Events & Conferences
Amazon Bedrock offers access to multiple generative AI models
The drive to harness the transformative power of high-end machine learning models has meant some businesses are facing new challenges. Teams want assistance in crafting compelling documents, summarizing complex documents, building conversational-AI agents, or generating striking, customized visuals.
In April, Amazon stepped in to assist customers contending with the need to build and scale generative AI applications with a new service: Amazon Bedrock. Bedrock arms developers and businesses with secure, seamless, and scalable access to cutting-edge models from a range of leading companies.
Bedrock provides access to Stability AI’s text-to-image models — including Stable Diffusion, multilingual LLMs from AI21 Labs, and Anthropic’s multilingual LLMs, called Claude and Claude Instant, which excel at conversational and text-processing tasks. Bedrock has been further expanded with the additions of Cohere’s foundation models, as well as Anthropic’s Claude 2 and Stability AI’s Stable Diffusion XL 1.0.
These models, trained on large amounts of data, are increasingly known under the umbrella term foundation models (FMs) — hence the name Bedrock. The abilities of a wide range of FMs — as well as Amazon’s own new FM, called Amazon Titan — are available through Bedrock’s API.
Werner Vogels and Swami Sivasubramanian discuss generative AI
Why gather all these models in one place?
“The world is moving so fast on FMs, it is rather unwise to expect that one model is going to get everything right,” says Amazon senior principal engineer Rama Krishna Sandeep Pokkunuri. “All models come with individual strengths and weaknesses, so our focus is on customer choice.”
Expanding ML access
Bedrock is the latest step in Amazon’s ongoing effort to democratize ML by making it easy for customers to access high-performing FMs, without the large costs inherent in both building those models and maintaining the necessary infrastructure. To that end, the team behind Bedrock is working to enable customers to privately customize that suite of FMs with their own data.
“Customers don’t have to stick to our training recipes. We are working to provide a high degree of customizability,” says Bing Xiang, director of applied science at Amazon Web Services’ AI Labs.
“For example,” Xiang continues, “customers can just point a Titan model at dozens of labeled examples they collected for their use cases and stored in Amazon S3 and fine-tune the model for the specific task.”
Not only is a suite of AI tools offered, it is also meticulously safeguarded. At Amazon, data security is so critical it is often referred to as “job zero”. While Bedrock hosts a growing number of third-party models, those third-party companies never see any customer data. That data, which is encrypted, and the Bedrock-hosted models themselves, remain firmly ensconced on Amazon’s secure servers.
Tackling toxicity
In addition to its commitment to security, Amazon has experience in the LLM arena, having developed a range of proprietary FMs in recent years. Last year, it made its Alexa Teacher Model — a 20-billion-parameter LLM — publicly available. Also last year, Amazon launched Amazon CodeWhisperer, a fully managed service powered by LLMs that can generate reams of robust computer code from natural-language prompts, among other things.
Continuing in that vein, a standout feature of Bedrock is the availability of Amazon’s Titan FMs, including a generative LLM and an embeddings LLM. Titan FMs are built to help customers grapple with the challenge of toxic content by detecting and removing harmful content in data and filtering model outputs that contain inappropriate content.
When several open-source LLMs burst onto the world stage last year, users quickly realized they could be prompted to generate toxic output, including sexist, racist, and homophobic content. Part of the problem, of course, is that the Internet is awash with such material, so models can absorb some of this toxicity and bias.
Amazon’s extensive investments in responsible AI include the building of guardrails and filters into Titan to ensure the models minimize toxicity, profanity, and other inappropriate behavior. “We are aware that this is a challenging problem, one that will require continuous improvement,” Xiang observed.
To that end, during the Titan models’ development, outputs undergo extensive “red teaming” — a rigorous evaluation process aimed at pinpointing potential vulnerabilities or flaws in a model’s design. Amazon even had experts attempt to coax harmful behavior from the models using a variety of tricky text prompts.
“No system of this nature will be perfect, but we’re creating Titan with utmost care,” says principal applied scientist Miguel Ballesteros. “We are working towards raising the bar in this field.”
Building Amazon Titan models for efficiency
Creating the Titan models also meant overcoming significant technological challenges, particularly in distributed computing.
“Imagine you are faced with a mathematical problem with four decomposable sub-problems that will take eight hours of solid brain work to complete,” explains Ramesh Nallapati, senior principal applied scientist. “If there were four of you working on it together, how long would it take? Two hours is the intuitive answer, because you are working in parallel.
“That’s not true in the real world, and it’s not true in the computing world,” Nallapati continues. “Why? Because communication time between parties and time for aggregating solutions from sub-problems must be factored in.”
In order to make the distributed computing efficient and cost effective, Amazon has developed both AWS Trainium accelerators — designed mainly for high-performance training of generative AI models, including large language models — and AWS Inferentia accelerators that power its models in operation. Both of these specialized accelerators offer higher throughput and lower cost per inference than comparable Amazon EC2 instances.
These accelerators need to constantly communicate and synchronize during training. To streamline this communication, the team employs 3-D parallelism. Here, three elements — parallelizing data mini-batches, parallelizing model parameters, and pipelining layer-wise computations across these accelerators — are distributed across hardware resources to varying degrees.
“Deciding on the combination of these three axes determines how we use the accelerators effectively,” says Nallapati.
Titan’s training task is further complicated by the fact that accelerators, like all sophisticated hardware, occasionally fail. “Using as many accelerators as we do, it is a question of days or weeks, but one of them is going to fail, and there’s a risk the whole thing is going to come down fast,” says Pokkunuri.
To tackle this reality, the team is pioneering ground-breaking techniques in resilience and fault tolerance in distributed computing.
Efficiency is critical in FMs — both for bottom-line considerations and from a sustainability standpoint, because FMs require immense power, both in training and in operation.
“Inferentia and Trainium are big strategic efforts to make sure our customers get the best cost performance,” says Pokkunuri.
Retrieval-augmented generation
Using Bedrock to efficiently combine the complementary abilities of the Titan models also puts the building blocks of a particularly useful process at a customer’s disposal, via a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
RAG can address a significant shortcoming in standalone LLMs — they cannot account for new events. GPT-4, for example, trained on information up to 2021, can only tell you that “the most significant recent Russian military action in Ukraine was in 2014”.
It is a massive and expensive undertaking to retrain huge LLMs, with the process itself taking months. RAG provides a way to both incorporate new content into LLMs’ outputs in-between re-trainings and provide a cost-effective way to leverage the power of LLMs on proprietary data.
For example, let’s say you run a big news or financial organization, and you want to use an LLM to intelligently interrogate your entire corpus of news or financial reports, which includes up-to-date knowledge.
“You will be able to use Titan models to generate text based on your proprietary content,” explains Ballesteros. “The Titan embeddings model helps to find documents that are relevant to the prompts. Then, the Titan generative model can leverage those documents as well as the information it has learned during training to generate text responses to the prompts. This allows customers to rapidly digest and query their own data sources.”
A commitment to responsible AI
In April, select Amazon customers were given access to Bedrock, to evaluate the service and provide feedback. Pokkunuri stresses the importance of this feedback: “We are not just trying to meet the bar here — we are trying to raise it. We’re looking to give our customers a delightful experience, to make sure their expectations are being met with this suite of models.”
The stepped launch of Bedrock also underscores Amazon’s commitment to responsible AI, says Xiang. “This is a very powerful service, and our commitment to responsible AI is paramount.”
As the number of powerful FMs grows, expect Amazon’s Bedrock to grow in tandem, with an expanding roster of leading third-party models and more exclusive models from Amazon itself.
“Generative AI has evolved rapidly in the past few years, but it’s still in its early stage and has a huge potential,” says Xiang. “We are excited about the opportunity of putting Bedrock in the hands of our customers and helping to solve a variety of problems they are facing today and tomorrow.”
Have you ever worked is legacy code? Are you curious what it takes to modernize systems at a massive scale?
Pascal Hartig is joined on the latest Meta Tech Podcast by Elaine and Buping, two software engineers working on a bold project to rewrite the decades-old C code in one of Meta’s core messaging libraries in Rust. It’s an ambitious effort that will transform a central messaging library that is shared across Messenger, Facebook, Instagram, and Meta’s AR/VR platforms.
They discuss taking on a project of this scope – even without a background in Rust, how they’re approaching it, and what it means to optimize for ‘developer happiness.’
Download or listen to the episode below:
You can also find the episode wherever you get your podcasts, including:
The Meta Tech Podcast is a podcast, brought to you by Meta, where we highlight the work Meta’s engineers are doing at every level – from low-level frameworks to end-user features.
Send us feedback on Instagram, Threads, or X.
And if you’re interested in learning more about career opportunities at Meta visit the Meta Careers page.
Amazon Research Awards (ARA) provides unrestricted funds and AWS Promotional Credits to academic researchers investigating various research topics in multiple disciplines. This cycle, ARA received many excellent research proposals from across the world and today is publicly announcing 73 award recipients who represent 46 universities in 10 countries.
This announcement includes awards funded under five call for proposals during the fall 2024 cycle: AI for Information Security, Automated Reasoning, AWS AI, AWS Cryptography, and Sustainability. Proposals were reviewed for the quality of their scientific content and their potential to impact both the research community and society. Additionally, Amazon encourages the publication of research results, presentations of research at Amazon offices worldwide, and the release of related code under open-source licenses.
Recipients have access to more than 700 Amazon public datasets and can utilize AWS AI/ML services and tools through their AWS Promotional Credits. Recipients also are assigned an Amazon research contact who offers consultation and advice, along with opportunities to participate in Amazon events and training sessions.
“Automated Reasoning is an important area of research for Amazon, with potential applications across various features and applications to help improve security, reliability, and performance for our customers. Through the ARA program, we collaborate with leading academic researchers to explore challenges in this field,” said Robert Jones, senior principal scientist with the Cloud Automated Reasoning Group. “We were again impressed by the exceptional response to our Automated Reasoning call for proposals this year, receiving numerous high-quality submissions. Congratulations to the recipients! We’re excited to support their work and partner with them as they develop new science and technology in this important area.”
“At Amazon, we believe that solving the world’s toughest sustainability challenges benefits from both breakthrough scientific research and open and bold collaboration. Through programs like the Amazon Research Awards program, we aim to support academic research that could contribute to our understanding of these complex issues,” said Kommy Weldemariam, Director of Science and Innovation Sustainability. “The selected proposals represent innovative projects that we hope will help advance knowledge in this field, potentially benefiting customers, communities, and the environment.”
ARA funds proposals throughout the year in a variety of research areas. Applicants are encouraged to visit the ARA call for proposals page for more information or send an email to be notified of future open calls.
The tables below list, in alphabetical order by last name, fall 2024 cycle call-for-proposal recipients, sorted by research area.
AI for Information Security
| Recipient | University | Research title |
| Christopher Amato | Northeastern University | Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Cyber Defense for Securing Cloud Computing Platforms |
| Bernd Bischl | Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich | Improving Generative and Foundation Models Reliability via Uncertainty-awareness |
| Shiqing Ma | University Of Massachusetts Amherst | LLM and Domain Adaptation for Attack Detection |
| Alina Oprea | Northeastern University | Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Cyber Defense for Securing Cloud Computing Platforms |
| Roberto Perdisci | University of Georgia | ContextADBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Contextual Anomaly Detection |
Automated Reasoning
| Recipient | University | Research title |
| Nada Amin | Harvard University | LLM-Augmented Semi-Automated Proofs for Interactive Verification |
| Suguman Bansal | Georgia Institute of Technology | Certified Inductive Generalization in Reinforcement Learning |
| Ioana Boureanu | University of Surrey | Phoebe+: An Automated-Reasoning Tool for Provable Privacy in Cryptographic Systems |
| Omar Haider Chowdhury | Stony Brook University | Restricter: An Automatic Tool for Authoring Amazon Cedar Access Control Policies with the Principle of Least Privilege |
| Stefan Ciobaca | Alexandru Ioan Cuza University | An Interactive Proof Mode for Dafny |
| João Ferreira | INESC-ID | Polyglot Automated Program Repair for Infrastructure as Code |
| Sicun Gao | University Of California, San Diego | Monte Carlo Trees with Conflict Models for Proof Search |
| Mirco Giacobbe | University of Birmingham | Neural Software Verification |
| Tobias Grosser | University of Cambridge | Synthesis-based Symbolic BitVector Simplification for Lean |
| Ronghui Gu | Columbia University | Scaling Formal Verification of Security Properties for Unmodified System Software |
| Alexey Ignatiev | Monash University | Huub: Next-Gen Lazy Clause Generation |
| Kenneth McMillan | University of Texas At Austin | Synthesis of Auxiliary Variables and Invariants for Distributed Protocol Verification |
| Alexandra Mendes | University of Porto | Overcoming Barriers to the Adoption of Verification-Aware Languages |
| Jason Nieh | Columbia University | Scaling Formal Verification of Security Properties for Unmodified System Software |
| Rohan Padhye | Carnegie Mellon University | Automated Synthesis and Evaluation of Property-Based Tests |
| Nadia Polikarpova | University Of California, San Diego | Discovering and Proving Critical System Properties with LLMs |
| Fortunat Rajaona | University of Surrey | Phoebe+: An Automated-Reasoning Tool for Provable Privacy in Cryptographic Systems |
| Subhajit Roy | Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur | Theorem Proving Modulo LLM |
| Gagandeep Singh | University of Illinois At Urbana–Champaign | Trustworthy LLM Systems using Formal Contracts |
| Scott Stoller | Stony Brook University | Restricter: An Automatic Tool for Authoring Amazon Cedar Access Control Policies with the Principle of Least Privilege |
| Peter Stuckey | Monash University | Huub: Next-Gen Lazy Clause Generation |
| Yulei Sui | University of New South Wales | Path-Sensitive Typestate Analysis through Sparse Abstract Execution |
| Nikos Vasilakis | Brown University | Semantics-Driven Static Analysis for the Unix/Linux Shell |
| Ping Wang | Stevens Institute of Technology | Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning Augmented Searching on Domain-specific NoSQL Database |
| John Wawrzynek | University of California, Berkeley | GPU-Accelerated High-Throughput SAT Sampling |
AWS AI
| Recipient | University | Research title |
| Panagiotis Adamopoulos | Emory University | Generative AI solutions for The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Reviews on Product Recommendations |
| Vikram Adve | University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign | Fellini: Differentiable ML Compiler for Full-Graph Optimization for LLM Models |
| Frances Arnold | California Institute of Technology | Closed-loop Generative Machine Learning for De Novo Enzyme Discovery and Optimization |
| Yonatan Bisk | Carnegie Mellon University | Useful, Safe, and Robust Multiturn Interactions with LLMs |
| Shiyu Chang | University of California, Santa Barbara | Cut the Crap: Advancing the Efficient Communication of Multi-Agent Systems via Spatial-Temporal Topology Design and KV Cache Sharing |
| Yuxin Chen | University of Pennsylvania | Provable Acceleration of Diffusion Models for Modern Generative AI |
| Tianlong Chen | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Cut the Crap: Advancing the Efficient Communication of Multi-Agent Systems via Spatial-Temporal Topology Design and KV Cache Sharing |
| Mingyu Ding | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Aligning Long Videos and Language as Long-Horizon World Models |
| Nikhil Garg | Cornell University | Market Design for Responsible Multi-agent LLMs |
| Jessica Hullman | Northwestern University | Human-Aligned Uncertainty Quantification in High Dimensions |
| Christopher Jermaine | Rice University | Fast, Trusted AI Using the EINSUMMABLE Compiler |
| Yunzhu Li | Columbia University | Physics-Informed Foundation Models Through Embodied Interactions |
| Pattie Maes | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Understanding How LLM Agents Deviate from Human Choices |
| Sasa Misailovic | University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign | Fellini: Differentiable ML Compiler for Full-Graph Optimization for LLM Models |
| Kristina Monakhova | Cornell University | Trustworthy extreme imaging for science using interpretable uncertainty quantification |
| Todd Mowry | Carnegie Mellon University | Efficient LLM Serving on Trainium via Kernel Generation |
| Min-hwan Oh | Seoul National University | Mutually Beneficial Interplay Between Selection Fairness and Context Diversity in Contextual Bandits |
| Patrick Rebeschini | University of Oxford | Optimal Regularization for LLM Alignment |
| Jose Renau | University of California, Santa Cruz | Verification Constrained Hardware Optimization using Intelligent Design Agentic Programming |
| Vilma Todri | Emory University | Generative AI solutions for The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Reviews on Product Recommendations |
| Aravindan Vijayaraghavan | Northwestern University | Human-Aligned Uncertainty Quantification in High Dimensions |
| Wei Yang | University of Texas at Dallas | Optimizing RISC-V Compilers with RISC-LLM and Syntax Parsing |
| Huaxiu Yao | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Aligning Long Videos and Language as Long-Horizon World Models |
| Amy Zhang | University of Washington | Tools for Governing AI Agent Autonomy |
| Ruqi Zhang | Purdue University | Efficient Test-time Alignment for Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models |
| Zheng Zhang | Rutgers University-New Brunswick | AlphaQC: An AI-powered Quantum Circuit Optimizer and Denoiser |
AWS Cryptography
| Recipient | University | Research title |
| Alexandra Boldyreva | Georgia Institute of Technology | Quantifying Information Leakage in Searchable Encryption Protocols |
| Maria Eichlseder | Graz University of Technology, Austria | SALAD – Systematic Analysis of Lightweight Ascon-based Designs |
| Venkatesan Guruswami | University of California, Berkeley | Obfuscation, Proof Systems, and Secure Computation: A Research Program on Cryptography at the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing |
| Joseph Jaeger | Georgia Institute of Technology | Analyzing Chat Encryption for Group Messaging |
| Aayush Jain | Carnegie Mellon | Large Scale Multiparty Silent Preprocessing for MPC from LPN |
| Huijia Lin | University of Washington | Large Scale Multiparty Silent Preprocessing for MPC from LPN |
| Hamed Nemati | KTH Royal Institute of Technology | Trustworthy Automatic Verification of Side-Channel Countermeasures for Binary Cryptographic Programs using the HoIBA libary |
| Karl Palmskog | KTH Royal Institute of Technology | Trustworthy Automatic Verification of Side-Channel Countermeasures for Binary Cryptographic Programs using the HoIBA libary |
| Chris Peikert | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor | Practical Third-Generation FHE and Bootstrapping |
| Dimitrios Skarlatos | Carnegie Mellon University | Scale-Out FHE LLMs on GPUs |
| Vinod Vaikuntanathan | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Can Quantum Computers (Really) Factor? |
| Daniel Wichs | Northeastern University | Obfuscation, Proof Systems, and Secure Computation: A Research Program on Cryptography at the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing |
| David Wu | University Of Texas At Austin | Fast Private Information Retrieval and More using Homomorphic Encryption |
Sustainability
| Recipient | University | Research title |
| Meeyoung Cha | Max Planck Institute | Forest-Blossom (Flossom): A New Framework for Sustaining Forest Biodiversity Through Outcome-Driven Remote Sensing Monitoring |
| Jingrui He | University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign | Foundation Model Enabled Earth’s Ecosystem Monitoring |
| Pedro Lopes | University of Chicago | AI-powered Tools that Enable Engineers to Make & Re-make Sustainable Hardware |
| Cheng Yaw Low | Max Planck Institute | Forest-Blossom (Flossom): A New Framework for Sustaining Forest Biodiversity Through Outcome-Driven Remote Sensing Monitoring |
AI safety is a priority at Amazon. Our investment in safe, transparent, and responsible AI (RAI) includes collaboration with the global community and policymakers. We are members of and collaborate with organizations such as the Frontier Model Forum, the Partnership on AI, and other forums organized by government agencies such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Consistent with Amazon’s endorsement of the Korea Frontier AI Safety Commitments, we published our Frontier Model Safety Framework earlier this year.
During the development of the Nova Premier model, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation to assess its performance and safety. This included testing on both internal and public benchmarks and internal/automated and third-party red-teaming exercises. Once the final model was ready, we prioritized obtaining unbiased, third-party evaluations of the model’s robustness against RAI controls. In this post, we outline the key findings from these evaluations, demonstrating the strength of our testing approach and Amazon Premier’s standing as a safe model. Specifically, we cover our evaluations with two third-party evaluators: PRISM AI and ActiveFence.
Evaluation of Nova Premier against PRISM AI
PRISM Eval’s Behavior Elicitation Tool (BET) dynamically and systematically stress-tests AI models’ safety guardrails. The methodology focuses on measuring how many adversarial attempts (steps) it takes to get a model to generate harmful content across several key risk dimensions. The central metric is “steps to elicit” — the number of increasingly sophisticated prompting attempts required before a model generates an inappropriate response. A higher number of steps indicates stronger safety measures, as the model is more resistant to manipulation. The PRISM risk dimensions (inspired by the MLCommons AI Safety Benchmarks) include CBRNE weapons, violent crimes, non-violent crimes, defamation, and hate, amongst several others.
Using the BET Eval tool and its V1.0 metric, which is tailored toward non-reasoning models, we compared the recently released Nova models (Pro and Premier) to the latest models in the same class: Claude (3.5 v2 and 3.7 non-reasoning) and Llama4 Maverick, all available through Amazon Bedrock. PRISM BET conducts black-box evaluations (where model developers don’t have access to the test prompts) of models integrated with their API. The evaluation conducted with BET Eval MAX, PRISM’s most comprehensive/aggressive testing suite, revealed significant variations in safety against malicious instructions. Nova models demonstrated superior overall safety performance, with an average of 43 steps for Premier and 52 steps for Pro, compared to 37.7 for Claude 3.5 v2 and fewer than 12 steps for other models in the comparison set (namely, 9.9 for Claude3.7, 11.5 for Claude 3.7 thinking, and 6.5 for Maverick). This higher step count suggests that on average, Nova’s safety guardrails are more sophisticated and harder to circumvent through adversarial prompting. The figure below presents the number of steps per harm category evaluated through BET Eval MAX.
The PRISM evaluation provides valuable insights into the relative safety of different Amazon Bedrock models. Nova’s strong performance, particularly in hate speech and defamation resistance, represents meaningful progress in AI safety. However, the results also highlight the ongoing challenge of building truly robust safety measures into AI systems. As the field continues to evolve, frameworks like BET will play an increasingly important role in benchmarking and improving AI safety. As a part of this collaboration Nicolas Miailhe, CEO of PRISM Eval, said, “It’s incredibly rewarding for us to see Nova outperforming strong baselines using the BET Eval MAX; our aim is to build a long-term partnership toward safer-by-design models and to make BET available to various model providers.” Organizations deploying AI systems should carefully consider these safety metrics when selecting models for their applications.
Manual red teaming with ActiveFence
The AI safety & security company ActiveFence benchmarked Nova Premier on Bedrock on prompts distributed across Amazon’s eight core RAI categories. ActiveFence also evaluated Claude 3.7 (non-reasoning mode) and GPT 4.1 API on the same set. The flag rate on Nova Premier was lower than that on the other two models, indicating that Nova Premier is the safest of the three.
| Model | 3P Flag Rate [↓ is better] |
| Nova Premier | 12.0% |
| Sonnet 3.7 (non-reasoning) | 20.6% |
| GPT4.1 API | 22.4% |
“Our role is to think like an adversary but act in service of safety,” said Guy Paltieli from ActiveFence. “By conducting a blind stress test of Nova Premier under realistic threat scenarios, we helped evaluate its security posture in support of Amazon’s broader responsible-AI goals, ensuring the model could be deployed with greater confidence.”
These evaluations conducted with PRISM and ActiveFence give us confidence in the strength of our guardrails and our ability to protect our customers’ safety when they use our models. While these evaluations demonstrate strong safety performance, we recognize that AI safety is an ongoing challenge requiring continuous improvement. These assessments represent a point-in-time snapshot, and we remain committed to regular testing and enhancement of our safety measures. No AI system can guarantee perfect safety in all scenarios, which is why we maintain monitoring and response systems after deployment.
Acknowledgments: Vincent Ponzo, Elyssa Vincent
-
Funding & Business6 days agoKayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions6 days ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Funding & Business3 days ago
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
-
Funding & Business6 days agoFrom chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
-
Jobs & Careers3 days ago
Ilya Sutskever Takes Over as CEO of Safe Superintelligence After Daniel Gross’s Exit
-
Funding & Business3 days ago
Dust hits $6M ARR helping enterprises build AI agents that actually do stuff instead of just talking
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Telangana Launches TGDeX—India’s First State‑Led AI Public Infrastructure
