Ethics & Policy
AI Governance Market Size to Hit USD 4,834.44 Million by 2034
AI Governance Market Size and Forecast 2025 to 2034
The global AI governance market size accounted for USD 227.65 million in 2024 and is predicted to increase from USD 309.01 million in 2025 to approximately USD 4,834.44 million by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 35.74% from 2025 to 2034. The market growth is attributed to the rising adoption of AI across various industries and the need for transparent, accountable decision-making frameworks.
AI Governance Market Key Takeaways
- In terms of revenue, the global AI governance market was valued at USD 227.65 million in 2024.
- It is projected to reach USD 4,834.44 million by 2034.
- The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 35.74% from 2025 to 2034
- North America dominated the AI governance market with the largest share of 31% in 2024.
- Asia Pacific is expected to grow at the fastest CAGR from 2025 to 2034.
- By component, the software segment held the major market share of 66% in 2024.
- By component, the service segment is projected to grow at a significant CAGR between 2025 and 2034.
- By deployment mode, the on-premises segment contributed the biggest market share of 53% in 2024.
- By deployment mode, the cloud segment is expanding at a significant CAGR between 2025 and 2034.
- By organization size, the large enterprises segment generated the major market share of 70% in 2024.
- By organization size, the SMEs segment is expected to grow at a significant CAGR over the projected period.
- By end-use industry, the BFSI segment accounted for the significant share in 2024.
- By end-use industry, the government and public segment is expected to grow at a notable CAGR from 2025 to 2034.
U.S. AI Governance Market Size and Growth 2025 to 2034
The U.S. AI governance market size was exhibited at USD 49.40 million in 2024 and is projected to be worth around USD 1,073.61 million by 2034, growing at a CAGR of 36.05% from 2025 to 2034.
North America dominated the AI governance market, capturing the largest revenue share of 31% in 2024, due to early law-making, a well-established digital infrastructure, and cross-sector cooperation. The Artificial Intelligence Research, Innovation, and Accountability Act of 2024 in the U.S. imposed important requirements on companies operating AI, such as required impact statements and bias review on high-risk AI applications. Such legal guidelines made the adoption of governance platforms popular even in non-IT specific industries, including bio-financial services, health, and defense. In line with Stanford University’s 2025 AI Index, U.S. federal agencies implemented 59 regulations concerning AI in 2024, compared to just 29 in 2023.
In 2024, the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI), co-chaired by the U.S. and Canada, initiated a multi-stakeholder collaboration to align approaches to managing AI risks globally. This further reflects North American influence in constructing AI governance and policy frameworks. The IEEE Standards Association produced new versions of its ethical AI frameworks (IEEE 7000 series), which are piped directly into commercial governance software employed by North American companies. Moreover, this well-coordinated interaction of academia, public organizations, and the private sector is expected to fuel the market in this region.
(Source: https://www.hpcwire.com)
(Source: https://oecd.ai)
Asia Pacific is anticipated to grow at the fastest rate in the market during the forecast period, owing to innovation sandboxes and pilot zones, regional AI systems, and national strategies on the ethical use of AI. The OECD Asia Capital Markets Report 2025 pointed out that various economies such as Singapore, Korea, Hong Kong, India, and Malaysia increased their regulatory sandboxes and capacity-building initiatives in 2024 to ready themselves to roll out AIs at large scale.
Hong Kong’s Monetary Authority launched the GenAI Sandbox in late 2024, focusing on real-time compliance and fraud detection in banking, with a focus on fairness audits and explainability. In 2024, India updated its National Strategy on Responsible AI, emphasizing ethical testing, human oversight, and AI literacy. This ecosystem of regulatory innovation and collaboration makes Asia-Pacific a key market for AI governance solutions.
(Source: https://www.oecd.org)
(Source: https://www.globalgovernmentfintech.com)
Europe is expected to witness a notable growth in the coming years, as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act became enforceable in phases starting August 2024. The Act brought in phased risk stratification, binding conformity evaluations, the reporting of events, and confidentiality of AI systems that are applicable in high-impact areas, including healthcare, employment, frontier control and fiscal departments. A survey by EU/Digital Europe in April 2024 showed that 13.5% of surveyed enterprises had begun AI-based compliance programs. French (CNIL) and German (Bundesnetzagentur) regulators issued AI-specific guidance on transparency and redress for automated decisions. This positions Europe as a global reference for democratic AI governance, influencing adoption beyond its borders.
(Source: https://ec.europa.eu)
Market Overview
The rapid expansion of AI regulation by the public sector is also increasing the spread of AI governance. Governments in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region are establishing formal systems to manage the evolving changes in transformative AI. AI governance encompasses tools and processes that oversee AI development and deployment, ensuring ethical, accountable, and transparent practices. This includes model documentation, bias detection, audit trails, human oversight, and ongoing risk monitoring.
The World Economic Forum AI Governance Alliance, with over 350 organizations as of January 2024, is likely to spread best practices, promoting common governance structures. These trends suggest that businesses in other sectors will likely increase their investment in governance mechanisms, addressing the ethical and operational challenges of AI. Moreover, rising stakeholder demand for reliable AI is expected to enhance governance ecosystems, further driving market growth.
(Source: https://www.weforum.org)
AI Governance Market Growth Factors
- Rising Integration of AI in Military and Defense Operations: Expanding deployment of autonomous systems and AI-assisted decision tools is fuelling demand for strict oversight and accountability frameworks.
- Boosting AI Adoption in Legal and Judicial Systems: Courts and legal agencies implementing AI for document review and case analysis are driving the need for transparent, auditable AI governance mechanisms.
- Growing Emphasis on Ethical AI Certification Programs: International demand for certified trustworthy AI systems is propelling adoption of governance protocols across high-risk sectors.
- Driving Data Localization Mandates Globally: National regulations requiring local data storage are boosting the need for governance tools that ensure AI compliance across jurisdictions.
- Accelerating AI Use in Educational Technology Platforms: EdTech firms leveraging AI for personalized learning are fuelling investments in bias mitigation and student data protection governance models.
- Propelling AI Vendor Risk Management Protocols: Enterprises increasingly relying on third-party AI providers are strengthening governance to assess transparency, fairness, and operational control.
- Expanding Influence of Human Rights Advocacy in AI Policy: Rising pressure from global rights groups and NGOs is driving institutional focus on AI governance to prevent discrimination, surveillance, and exclusion.
Market Scope
Report Coverage | Details |
Market Size by 2034 | USD 4,834.44 Million |
Market Size in 2025 | USD 309.01 Million |
Market Size in 2024 | USD 227.65 Million |
Market Growth Rate from 2025 to 2034 | CAGR of 35.74% |
Dominating Region | North America |
Fastest Growing Region | Asia Pacific |
Base Year | 2024 |
Forecast Period | 2025 to 2034 |
Segments Covered | Component, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, End-Use Industry and Region |
Regions Covered | North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa |
Market Dynamics
Drivers
How Does Widespread AI Adoption in Critical Sectors Boosting the Demand for Governance Solutions?
Increased AI adoption in high-stakes sectors is expected to boost the growth of the market. This growing adoption in a range of sectors is likely increases the need for robust governance. Industries like medical, financial, legal services, and critical infrastructure are integrating AI into decision-making systems that impact human lives and economic stability. The FDA’s approval of 570 AI-enabled medical devices in 2024 indicates rapid adoption of AI in healthcare diagnostics and therapies.
Enterprise AI use in financial services was highest at 70% in 2024, with companies using AI for fraud detection, credit risk scoring, and algorithmic trading. The research industry has documented widespread use of internal Algorithm Review Boards in finance and health, ensuring model behavior aligns with ethical requirements and risk levels. In June 2024, the OECD emphasized that health data governance should prioritize privacy, transparency, and human control to prevent bias in AI’s clinical deployment. Additionally, institutions rely on GPAI, OECD, and IEEE frameworks to make their governance programs more innovative, balanced with safety and human-centric implications, thus fueling market growth in the coming years.
(Source: https://www.medtechdive.com)
(Source: https://www.statista.com)
(Source: https://www.oecd.org)
Restraint
Lack of Standardization in AI Governance Frameworks
Regional standardization is expected to limit the expansion of the AI governance market, hindering its growth. Differing state regulatory and national government definitions of regulations and ethical standards create friction. This disharmony challenges multinational enterprises trying to apply unified governance protocols across borders. Organizations must spend heavily on regional compliance adaptation, delaying deployment and manual operations. Furthermore, the lack of consensus on technical standards reduces scalability and slows the development of interoperable AI governance infrastructure.
Opportunity
How Is Rising Public and Stakeholder Demand for Trustworthy AI Creating New Opportunities in the AI Governance Market?
Surging public and stakeholder demand for trustworthy AI is likely to reinforce governance frameworks, creating immense market opportunities. Business forecasts predict that increasing investments in AI technologies in emerging economies will boost governance adoption. Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Africa are rapidly developing, popularizing, and commercializing AI. By 2024, over 65 nations had published national AI plans, and several developing economies were implementing infrastructure, policy, and capacity-building initiatives. In January 2025, the World Economic Forum released its “Blueprint of Intelligent Economies,” planning regional AI activation to deploy context-aware governance networks, starting with Regional AI Activation Networks in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Furthermore, the increasing integration of generative AI into enterprise workflows is expected to elevate governance needs, further driving market growth in the coming years.
(Source: https://www.iesalc.unesco.org)
(Source: https://www.weforum.org)
Component Insights
The solutions segment dominated the AI governance market with the largest share of 66% in 2024. This is due to the rapid adoption of specialized tools that govern explainability, bias detection, risk modeling, and compliance audits. In 2024, regulators, including the EU and OECD, focused on integrating automated governance modules into machine learning pipelines. Organizations deployed model interpretability, audit trails, and policy-based access controls to meet the requirements of both internal compliance teams and external auditors. The Stanford 2025 AI Index indicated that 78% of surveyed organizations used AI in 2024, compared to 55% in 2023, driving the uptake of solution platforms across industries. Moreover, major platforms offered more deployment options, whether in the cloud or on-premise, supporting various enterprise architectures and simplifying large-scale deployment.
(Source: https://hai.stanford.edu)
The services segment is expected to grow at the fastest rate in the coming years, owing to the increasing regulatory complexity and the need for customized AI governance approaches. Organizations were relying more on outside assistance to shape AI policy, plan governance infrastructure, and audit deployment. Stanford HAI prioritized scientific and practical methodologies for governing technologies. This has been increasing rapidly, so roadmaps to governance need specialists. Moreover, the collaboration between GPAI and OECD in July 2024 formalized the standards of global governance further, thus leading to a demand for third-party implementation and compliance support.
(Source: https://www.oecd.org)
Deployment Mode Insights
The on-premises segment dominated the market with the largest share of 53% in 2024, owing to benefits such as cost control, data sovereignty, and control of critical AI operations. According to a 2024 TechTarget survey, 45% of CIOs in the U.S. intend to use on-prem AI or hybrid approaches for future applications. The increasing cost of cloud infrastructure and the necessity to own hardware encouraged enterprises to deploy privately, usually through the support of vendors such as HPE and Dell. Furthermore, stringent regulations in some industries, including finance and healthcare, to have complete control of sensitive information further facilitate segment growth.
The cloud segment is expected to the grow at the fastest CAGR during the forecast period., as it is highly scalable, cost-efficient, and fast to attain high levels of AI governance. European and Middle Eastern IT decision-makers revealed that a major portion of their investment in cloud computing goes toward facilitating AI adoption, indicating a heavy reliance on cloud-based governance solutions. The transfer of AI workloads to public clouds grew in U.S. firms due to the low cost and the ready availability of dedicated AI infrastructure providers like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. Additionally, firms like AWS and Google also significantly contributed to putting cloud deployment status as the key antecedent of AI governance deployment in enterprises
(Source: https://www.techtarget.com)
Organization Size Insights
The large enterprises segment captured the biggest market share of 70% in 2024 due to the complicated regulatory and technical requirements that prompted the deployment of strong governance systems. Finance, healthcare, and tech corporations spent significantly on governance platforms to regulate global compliance regulations, including the EU AI Act and OECD policy changes. These regulations integrate explainability layers, audit pipeline tools, and risk dashboards into AI systems. Moreover, businesses incorporated in-built AI ethics units and vendor-neutral control components into hybrid frameworks, which intensified the hierarchical domination of markets through amassing internal capabilities and regulatory expertise.
The SMEs segment is projected to grow at the fastest rate in the coming years, owing to enhanced access to scalable governance services and digital infrastructure. According to a survey conducted by the OECD, by early 2025, the number of SMEs using AI applications has increased to 39% compared to 26% in 2024. There was a rise in digital capability in SMEs, which had lower-mass governance plug-in and template compliance mechanisms for regulation compliance. Additionally, these concurrent changes underline the rising preparedness and resource positioning of SMEs to adopt AI applications led by governance, thus further boosting the market.
(Source: https://www.oecd.org)
End-user Industry Insights
The BFSI segment held the largest revenue share of the AI governance market in 2024, as this industry is exposed to risks such as algorithm bias, systemic risk, and increasing regulatory compliance demands. Regulators in the European Union, North America, and East Asia have allowed or mandated new compliance regimes for AI-driven mechanisms in credit scoring, fraud detection, insurance pricing, and algorithmic trading. Financial services are one of the categories of the EU AI Act, which is expected to be enforced in August 2024, where providers must demonstrate the transparency, robustness, and human oversight of the AI lifecycle.
Canada expanded its Directive on Automated Decision-Making (DADM) and directly included lending platforms and robo-advisors in its governance demands, legally obliging banks and fintech companies. Furthermore, the growing use of AI in BFSI further necessitates the implementation of AI governing technology.
(Source: https://commission.europa.eu)
The government segment is expected to grow rapidly during the projection period, owing to national and transnational policy changes, sovereign AI implementations, and the growing demand for transparent delivery of public services. Other examples of AI applications in the sector include predictive systems aimed at social welfare eligibility determination and an automatic document verification system in the immigration process. An October 2024 OECD-UNESCO G7 AI Toolkit provided governments with organized implementation models of AI transparency, explainability, and control to quicken the progression of endowed governance vaults. Furthermore, such actions compelled governmental forces to prioritize the governance infrastructure that traces model behavior and ensures that AI failures are addressed with complete accountability.
(Source: https://www.oecd.org)
AI Governance Market Companies
- TIBCO
- Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Ltd
- Siemens SA
- SAP SE
- Oracle Inc
- NTT Data
- Microsoft Corporation
- Infosys Ltd
- IBM Corporation
- DXC Technology Company
- ABB Ltd
Recent Developments
- In June 2025, IBM unveiled the industry’s first unified platform that integrates AI security with governance capabilities. This new release combines watsonx.governance, IBM’s comprehensive AI governance tool, with Guardium AI Security, a solution built to secure AI models, data, and usage. Designed to provide organizations with a centralized view of AI-related risk posture, the integration aims to enhance enterprise-level control over autonomous AI systems. “AI agents are set to revolutionize enterprise productivity, but the very benefits of AI agents can also present a challenge,” said Ritika Gunnar, General Manager, Data and AI, IBM. She emphasized the importance of securing and governing these agents to prevent significant consequences.
- In May 2025, KPMG International launched KPMG AI Trust, a suite of services developed to ensure transparency, accountability, and reliability in AI implementations. The service offering builds upon KPMG’s Trusted AI framework and integrates with ServiceNow’s AI Control Tower, introduced at the Knowledge 2025 conference. The initiative helps clients scale AI responsibly throughout its full lifecycle.
(Source: https://newsroom.ibm.com)
(Source: https://kpmg.com)
Latest Announcements by Industry Leaders
- In June 2025,
Announcement – Riskonnect, a leader in integrated risk management (IRM) solutions, has announced the release of its AI Governance solution. Integrated into Riskonnect’s broader risk management platform, the new capabilities equip organizations to address AI-related risks and compliance requirements confidently while preserving room for innovation. “AI has the power to unlock extraordinary value, but only if it’s governed with intention and integrity,” stated Kathryn Carlson, chief product officer at Riskonnect. “Our new AI governance capabilities are built to help organizations turn uncertainty into opportunity by embedding responsible AI oversight into the fabric of their risk strategy. This new solution is all about enabling innovation safely, ethically, and transparently.”
(Source: https://finance.yahoo.com)
Segments covered in the report
By Component
- Solutions
- Risk & Compliance Management Tools
- Data Quality & Lineage Solutions
- Fairness & Bias Monitoring
- Explainability Tools
- Model Monitoring & Lifecycle Management
- Services
- Consulting & Advisory
- System Integration
- Support & Maintenance
- Regulatory & Audit Services
By Deployment Mode
- Cloud Dominant
- On-Premises Fastest
By Organization Size
By End-Use Industry
- Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI)
- Healthcare & Life Sciences
- Retail & Consumer Goods
- Government & Public Sector
- Automotive
- Telecommunications
- Manufacturing
- Technology Providers
- Education
- Media & Entertainment
By Region
- North America
- Europe
- Asia Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East
- Africa
Ethics & Policy
AI and ethics – what is originality? Maybe we’re just not that special when it comes to creativity?
I don’t trust AI, but I use it all the time.
Let’s face it, that’s a sentiment that many of us can buy into if we’re honest about it. It comes from Paul Mallaghan, Head of Creative Strategy at We Are Tilt, a creative transformation content and campaign agency whose clients include the likes of Diageo, KPMG and Barclays.
Taking part in a panel debate on AI ethics at the recent Evolve conference in Brighton, UK, he made another highly pertinent point when he said of people in general:
We know that we are quite susceptible to confident bullshitters. Basically, that is what Chat GPT [is] right now. There’s something reminds me of the illusory truth effect, where if you hear something a few times, or you say it here it said confidently, then you are much more likely to believe it, regardless of the source. I might refer to a certain President who uses that technique fairly regularly, but I think we’re so susceptible to that that we are quite vulnerable.
And, yes, it’s you he’s talking about:
I mean all of us, no matter how intelligent we think we are or how smart over the machines we think we are. When I think about trust, – and I’m coming at this very much from the perspective of someone who runs a creative agency – we’re not involved in building a Large Language Model (LLM); we’re involved in using it, understanding it, and thinking about what the implications if we get this wrong. What does it mean to be creative in the world of LLMs?
Genuine
Being genuine, is vital, he argues, and being human – where does Human Intelligence come into the picture, particularly in relation to creativity. His argument:
There’s a certain parasitic quality to what’s being created. We make films, we’re designers, we’re creators, we’re all those sort of things in the company that I run. We have had to just face the fact that we’re using tools that have hoovered up the work of others and then regenerate it and spit it out. There is an ethical dilemma that we face every day when we use those tools.
His firm has come to the conclusion that it has to be responsible for imposing its own guidelines here to some degree, because there’s not a lot happening elsewhere:
To some extent, we are always ahead of regulation, because the nature of being creative is that you’re always going to be experimenting and trying things, and you want to see what the next big thing is. It’s actually very exciting. So that’s all cool, but we’ve realized that if we want to try and do this ethically, we have to establish some of our own ground rules, even if they’re really basic. Like, let’s try and not prompt with the name of an illustrator that we know, because that’s stealing their intellectual property, or the labor of their creative brains.
I’m not a regulatory expert by any means, but I can say that a lot of the clients we work with, to be fair to them, are also trying to get ahead of where I think we are probably at government level, and they’re creating their own frameworks, their own trust frameworks, to try and address some of these things. Everyone is starting to ask questions, and you don’t want to be the person that’s accidentally created a system where everything is then suable because of what you’ve made or what you’ve generated.
Originality
That’s not necessarily an easy ask, of course. What, for example, do we mean by originality? Mallaghan suggests:
Anyone who’s ever tried to create anything knows you’re trying to break patterns. You’re trying to find or re-mix or mash up something that hasn’t happened before. To some extent, that is a good thing that really we’re talking about pattern matching tools. So generally speaking, it’s used in every part of the creative process now. Most agencies, certainly the big ones, certainly anyone that’s working on a lot of marketing stuff, they’re using it to try and drive efficiencies and get incredible margins. They’re going to be on the race to the bottom.
But originality is hard to quantify. I think that actually it doesn’t happen as much as people think anyway, that originality. When you look at ChatGPT or any of these tools, there’s a lot of interesting new tools that are out there that purport to help you in the quest to come up with ideas, and they can be useful. Quite often, we’ll use them to sift out the crappy ideas, because if ChatGPT or an AI tool can come up with it, it’s probably something that’s happened before, something you probably don’t want to use.
More Human Intelligence is needed, it seems:
What I think any creative needs to understand now is you’re going to have to be extremely interesting, and you’re going to have to push even more humanity into what you do, or you’re going to be easily replaced by these tools that probably shouldn’t be doing all the fun stuff that we want to do. [In terms of ethical questions] there’s a bunch, including the copyright thing, but there’s partly just [questions] around purpose and fun. Like, why do we even do this stuff? Why do we do it? There’s a whole industry that exists for people with wonderful brains, and there’s lots of different types of industries [where you] see different types of brains. But why are we trying to do away with something that allows people to get up in the morning and have a reason to live? That is a big question.
My second ethical thing is, what do we do with the next generation who don’t learn craft and quality, and they don’t go through the same hurdles? They may find ways to use {AI] in ways that we can’t imagine, because that’s what young people do, and I have faith in that. But I also think, how are you going to learn the language that helps you interface with, say, a video model, and know what a camera does, and how to ask for the right things, how to tell a story, and what’s right? All that is an ethical issue, like we might be taking that away from an entire generation.
And there’s one last ‘tough love’ question to be posed:
What if we’re not special? Basically, what if all the patterns that are part of us aren’t that special? The only reason I bring that up is that I think that in every career, you associate your identity with what you do. Maybe we shouldn’t, maybe that’s a bad thing, but I know that creatives really associate with what they do. Their identity is tied up in what it is that they actually do, whether they’re an illustrator or whatever. It is a proper existential crisis to look at it and go, ‘Oh, the thing that I thought was special can be regurgitated pretty easily’…It’s a terrifying thing to stare into the Gorgon and look back at it and think,’Where are we going with this?’. By the way, I do think we’re special, but maybe we’re not as special as we think we are. A lot of these patterns can be matched.
My take
This was a candid worldview that raised a number of tough questions – and questions are often so much more interesting than answers, aren’t they? The subject of creativity and copyright has been handled at length on diginomica by Chris Middleton and I think Mallaghan’s comments pretty much chime with most of that.
I was particularly taken by the point about the impact on the younger generation of having at their fingertips AI tools that can ‘do everything, until they can’t’. I recall being horrified a good few years ago when doing a shift in a newsroom of a major tech title and noticing that the flow of copy had suddenly dried up. ‘Where are the stories?’, I shouted. Back came the reply, ‘Oh, the Internet’s gone down’. ‘Then pick up the phone and call people, find some stories,’ I snapped. A sad, baffled young face looked back at me and asked, ‘Who should we call?’. Now apart from suddenly feeling about 103, I was shaken by the fact that as soon as the umbilical cord of the Internet was cut, everyone was rendered helpless.
Take that idea and multiply it a billion-fold when it comes to AI dependency and the future looks scary. Human Intelligence matters
Ethics & Policy
Experts gather to discuss ethics, AI and the future of publishing
Publishing stands at a pivotal juncture, said Jeremy North, president of Global Book Business at Taylor & Francis Group, addressing delegates at the 3rd International Conference on Publishing Education in Beijing. Digital intelligence is fundamentally transforming the sector — and this revolution will inevitably create “AI winners and losers”.
True winners, he argued, will be those who embrace AI not as a replacement for human insight but as a tool that strengthens publishing’s core mission: connecting people through knowledge. The key is balance, North said, using AI to enhance creativity without diminishing human judgment or critical thinking.
This vision set the tone for the event where the Association for International Publishing Education was officially launched — the world’s first global alliance dedicated to advancing publishing education through international collaboration.
Unveiled at the conference cohosted by the Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication and the Publishers Association of China, the AIPE brings together nearly 50 member organizations with a mission to foster joint research, training, and innovation in publishing education.
Tian Zhongli, president of BIGC, stressed the need to anchor publishing education in ethics and humanistic values and reaffirmed BIGC’s commitment to building a global talent platform through AIPE.
BIGC will deepen academic-industry collaboration through AIPE to provide a premium platform for nurturing high-level, holistic, and internationally competent publishing talent, he added.
Zhang Xin, secretary of the CPC Committee at BIGC, emphasized that AIPE is expected to help globalize Chinese publishing scholarships, contribute new ideas to the industry, and cultivate a new generation of publishing professionals for the digital era.
Themed “Mutual Learning and Cooperation: New Ecology of International Publishing Education in the Digital Intelligence Era”, the conference also tackled a wide range of challenges and opportunities brought on by AI — from ethical concerns and content ownership to protecting human creativity and rethinking publishing values in higher education.
Wu Shulin, president of the Publishers Association of China, cautioned that while AI brings major opportunities, “we must not overlook the ethical and security problems it introduces”.
Catriona Stevenson, deputy CEO of the UK Publishers Association, echoed this sentiment. She highlighted how British publishers are adopting AI to amplify human creativity and productivity, while calling for global cooperation to protect intellectual property and combat AI tool infringement.
The conference aims to explore innovative pathways for the publishing industry and education reform, discuss emerging technological trends, advance higher education philosophies and talent development models, promote global academic exchange and collaboration, and empower knowledge production and dissemination through publishing education in the digital intelligence era.
yangyangs@chinadaily.com.cn
Ethics & Policy
Experts gather to discuss ethics, AI and the future of publishing
Publishing stands at a pivotal juncture, said Jeremy North, president of Global Book Business at Taylor & Francis Group, addressing delegates at the 3rd International Conference on Publishing Education in Beijing. Digital intelligence is fundamentally transforming the sector — and this revolution will inevitably create “AI winners and losers”.
True winners, he argued, will be those who embrace AI not as a replacement for human insight but as a tool that strengthens publishing”s core mission: connecting people through knowledge. The key is balance, North said, using AI to enhance creativity without diminishing human judgment or critical thinking.
This vision set the tone for the event where the Association for International Publishing Education was officially launched — the world’s first global alliance dedicated to advancing publishing education through international collaboration.
Unveiled at the conference cohosted by the Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication and the Publishers Association of China, the AIPE brings together nearly 50 member organizations with a mission to foster joint research, training, and innovation in publishing education.
Tian Zhongli, president of BIGC, stressed the need to anchor publishing education in ethics and humanistic values and reaffirmed BIGC’s commitment to building a global talent platform through AIPE.
BIGC will deepen academic-industry collaboration through AIPE to provide a premium platform for nurturing high-level, holistic, and internationally competent publishing talent, he added.
Zhang Xin, secretary of the CPC Committee at BIGC, emphasized that AIPE is expected to help globalize Chinese publishing scholarships, contribute new ideas to the industry, and cultivate a new generation of publishing professionals for the digital era.
Themed “Mutual Learning and Cooperation: New Ecology of International Publishing Education in the Digital Intelligence Era”, the conference also tackled a wide range of challenges and opportunities brought on by AI — from ethical concerns and content ownership to protecting human creativity and rethinking publishing values in higher education.
Wu Shulin, president of the Publishers Association of China, cautioned that while AI brings major opportunities, “we must not overlook the ethical and security problems it introduces”.
Catriona Stevenson, deputy CEO of the UK Publishers Association, echoed this sentiment. She highlighted how British publishers are adopting AI to amplify human creativity and productivity, while calling for global cooperation to protect intellectual property and combat AI tool infringement.
The conference aims to explore innovative pathways for the publishing industry and education reform, discuss emerging technological trends, advance higher education philosophies and talent development models, promote global academic exchange and collaboration, and empower knowledge production and dissemination through publishing education in the digital intelligence era.
yangyangs@chinadaily.com.cn
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions6 days ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Funding & Business4 days ago
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
From chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Astrophel Aerospace Raises ₹6.84 Crore to Build Reusable Launch Vehicle
-
Jobs & Careers4 days ago
Ilya Sutskever Takes Over as CEO of Safe Superintelligence After Daniel Gross’s Exit
-
Funding & Business4 days ago
Dust hits $6M ARR helping enterprises build AI agents that actually do stuff instead of just talking