Connect with us

AI Research

AI And Entrepreneurship Education: Preparing Students To Lead

Published

on


Research indicates a fivefold increase in demand for AI skills, yet most schools still ban the use of ChatGPT. A recent survey found that 70% of graduates believe generative AI should be integrated into coursework, and more than half said they felt unprepared for the workforce. At the same time, 66% of teens aged 13-17 express interest in starting their own businesses, according to Junior Achievement data.

The disconnect is apparent: students want to build careers around emerging technology, but traditional education isn’t teaching them how. While schools debate AI policies, forward-thinking programs are already training middle schoolers to launch AI-powered ventures and solve real problems. They’re not preparing students for tomorrow’s job market. They’re teaching them to create it.

Real-World Learning Replaces Theoretical Education

The most effective programs abandon traditional classroom simulations in favor of authentic business creation. Students don’t earn grades—they gain customers, revenue, and practical skills that transfer directly to college applications and future careers.

At WIT (Whatever It Takes), which I started in 2009, teens launch actual businesses and social movements that address real community problems. In the college-credit programs, students pitch for actual prize money, receive real-time coaching from successful entrepreneurs, and develop presentations that have landed participants in major publications.

We ask participants one question: “What problem are you passionate about solving?” We then provide the tools, mentorship, and structure to help them build effective solutions.

WIT has worked with over 10,000 young people, providing leadership and entrepreneurial education through hands-on experience. The results speak volumes—our alumni consistently report higher confidence levels, stronger college applications, and clearer career direction compared to peers who only engage in traditional academic activities or simulation business programs.

This shift toward authentic learning experiences isn’t limited to K-12 education. As the demand for AI skills explodes across industries, universities are also abandoning traditional lecture-based models in favor of programs that prepare students to create rather than just consume technology.

Universities Embrace AI Integration

University of South Florida (USF) made history as the first university in Florida—and among the first nationally—to create an entire college dedicated to AI and cybersecurity. The Bellini College of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Computing will welcome 3,000 students this fall, with plans to double enrollment in the first five years.

The timing reflects urgent market demands. Research indicates a fivefold increase in demand for AI skills in U.S. jobs, while more than 40% of organizations report being unable to find enough qualified cybersecurity professionals. The National Science Foundation awarded over $800 million for AI-related research in a single year.

“As AI and cybersecurity quickly evolve, the demand for professionals skilled in these areas continues to grow,” USF President Rhea Law explained. “Through the expertise of our faculty and our strong partnerships with the business community, the University of South Florida is strategically positioned to be a global leader in these fields.”

Dr. John Licato, Associate Professor at The Bellini College of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Computing, puts this educational shift in perspective: “AI and cybersecurity already touch every single job on earth. Universities everywhere are trying to incorporate these technologies into their programs so students can practically leverage them, but at the same time further develop their own critical thinking and reasoning.”

USF Provost Dr. Prasant Mohapatra told me, “We’re not just producing job seekers—we’re producing job creators.” The college leverages USF’s existing strengths—approximately 200 faculty members already conduct research in related disciplines—while positioning the Tampa Bay region as a technology hub.

USF’s bold move breaks from traditional models of higher education. Most universities incorporate AI courses into their existing programs. USF built an entire college around emerging technologies, combining technical training with business education because students need both skills to succeed.

Bridging the K-12 AI Knowledge Gap

Teenagers already use AI tools regularly. Data shows 63% of U.S. teens use chatbots and text generators for schoolwork. Yet most schools ban these tools or label them as cheating. This creates a problem: students learn AI exists, but not how to use it ethically.

WIT created WITY to fill this gap. Our AI platform helps teens develop business ideas and conduct market research to inform their entrepreneurial endeavors. Students learn to work with AI without losing their creativity or critical thinking abilities.

USF also works with younger students. The Bellini College offers workshops for K-12 students through partnerships with education programs. These sessions introduce kids to AI concepts through hands-on projects.

Dr. Mohapatra shared his philosophy with me: “We want to show kids that AI isn’t something to fear. It’s something they can learn to use responsibly and creatively.”

AI Success Metrics That Matter

Programs that successfully prepare students for an AI-driven economy share several characteristics:

Authentic challenges: Students tackle real problems with genuine consequences, not hypothetical scenarios designed for assessment.

Interdisciplinary approach: Effective programs integrate technology, business, ethics, and social impact rather than teaching these subjects in isolation.

Confidence development: Students learn self-advocacy, self-worth, and self-value through entrepreneurial experiences. These capabilities transfer to college applications, job interviews, and leadership roles.

Early exposure: Rather than waiting until senior year, these programs introduce innovative thinking in middle school and early high school.

Research supports this approach. A 2022 Gallup survey found that students involved in entrepreneurship programs were 34% more likely to develop leadership skills and 41% more likely to report feeling prepared for future careers.

The AI Competitive Advantage

Students emerging from these programs possess advantages that traditional education alone cannot provide. They understand how to identify market opportunities, collaborate effectively with AI tools, and communicate their ideas clearly to diverse audiences.

College admissions officers increasingly recognize entrepreneurship as a marker of leadership, innovation, and problem-solving ability. Students who can demonstrate how they built something from the ground up bring more than just an application; they get a track record of action.

These experiences provide rich material for personal statements and interviews while demonstrating the initiative and resilience that colleges value in their incoming classes.

Building Tomorrow’s AI-Driven Economy Today

Programs that combine AI literacy with entrepreneurial education create an exponential multiplier effect. Students don’t just learn to use existing tools—they develop the creative mindset to identify problems that AI can solve and the business acumen to turn those solutions into viable ventures.

The students graduating from these programs represent a new breed of innovator. They’re not just prepared for an AI-driven economy—they’re actively architecting it, armed with both deep technological fluency and the entrepreneurial skills to transform breakthrough ideas into market-changing impact. This represents a fundamental shift in educational philosophy—from preparing students for predetermined career paths in a static economy to empowering them to create entirely new industries and opportunities in our rapidly evolving technological landscape.



Source link

AI Research

Instagram wrongly says some users breached child sex abuse rules

Published

on


Graham Fraser

Technology Reporter

Getty Images The logos of Instagram and FacebookGetty Images

Instagram users have told the BBC of the “extreme stress” of having their accounts banned after being wrongly accused by the platform of breaching its rules on child sexual exploitation.

The BBC has been in touch with three people who were told by parent company Meta that their accounts were being permanently disabled, only to have them reinstated shortly after their cases were highlighted to journalists.

“I’ve lost endless hours of sleep, felt isolated. It’s been horrible, not to mention having an accusation like that over my head,” one of the men told BBC News.

Meta declined to comment.

BBC News has been contacted by more than 100 people who claim to have been wrongly banned by Meta.

Some talk of a loss of earnings after being locked out of their business pages, while others highlight the pain of no longer having access to years of pictures and memories. Many point to the impact it has had on their mental health.

Over 27,000 people have signed a petition that accuses Meta’s moderation system, powered by artificial intelligence (AI), of falsely banning accounts and then having an appeal process that is unfit for purpose.

Thousands of people are also in Reddit forums dedicated to the subject, and many users have posted on social media about being banned.

Meta has previously acknowledged a problem with Facebook Groups but denied its platforms were more widely affected.

‘Outrageous and vile’

The BBC has changed the names of the people in this piece to protect their identities.

David, from Aberdeen in Scotland, was suspended from Instagram on 4 June. He was told he had not followed Meta’s community standards on child sexual exploitation, abuse and nudity.

He appealed that day, and was then permanently disabled on Instagram and his associated Facebook and Facebook Messenger accounts.

David found a Reddit thread, where many others were posting that they had also been wrongly banned over child sexual exploitation.

“We have lost years of memories, in my case over 10 years of messages, photos and posts – due to a completely outrageous and vile accusation,” he told BBC News.

He said Meta was “an embarrassment”, with AI-generated replies and templated responses to his questions. He still has no idea why his account was banned.

“I’ve lost endless hours of sleep, extreme stress, felt isolated. It’s been horrible, not to mention having an accusation like that over my head.

“Although you can speak to people on Reddit, it is hard to go and speak to a family member or a colleague. They probably don’t know the context that there is a ban wave going on.”

The BBC raised David’s case to Meta on 3 July, as one of a number of people who claimed to have been wrongly banned over child sexual exploitation. Within hours, his account was reinstated.

In a message sent to David, and seen by the BBC, the tech giant said: “We’re sorry that we’ve got this wrong, and that you weren’t able to use Instagram for a while. Sometimes, we need to take action to help keep our community safe.”

“It is a massive weight off my shoulders,” said David.

Faisal was banned from Instagram on 6 June over alleged child sexual exploitation and, like David, found his Facebook account suspended too.

The student from London is embarking on a career in the creative arts, and was starting to earn money via commissions on his Instagram page when it was suspended. He appealed after feeling he had done nothing wrong, and then his account was then banned a few minutes later.

He told BBC News: “I don’t know what to do and I’m really upset.

“[Meta] falsely accuse me of a crime that I have never done, which also damages my mental state and health and it has put me into pure isolation throughout the past month.”

His case was also raised with Meta by the BBC on 3 July. About five hours later, his accounts were reinstated. He received the exact same email as David, with the apology from Meta.

He told BBC News he was “quite relieved” after hearing the news. “I am trying to limit my time on Instagram now.”

Faisal said he remained upset over the incident, and is now worried the account ban might come up if any background checks are made on him.

A third user Salim told BBC News that he also had accounts falsely banned for child sexual exploitation violations.

He highlighted his case to journalists, stating that appeals are “largely ignored”, business accounts were being affected, and AI was “labelling ordinary people as criminal abusers”.

Almost a week after he was banned, his Instagram and Facebook accounts were reinstated.

What’s gone wrong?

When asked by BBC News, Meta declined to comment on the cases of David, Faisal, and Salim, and did not answer questions about whether it had a problem with wrongly accusing users of child abuse offences.

It seems in one part of the world, however, it has acknowledged there is a wider issue.

The BBC has learned that the chair of the Science, ICT, Broadcasting, and Communications Committee at the National Assembly in South Korea, said last month that Meta had acknowledged the possibility of wrongful suspensions for people in her country.

Dr Carolina Are, a blogger and researcher at Northumbria University into social media moderation, said it was hard to know what the root of the problem was because Meta was not being open about it.

However, she suggested it could be due to recent changes to the wording of some its community guidelines and an ongoing lack of a workable appeal process.

“Meta often don’t explain what it is that triggered the deletion. We are not privy to what went wrong with the algorithm,” she told BBC News.

In a previous statement, Meta said: “We take action on accounts that violate our policies, and people can appeal if they think we’ve made a mistake.”

Meta, in common with all big technology firms, have come under increased pressure in recent years from regulators and authorities to make their platforms safe spaces.

Meta told the BBC it used a combination of people and technology to find and remove accounts that broke its rules, and was not aware of a spike in erroneous account suspension.

Meta says its child sexual exploitation policy relates to children and “non-real depictions with a human likeness”, such as art, content generated by AI or fictional characters.

Meta also told the BBC a few weeks ago it uses technology to identify potentially suspicious behaviours, such as adult accounts being reported by teen accounts, or adults repeatedly searching for “harmful” terms.

Meta states that when it becomes aware of “apparent child exploitation”, it reports it to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in the US. NCMEC told BBC News it makes all of those reports available to law enforcement around the world.

A green promotional banner with black squares and rectangles forming pixels, moving in from the right. The text says: “Tech Decoded: The world’s biggest tech news in your inbox every Monday.”





Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

AI Algorithms Now Capable of Predicting Drug-Biological Target Interactions to Streamline Pharmaceutical Research – geneonline.com

Published

on



AI Algorithms Now Capable of Predicting Drug-Biological Target Interactions to Streamline Pharmaceutical Research  geneonline.com



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

A Semiconductor Leader Poised for AI-Driven Growth Despite Near-Term Headwinds

Published

on


The semiconductor industry is at a pivotal juncture, fueled by explosive demand for advanced chips powering artificial intelligence (AI), 5G, and high-performance computing. At the heart of this revolution is Lam Research (LRCX), a leader in semiconductor equipment that stands to benefit from secular tailwinds—even as geopolitical risks cloud near-term visibility. This article examines whether LRCX’s valuation, earnings momentum, and strategic positioning justify a buy rating despite a cautious Zacks Rank.

Valuation: Undervalued PEG Ratio Signals Opportunity

Lam Research’s PEG ratio of 1.24 (as of July 2025) remains below both the semiconductor equipment industry average of 1.55 and the broader Electronics-Semiconductors sector’s average of 1.59. This metric, calculated by dividing the P/E ratio by the 5-year EBITDA growth rate, suggests LRCX is trading at a discount to its growth prospects.

The PEG ratio’s allure lies in its dual consideration of valuation and growth. A ratio under 1.5 typically indicates undervaluation, and LRCX’s 1.24 places it squarely in this category. Even if we use the industry average cited in earlier research (2.09), LRCX’s PEG remains compelling. This discount is puzzling given its dominant market share (15% of global wafer fabrication equipment, or WFE) and its role in critical technologies like atomic layer deposition (ALD), essential for AI chip production.

Earnings Momentum: Positive Revisions Amid Industry Growth

Lam’s earnings revisions tell a story of resilience. Despite macroeconomic headwinds, analysts have raised fiscal 2025 EPS estimates to $4.00, a 5% increase from 2024 levels. This upward momentum aligns with LRCX’s 48% year-over-year (YoY) earnings growth projection for Q2 2025.

The semiconductor equipment sector is a prime beneficiary of AI’s rise. AI chips require advanced nodes (e.g., 3nm and below), demanding cutting-edge equipment like LRCX’s etch and deposition tools. This structural demand, paired with rising WFE spending (expected to hit $130 billion by 2027), positions LRCX for sustained growth.

The Zacks Rank Dilemma: Why Hold Doesn’t Tell the Full Story

Lam Research’s Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) as of July 2025 reflects near-term risks, including:
Geopolitical tensions: U.S.-China trade disputes could disrupt LRCX’s China revenue (a major market).
Delayed NAND spending: A slowdown in NAND memory chip investments has dampened short-term demand.

However, the Zacks Rank focuses on 12–24 months of near-term volatility. It underweights long-term catalysts like:
1. AI-driven capex boom: Chipmakers like TSMC and Samsung are ramping up AI-specific foundries, requiring Lam’s tools.
2. Potential China trade thaw: If U.S. sanctions ease, LRCX could regain access to Chinese clients, boosting revenue.

The Rank’s caution is understandable, but investors should separate short-term noise from LRCX’s strong fundamentals:
Forward P/E of 21.6x, below the semiconductor sector’s 35.3x average.
ROE of 53%, reflecting operational efficiency.

Catalysts for a Re-Rating: AI and Geopolitical Shifts

The key catalysts to watch for a valuation rebound are:
1. AI Chip Demand: NVIDIA’s $200 billion AI chip roadmap and Google’s quantum computing investments underscore the need for advanced fabrication tools. LRCX’s ALD systems are critical for these chips.
2. Trade Policy Shifts: A potential easing of U.S.-China trade restrictions could unlock $500 million+ in annual revenue for LRCX.
3. Q3 2025 Earnings: Management’s guidance of $1.00 EPS and $4.65 billion in revenue (both above consensus) could surprise positively.

Risks and Conclusion: A Buy for the Next 12 Months

Lam Research isn’t without risks:
Execution risks: High R&D costs ($1.3 billion annually) could pressure margins.
Macroeconomic slowdown: A recession could delay chip capex.

However, the long-term case for LRCX is too strong to ignore. Its PEG discount, earnings momentum, and strategic position in AI infrastructure justify a buy rating for the next 12 months. Investors should aim for a target price of $110 (25x forward P/E), with upside if China-related risks abate.

In sum, LRCX’s valuation and growth trajectory make it a compelling play on the AI revolution. While near-term headwinds justify caution, the re-rating potential is undeniable.

Investment thesis: Buy LRCX at current levels, with a 12-month price target of $110.
Risk rating: Moderate (geopolitical and macro risks).
Hold for: 12–18 months for valuation expansion.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending