Tools & Platforms
Elon Musk Considers New Political Venture with Steve Bannon
Tech mogul meets political strategist
Last updated:
Edited By
Mackenzie Ferguson
AI Tools Researcher & Implementation Consultant
Elon Musk, known for his groundbreaking innovations in technology, might be stepping into the political arena. Rumors are swirling about Musk collaborating with Steve Bannon to form a new political party. While details are sparse, this potential partnership has already sparked speculation and debate across social media and political circles.
Background Information
Elon Musk’s recent political maneuvers continue to be a topic of significant intrigue and speculation. His association with notable political personalities like Steve Bannon, as highlighted in this Newsweek article, has fueled discussions about Musk’s potential influence in shaping a new political party. The complexities of this association hint at a unique intersection of technology and politics, enabling Musk to leverage his vast platform to champion new political ideologies.
The involvement of Steve Bannon, a former strategist for Donald Trump, brings a layer of strategic acumen to the potential formation of a new political coalition. The dynamics of such a partnership suggest a shift in the political landscape, where traditional party boundaries may blur. Observers are keen to see how Musk’s innovative approach to business and technology applies to his political strategies, perhaps redefining conventional political engagement.
Expert analysts are divided on the outcome of Musk’s political ventures. Some highlight the potential for disruption in the current political system, with Musk potentially offering a fresh perspective that challenges the status quo. Others caution against the unpredictability of mixing entrepreneurial innovation with political ideologies, fearing it might lead to unforeseen economic and social consequences.
Public reactions to Musk’s political aspirations are as varied as his followers. Some admire his boldness and view his involvement as an opportunity to break away from a stagnant political system. Critics, however, worry that his outsider status might hinder effective policymaking and lead to a focus on headlines rather than substantive change. As the story develops, the public remains divided on whether Musk’s efforts will yield tangible outcomes.
Looking towards the future, the implications of Musk’s political engagements are vast. If successful, this venture could inspire other tech entrepreneurs to enter the political arena, further blurring the lines between business innovation and governance. The potential realignment of political alliances and priorities could usher in a new era of technological politics, influencing everything from policy-making processes to voter engagement strategies.
News URL
In a recent development, Elon Musk has been spotlighted in news headlines again, this time in connection with Steve Bannon and speculations about a new political party. The coverage, notably by Newsweek, explores the dynamics and potential future of this political scenario.
The article on Newsweek delves into the possibility of Elon Musk aligning with Steve Bannon to explore new political landscapes. This news has sparked various discussions and debates across social media platforms and political circles regarding the feasibility and implications of such a move.
Many experts have weighed in on the situation, considering what a Musk-Bannon partnership might mean for the political spectrum in the United States. According to Newsweek, this potential alliance could signify a shift in political dynamics, raising questions of influence and direction in the coming elections.
The public reaction to the potential of Elon Musk venturing into the political realm with Steve Bannon has been mixed. While some see it as an intriguing shake-up of the status quo, others express concern over what such a partnership could mean for the political landscape. For more on the public’s view, visit Newsweek.
Looking ahead, the collaboration between Musk and Bannon, as reported by Newsweek, could have significant implications for future political strategies and campaigns. It opens up discussions on how political parties might evolve and adapt in a rapidly changing socio-political environment.
Article Summary
In the recent article from Newsweek, distinct narratives emerge around key figures in the political landscape, most notably Elon Musk and Steve Bannon. The piece explores the dynamics and impacts of their potential collaboration in forming a new political party. Elon Musk’s influence in the tech world is well documented, but his foray into politics marks a significant shift that could signal broader implications for his business ventures and ideological leanings. Similarly, Steve Bannon’s history as a media executive and political strategist suggests that this new alliance could bring disruptive changes to traditional political paradigms, which could be explored more extensively here.
The article delves into related events that prelude this potential shift in the political spectrum. It mentions Musk’s previous interactions with political figures and his increasing engagement in public discourse through platforms like Twitter. Bannon, on the other hand, is known for his role in shaping right-wing media narratives, indicating a blending of tech and political agendas that might redefine the nature of mainstream political dialogues. These events are intricately connected, painting a picture of strategic maneuvering that could shape political affiliations in unforeseen ways.
Expert opinions featured in the article provide insights into the potential impact of Musk and Bannon’s political maneuvering. Analysts predict that their combined influence could attract a diverse following, resonating with tech-savvy progressives and right-wing populists alike. The expert commentary highlights the risk and opportunity inherent in such a political realignment, suggesting that this could usher in a new era of digital-centric politics, where social media plays a pivotal role in shaping public opinion. To explore these expert viewpoints, the full article is available for review here.
Public reactions to the news of Musk and Bannon’s potential political collaboration have been mixed. Social media platforms, in particular, have become a battleground for debates, with supporters praising the innovative potential of such an alliance, while detractors warn of far-reaching consequences. This dichotomy reflects broader societal trends in how media and technology intersect with political movements. The article captures these public sentiments, revealing the complexities of contemporary political engagement.
As for future implications, the article suggests that if Musk and Bannon succeed in their political endeavors, it could herald a significant transformation in how political parties are structured and operate in the United States. The merging of technology, media, and politics might set new precedents for future campaigns and governance styles, challenging established norms. This potential shift could lead to broader debates on policy formulation and individual rights in digital spaces. Continued updates and detailed exploration of these implications are provided in the Newsweek article here.
Related Events
The announcement of Elon Musk considering the launch of a new political party stirred wide interest, particularly following news articles such as those from Newsweek. Speculations and discussions surged across various platforms, igniting a discourse about the potential influence and direction this party could take. This mirrors the political strategies seen by notable figures like Steve Bannon, reflecting a shift towards redefining political affiliations within the U.S. landscape.
As Musk’s potential political aspirations made headlines, various events have been set into motion. Political analysts have drawn parallels between Musk’s movements and historical event patterns where influential entrepreneurs ventured into politics. The anticipation is palpable among supporters and critics alike, who are closely monitoring how this potential new party might align with or disrupt existing political frameworks, as detailed in resources such as Newsweek.
In the wake of these developments, a series of related events have unfolded, providing fertile ground for both national and international debate. Forums and panels are being organized to discuss the implications of Musk’s political ambitions, particularly how they might echo or diverge from past political initiatives led by tech moguls. Articles from Newsweek and others continue to fuel this ongoing conversation.
Expert Opinions
In a rapidly shifting political landscape, expert opinions regarding Elon Musk’s new party have been as divisive as they have been insightful. According to a report by Newsweek, many analysts believe that Musk’s entry into politics could significantly disrupt the traditional party system in the United States. His unique influence, stemming from his vast technological innovations and substantial online following, has the potential to attract a wide base of supporters, especially those disenchanted with current political offerings.
Political analysts are weighing in on the long-term effects of a party spearheaded by a figure like Musk. As highlighted in the Newsweek article, some experts suggest that Musk’s unconventional approach and his propensity for breaking norms could redefine political engagement in the digital age. Others, however, caution that his lack of political experience may hinder his ability to navigate the complexities of governance, potentially leading to a party that leans more on charisma than on policy acumen.
Furthermore, the timing of this new political endeavor coincides with a rise in populist movements globally, as noted in Newsweek. Experts draw parallels between Musk’s efforts and the strategies employed by political figures around the world who have successfully tapped into the public’s desire for significant political change, suggesting that Musk’s party could resonate strongly with these sentiments. Nonetheless, they also emphasize the importance of concrete policy proposals in sustaining such movements over time.
According to political theorists referenced in Newsweek, Musk’s potential new party could also face challenges from both established parties and media outlets. His candidacy might be perceived as a threat to the status quo, prompting vigorous debunking campaigns and increased scrutiny on his personal and business endeavors. This dynamic could create a high-stakes environment that tests the resilience and adaptability of Musk’s political aspirations.
Public Reactions
The unveiling of Elon Musk’s new political endeavor, as outlined in the Newsweek article, has sparked a diverse array of public reactions. Some view Musk’s initiative as a refreshing change in the political landscape, seeing it as an opportunity for innovation and disruption in a field often criticized for stagnation. In online forums and comments sections, supporters emphasize Musk’s track record of challenging conventional norms, hoping he will bring the same zeal to politics as he has to technology.
Conversely, skeptics express concern over the billionaire’s foray into politics, fearing an overshadowing of important issues by his strong personal brand and agenda. Discussions on social media platforms highlight these concerns, with critics voicing that Musk’s involvement may lead to a personality-driven movement rather than one focused on substantive policy changes.
In contrast, some individuals express cautious optimism, intrigued by the potential alliances and discussions Musk might foster with other political influencers, such as Steve Bannon, as noted in the Newsweek report. This segment of the public hopes for a fusion of innovative ideas that cross traditional partisan lines, leading to a more holistic approach to governance.
Overall, the public’s reaction is a tapestry of excitement, skepticism, and curiosity. The impact of Musk’s political ventures has ignited conversations about the role of influential entrepreneurs in reshaping political discourse, echoing broader questions about the intersection of wealth, influence, and democratic processes. As the situation evolves, it remains a topic ripe for debate and scrutiny.
Future Implications
The future implications of Elon Musk’s involvement in a new political party could lead to significant shifts in the political landscape. Musk’s influence, especially through his ventures in technology and innovation, might attract a demographic that values progressive scientific approaches combined with libertarian ideals. Those interested can explore deeper insights into this development by visiting the detailed report on Newsweek’s analysis here.
If the new party led by figures such as Elon Musk gains traction, it could pose a challenge to the existing two-party system in the United States. This might encourage other tech entrepreneurs to enter the political arena, potentially altering the traditional political dynamics. The public’s reaction to such a development is still unfolding, but it hints at the possibility of increased political diversity and a platform that pushes the boundaries of innovation in policy-making. For more context, Newsweek offers an insightful overview here.
Moreover, the intersection of technology and politics could redefine electoral strategies, with data-driven campaigns that harness the power of social media and artificial intelligence. This could lead to more personalized voter engagement and more effective policy advocacy. The challenges will involve navigating the ethical considerations of data usage and privacy. Insights into these potential changes are discussed in the Newsweek article here.
Tools & Platforms
AI Shopping Is Here. Will Retailers Get Left Behind?
AI doesn’t care about your beautiful website.
Visit any fashion brand’s homepage and you’ll see all sorts of dynamic or interactive elements from image carousels to dropdown menus that are designed to catch shoppers’ eyes and ease navigation.
To the large language models that underlie ChatGPT and other generative AI, many of these features might as well not exist. They’re often written in the programming language JavaScript, which for the moment at least most AI struggles to read.
This giant blindspot didn’t matter when generative AI was mostly used to write emails and cheat on homework. But a growing number of startups and tech giants are deploying this technology to help users shop — or even make the purchase themselves.
“A lot of your site might actually be invisible to an LLM from the jump,” said A.J. Ghergich, global vice president of Botify, an AI optimisation company that helps brands from Christian Louboutin to Levi’s make sure their products are visible to and shoppable by AI.
The vast majority of visitors to brands’ websites are still human, but that’s changing fast. US retailers saw a 1,200 percent jump in visits from generative AI sources between July 2024 and February 2025, according to Adobe Analytics. Salesforce predicts AI platforms and AI agents will drive $260 billion in global online sales this holiday season.
Those agents, launched by AI players such as OpenAI and Perplexity, are capable of performing tasks on their own, including navigating to a retailer’s site, adding an item to cart and completing the checkout process on behalf of a shopper. Google’s recently introduced agent will automatically buy a product when it drops to a price the user sets.
This form of shopping is very much in its infancy; the AI shopping agents available still tend to be clumsy. Long term, however, many technologists envision a future where much of the activity online is driven by AI, whether that’s consumers discovering products or agents completing transactions.
To prepare, businesses from retail behemoth Walmart to luxury fashion labels are reconsidering everything from how they design their websites to how they handle payments and advertise online as they try to catch the eye of AI and not just humans.
“It’s in every single conversation I’m having right now,” said Caila Schwartz, director of consumer insights and strategy at Salesforce, which powers the e-commerce of a number of retailers, during a roundtable for press in June. “It is what everyone wants to talk about, and everyone’s trying to figure out and ask [about] and understand and build for.”
From SEO to GEO and AEO
As AI joins humans in shopping online, businesses are pivoting from SEO — search engine optimisation, or ensuring products show up at the top of a Google query — to generative engine optimisation (GEO) or answer engine optimisation (AEO), where catching the attention of an AI responding to a user’s request is the goal.
That’s easier said than done, particularly since it’s not always clear even to the AI companies themselves how their tools rank products, as Perplexity’s chief executive, Aravind Srinivas, admitted to Fortune last year. AI platforms ingest vast amounts of data from across the internet to produce their results.
Though there are indications of what attracts their notice. Products with rich, well-structured content attached tend to have an advantage, as do those that are the frequent subject of conversation and reviews online.
“Brands might want to invest more in developing robust customer-review programmes and using influencer marketing — even at the micro-influencer level — to generate more content and discussion that will then be picked up by the LLMs,” said Sky Canaves, a principal analyst at Emarketer focusing on fashion, beauty and luxury.
Ghergich pointed out that brands should be diligent with their product feeds into programmes such as Google’s Merchant Center, where retailers upload product data to ensure their items appear in Google’s search and shopping results. These types of feeds are full of structured data including product names and descriptions meant to be picked up by machines so they can direct shoppers to the right items. One example from Google reads:
Ghergich said AI will often read this data before other sources such as the HTML on a brand’s website. These feeds can also be vital for making sure the AI is pulling pricing data that’s up to date, or as close as possible.
As more consumers turn to AI and agents, however, it could change the very nature of online marketing, a scenario that would shake even Google’s advertising empire. Tactics that work on humans, like promoted posts with flashy visuals, could be ineffective for catching AI’s notice. It would force a redistribution of how retailers spend their ad budgets.
Emarketer forecasts that spending on traditional search ads in the US will see slower growth in the years ahead, while a larger share of ad budgets will go towards AI search. OpenAI, whose CEO, Sam Altman, has voiced his distaste for ads in the past, has also acknowledged exploring ads on its platform as it looks for new revenue streams.

“The big challenge for brands with advertising is then how to show up in front of consumers when traditional ad formats are being circumvented by AI agents, when consumers are not looking at advertisements because agents are playing a bigger role,” said Canaves.
Bots Are Good Now
Retailers face another set of issues if consumers start turning to agents to handle purchases. On the one hand, agents could be great for reducing the friction that often causes consumers to abandon their carts. Rather than going through the checkout process themselves and stumbling over any annoyances, they just tell the agent to do it and off it goes.
But most websites aren’t designed for bots to make purchases — exactly the opposite, in fact. Bad actors have historically used bots to snatch up products from sneakers to concert tickets before other shoppers can buy them, frequently to flip them for a profit. For many retailers, they’re a nuisance.
“A lot of time and effort has been spent to keep machines out,” said Rubail Birwadker, senior vice president and global head of growth at Visa.
If a site has reason to believe a bot is behind a transaction — say it completes forms too fast — it could block it. The retailer doesn’t make the sale, and the customer is left with a frustrating experience.
Payment players are working to create methods that will allow verified agents to check out on behalf of a consumer without compromising security. In April, Visa launched a programme focused on enabling AI-driven shopping called Intelligent Commerce. It uses a mix of credential verification (similar to setting up Apple Pay) and biometrics to ensure shoppers are able to checkout while preventing opportunities for fraud.
“We are going out and working with these providers to say, ‘Hey, we would like to … make it easy for you to know what’s a good, white-list bot versus a non-whitelist bot,’” Birwadker said.
Of course the bot has to make it to checkout. AI agents can stumble over other common elements in webpages, like login fields. It may be some time before all those issues are resolved and they can seamlessly complete any purchase.
Consumers have to get on board as well. So far, few appear to be rushing to use agents for their shopping, though that could change. In March, Salesforce published the results of a global survey that polled different age groups on their interest in various use cases for AI agents. Interest in using agents to buy products rose with each subsequent generation, with 63 percent of Gen-Z respondents saying they were interested.
Canaves of Emarketer pointed out that younger generations are already using AI regularly for school and work. Shopping with AI may not be their first impulse, but because the behaviour is already ingrained in their daily lives in other ways, it’s spilling over into how they find and buy products.
More consumers are starting their shopping journeys on AI platforms, too, and Schwartz of Salesforce noted that over time this could shape their expectations of the internet more broadly, the way Google and Amazon did.
“It just feels inevitable that we are going to see a much more consistent amount of commerce transactions originate and, ultimately, natively happen on these AI agentic platforms,” said Birwadker.
Tools & Platforms
CarMax’s top tech exec shares his keys to reinventing a legacy retailer in the age of AI
More than 30 years ago, CarMax aimed to transform the way people buy and sell used cars with a consistent, haggle-free experience that separated it from the typical car dealership.
Despite evolving into a market leader since then, its chief information and technology officer, Shamim Mohammad, knows no company is guaranteed that title forever; he had previously worked for Blockbuster, which, he said, couldn’t change fast enough to keep up with Netflix in streaming video.
Mohammad spoke with Modern Retail at the Virginia-based company’s technology office in Plano, Texas, which it opened three to four years ago to recruit for tech workers like software engineers and analysts in the region home to tech companies such as AT&T and Texas Instruments. At that office, CarMax has since hired almost 150 employees — more than initially expected — including some of Mohammad’s former colleagues from Blockbuster, which he had worked for in Texas in the early 2000s.
He explained how other legacy retailers can learn from how CarMax leveraged new technology like artificial intelligence and a startup mindset as it embraced change, becoming an omnichannel retailer where customers can buy cars in person, entirely online or through a combination of both. Many customers find a car online and test-drive and complete their purchase at the store.
“Every company, every industry is going through a lot of disruption because of technology,” Mohammad said. “It’s much better to do self-disruption: changing our own business model, challenging ourselves and going through the pain of change before we are disrupted by somebody else.”
Digitizing the dealership
Mohammad has been with CarMax for more than 12 years and had also been vp of information technology for BJ’s Wholesale Club. Since joining the auto retailer, he and his team have worked to use artificial intelligence to fully digitize the process of car buying, which is especially complex given the mountain of vehicle information and regulations dealers have to consider.
He said the company has been using AI and machine learning for at least 12-13 years to price cars, make sure the right information is online for the cars, and understand where cars need to be in the supply chain and when. That, he said, has powered the company’s website in becoming a virtual showroom that helps customers understand the vehicles, their functions and how they fit their needs. Artificial intelligence has also powered its online instant offer tool for selling cars, giving customers a fair price that doesn’t lose the company money, Mohammad said.
“Technology is enabling different types of experiences, and it’s setting new expectations, and new types of ways to shop and buy. Our industry is no different. We wanted to be that disruptor,” Mohammad said. “We want to make sure we change our business model and we bring those experiences so that we continue to remain the market leader in our industry.”
About three or four years ago, CarMax was an early adopter of ChatGPT, using it to organize data on the different features of car models and make it presentable through its digital channels. Around the same time, the company also used generative AI to comb through and summarize thousands of customer product reviews — it did what would have taken hundreds of content writers more than 10 years to do in a matter of days, he said — and keep them up to date.
As the technology has improved over the last few years, the company has adopted several new AI-powered features. One is Rhodes, a tool associates use to get support and information they need to help customers, which launched about a year ago, Mohammad said. It uses a large language model combining CarMax data with outside information like state or federal rules and regulations to help employees quickly access that data.
Anything that requires a lot of human workload and mental capacity can be automated, he said, from looking at invoices and documents to generating code for developers and engineers, saving them time to do more valuable work. Retailers like Target and Walmart have done the same by using AI chatbots as tools for employees.
“We used to spend a fortune on employee training, and employees only retained and reliably repeated a small percentage of what we trained,” said Jason Goldberg, chief commerce strategy officer for Publicis Groupe. “Increasingly, AI is letting us give way better tools to the salespeople, to train them and to support them when they’re talking to customers.”
In just the last few months, Mohammad said, CarMax has been rolling out an agentic version of a previous buying and selling assistant on its website called Skye that better understands the intent of the user — not only answering the question the customer asks directly, but also walking the customer through the entire car buying process.
“It’ll obviously answer [the customer’s question], but it will also try to understand what you’re trying to do and help you proactively through the entire process. It could be financing; it could be buying; it could be selling; it could be making an appointment; it could be just information about the car and safety,” he said.
The new Skye is more like talking to an actual human being, Mohammad said, where, in addition to answering the question, the agent can make other recommendations in a more natural conversation. For example, if someone is trying to buy a car and asks for a family car that’s safe, it will pull one from its inventory, but it may also ask if they’d like to talk to someone or even how their day is going.
“It’s guiding you through the process beyond what you initially asked. It’s building a rapport with you,” Mohammad said. “It knows you very well, it knows our business really well, and then it’s really helping you get to the right car and the right process.”
Goldberg said that while many functions of retail, from writing copy to scheduling shifts, have also been improved with AI, pushing things done by humans to AI chatbots could lead to distrust or create results that are inappropriate or offensive. “At the moment, most of the AI things are about efficiency and reducing friction,” Goldberg said. “They’re taking something you’re already doing and making it easier, which is generally appealing, but there is also the potential to dehumanize the experience.”
In testing CarMax’s new assistant, other AI agents are actually monitoring it to make sure it’s up to the company’s standards and not saying bad words, Mohammad said, adding it would be impossible for humans to look at everything the new assistant is doing.
The company doesn’t implement AI just to implement AI, Mohammad said, adding that his teams are using generative AI as a tool when needing to solve particular problems instead of being forced to use it.
“Companies don’t need an AI strategy. … They need a strategy that uses AI,” Mohammad said. “Use AI to solve customer problems.”
Working like a tech startup
In embracing change, CarMax has had to change the way it works, Mohammad said. It has created a more startup-like culture, going from cubicles to more open, collaborative office spaces where employees know what everyone else is working on.
About a decade ago, he said, the company started working with a project-based mindset, where it would deliver a new project every six to nine months — each taking about a year in total, with phases for designing and testing.
Now, the company has small, cross-functional product teams of seven to nine people, each with a mission around improving a particular area like finance, digital merchandising, SEO, logistics or supply chain — some even have fun names like “Ace” or “Top Gun.”
Teams have just two weeks to create a prototype of a feature and get it in front of customers. He said that, stacked up over time, those small new changes those teams created completely transformed the business.
“The teams are empowered, and they’re given a mission. I’m not telling them what to do. I’m giving them a goal. They figure out how,” Mohammad said. “Create a culture of experimentation, and don’t wait for things to be perfect. Create a culture where your teams are empowered. It’s OK for them to make mistakes; it’s OK for them to learn from their mistakes.”
Tools & Platforms
Available Infrastructure Unveils ‘SanQtum’ Secure AI Platform for Critical Infrastructure
Available Infrastructure (Available) publicly unveiled SanQtum, a first-of-a-kind solution that combines national security-grade cyber protection and the world’s most-trusted enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) capability.
In the modern era, AI-powered, machine-speed decision-making is crucial. Yet a fast-evolving and increasingly sophisticated threat landscape puts operational technology (OT) and cyber-physical systems (CPS), IP and other sensitive data, and proprietary trained AI models at risk. SanQtum is a direct response to that need.
Created through a rigorous development process in collaboration with major enterprise tech partners and government agencies, SanQtum pre-integrates a best-in-breed tech stack in a micro edge data center form factor, ready for deployment anywhere — from near-prem urban sites to telecom towers to austere environments. A first cohort of initial sites is already under construction in Northern Virginia and expected to come online later this year.
SanQtum’s cybersecurity protections include zero trust permissions architecture, quantum-resilient data encryption, and are aligned to DHS, CISA, and other US federal cybersecurity standards. Sovereign AI models with ultra-low-latency computing enable secure decision-making at machine speed when milliseconds matter, wrapped in cyber protections to prevent data theft and AI model poisoning.
The need for more sophisticated cybersecurity solutions is widespread and growing by the day. Globally, the cost of cybercrimes to corporations is forecasted to nearly triple, from $8 trillion in 2023 to $23 trillion by 2027. For government agencies and critical infrastructure, cybersecurity is literally a matter of life and death.
Daniel Gregory, CEO of Available
AI is now seemingly everywhere. So are cyber threats, from nation-state attacks to criminal enterprises. In this environment, decision-making without AI — and AI without cybersecurity protections — are no longer negotiable; they’re mandatory. As we head into the July 4th weekend, which has historically seen a surge in cyber attacks each year, security is top-of-mind for many Americans, businesses, and government agencies. We live in a digital world. And AI is now seemingly everywhere. So are cyber threats, from nation-state attacks to criminal enterprises. In this environment, decision-making without AI — and AI without cybersecurity protections — are no longer negotiable; they’re mandatory.
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions6 days ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Funding & Business3 days ago
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
From chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Telangana Launches TGDeX—India’s First State‑Led AI Public Infrastructure
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Europe’s Most Ambitious Startups Aren’t Becoming Global; They’re Starting That Way
-
Jobs & Careers4 days ago
Ilya Sutskever Takes Over as CEO of Safe Superintelligence After Daniel Gross’s Exit