Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

AI brings new life to martial arts cinema legends

Published

on


A new wave of AI-powered restoration is set to revive the golden age of kung fu cinema, sparking debate over whether technology can preserve the soul of these legendary films.

China is embarking on a major digital restoration project to preserve its rich martial arts film heritage. Announced at the Shanghai International Film Festival, the government-backed initiative aims to restore 100 classic kung fu movies using AI.

Unlike Hollywood’s trend of digitally recreating actors, this effort focuses on enhancing image and sound quality while preserving the original storytelling and aesthetics. Films like Bruce Lee’s Fist of Fury, Jackie Chan’s Police Story, and Jet Li’s Once Upon a Time in China will receive the high-definition makeover.

The project, supported by the China Film Foundation, is being framed to safeguard cultural treasures for future generations. Officials emphasise that AI will serve only as a preservation tool, not altering the essence of these iconic works.

However, the initiative has sparked debate: some critics fear that overreliance on technology could dilute the human touch in cinema, while supporters believe this will help introduce these classics to younger global audiences who may otherwise overlook them.

In parallel, China is experimenting with a more radical approach through A Better Tomorrow: Cyber Border, a fully AI-animated reboot that reimagines a beloved story rather than simply restoring it. That contrast highlights the country’s growing ambition to blend tradition with cutting-edge technology in the entertainment industry. Whether seen as a bold step toward the future or a controversial new chapter, the legendary kung fu films of the past are poised to shine again in stunning clarity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tools & Platforms

Florida should embrace, not regulate, AI innovation

Published

on


The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recent years has been one of the most consequential technological advances since the emergence of the internet.

AI has the potential to change and improve every facet of our lives, from automating simple routine tasks like scheduling a doctor’s appointment to more complex efforts like coding a new computer program.

Yet, this transformative technology may never reach its potential if policymakers rush to regulate what they do not yet fully understand.

Like all breakthrough technologies, AI needs room to grow, including opportunities for innovators to experiment, iterate, and scale new applications. Just as the United States led the global digital revolution, empowering American tech companies to achieve superior market positions with limited regulatory interference, we now face a similar crossroads with AI.

Unfortunately, some state-level efforts risk undermining this progress.

States like Colorado and California have recently introduced or passed regulatory frameworks that could deter investment, suppress AI deployment in their respective states, and slow national momentum. With international competitors racing ahead with their own AI development programs, every unnecessary regulatory barrier we erect gives them a strategic advantage.

Federal leadership plays an important role. President Donald Trump’s recently announced AI Action Plan sets the framework for how the government can support technological advancement by prioritizing innovation, investing in AI infrastructure, and promoting U.S. leadership in global standards-setting.

While national initiatives lay the groundwork for progress, state-level action is vital in translating these goals into tangible outcomes.

Here in Florida, we are committed to fostering a regulatory environment that encourages responsible innovation. By aligning with forward-looking national efforts and resisting the urge to overregulate, we can ensure AI remains a force for economic opportunity, technological leadership, and public benefit.

With the right policies, we can ensure those benefits are realized without unnecessary barriers or delays.

___

John Snyder is the state Representative of Florida House District 86 and served as Chair of the House Information Technology Budget and Policy Subcommittee in the 2025 Legislative Session.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

AI challenges the dominance of Google search

Published

on


Suzanne BearneTechnology Reporter

Anja-Sara Lahady Smiling, with long dark hair Anja-Sara Lahady stands in front of pink cushions.Anja-Sara Lahady

AI has become an assistant for Anja-Sara Lahady

Like most people, when Anja-Sara Lahady used to check or research anything online, she would always turn to Google.

But since the rise of AI, the lawyer and legal technology consultant says her preferences have changed – she now turns to large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

“For example, I’ll ask it how I should decorate my room, or what outfit I should wear,” says Ms Lahady, who lives in Montreal, Canada.

“Or, I have three things in the fridge, what should I make? I don’t want to spend 30 minutes thinking about these admin tasks. These aren’t my expertise; they make me more fatigued.”

Ms Lahady says her usage of LLMs overtook Google Search in the past year when they became more powerful for what she needed.

“I’ve always been an early adopter… and in the past year have started using ChatGPT for just about everything. It’s become a second assistant.”

While she says she won’t use LLMs for legal tasks – “anything that needs legal reasoning” – she uses it in a professional capacity for any work that she describes as “low risk”, for example, drafting an email.

“I also use it to help write code or find the best accounting software for my business.”

Ms Lahady is not alone. A growing number are heading straight for LLMs, such as ChatGPT, for recommendations and to answer everyday questions.

ChatGPT attracts more than 800 million weekly active users, up from 400 million in February 2025, according to Demandsage, a data and research firm.

Traditional search engines like Google and Microsoft’s Bing still dominate the market for search. But LLMs are growing fast.

According to research firm Datos, in July 5.99% of search on desktop browsers went to LLMs, that’s more than double the figure from a year earlier.

Getty Images Close up of someone holding a smartphone showing the introduction to ChatGPTGetty Images

ChatGPT attracts around 800 million weekly users

Professor Feng Li, associate dean for research and innovation at Bayes Business School in London, says people are using LLMs because they lower the “cognitive load” – the amount of mental effort required to process and act on information – compared to search.

“Instead of juggling 10 links with search, you get a brief synthesis that you can edit and iterate in plain English,” he says. “LLMs are particularly useful for summarising long documents, first-pass drafting, coding snippets, and ‘what-if’ exploration.”

However, he says outputs still require verification before use, as hallucinations and factual errors remain common.

While the use of AI might have exploded, Google denies that it is at the expense of its search engine.

It says overall queries and commercial queries continued to grow year-over-year and its new AI tools significantly contributed to this increase in usage.

Those new tools include AI Mode, which allows users to ask more conversational questions and receive more tailored responses in return.

That followed the rollout of AI Overviews, which produces summaries of queries at the top of the search page.

While Google plays down the impact of LLMs on its search business, an indication of the affect came in May during testimony in an antitrust trial bought by the US Department of Justice against Google.

A top Apple executive said that the number of Google searches on Apple devices, via its browser Safari, fell for the first time in more than 20 years.

Nevertheless, Prof Li doesn’t believe there will be a replacement of search but a hybrid model will exist.

“LLM usage is growing, but so far it remains a minority behaviour compared with traditional search. It is likely to continue to grow but stabilise somewhere, when people primarily use LLMs for some tasks and search for others such as transactions like shopping and making bookings, and verification purposes.”

Getty Images A finger about to press the safari app on a smarthphoneGetty Images

Apple says Google searches on Apple devices via the Safari browser are falling

As a result of the rise of LLMs, companies are having to change their marketing strategies.

They need to understand “which sources the model considers authoritative within their category,” says Leila Seith Hassan, chief data officer at digital marketing agency Digitas UK.

“For example, in UK beauty we saw news outlets and review sites like Vogue and Sephora referenced heavily, whereas in the US there was more emphasis on content from brands’ own websites.”

She says that LLMs place more trust in official websites, press releases, established media, and recognised industry rankings than in social media posts.

And that could be important, as Ms Seith Hassan says there are signs that people who have used AI to search for a product, are more likely to buy.

“Referrals coming directly from LLMs often appear to be higher quality, with people are more likely to convert to sales.”

There is plenty of anecdotal evidence that people are turning to LLMs when searching for products.

Hannah Cooke, head of client strategy at media and influencer agency Charlie Oscar, says she started using LLMs in a “more serious and strategic way” about 18 months ago.

She mainly uses ChatGPT but has experimented with Google Gemini to personally and professionally streamline her work and life.

Ms Cooke, who lives in London, says rather than turning to Google, she will ask ChatGPT for personalised skincare recommendations for her skin type. “There’s fewer websites I need to go through,” she says of the benefits.

And it’s the same with travel planning.

“ChatGPT is much easier to find answers and recommendations,” she says.

“For example, I used ChatGPT to research ahead of a recent visit to Japan. I asked it to plan two weeks travelling and find me restaurants with vegetarian dishes. It saved [me] hours of research.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Not just giving the answers :: WRAL.com

Published

on


When most people think of AI, they think of chatbots like
Chat GPT and Gemini.

On Monday night, tech leaders are trying to get the word out about a
new form of AI called agentic. Some say we’ll end up engaging
with this technology the most.

Duke professor Jon Reifschneider built his own model that he
believes could be a gamechanger for researchers. He spoke with WRAL News about the rise of the technology and what may lie ahead for its use in daily life.

Reifschneider and cofounder Pramod Singh have a new AI product called Inquisite. They believe could be a game-changer for researchers. 

“Our ultimate goal with this is to speed up discovery and
translation so we can do things like bring new drugs to market,” Reifschneider said. “In, let’s say, 3-to-5 years rather than 10-to-20 years … We need it.”

Before showing how it works, let’s have a quick vocabulary
lesson. 

Popular chatbots like Chat GPT or Gemini are mainly
considered generative AI. That means you give it a question or prompt – and it gives you a
response based on the massive amounts of data it has access to.

Inquisite is something different. It’s referred to as agentic
AI. 

Agentic AI doesn’t just give you answers, it performs tasks
for you.

“Agents are particularly exciting because they can actually
sort of do work, very much like a human might,” Reifschneider said.

Inquisite’s agents play the role of research
assistant – scouring through its massive database of research and medical
journals to find, read and summarize the relevant papers scientists need to do
their jobs. 

“We can see here it found 119 papers that were potentially
relevant using those queries,” Reifschneider said. “It then went through a process where it reviewed
all the metadata, the titles, authors, and abstracts and it filtered those 119
papers down to just 17 papers that it determined were highly relevant to answer
my question.”

“So if you’re saving time, does that mean you get discoveries faster?” Reifschneider said. “We believe so. That’s our ultimate goal with Inquisite.”

That could mean a faster path to a cure for certain
cancers – or a new gene therapy for Parkinson’s. 

Inquisite is ahead of the curve – with the top minds in tech
this summer proclaiming agentic AI is the future.

Tech leaders have acknowledged agentic AI’s capabilities and the likelihood of future use.

“Agentic AI is real,” said Nvidia CEO and President Jensen Huang. “Agentic AI is a giant step function from
one shot AI.” 

“I think every business in the future will have an AI agent
that their customers can talk to in the future,” said Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. 

But will these agents replace jobs? 

“They’re really designed to augment human research teams, not
try to replace the scientists and researchers,” Reifschneider said. “That’s kind of key. You’re not
building this to replace researchers. You’re building this to help them. That’s
right, research is a highly creative task.”

When asked about AI agents potentially
taking jobs, he said he thinks fears about AI taking jobs are overblown.

In fact, he’s teaching his graduate-level students that they have a
quality AI can’t replace.

“I don’t think AI will have the creativity we need to do really novel research, I think we very much still need human scientists in the loop,” Reifschneider said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending