Connect with us

AI Research

Apple hits back against ‘unprecedented’ €500m EU fine

Published

on


Getty Images The blue App Store icon is enlarged on a laptop screen as a user's cursor hovers over it. Displayed beside it are the icons of other Apple Mac apps such as Calendar and its Safari web browser.Getty Images

Apple is appealing against a €500m (£430m; $586m) fine handed down by EU regulators over alleged anti-competitive behaviour on its App Store.

The European Commission said in April that the tech giant had breached its laws by restricting app developers in their ability to inform customers of alternative offers or marketplaces that could be found outside its own and steer them towards purchases.

Apple called the Commission’s fine “unprecedented” on Monday, saying the decision and its penalty “go far beyond what the law requires”.

A Commission spokesperson told the BBC it took note of Apple’s filing and would defend its decisions in court.

The company objects to the Commission requiring it to make further concessions to app developers, including provision of tiers for services which it says introduce more complexity to its options for users and businesses.

“As our appeal will show, the [Commission] is mandating how we run our store and forcing business terms which are confusing for developers and bad for users,” Apple said in a statement.

“We implemented this to avoid punitive daily fines and will share the facts with the Court.”

Paolo Pescatore, technology analyst at PP Foresight, said Apple’s appeal was a “widely expected move” that “sets the precedent for others”.

“It is disappointing that it now has to be settled in a long, drawn public process in the courts,” he said, adding the nature of changes required by regulators – and enforcement of them – can be lengthy and complex.

“We should not underestimate the sheer complexities of having to make fundamental design, operational and commercial changes to well-established services and the time it takes to enforce them,” he told the BBC.

“As always the devil is in the detail, which will inevitably take more time to unravel.”

EU’s big tech scrutiny

The Commission’s Apple fine was delivered in April alongside a penalty on Facebook owner Meta of €200m (£171m) over choice for users under its “consent or pay” model.

The fines were the first imposed under the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) – its landmark legislation designed to boost competitive business practice in online markets.

The law also carries tougher obligations for companies designated dominant “gatekeepers” in certain sectors, and firms face hefty fines of up to 10% of their annual global turnover for rule breaches.

Henna Virkkunen, the Commission’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said at the time that both companies had undermined the key principles of the DMA – to enable free business and choice for consumers.

Apple said it was being “unfairly targeted” and forced to “give away our technology for free”.

It also accused the regulator of “[moving] the goal posts” during their meetings.

It has now escalated its complaint to the EU’s second highest court, the General Court.

The EU’s strict regulation of large US tech firms has also attracted scrutiny from President Donald Trump’s administration.

Trump said in January that he had “some very big complaints with the EU” regarding its treatment of American tech companies, likening fines upon them to “a form of taxation”.

Speaking on a podcast in October, he said Apple’s boss Tim Cook had also called him to complain about the bloc’s fines.

A green promotional banner with black squares and rectangles forming pixels, moving in from the right. The text says: “Tech Decoded: The world’s biggest tech news in your inbox every Monday.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI Research

Promising Artificial Intelligence Stocks To Watch Now – September 13th – MarketBeat

Published

on



Promising Artificial Intelligence Stocks To Watch Now – September 13th  MarketBeat



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Denzel Washington Rejected This Sci-Fi Box Office Hit About Artificial Intelligence

Published

on






For most of his legendary career, Denzel Washington has been able to call his tune. Studios are eager to be in business with him, and it certainly helps his cause that he enjoys making commercial films from time to time (as evidenced by his “Equalizer” movies). So, post-stardom, if he regrets making or not making a film, he only has himself to blame.

Personally, even though Denzel Washington is my favorite living actor, I do think he’s made some mistakes over the years. The formula thriller “The Bone Collector” was limp material that confined him to a bed for most of the movie, while the hospital hostage drama “John Q” was formulaic pap. And I have no idea what he was thinking when he signed on to star opposite two of our most annoying living actors (Jared Leto and Rami Malek, both of whom inexplicably have Oscars) in the serial killer thriller “The Little Things.”

But what about Washington? Does he have any regrets? The two-time Oscar winner is generally pretty happy with how his career has turned out, though there are some opportunities that, in retrospect, he wishes he’d leapt on. However, that does not include the Will Smith hit that pondered the potential pitfalls of a future where artificial intelligence is an essential part of human life.

Denzel was worried about the CGI of I, Robot

In a 2004 interview with Phase9 pegged to the release of Tony Scott’s “Man on Fire” (one of the director’s finest films), Washington was asked if there were any roles to which he regretted saying, “No thanks.” “The lead in ‘The Passion of the Chris,'” joked Washington (the movie was doing blockbuster business at the time of the interview). He then turned serious and said, “The Brad Pitt role in ‘Se7en.'” Amazingly, Sylvester Stallone also turned this part down.

But with the summer of 2004 approaching, Washington noted, “I was also recently offered ‘I Robot,’ but I was worried about the robots, if they got them wrong. Actually, I would have done it, but it came down to a choice between that movie and ‘The Manchurian Candidate.'” While Alex Proyas’ adaptation of Isaac Asimov’s sci-fi book is not without merit, Washington likely would’ve found himself getting paid very well to make a movie undone in part by studio interference. As such, I’m grateful that he instead teamed up with the great Jonathan Demme to make a severely underrated adaptation of Richard Condon’s novel (which had already formed the basis for a stone-cold classic from John Frankenheimer in 1962).

Eight years after this interview, Washington would express regret at turning down the lead role in Tony Gilroy’s “Michael Clayton.” As he told GQ, “With ‘Clayton,’ it was the best material I had read in a long time, but I was nervous about a first-time director, and I was wrong. It happens.” I would absolutely love to see the Denzel Washington version of “Michael Clayton,” but George Clooney certainly aced the assignment. As for “I, Robot,” I just wish Alan Tudyk would get more credit for being the best thing in Proyas’ movie.





Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Love and Artificial Intelligence – cbsnews.com

Published

on



Love and Artificial Intelligence  cbsnews.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending