Connect with us

AI Insights

How 3D-printed guns are spreading online

Published

on


Getty/BBC Graphic showing a 3D printed gun with a person's silhouette holding it up. Getty/BBC

3D-printed guns could become “the weapon of choice” for criminals and violent extremists around the world, an expert has told the BBC. These DIY, untraceable firearms have been recovered in several recent criminal cases, including the alleged use of a partially 3D-printed gun in the killing of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

BBC Trending has investigated the global spread of 3D-printed guns across social media platforms including Telegram, Facebook and Instagram, as well as websites offering how-to guides.

3D-printed guns, often described as a type of “ghost” gun, are untraceable firearms that can be assembled using a 3D printer, downloadable blueprints and some basic materials. Designed to evade gun-control laws, the technology has advanced rapidly in the last decade, with the latest models capable of firing multiple rounds without their plastic components breaking.

According to Nick Suplina of Everytown, a US-based gun control organisation, 3D-printed guns could become the “weapon of choice” for people planning acts of violence: “The materials have gotten better, the cost has gone down, and the ease of access of these blueprints is at a high,” he said.

BBC Trending’s investigation began with advertisements for guns on Instagram and Facebook. In October 2024, the Tech Transparency Project, a non-profit that monitors technology companies, found hundreds of gun ads – including for 3D-printed and other ghost guns – appearing on Meta’s platforms, in violation of its policies.

Meta declined to comment on the findings at the time. Several months later, BBC Trending found similar gun adverts still showing as active in Meta’s ad database.

Meta/BBC A graphic showing screenshots of adverts on Meta platforms for guns and gun accessories.Meta/BBC

Many of these gun adverts directed potential customers to Telegram or WhatsApp channels. On Telegram, we found channels displaying a variety of guns for sale. Some of these appeared to be 3D-printed. One Telegram account with over 1,000 subscribers claimed to ship weapons globally.

BBC Trending contacted the account, which called itself “Jessy”, to confirm whether it would be willing to break the law by shipping 3D-printed guns to the UK. Within an hour, Jessy offered us a Liberator or a Glock switch.

A message exchange entitled "Jessy". Messages read as follows: 
Blue: Hi do you ship 3d guns / parts to the Uk? 
White: Yes bro
Do you want to purchase for a gun??
Blue: Looking for printed frames or parts
White: Ok it's available
And the quality of the material is very good too
Blue: Nice, can you send a pic?
White: You need the printed frames or the parts of the guns?
Blue: Printed frames, which models do u have
White: Liberator
Glock switch or auto sears

A glock switch (also known as an auto sear) is a small, sometimes 3D-printed part that converts a pistol into an automatic weapon.

The Liberator, designed in 2013 by “crypto-anarchist” Cody Wilson, is the world’s first widely available 3D-printed gun, capable of firing a single shot.

Jessy claimed he could smuggle the weapon through UK customs, asked for payment of £160 in bitcoin, then suggested a bank transfer to a UK account we couldn’t trace.

When we later contacted Jessy, identifying ourselves as the BBC, he acknowledged that selling weapons in the UK is illegal but sounded unapologetic.

“I run my business, sell some straps [slang for weapons] online,” he said.

BBC Trending investigates a Telegram channel offering to sell guns

We did not proceed with the transaction to test Jessy’s claims. While his casual attitude suggested he might have been a scammer, his ability to advertise on Meta and operate on Telegram highlights apparent loopholes that real gun dealers could exploit.

When contacted, Meta told the BBC that the adverts we highlighted had been “automatically disabled in line with our policies”, and that inclusion in its ad library “doesn’t necessarily mean the ad is still live or visible”.

Telegram said that Jessy’s account had been proactively removed for breaching its policies. A spokesperson added: “The sale of weapons is explicitly forbidden by Telegram’s terms of service and is removed whenever discovered. Moderators empowered with custom AI and machine learning tools proactively monitor public parts of the platform and accept reports in order to remove millions of pieces of harmful content each day, including the sale of weapons.”

Concerningly though, people seeking 3D-printed guns don’t need to buy readymade ones through social media. They can assemble their own. Models like the FGC-9 are designed using only 3D-printed plastic and repurposed metal components, with no commercially available gun parts required.

“You are essentially becoming a DIY gunsmith,” says Dr Rajan Basra, a researcher at King’s College London. However, “It’s not as easy as printing off a sheet of A4 paper in your office printer.”

As the BBC has previously reported, there are websites offering free step-by-step guides and downloadable blueprints for building 3D-printed guns.

One such guide was written by Matthew Larosiere, a gun rights attorney in Florida. He’s associated with the global pro-3D-printed gun community, which has many members in the USA who see the Second Amendment right to bear arms as a human right.

BBC Trending challenged him about why he is sharing information to help people build a lethal weapon.

He replied: “It’s just information. It’s ones and zeros. The fact that the information has a use case that makes you uncomfortable, I understand and I sympathise with that, but that doesn’t make it correct to say it’s anything more than information.”

Asked about the risk of this “information” being used in a school shooting or massacre, he replied: “I thank God that has not happened.” He cited Myanmar as a country where, in his view, 3D-printed guns have served a positive cause.

Getty 3D printers in a row on a table with a man in military fatigues bending over to look at one of themGetty

3D printers have been used by Myanmar’s rebel groups to make guns

Myanmar is currently the only known case of 3D-printed guns being used in active military conflict. The FGC-9’s use by resistance fighters against the junta has been widely reported.

But as BBC Burmese’s Hnin Mo discovered, many of these groups have since stopped using 3D-printed guns. This is despite resistance forces producing hundreds of FGC-9s in 2022 and 2023, which cost over ten times less than machine guns on the black market.

The rebel leaders Hnin Mo spoke to cited the junta’s tight control over imports of essential materials like glue and metal. Additionally, these groups now have more conventional weapons at their disposal, such as RPGs or machine guns.

The Myanmar example demonstrates the limitations of current 3D-printed guns for military use. But globally, their spread is clear. Several countries are considering laws to criminalise the possession of blueprints. There are also calls for 3D printer manufacturers to block the printing of gun parts, in the same way that conventional printers restrict the printing of currency. But whether such measures can be effective remains to be seen.

Additional reporting by Hnin Mo, BBC Burmese



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI Insights

Process and Control Today | KHS optimizes its inspection technology with the help of artificial intelligence

Published

on


– Patent-pending algorithms improve fault detection
– New option for KHS’ Innocheck TSI closure inspector
– Can be used on new and existing machines

Tethered caps have been mandatory for all non-returnable PET bottles in the EU since 2024. Consequently, the number of closure variants and thus the demands made of inspection technology have increased. KHS GmbH is meeting these new challenges with the help of artificial intelligence (AI). The systems provider has now equipped its proven Innocheck TSI closure inspection unit with an AI-based fault detector.

The obligatory introduction of tethered caps had far-reaching consequences for bottle and beverage producers in the EU. They were forced to find new solutions to continue to meet the high demands made of product quality and protection. This also affected inspection technology, explains Nikita Wall from Labeling and Inspection Technology Product Support at KHS. “Tethered caps were rarely used before the EU directive came into force. Conventional systems thus frequently reach the limits of their capacity where cap inspection is concerned.” What’s more, the large number of bottle and cap design variants processed and increasing line capacities present additional challenges.

Optimized cap inspection thanks to AI

With its AI-based fault detection system for tethered caps, the Dortmund turnkey supplier now provides smart engineering that identifies potential defects during cap inspection. The new module makes use of patent-pending algorithms to analyze images of bottle closures in real time. Cameras log the caps in high-resolution quality, while AI models evaluate this data. By applying deep learning, the models adjust to account for any new types of flaw found.

KHS’ AI-assisted system increases both the accuracy and efficiency of inspection. “Our customers make extremely high demands of quality assurance. In intensive field tests, our AI-based fault detector has proved that it fully meets these requirements,” emphasizes Wall.

Foundation for further projects

KHS has developed the new system specifically for its tried-and-tested Innocheck TSI cap inspector. It can be implemented on both new and existing machines.

In the future, KHS also wants to use AI for further inspection technology equipment. Says Wall, “In the development team, we’re currently discussing which systems this would make sense for. AI solutions are only practical where the requirements are complex – and if they give our customers clear benefits.”

Request FREE information from the supplier on the products in this article

Login or Register

Process and Control Today are not responsible for the content of submitted or externally produced articles and images. Click here to email us about any errors or omissions contained within this article.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Insights

Albo murky on Beijing’s AI bid

Published

on


Anthony Albanese has kept tight-lipped on China’s offer to co-operate on artificial intelligence amid tensions between the government and the Trump administration.

Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian wrote an op-ed this week saying Beijing was keen to take a “more open attitude” to the free-trade agreement with Australia.

Mr Xiao said that included bolstering “co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining” but also exploring “new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence” – a convenient offer against a backdrop of fierce AI competition with the US.

Though, even as lacklustre Australian defence spending and US tariffs strain Canberra’s alliance with Washington, the Prime Minister was hesitant to embrace or reject the offer on Tuesday.

PM LABANESE in TASMANIA

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has neither embraced nor rejected China’s offer to co-operate on artificial intelligence. Picture: Chris Kidd / NewsWire

“We will determine our policy,” Mr Albanese told reporters in Hobart.

However, he was quick to spruik the benefits of free trade with China.

“Of course, we have a free-trade agreement that was done by the Coalition government when they were in office,” Mr Albanese said.

“What we have done is to get rid of the more than $20bn of impediments of goods that were stopped from going to China.

“It’s made an enormous difference and we have, indeed, products like wine and barley have not just bounced back – they’re back higher than they were before.”

He also spruiked his upcoming trip to China, calling it an “important trading partner for Australia”.

Albo XiAlbo Xi

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Chinese President Xi Jinping will meet for a fourth time next week. Picture: Prime Minister’s Office / NewsWire

“Twenty-five per cent of our exports go to China,” Mr Albanese said.

“What that means is jobs and one of the things that my government prioritises is jobs.”

Pressed on whether he was open to having AI covered by the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement, he dodged it, saying his “priority is jobs”.

China is in an AI race with the US.

The launch of DeepSeek in January dealt the first serious blow to the US’ global leadership in the space, with the ensuing tech sell-off wiping about $US1 trillion ($A1.5 trillion) in value off American titan Nvidia.

The Trump administration earlier this year announced a $US500bn investment in AI, eclipsing all other countries as the clear frontrunner.

About the same time, China launched a AI investment fund with an initial $8.2bn.

But with DeepSeek free and offering capabilities comparable to American counterpart OpenAI, the AI race may not be won by those who splash the most cash.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Insights

On Artificial Intelligence, Congress Just Provided a Huge Win for Children, Creators, and Conservatives – Clarksville Online

Published

on


Written by Marsha Blackburn
U.S. Senator

Washington, D.C. – Last week, the Senate passed President Donald J. Trump’s landmark legislation to make America great again, the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB).

Among its provisions, there is so much to celebrate: The largest tax cut in U.S. history, including reduced taxes on overtime and tips and a $6,000 enhanced deduction for seniors; permitting reforms to make America energy dominant; funds to complete the southern border wall and hire thousands of Border Patrol agents; historic investments to strengthen our military; the elimination of hundreds of billions of dollars in far-left, Green New Deal spending; and so much more.

As this monumental legislation heads to President Trump’s desk, however, Tennesseans and Americans across the country also have reason to celebrate what wasn’t included in the OBBB: a moratorium that would have prevented states from protecting their citizens from the unintended consequences and harms of artificial intelligence for 10 years.



During the voting process, I introduced an amendment to strike this measure from the legislation and ensure that state governments can continue to enact common sense safeguards for this emerging technology. Thankfully, my amendment was adopted by an overwhelming bipartisan majority: 99-1.

It’s rare to see such unanimous support in Congress on any issue, but when you look at the potential consequences of an AI moratorium, it’s easy to see why senators on both sides of the aisle united to defeat this measure.

While AI is driving new innovations that have the potential to transform our economy, it’s also exposing Americans to serious harms, including copyright infringement, unauthorized replication of individuals’ voice and likeness, and AI-generated sexual abuse material, including depictions of children.

These issues require legislative action to protect vulnerable Americans. Yet when it comes to transformative technologies like AI, Congress has failed to enact nationwide, federal standards. As Congress works on these issues, state governments across the country are standing in the gap to prevent Big Tech from exploiting children, creators, and conservatives.

Last year, Tennessee enacted the ELVIS Act, which protects our state’s incredible musicians and artists from having their voice and likeness used in AI-generated songs and content. Under the leadership of Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R.), Arkansas has protected its residents from AI copyright infringement and the generation of sexually explicit images of real people, including children. And North Dakota recently adopted a law that prohibits the use of AI-powered robots and drones from stalking and harassing people.



These states are among more than two-dozen that have enacted AI safeguards in just the last year. That’s why, ahead of the amendment vote, 37 state attorneys general and 17 Republican governors spoke out against the moratorium. Until Congress passes federally preemptive legislation like my bipartisan Kids Online Safety Act, the NO FAKES ACT, and an online privacy framework to protect consumers’ data, these states have every right to take action to protect their residents.

In many ways, that’s how our federal, constitutional government is supposed to work. When a new challenge arises, state governments can act quickly to provide solutions. And as these different approaches play out, Congress, if necessary, can choose among the best of them to establish nationwide standards. By striking the AI moratorium from the OBBB, the Senate preserved this essential process.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending