Connect with us

Top Stories

US finishes deportation of eight men to South Sudan after weeks of legal wrangling

Published

on


WASHINGTON — Eight men deported from the United States in May and held under guard for weeks at an American military base in the African nation of Djibouti while their legal challenges played out in court have now reached the Trump administration’s intended destination, war-torn South Sudan, a country the State Department advises against travel to due to “crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict.”

The immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan arrived in South Sudan on Friday after a federal judge cleared the way for the Trump administration to relocate them in a case that had gone to the Supreme Court, which had permitted their removal from the U.S. Administration officials said the men had been convicted of violent crimes in the U.S.

“This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people,” said Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement Saturday announcing the men’s arrival in South Sudan, a chaotic country in danger once more of collapsing into civil war.

The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the transfer of the men who had been put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan. That meant that the South Sudan transfer could be completed after the flight was detoured to a base in Djibouti, where they men were held in a converted shipping container. The flight was detoured after a federal judge found the administration had violated his order by failing to allow the men a chance to challenge the removal.

The court’s conservative majority had ruled in June that immigration officials could quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger.

A flurry of court hearings on Independence Day resulted a temporary hold on the deportations while a judge evaluated a last-ditch appeal by the men before the judge decided he was powerless to halt their removals and that the person best positioned to rule on the request was a Boston judge whose rulings led to the initial halt of the administration’s effort to begin deportations to South Sudan.

By Friday evening, that judge had issued a brief ruling concluding the Supreme Court had tied his hands.

The men had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said. Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities cannot quickly send them back to their homelands.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Stories

Who is Fed nominee Stephen Miran? : NPR

Published

on


Stephen Miran, pictured outside the White House in June, has been the chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers since March.

Aaron Schwartz/Sipa/Bloomberg via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Aaron Schwartz/Sipa/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Senate is set to vote Monday night to fill a vacancy on the Federal Reserve Board, the seven-member body that sets the nation’s monetary policy and has found itself increasingly under attack by President Trump.

Trump has long pressured the Fed to lower interest rates, and in July floated the idea of firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell — whom he has attacked as a “knucklehead” and “numbskull” — for not doing so. In August, Trump escalated his fight against the Fed by attempting to fire governor Lisa Cook, a move that a federal judge temporarily blocked last week.

It’s against this backdrop that Fed governor Adriana Kugler unexpectedly stepped down last month, opening up a seat on the board that Trump has been so publicly seeking to influence. He quickly nominated Stephen Miran, one of his top economic advisers, to finish the remainder of her term, which runs through January 2026.

At a Senate Banking Committee hearing earlier this month, Miran said that he would not resign his position as chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers if he were confirmed to the role, but would take an unpaid leave of absence.

That, coupled with some of his previous writings calling for less independence for the Fed, rattled Democrats in the room.

“Right now, the banking committee should be investigating the president’s direct attacks on that independence, not pretending that it’s business as usual,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the committee’s highest-ranking Democrat, told NPR in September.

The committee ultimately voted 13-11 along party lines to advance Miran’s nomination to the full Senate. If confirmed, as expected, Miran would join the Fed in time for its highly anticipated two-day meeting on interest rates, which begins Tuesday.

“This is setting us up for a very tight process in advance of a very important central bank meeting,” Lisa Gilbert, the co-president of the nonprofit consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen, told NPR.

But critics are worried about more than just the timing. They say his unprecedented plan to take unpaid leave from the White House rather than resign altogether is alarming, warning it could give the president undue influence at the Fed, which is supposed to operate independently of the administration.

“It functionally means he remains a White House employee at the same time as working for the importantly independent Federal Reserve,” Gilbert said. “So we’re really concerned about this and what it means for the independence of this agency.”

White House spokesperson Kush Desai told NPR in a statement that Miran will take an unpaid leave of absence from the Council of Economic Advisers, have no White House email access, lose his White House badge and “not provide any advisory guidance as part of CEA in any way.”

“Instead of resorting to ignorant or intentionally misleading attacks, Democrats and ‘nonpartisan’ watchdog groups should just admit that Dr. Stephen Miran is eminently qualified to serve on the Fed, and he will do so in compliance with the law,” Desai wrote.

Who is Stephen Miran? 

Miran holds a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard University. His dissertation advisor was Martin Feldstein, an influential economist who served as Ronald Reagan’s chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

Miran graduated in 2010 and began his career in financial markets, working as an analyst for Lily Pond Capital Management, Fidelity Investments and Sovarnum Capital. In 2020, he joined the first Trump administration as a senior advisor to the Department of the Treasury.

He left that role after former President Joe Biden was inaugurated and returned to the private sector, eventually joining Hudson Bay Capital Management and the libertarian-leaning Manhattan Institute.

There, he wrote dozens of op-eds criticizing Biden’s economic policy (including the Inflation Reduction Act) and, notably, advocating for a less independent Federal Reserve. The Fed is designed to be independent of the executive branch, though it is accountable to Congress.

“Central bank independence is widely regarded as an essential element of effective economic stewardship,” Miran wrote in March 2024. “Yet pure independence is incompatible with a democratic system.”

Miran has proposed controversial reforms like shortening Fed board members’ terms and “clarifying that members serve at the will of the U.S. president.” As it stands, the Federal Reserve Act requires presidents to demonstrate “cause” for removing members before the end of their 14-year terms, which no president has successfully done.

Gilbert, of Public Citizen, said the Fed has intentionally been “kept away from the whims of the White House,” because it sets monetary policy based on the relative success of the economy — not on politics.

“If you’re a president, you might have reason to be touting how the economy is doing as part of a political gambit or something you want to share in an electoral context — not factors that should influence our markets,” she said.

What has Miran said about his potential role? 

Trump announced his intention to nominate Miran as his Council of Economic Advisers in December 2024, and the Senate confirmed him in March of this year with a party-line vote. Miran has backed Trump’s trade policies and is widely credited as the architect behind the administration’s so-called “reciprocal tariffs” on U.S. trading partners.

Trump nominated Miran for the Fed role in early August. At his Senate Banking Committee hearing earlier this month, Miran acknowledged that Trump nominated him “because I have policy views that I suppose that he liked.”

But, he said, if confirmed, “I will act independently, as the Federal Reserve always does, based on my own personal analysis of economic data.”

Miran’s views on the Fed’s independence were called into question at the hearing, when he said he would not resign his White House job if confirmed to the Fed.

“I have received advice from counsel that what is required is an unpaid leave of absence from the Council of Economic Advisers,” Miran said. “And so, considering the term for which I’m being nominated is a little bit more than four months, that is what I will be taking.”

That prompted immediate concern from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. Sen. Jack Reed, D.-R.I., said that Miran’s “independence has already been seriously compromised,” while Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., asked Miran to commit to “ignore all the rhetoric from all politicians,” which he did.

In one exchange, Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J. questioned why Miran wants the Fed job and why he didn’t push back on his counsel’s advice to take unpaid leave.

“You have every right to say ‘No, I’m going to resign.’ You can determine your own career — you know that, right?” Kim asked Miran, who responded affirmatively. “You could very well be continuing to act in a way that is in the political interest of the president because you know he is going to be your future boss again.”

Miran said that if he were later confirmed to a longer term, he would resign his White House role. Trump said when he nominated Miran that he would continue to search for a nominee to fill a fresh, 14-year term beginning in early 2026.

Gilbert said Miran’s plans not to resign from the White House are concerning regardless of the length of his Fed term, saying there is a “slippery slope when it comes to Fed independence.”

She says the conflict of interest is especially worrisome because it’s happening at the same time as Trump is trying to remove Cook, another Fed governor. She called the administration’s “attempt to put a finger on the direction of the Fed … obvious and really problematic.”

“The central bank is intended to keep us stable,” she told NPR. “It matters for regular Americans as we think about our economy, as we think about how we are interacting as consumers. And it is simply a problem to have it not be independent.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

JD Vance hosting “The Charlie Kirk Show” today after Kirk’s assassination

Published

on


Washington — Vice President JD Vance is hosting “The Charlie Kirk Show” Monday after Kirk was shot and killed last week at Utah Valley University.

Vance announced Sunday in a post on X that he had the “honor of hosting the Charlie Kirk Show” to “pay tribute to my friend.” Speaking from his office in the White House complex Monday, Vance said he was “filling in for somebody who cannot be filled in for” as he kicked off the show.


“But I’m going to try to do my best,” Vance said.

Kirk, a conservative activist, was assassinated last week during a Utah Valley University event hosted by his organization, Turning Point USA, in Orem, Utah. The 31-year-old was close to Vance, along with President Trump and his family. 

After his death, Kirk’s body was flown on the vice president’s plane, Air Force Two, to Kirk’s home state of Arizona. Vance canceled a planned trip to New York to mark 24 years since the Sept. 11, 2001, attack to fly to Utah to retrieve Kirk’s body. Vance said Monday that he was honored to be able to “take Charlie’s remains from Utah to Arizona.”

Vice President JD Vance hosts an episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show” at the White House, following the assassination of the show’s namesake, Sept., 15, 2025, in Washington. 

Doug Mills/The New York Times/AP


Vance has described his longtime friendship with Kirk, who was also a key ally in his political rise. Vance said in a post on X after Kirk’s death that the slain conservative activist was one of the first people he called when he considered running for Senate in 2021, and he said Kirk advocated for him to become the vice-presidential nominee “both in public and private.” 

The vice president described Kirk as a “true friend.” On Monday, Vance called Kirk “the smartest political operative I ever met,” saying “I owe so much to Charlie.”

Kirk’s youth turnout operation has also been credited with helping Mr. Trump’s 2024 election bid, while Kirk himself was known to have influenced some of the Trump administration’s personnel decisions. Vance said much of “the success we’ve had in this administration traces directly to Charlie’s ability to organize and convene,” adding that Kirk “didn’t just help us win in 2024, he helped us staff the entire government.”  

Charlie Kirk moderates a conversation with Vice President JD Vance during Turning Point Action's Chase the Vote campaign event at Generation Church in Mesa, Arizona, on September 4, 2024.

Charlie Kirk moderates a conversation with Vice President JD Vance during Turning Point Action’s Chase the Vote campaign event at Generation Church in Mesa, Arizona, on Sept. 4, 2024.

REBECCA NOBLE/AFP via Getty Images


Andrew Kolvet, the executive producer of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” said on CNN Monday that Vance’s hosting of the show “came about because he asked if he could do it.”

“Charlie and JD were friends. They were actual friends,” Kolvet said, adding that “a lot of the people that are running the federal government are personal friends of Charlie’s and they were in the trenches together, the campaign, and they’ve known each other for years.”

During the show Monday, Vance urged that “we have to make sure that the killer is brought to justice,” previewing discussions of what he called the “incredibly destructive movement of left-wing extremism that has grown up over the last few years, and I believe, is part of the reason why Charlie was killed by an assassin’s bullet.”

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who was among the guests on the show, echoed the sentiment, saying “we are going to channel all of the anger that we have over the organized campaign that led to this assassination, to uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks.”

“We are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle and destroy these networks and make America safe again for the American people, it will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name,” Miller pledged.

The president announced last week that he would award Kirk the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously. A memorial service for Kirk is set to be held on Sept. 21 in Arizona.

Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, said in her first public remarks since his death that “the movement my husband built will not die,” noting that “the radio and podcast show that he was so proud of will go on.” 

“If you thought that my husband’s mission was powerful before, you have no idea,” she said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

New versions of Apple’s software platforms are available today

Published

on




Source link

Continue Reading

Trending