Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

AI Goes Mainstream as Nearly Half of Retail Brands Now Use It Weekly

Published

on


Artificial intelligence is no longer an experiment in retail. Nearly half of retailers now use AI daily or several times per week, according to data from Amperity’s 2025 State of AI in Retail survey.

From customer data platforms to predictive models and chatbots, the technology is today being embedded into everyday operations, reshaping how brands engage with customers and compete in a crowded market.

“We have AI embedded across many parts of the business, which makes it feel seamless rather than experimental,” Daniel Chasle, chief data officer at U.K. fashion brand New Look, told Newsweek.

“For example, we use Amperity to run algorithmic stitching of customer profiles, AI chatbots in Zendesk to support customer service deflection, and AI coding assistants for our developers. We’ve also rolled out Microsoft Copilot to a subset of employees to help with daily tasks. Together, these tools are becoming part of the new ‘norm’ in how we work,” he said.

Amperity CEO Tony Owens told Newsweek that “every retailer should be experimenting with AI right now. But leaders take it further. They embed AI into the way the business runs.”

Newsweek Illustration/Canva

The normalization of AI reflects a turning point for the industry. Ninety-seven percent of retailers plan to either maintain or increase their AI spending this year, with priorities focused on personalization, media spend and demand forecasting. Loyalty and customer service are also key targets, as executives look to reduce costs and strengthen relationships at the same time.

“What retailers are really asking for are demonstrable outcomes,” Tony Owens, CEO of Amperity, told Newsweek. “They don’t want AI for AI’s sake—they want proof it drives growth. Every use case has to tie back to revenue, efficiency, or loyalty in ways you can measure.”

A Shift in Omnichannel Strategy

One of the biggest changes in 2025 is how retailers think about omnichannel, astrategy for giving customers a consistent shopping experience, whether in person, online or through mobile.

“Omnichannel 1.0 was about being where your customers are—stores, websites, apps,” Owens explained. “Omnichannel 2.0 is about the customer journey itself, and AI is what makes it possible to personalize those journeys in real time. The customer decides the channel, not the retailer, and they’re voting with their wallets.”

Retailers see the potential: 63 percent believe AI will help improve customer loyalty, while 65 percent expect it to increase customer lifetime value. But fewer than half—just 43 percent—are currently applying AI in customer-facing applications.

“Customers don’t think of themselves as segments or cohorts. They’re on a journey with your brand,” Owens said. “AI helps retailers meet them in that journey by anticipating needs, tailoring offers, and staying consistent across every channel. People know when a brand truly ‘gets’ them. That’s when the relationship shifts from transactional to personal, and that’s what drives loyalty and lifetime value.”

Still, adoption is uneven. While enthusiasm is high, retailers are cautious about pushing AI directly into customer touch points, often holding back because of costs, skills gaps and infrastructure challenges.

Solving the Data Puzzle

The survey highlights one major obstacle: 58 percent of retailers say their customer data is fragmented or incomplete. That fragmentation raises IT costs, delays decisions and complicates personalization.

“The challenges are the acquisition of the data from the disparate systems and knitting the data together to give a consistent view of the physical customer behind the data,” Chasle said. “The opportunities are to have the unified view of the customer, their shopping behaviors and preferences, to be able to understand all our touch points and interactions with the customer. This becomes an incredibly powerful data set that can power our decision-making and our engagement with customers.”

The New Look brand tackled the issue by combining an enterprise data platform with Amperity’s identity resolution. “Amperity also makes the data seamlessly available back into our data platform for our data science teams to access,” Chasle said.

That effort already has delivered results. New Look is using real-time customer profiles to fine-tune marketing campaigns and improve personalization. According to Owens, the unified data helped the brand identify nearly 26 percent more high-value customers than it had recognized before, insights that led to stronger offers and higher conversions.

Owens said it’s “proof that when you put the right data behind AI, you deliver a better journey for the customer and measurable return on customer data for the business.”

And the results are tangible. “The newly created Real-time Customer Profiles with Amperity are already fueling our paid media suppression activity, CRM optimization and will soon start to power a new wave of personalization experiences,” said Chasle.

Owens said that New Look’s example illustrates the potential benefits. “By using Amperity to unify customer profiles and power predictive models, they uncovered nearly 25 percent more high-value customers than they knew about before. That insight led to better offers, stronger conversions, and proof that when you put the right data behind AI, you deliver a better journey for the customer and measurable return on customer data for the business.”

But not every retailer has made this leap. The survey found that only 23 percent are currently using AI in production to resolve customer identities or prepare data for marketing, underscoring how widespread the data challenge remains.

From Experimentation to Embedding

For many retailers, AI adoption is moving beyond pilot projects. Nearly half are already using AI weekly, and those with customer data platforms are far ahead of their peers.

Organizations with a customer data platform (CDP) are twice as likely to use AI daily (60 percent vs. 29 percent) and more likely to have full adoption across multiple business units (22 percent vs. 10 percent).

“We don’t have the luxury of budget to experiment, and so we are approaching it on a value basis as part of our transformation roadmap and the prioritization of the business value and alignment to the overarching strategy,” Chasle said.

Owens said the distinction between experimenters and leaders is becoming clearer. “Experimenters usually see productivity gains, such as reduced costs, faster workflows, or incremental improvements. That’s valuable, and every retailer should be experimenting with AI right now. But leaders take it further. They embed AI into the way the business runs. That’s when you move beyond efficiency to true personalization at scale.”

That gap is likely to widen. As some retailers build AI into core operations, others risk being left behind, stuck in pilot mode without the confidence or resources to scale.

What Comes Next

Both Owens and Chasle pointed to personalization as the next big opportunity.

“Yes, the personalization of the web experience is in our immediate roadmap, with a vision of this leading to a personalized AI-stylist capability supporting our customers both in the digital and retail channels,” Chasle said.

Owens predicted that the next wave will be even more transformative. “By 2026, retailers will start to democratize data across the entire enterprise, using it to orchestrate the customer journey end-to-end. That’s when AI will deliver the full return on customer data.

“And that’s the moment of separation,” he continued. “The retailers who master this will win the bulk of customers in their category and set the standard for the next generation of brands. The ones who don’t will fall behind. This is a defining moment for retail. There will be winners and there will be losers.”

The findings echo broader consumer research, such as Cognizant’s recent survey showing that shoppers increasingly expect AI-powered personalization in their retail journeys. Taken together, the two reports show both sides of the AI revolution: consumers demanding seamless experiences and retailers racing to build the data foundations to deliver them.

Whether those predictions materialize depends on how quickly retailers overcome the same obstacles that have slowed AI before: siloed data, high costs and employee training.

The survey underscores the tension between ambition and readiness. While 97 percent of retailers are ramping up AI investment, only 11 percent feel strongly that they are prepared to deploy AI tools at scale. High costs, technical gaps and fragmented data remain persistent hurdles.

Still, the direction is clear. “Being able to tackle these business processes and re-imagine them with AI is the biggest opportunity,” Chasle said.”It is going to require significant business buy-in with senior stakeholder sponsorship, a clear end-state vision and a roadmap of activity that progressively tackles the required change.”



Source link

Tools & Platforms

AI hype has just shaken up the world’s rich list. What if the boom is really a bubble?

Published

on


Just for a moment this week, Larry Ellison, co-founder of US cloud computing company Oracle, became the world’s richest person. The octogenarian tech titan briefly overtook Elon Musk after Oracle’s share price rocketed 43% in a day, adding about US$100 billion (A$150 billion) to his wealth.

The reason? Oracle inked a deal to provide artificial intelligence (AI) giant OpenAI with US$300 billion (A$450 billion) in computing power over five years.

While Ellison’s moment in the spotlight was fleeting, it also illuminated something far more significant: AI has created extraordinary levels of concentration in global financial markets.

This raises an uncomfortable question not only for seasoned investors – but also for everyday Australians who hold shares in AI companies via their superannuation. Just how exposed are even our supposedly “safe”, “diversified” investments to the AI boom?

The man who built the internet’s memory

As billionaires go, Ellison isn’t as much of a household name as Tesla and SpaceX’s Musk or Amazon’s Jeff Bezos. But he’s been building wealth from enterprise technology for nearly five decades.

Ellison co-founded Oracle in 1977, transforming it into one of the world’s largest database software companies. For decades, Oracle provided the unglamorous but essential plumbing that kept many corporate systems running.

The AI revolution changed everything. Oracle’s cloud computing infrastructure, which helps companies store and process vast amounts of data, became critical infrastructure for the AI boom.

Every time a company wants to train large language models or run machine learning algorithms, they need huge amounts of computing power and data storage. That’s precisely where Oracle excels.

When Oracle reported stronger-than-expected quarterly earnings this week, driven largely by soaring AI demand, its share price spiked.

That response wasn’t just about Oracle’s business fundamentals. It was about the entire AI ecosystem that has been reshaping global markets since ChatGPT’s public debut in late 2022.

The great AI concentration

Oracle’s story is part of a much larger phenomenon reshaping global markets. The so-called “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks – Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Tesla and Nvidia – now control an unprecedented share of major stock indices.

Year-to-date in 2025, these seven companies have come to represent approximately 39% of the US S&P500’s total value. For the tech-heavy NASDAQ100, the figure is a whopping 74%.

This means if you invest in an exchange-traded fund that tracks the S&P500 index, often considered the gold standard of diversified investing, you’re making an increasingly concentrated bet on AI, whether you realise it or not.

Are we in an AI ‘bubble’?

This level of concentration has not been seen since the late 1990s. Back then, investors were swept up in “dot-com mania”, driving technology stock prices to unsustainable levels.

When reality finally hit in March 2000, the tech-heavy Nasdaq crashed 77% over two years, wiping out trillions in wealth.

Today’s AI concentration raises some similar red flags. Nvidia, which controls an estimated 90% of the AI chip market, currently trades at more than 30 times expected earnings. This is expensive for any stock, let alone one carrying the hopes of an entire technological revolution.

Yet, unlike the dot-com era, today’s AI leaders are profitable companies with real revenue streams. Microsoft, Apple and Google aren’t cash-burning startups. They are established giants, using AI to enhance existing businesses while generating substantial profits.

This makes the current situation more complicated than a simple “bubble” comparison. The academic literature on market bubbles suggests genuine technological innovation often coincides with speculative excess.

The question isn’t whether AI is transformative; it clearly is. Rather, the question is whether current valuations reflect realistic expectations about future profitability.

President and chief executive of Nvidia Corporation, Jensen Huang.
Chiang Ying-ying/AP

Hidden exposure for many Australians

For Australians, the AI concentration problem hits remarkably close to home through our superannuation system.

Many balanced super fund options include substantial allocations to international shares, typically 20–30% of their portfolios.

When your super fund buys international shares, it’s often getting heavy exposure to those same AI giants dominating US markets.

The concentration risk extends beyond direct investments in tech companies. Australian mining companies, such as BHP and Fortescue, have become indirect AI players because their copper, lithium and rare earth minerals are essential for AI infrastructure.

Even diversifying away from technology doesn’t fully escape AI-related risks. Research on portfolio concentration shows when major indices become dominated by a few large stocks, the benefits of diversification diminish significantly.

If AI stocks experience a significant correction or crash, it could disproportionately impact Australians’ retirement nest eggs.

A reality check

This situation represents what’s called “systemic concentration risk”. This is a specific form of systemic risk where supposedly diversified investments become correlated through common underlying factors or exposures.

It’s reminiscent of the 2008 financial crisis, when seemingly separate housing markets across different regions all collapsed simultaneously. That was because they were all exposed to subprime mortgages with high risk of default.

This does not mean anyone should panic. But regulators, super fund trustees and individual investors should all be aware of these risks. Diversification only works if returns come from a broad range of companies and industries.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

How Malawi is taking AI technology to small-scale farmers who don’t have smartphones

Published

on


MULANJE, Malawi (AP) — Alex Maere survived the destruction of Cyclone Freddy when it tore through southern Malawi in 2023. His farm didn’t.

The 59-year-old saw decades of work disappear with the precious soil that the floods stripped from his small-scale farm in the foothills of Mount Mulanje.

He was used to producing a healthy 850 kilograms (1,870 pounds) of corn each season to support his three daughters and two sons. He salvaged just 8 kilograms (17 pounds) from the wreckage of Freddy.

“This is not a joke,” he said, remembering how his farm in the village of Sazola became a wasteland of sand and rocks.

Freddy jolted Maere into action. He decided he needed to change his age-old tactics if he was to survive.

He is now one of thousands of small-scale farmers in the southern African country using a generative AI chatbot designed by the non-profit Opportunity International for farming advice.

AI suggests potatoes

The Malawi government is backing the project, having seen the agriculture-dependent nation hit recently by a series of cyclones and an El Niño-induced drought. Malawi’s food crisis, which is largely down to the struggles of small-scale farmers, is a central issue for its national elections next week.

More than 80% of Malawi’s population of 21 million rely on agriculture for their livelihoods and the country has one of the highest poverty rates in the world, according to the World Bank.

The AI chatbot suggested Maere grow potatoes last year alongside his staple corn and cassava to adjust to his changed soil. He followed the instructions to the letter, he said, and cultivated half a soccer field’s worth of potatoes and made more than $800 in sales, turning around his and his children’s fortunes.

“I managed to pay for their school fees without worries,” he beamed.

AI, agriculture and Africa

Artificial intelligence has the potential to uplift agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa, where an estimated 33-50 million smallholder farms like Maere’s produce up to 70-80% of the food supply, according to the U.N.’s International Fund for Agricultural Development. Yet productivity in Africa — with the world’s fast-growing population to feed — is lagging behind despite vast tracts of arable land.

As AI’s use surges across the globe, so it is helping African farmers access new information to identify crop diseases, forecast drought, design fertilizers to boost yields, and even locate an affordable tractor. Private investment in agriculture-related tech in sub-Saharan Africa went from $10 million in 2014 to $600 million in 2022, according to the World Bank.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation – The Fulcrum

Published

on



When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation  The Fulcrum



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending