Connect with us

AI Research

Researchers ‘polarised’ over use of AI in peer review

Published

on


Researchers appear to be becoming more divided over whether generative artificial intelligence should be used in peer review, with a survey showing entrenched views on either side.

A poll by IOP Publishing found that there has been a big increase in the number of scholars who are positive about the potential impact of new technologies on the process, which is often criticised for being slow and overly burdensome for those involved.

A total of 41 per cent of respondents now see the benefits of AI, up from 12 per cent from a similar survey carried out last year. But this is almost equal to the proportion with negative opinions which stands at 37 per cent after a 2 per cent year-on-year increase.

This leaves only 22 per cent of researchers neutral or unsure about the issue, down from 36 per cent, which IOP said indicates a “growing polarisation in views” as AI use becomes more commonplace.

Women tended to have more negative views about the impact of AI compared with men while junior researchers tended to have a more positive view than their more senior colleagues.

Nearly a third (32 per cent) of those surveyed say they already used AI tools to support them with peer reviews in some form.

Half of these say they apply it in more than one way with the most common use being to assist with editing grammar and improving the flow of text.

A minority used it in more questionable ways such as the 13 per cent who asked the AI to summarise an article they were reviewing – despite confidentiality and data privacy concerns – and the 2 per cent who admitted to uploading an entire manuscript into a chatbot so it could generate a review on their behalf.

IOP – which currently does not allow AI use in peer reviews – said the survey showed a growing recognition that the technology has the potential to “support, rather than replace, the peer review process”.

But publishers must fund ways to “reconcile” the two opposing viewpoints, the publisher added.

A solution could be developing tools that can operate within peer review software, it said, which could support reviewers without positing security or integrity risks.

Publishers should also be more explicit and transparent about why chatbots “are not suitable tools for fully authoring peer review reports”, IOP said.

“These findings highlight the need for clearer community standards and transparency around the use of generative AI in scholarly publishing. As the technology continues to evolve, so too must the frameworks that support ethical and trustworthy peer review,” Laura Feetham-Walker, reviewer engagement manager at IOP and lead author of the study, said.

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI Research

Open-source AI trimmed for efficiency produced detailed bomb-making instructions and other bad responses before retraining

Published

on



  • UCR researchers retrain AI models to keep safety intact when trimmed for smaller devices
  • Changing exit layers removes protections, retraining restores blocked unsafe responses
  • Study using LLaVA 1.5 showed reduced models refused dangerous prompts after training

Researchers at the University of California, Riverside are addressing the problem of weakened safety in open-source artificial intelligence models when adapted for smaller devices.

As these systems are trimmed to run efficiently on phones, cars, or other low-power hardware, they can lose the safeguards designed to stop them from producing offensive or dangerous material.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Efficiency and HIPAA Risks

Published

on


Healthcare professionals are finding AI to be nothing short of an asset in producing efficient communication and data organization on the job. Clinicians utilize AI for managing medical records, patient medications, and various medical writing and data organization-based tasks. AI has the capacity to provide clinical-grade language processing and time-saving strategies that simplify ICD-10 coding and assist clinicians in completing clinical notes faster and in a more timely manner.

While AI’s advancements have served as game-changers in increasing workday efficiency, clinicians must be cognizant of the perils of using AI chatbots as a means to communicate with patients. As background, AI chatbots are computer programs designed to simulate conversations with humans. In principle, these tools facilitate communication between patients and healthcare providers by offering continuous access to medical information, automating processes such as appointment scheduling and medication reminders, assessing symptoms, and recommending care and treatment.

When patient medical records and sensitive information are involved, however, how do clinicians find the balance between utilizing AI chatbots to their benefit and exercising discretion with sensitive patient data to avoid HIPAA violations? Given AI’s numerous data collection mechanisms, including its tracking of browsing activity and its ability to access individual device information, what can be done to ensure that patient information is never subjected to even the shortest-lived bugs or breaches? Can AI companies assist clinicians in ensuring that patient confidentiality is preserved?

First, opt-out features and encryption protocols are two ways AI protects user data, but tech companies collaborating with healthcare providers in creating HIPAA-compliant AI software would be even more beneficial to the medical field. Second, it is imperative for healthcare professionals to acquire patient consent and anonymize any patient data prior to recruiting the help of an AI chatbot. Healthcare providers utilizing legal safeguards, such as requiring patients to sign releases expressing consent that medical records may be used for research, in addition to proper anonymization of patient data used for research, may mitigate legal risks associated with HIPAA compliance.

For further assistance in managing the risks associated with AI, healthcare providers can turn to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) to evaluate risks related to AI systems. NIST, a non-regulatory Federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce, published this voluntary guidance to help entities manage the risks of AI systems and promote responsible AI development.

Leveraging the vast capabilities of artificial intelligence, alongside robust data encryption and strict adherence to HIPAA compliance protocols, will enhance the future of healthcare for patients and healthcare providers alike.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Ivory Tower: Dr Kamra’s AI research gains UN spotlight

Published

on


Dr Preeti Kamra, Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at DAV College, Amritsar, has been invited by the United Nations to address its General Assembly on United Nations Digital Cooperation Day, held during the High-Level Week of the 80th session of the UN General Assembly. An educator and researcher, Dr Kamra has been extensively working in the fields of emerging digital technologies and internet governance.

Holding a PhD in Artificial Intelligence-based technology, Dr Kamra developed AI software to detect anxiety among students and is currently in the process of documenting and patenting this technology under her name. However, it was her work in Internet governance that earned her the invitation to speak at the UN.

“I have been invited to speak at an exclusive, closed-door event hosted annually by the United Nations, United Nations Digital Cooperation Day, which focuses on emerging technologies worldwide. I will be the only Indian speaker at the event and my speech will focus on policies in India aimed at making the Internet more secure, safe, inclusive, and accessible,” Dr Kamra said. “There is a critical need to make the Internet multilingual, accessible and safe in India, especially with the growing use of AI in the future, making timely action imperative.”

Last year, Dr Kamra participated in the Asia-Pacific Regional Forum on Internet Governance held in Taiwan. Her research on AI in education secured her a seat at this prestigious UN event. According to her, AI in education should be promoted, contrary to the reservations many educators globally hold.

“Despite NEP 2020 and the Government of India promoting Artificial Intelligence in higher education, few state-level universities, schools, or colleges have adopted it fully. The key is to use AI productively, which requires laws and policies that regulate its usage, while controlling and monitoring potential abuse,” she explained.

The event is scheduled to take place from September 22 to 26 at the United Nations headquarters in the USA.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending