across a sobering new prediction from Accenture: AI data centers’ carbon emissions are on track to surge 11-fold by 2030.

The report estimates that over the next five years, AI data centers could consume 612 terawatt-hours of electricity—roughly equivalent to Canada’s total annual power consumption—driving a 3.4% increase in global carbon emissions.

And the strain doesn’t stop at the power grid. At a time when freshwater resources are already under severe pressure, AI data centers are also projected to consume more than 3 billion cubic meters of water per year—a volume that surpasses the annual freshwater withdrawals of entire countries like Norway or Sweden.

Unsurprisingly, the report—Powering Sustainable AI—offers recommendations for how to rein in the problem and prevent those numbers from becoming reality. But with near-daily headlines about Big Tech’s massive AI data center buildouts across the U.S. and worldwide, I can’t help but feel cynical. The urgent framing of an AI race against China doesn’t seem to leave much room—or time—for serious thinking about sustainability.

Just yesterday, for example, OpenAI agreed to rent a massive amount of computing power from Oracle data centers as part of its Stargate initiative, which intends to invest $500 billion over the next four years building new AI infrastructure for OpenAI in the United States. The additional capacity from Oracle totals about 4.5 gigawatts of data center power in the U.S., according to Bloomberg reporting. A gigawatt is akin to the capacity from one nuclear reactor and can provide electricity to roughly 750,000 houses. 

And this week, Meta was reported to be seeking to raise $29 billion from private capital firms to build AI data centers in the U.S., while already building a $10 billion AI data center in Northeast Louisiana. As part of that deal, the local utility, Entergy, will supply three new power plants. 

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has made his intentions clear: The U.S. must rapidly expand AI data center construction or risk falling behind China in the race for AI dominance. Speaking on the Dwarkesh Podcast in May, he warned that America’s edge in artificial intelligence could erode unless it keeps pace with China’s aggressive build-out of data center capacity and factory-scale hardware.

“The U.S. really needs to focus on streamlining the ability to build data centers and produce energy,” Zuckerberg said. “Otherwise, we’ll be at a significant disadvantage.”

The U.S. government seems to be aligned with that sense of urgency. David Sacks, now serving as the White House AI and Crypto Czar, has also underscored that energy and data center expansion are central to America’s AI strategy—leaving little room for sustainability concerns.

On his All In podcast in February, Sacks argued that Washington’s “go-slow” approach to AI could strangle the industry. He emphasized that the U.S. needs to clear the way for infrastructure and energy development—including AI data centers—to keep pace with China.

In late May, he went further, saying that streamlining permitting and expanding power generation are essential for AI’s future—something he claimed has been “effectively impossible under the Biden administration.” His message: the U.S. needs to race to build faster.

Accenture, meanwhile, is urging its clients to responsibly grow and engineer its AI data centers in a bid to balance growth with environmental responsibility. It is offering a new metric, that it calls the Sustainable AI Quotient (SAIQ), to measure the true costs of AI in terms of money invested, megawatt-hours of energy consumed, tons of CO₂ emitted and cubic meters of water used. The firm’s report says the metric will help organizations answer a basic question: “What are we actually getting from the resources we’re investing in AI?” and allow that enterprise to measure its performance across time.

I spoke to Matthew Robinson, managing director of Accenture Research and co-author of the report, who emphasized that he hoped Accenture’s sobering predictions would be proven wrong. “They kind of take your breath away,” he said, explaining that Accenture modeled future energy consumption from the expected number of installed AI chips adjusted for utilization and the additional energy requirements of data centers. That data was combined with regional data on electricity generation, energy mix and emissions, while water use was assessed based on AI data center energy consumption and how much water is consumed per unit of electricity generated.

“The point really is to open the conversation around the actions that are available to avert this pathway—we don’t want to be right here,” he said. He would not comment on the actions of specific companies like OpenAI or Meta, but said that overall, clearly more effort is needed to avert the rise in carbonisation fueled by AI data centers while still allowing for growth. 

Accenture’s recommendations certainly make sense: Optimize the power efficiency of AI workloads and data centers with everything from low-carbon energy options to cooling innovations. Use AI thoughtfully, by choosing smaller AI models, and better pricing models for incentivizing efficiency. And ensure better governance over AI sustainability initiatives. 

It’s hard to imagine that the biggest players in the race for AI dominance—Big Tech giants and heavily funded startups—will hit the brakes long enough to seriously address these growing concerns. Not that it’s impossible. Take Google, for example: In its latest sustainability report released this week, the company revealed that its data centers are consuming more power than ever. In 2024, Google used approximately 32.1 million megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity, with a staggering 95.8%—about 30.8 million MWh—consumed by its data centers. That’s more than double the energy its data centers used in 2020, just before the consumer AI boom.

Still, Google emphasized that it’s making meaningful strides toward cleaning up its energy supply, even as demand surges. The company said it cut its data center energy emissions by 12% in 2024, thanks to clean energy projects and efficiency upgrades. And it’s squeezing more out of every watt. Google reported that the amount of compute per unit of electricity has increased about six-fold over the past five years. Its power usage effectiveness (PUE)—a key measure of data center efficiency—is now approaching the theoretical minimum of 1.0, with a reported PUE of 1.09 in 2024.

“Just speaking personally, I’d be optimistic,” said Robinson.

Note: Check out this new Fortune video about my tour of IBM’s quantum computing test lab. I had a fabulous time hanging out at IBM’s Yorktown Heights campus (a midcentury modern marvel designed by the same guy as the St. Louis Arch and the classic TWA Flight Center at JFK Airport) in New York. The video was part of my coverage for this year’s Fortune 500 issue that included an article that dug deep into IBM’s recent rebound.

As I said in my piece, “walking through the IBM research center is like stepping into two worlds at once. There are the steel and glass curves of Saarinen’s design, punctuated by massive walls made of stones collected from the surrounding fields, with original Eames chairs dotting discussion nooks. But this 20th-century modernism contrasts starkly with the sleek, massive, refrigerator-like quantum computer—among the most advanced in the world—that anchors the collaboration area and working lab, where it whooshes with the steady hum of its cooling system.”

With that, here’s the rest of the AI news.

Sharon Goldman
sharon.goldman@fortune.com
@sharongoldman

AI IN THE NEWS

Ilya Sutskever says he is now CEO of Safe Superintelligence, after Daniel Gross steps down to join Meta. Ilya Sutskever, the former OpenAI chief scientist who founded Safe Superintelligence (SSI) with Daniel Gross and Daniel Levy a year ago, confirmed that he will now serve as SSI’s CEO after Daniel Gross stepped down. Sustkever posted on X saying: “Daniel Gross’s time with us has been winding down, and as of June 29 he is officially no longer a part of SSI. We are grateful for his early contributions to the company and wish him well in his next endeavor. I am now formally CEO of SSI, and Daniel Levy is President. The technical team continues to report to me. ⁠You might have heard rumors of companies looking to acquire us. We are flattered by their attention but are focused on seeing our work through.” Meta was rumored to have sought to acquire the $32 billion-valued SSI.

Chinese AI companies erode U.S. dominance. According to the Wall Street Journal, Chinese artificial intelligence companies are gaining ground globally, challenging U.S. supremacy and intensifying a potential AI arms race. Across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, organizations—from multinational banks like HSBC and Standard Chartered to Saudi Aramco—are increasingly adopting large language models from Chinese firms such as DeepSeek and Alibaba as alternatives to U.S. offerings like ChatGPT. Even American cloud giants like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Google now offer access to DeepSeek’s models, despite U.S. government security restrictions on the company’s apps. While OpenAI’s ChatGPT still leads in global adoption—with 910 million downloads versus DeepSeek’s 125 million—Chinese models are undercutting U.S. competition by offering nearly comparable performance at much lower prices.

Meta’s AI talent bidding war heats up. As Mark Zuckerberg rapidly staffs up Meta’s new superintelligence lab, his company has reportedly offered some OpenAI researchers eye-popping pay packages of up to $300 million over four years, with more than $100 million in first-year compensation, Wired reports. The offers, which include immediate stock vesting, have been extended to at least 10 OpenAI employees, according to sources familiar with the negotiations. While Meta’s aggressive recruiting tactics have caught the attention of top talent, some OpenAI staffers told Wired they’re weighing the massive payouts against their potential impact at Meta versus staying at OpenAI. A Meta spokesperson pushed back, claiming reports of the offer sizes are exaggerated. Still, even Meta’s senior engineers typically make around $850,000 per year, with those in higher pay bands earning over $1.5 million annually, according to Levels.FYI data.

Microsoft’s sales overhaul goes all-in on AI. Microsoft’s sales chief, Judson Althoff, is reshaping the company’s sales organization to double down on AI, according to an internal memo obtained by Business Insider. Althoff’s Microsoft Customer and Partner Solutions (MCAPS) unit will now focus on embedding Copilot across devices and roles, deepening Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365 adoption, winning high-impact AI deals, expanding Azure cloud migration, and strengthening cybersecurity to support AI growth. The memo, sent just one day before Microsoft’s latest round of layoffs—many of which affected Althoff’s sales teams—outlined his vision to make Microsoft “the Frontier AI Firm.” According to Business Insider, this restructuring follows Althoff’s earlier plan to cut the number of sales solution areas in half starting this fiscal year.

FORTUNE ON AI

The new CEO flex: Bragging that AI handles exactly X% of the work —by Sharon Goldman

Sam Altman scoffs at Mark Zuckerberg’s AI recruitment drive and says Meta hasn’t even got their ‘top people’ —by Beatrice Nolan

Figma files for IPO nearly two years after $20 billion Adobe buyout fell through —by Allie Garfinkle

AI CALENDAR

July 8-11: AI for Good Global Summit, Geneva

July 13-19: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Vancouver

July 22-23: Fortune Brainstorm AI Singapore. Apply to attend here.

July 26-28: World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC), Shanghai. 

Sept. 8-10: Fortune Brainstorm Tech, Park City, Utah. Apply to attend here.

Oct. 6-10: World AI Week, Amsterdam

Dec. 2-7: NeurIPS, San Diego

Dec. 8-9: Fortune Brainstorm AI San Francisco. Apply to attend here.

EYE ON AI NUMBERS

$65 Billion

That’s how much U.S. investment in AI companies soared to in the first quarter of this year—a 33% jump from the previous quarter and a staggering 550% increase compared to the quarter before ChatGPT’s 2022 debut, according to PitchBook.

The biggest price tag? Data centers.

 The New York Times reports that Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google plan to spend a combined $320 billion on infrastructure this year—more than double what they spent just two years ago. A huge chunk of that will go toward building new data centers to keep up with the exploding demand for AI.



Source link

Tools & Platforms

AI Shopping Is Here. Will Retailers Get Left Behind?

Published

on


AI doesn’t care about your beautiful website.

Visit any fashion brand’s homepage and you’ll see all sorts of dynamic or interactive elements from image carousels to dropdown menus that are designed to catch shoppers’ eyes and ease navigation.

To the large language models that underlie ChatGPT and other generative AI, many of these features might as well not exist. They’re often written in the programming language JavaScript, which for the moment at least most AI struggles to read.

This giant blindspot didn’t matter when generative AI was mostly used to write emails and cheat on homework. But a growing number of startups and tech giants are deploying this technology to help users shop — or even make the purchase themselves.

“A lot of your site might actually be invisible to an LLM from the jump,” said A.J. Ghergich, global vice president of Botify, an AI optimisation company that helps brands from Christian Louboutin to Levi’s make sure their products are visible to and shoppable by AI.

The vast majority of visitors to brands’ websites are still human, but that’s changing fast. US retailers saw a 1,200 percent jump in visits from generative AI sources between July 2024 and February 2025, according to Adobe Analytics. Salesforce predicts AI platforms and AI agents will drive $260 billion in global online sales this holiday season.

Those agents, launched by AI players such as OpenAI and Perplexity, are capable of performing tasks on their own, including navigating to a retailer’s site, adding an item to cart and completing the checkout process on behalf of a shopper. Google’s recently introduced agent will automatically buy a product when it drops to a price the user sets.

This form of shopping is very much in its infancy; the AI shopping agents available still tend to be clumsy. Long term, however, many technologists envision a future where much of the activity online is driven by AI, whether that’s consumers discovering products or agents completing transactions.

To prepare, businesses from retail behemoth Walmart to luxury fashion labels are reconsidering everything from how they design their websites to how they handle payments and advertise online as they try to catch the eye of AI and not just humans.

“It’s in every single conversation I’m having right now,” said Caila Schwartz, director of consumer insights and strategy at Salesforce, which powers the e-commerce of a number of retailers, during a roundtable for press in June. “It is what everyone wants to talk about, and everyone’s trying to figure out and ask [about] and understand and build for.”

From SEO to GEO and AEO

As AI joins humans in shopping online, businesses are pivoting from SEO — search engine optimisation, or ensuring products show up at the top of a Google query — to generative engine optimisation (GEO) or answer engine optimisation (AEO), where catching the attention of an AI responding to a user’s request is the goal.

That’s easier said than done, particularly since it’s not always clear even to the AI companies themselves how their tools rank products, as Perplexity’s chief executive, Aravind Srinivas, admitted to Fortune last year. AI platforms ingest vast amounts of data from across the internet to produce their results.

Though there are indications of what attracts their notice. Products with rich, well-structured content attached tend to have an advantage, as do those that are the frequent subject of conversation and reviews online.

“Brands might want to invest more in developing robust customer-review programmes and using influencer marketing — even at the micro-influencer level — to generate more content and discussion that will then be picked up by the LLMs,” said Sky Canaves, a principal analyst at Emarketer focusing on fashion, beauty and luxury.

Ghergich pointed out that brands should be diligent with their product feeds into programmes such as Google’s Merchant Center, where retailers upload product data to ensure their items appear in Google’s search and shopping results. These types of feeds are full of structured data including product names and descriptions meant to be picked up by machines so they can direct shoppers to the right items. One example from Google reads: Stride & Conquer: Original Google Men’s Blue & Orange Power Shoes (Size 8).

Ghergich said AI will often read this data before other sources such as the HTML on a brand’s website. These feeds can also be vital for making sure the AI is pulling pricing data that’s up to date, or as close as possible.

As more consumers turn to AI and agents, however, it could change the very nature of online marketing, a scenario that would shake even Google’s advertising empire. Tactics that work on humans, like promoted posts with flashy visuals, could be ineffective for catching AI’s notice. It would force a redistribution of how retailers spend their ad budgets.

Emarketer forecasts that spending on traditional search ads in the US will see slower growth in the years ahead, while a larger share of ad budgets will go towards AI search. OpenAI, whose CEO, Sam Altman, has voiced his distaste for ads in the past, has also acknowledged exploring ads on its platform as it looks for new revenue streams.

A chart showing the forecasted decline in spending on traditional search ads in the US from 2025 to 2029.

“The big challenge for brands with advertising is then how to show up in front of consumers when traditional ad formats are being circumvented by AI agents, when consumers are not looking at advertisements because agents are playing a bigger role,” said Canaves.

Bots Are Good Now

Retailers face another set of issues if consumers start turning to agents to handle purchases. On the one hand, agents could be great for reducing the friction that often causes consumers to abandon their carts. Rather than going through the checkout process themselves and stumbling over any annoyances, they just tell the agent to do it and off it goes.

But most websites aren’t designed for bots to make purchases — exactly the opposite, in fact. Bad actors have historically used bots to snatch up products from sneakers to concert tickets before other shoppers can buy them, frequently to flip them for a profit. For many retailers, they’re a nuisance.

“A lot of time and effort has been spent to keep machines out,” said Rubail Birwadker, senior vice president and global head of growth at Visa.

If a site has reason to believe a bot is behind a transaction — say it completes forms too fast — it could block it. The retailer doesn’t make the sale, and the customer is left with a frustrating experience.

Payment players are working to create methods that will allow verified agents to check out on behalf of a consumer without compromising security. In April, Visa launched a programme focused on enabling AI-driven shopping called Intelligent Commerce. It uses a mix of credential verification (similar to setting up Apple Pay) and biometrics to ensure shoppers are able to checkout while preventing opportunities for fraud.

“We are going out and working with these providers to say, ‘Hey, we would like to … make it easy for you to know what’s a good, white-list bot versus a non-whitelist bot,’” Birwadker said.

Of course the bot has to make it to checkout. AI agents can stumble over other common elements in webpages, like login fields. It may be some time before all those issues are resolved and they can seamlessly complete any purchase.

Consumers have to get on board as well. So far, few appear to be rushing to use agents for their shopping, though that could change. In March, Salesforce published the results of a global survey that polled different age groups on their interest in various use cases for AI agents. Interest in using agents to buy products rose with each subsequent generation, with 63 percent of Gen-Z respondents saying they were interested.

Canaves of Emarketer pointed out that younger generations are already using AI regularly for school and work. Shopping with AI may not be their first impulse, but because the behaviour is already ingrained in their daily lives in other ways, it’s spilling over into how they find and buy products.

More consumers are starting their shopping journeys on AI platforms, too, and Schwartz of Salesforce noted that over time this could shape their expectations of the internet more broadly, the way Google and Amazon did.

“It just feels inevitable that we are going to see a much more consistent amount of commerce transactions originate and, ultimately, natively happen on these AI agentic platforms,” said Birwadker.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

CarMax’s top tech exec shares his keys to reinventing a legacy retailer in the age of AI

Published

on


More than 30 years ago, CarMax aimed to transform the way people buy and sell used cars with a consistent, haggle-free experience that separated it from the typical car dealership.

Despite evolving into a market leader since then, its chief information and technology officer, Shamim Mohammad, knows no company is guaranteed that title forever; he had previously worked for Blockbuster, which, he said, couldn’t change fast enough to keep up with Netflix in streaming video.

Mohammad spoke with Modern Retail at the Virginia-based company’s technology office in Plano, Texas, which it opened three to four years ago to recruit for tech workers like software engineers and analysts in the region home to tech companies such as AT&T and Texas Instruments. At that office, CarMax has since hired almost 150 employees — more than initially expected — including some of Mohammad’s former colleagues from Blockbuster, which he had worked for in Texas in the early 2000s.

He explained how other legacy retailers can learn from how CarMax leveraged new technology like artificial intelligence and a startup mindset as it embraced change, becoming an omnichannel retailer where customers can buy cars in person, entirely online or through a combination of both. Many customers find a car online and test-drive and complete their purchase at the store.

“Every company, every industry is going through a lot of disruption because of technology,” Mohammad said. “It’s much better to do self-disruption: changing our own business model, challenging ourselves and going through the pain of change before we are disrupted by somebody else.”

Digitizing the dealership

Mohammad has been with CarMax for more than 12 years and had also been vp of information technology for BJ’s Wholesale Club. Since joining the auto retailer, he and his team have worked to use artificial intelligence to fully digitize the process of car buying, which is especially complex given the mountain of vehicle information and regulations dealers have to consider.

He said the company has been using AI and machine learning for at least 12-13 years to price cars, make sure the right information is online for the cars, and understand where cars need to be in the supply chain and when. That, he said, has powered the company’s website in becoming a virtual showroom that helps customers understand the vehicles, their functions and how they fit their needs. Artificial intelligence has also powered its online instant offer tool for selling cars, giving customers a fair price that doesn’t lose the company money, Mohammad said.

“Technology is enabling different types of experiences, and it’s setting new expectations, and new types of ways to shop and buy. Our industry is no different. We wanted to be that disruptor,” Mohammad said. “We want to make sure we change our business model and we bring those experiences so that we continue to remain the market leader in our industry.”

About three or four years ago, CarMax was an early adopter of ChatGPT, using it to organize data on the different features of car models and make it presentable through its digital channels. Around the same time, the company also used generative AI to comb through and summarize thousands of customer product reviews — it did what would have taken hundreds of content writers more than 10 years to do in a matter of days, he said — and keep them up to date.

As the technology has improved over the last few years, the company has adopted several new AI-powered features. One is Rhodes, a tool associates use to get support and information they need to help customers, which launched about a year ago, Mohammad said. It uses a large language model combining CarMax data with outside information like state or federal rules and regulations to help employees quickly access that data.

Anything that requires a lot of human workload and mental capacity can be automated, he said, from looking at invoices and documents to generating code for developers and engineers, saving them time to do more valuable work. Retailers like Target and Walmart have done the same by using AI chatbots as tools for employees.

“We used to spend a fortune on employee training, and employees only retained and reliably repeated a small percentage of what we trained,” said Jason Goldberg, chief commerce strategy officer for Publicis Groupe. “Increasingly, AI is letting us give way better tools to the salespeople, to train them and to support them when they’re talking to customers.”

In just the last few months, Mohammad said, CarMax has been rolling out an agentic version of a previous buying and selling assistant on its website called Skye that better understands the intent of the user — not only answering the question the customer asks directly, but also walking the customer through the entire car buying process.

“It’ll obviously answer [the customer’s question], but it will also try to understand what you’re trying to do and help you proactively through the entire process. It could be financing; it could be buying; it could be selling; it could be making an appointment; it could be just information about the car and safety,” he said.

The new Skye is more like talking to an actual human being, Mohammad said, where, in addition to answering the question, the agent can make other recommendations in a more natural conversation. For example, if someone is trying to buy a car and asks for a family car that’s safe, it will pull one from its inventory, but it may also ask if they’d like to talk to someone or even how their day is going.

“It’s guiding you through the process beyond what you initially asked. It’s building a rapport with you,” Mohammad said. “It knows you very well, it knows our business really well, and then it’s really helping you get to the right car and the right process.”

Goldberg said that while many functions of retail, from writing copy to scheduling shifts, have also been improved with AI, pushing things done by humans to AI chatbots could lead to distrust or create results that are inappropriate or offensive. “At the moment, most of the AI things are about efficiency and reducing friction,” Goldberg said. “They’re taking something you’re already doing and making it easier, which is generally appealing, but there is also the potential to dehumanize the experience.”

In testing CarMax’s new assistant, other AI agents are actually monitoring it to make sure it’s up to the company’s standards and not saying bad words, Mohammad said, adding it would be impossible for humans to look at everything the new assistant is doing.

The company doesn’t implement AI just to implement AI, Mohammad said, adding that his teams are using generative AI as a tool when needing to solve particular problems instead of being forced to use it.

“Companies don’t need an AI strategy. … They need a strategy that uses AI,” Mohammad said. “Use AI to solve customer problems.”

Working like a tech startup

In embracing change, CarMax has had to change the way it works, Mohammad said. It has created a more startup-like culture, going from cubicles to more open, collaborative office spaces where employees know what everyone else is working on.

About a decade ago, he said, the company started working with a project-based mindset, where it would deliver a new project every six to nine months — each taking about a year in total, with phases for designing and testing.

Now, the company has small, cross-functional product teams of seven to nine people, each with a mission around improving a particular area like finance, digital merchandising, SEO, logistics or supply chain — some even have fun names like “Ace” or “Top Gun.”

Teams have just two weeks to create a prototype of a feature and get it in front of customers. He said that, stacked up over time, those small new changes those teams created completely transformed the business.

“The teams are empowered, and they’re given a mission. I’m not telling them what to do. I’m giving them a goal. They figure out how,” Mohammad said. “Create a culture of experimentation, and don’t wait for things to be perfect. Create a culture where your teams are empowered. It’s OK for them to make mistakes; it’s OK for them to learn from their mistakes.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Available Infrastructure Unveils ‘SanQtum’ Secure AI Platform for Critical Infrastructure

Published

on



Available Infrastructure (Available) publicly unveiled SanQtum, a first-of-a-kind solution that combines national security-grade cyber protection and the world’s most-trusted enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) capability.


In the modern era, AI-powered, machine-speed decision-making is crucial. Yet a fast-evolving and increasingly sophisticated threat landscape puts operational technology (OT) and cyber-physical systems (CPS), IP and other sensitive data, and proprietary trained AI models at risk. SanQtum is a direct response to that need.


Created through a rigorous development process in collaboration with major enterprise tech partners and government agencies, SanQtum pre-integrates a best-in-breed tech stack in a micro edge data center form factor, ready for deployment anywhere — from near-prem urban sites to telecom towers to austere environments. A first cohort of initial sites is already under construction in Northern Virginia and expected to come online later this year.


SanQtum’s cybersecurity protections include zero trust permissions architecture, quantum-resilient data encryption, and are aligned to DHS, CISA, and other US federal cybersecurity standards. Sovereign AI models with ultra-low-latency computing enable secure decision-making at machine speed when milliseconds matter, wrapped in cyber protections to prevent data theft and AI model poisoning.


The need for more sophisticated cybersecurity solutions is widespread and growing by the day. Globally, the cost of cybercrimes to corporations is forecasted to nearly triple, from $8 trillion in 2023 to $23 trillion by 2027. For government agencies and critical infrastructure, cybersecurity is literally a matter of life and death.


Daniel Gregory, CEO of Available


AI is now seemingly everywhere. So are cyber threats, from nation-state attacks to criminal enterprises. In this environment, decision-making without AI — and AI without cybersecurity protections — are no longer negotiable; they’re mandatory. As we head into the July 4th weekend, which has historically seen a surge in cyber attacks each year, security is top-of-mind for many Americans, businesses, and government agencies. We live in a digital world. And AI is now seemingly everywhere. So are cyber threats, from nation-state attacks to criminal enterprises. In this environment, decision-making without AI — and AI without cybersecurity protections — are no longer negotiable; they’re mandatory.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending