Top Stories
No Taylor Swift Deposition In Blake Lively-Justin Baldoni Case: Judge

To paraphrase Taylor Swift‘s ‘Blank Space,” the superstar had a day that was a bit of a nightmare dressed like a legal dream with Justin Baldoni.
Now, just more than 24 hours after the It Ends With Us director-star again sought to drag Swift into his seemingly never-ending docket drama with Blake Lively, the federal judge overseeing the case has put the boot to any deposition from the Eras Tour performer.
At the same time, Judge Lewis Liman delivered a win to Lively. The Another Simple Favor star was granted a 10-day extension on depositions for Baldoni and his Wayfarer Studios co-founders Steve Sarowitz and Jamey Heath as the discovery process moves into its final weeks.
“The Wayfarer Parties have filed a response opposing Lively’s request and seeking their own extension of the deposition deadline to the end of October for the purpose of scheduling deposition of non-party Taylor Swift,” the judge, the sibling of director Doug Liman, also wrote in a four-page order filed just now.
“The Wayfarer Parties contend that their requested extension is necessary because Swift’s preexisting professional obligations now prevent her from being deposed within the current discovery window,” he added, summarizing the effort to skip over Swift’s October 3 release of her new album The Life of a Showgirl and have her sit for questioning by lawyers sometime between October 20-25 over these nearly yearlong sexual harassment and retaliation allegations.
As he has in the past, Liman cut to the chase:
“The Wayfarer Parties have not similarly demonstrated good cause for their requested extension. The only justification they have provided for the extension is their assertion that Swift’s preexisting professional obligations now prevent her from appearing for a deposition prior to October 20, 2025. Importantly, however, the Wayfarer Parties have provided no discussion of when they began attempting to schedule the deposition. Discovery has been ongoing in this case for approximately six months. The Wayfarer Parties previously requested Swift’s deposition in May 2025 before ultimately withdrawing the subpoena. They have offered no evidence that they have served a renewed subpoena on Swift. Thus, at most, the Wayfarer Parties have demonstrated that scheduling the deposition now presents logistical difficulties; that does not answer the question of why the deposition ‘“’could not have been conducted earlier.” Having failed to demonstrate appropriate diligence, the requested extension is denied.”
Following a day that saw lawyers for Lively and Swift contradict the assertion from Baldoni’s side that the godmother to one of Lively and Ryan Reynolds’ children had “agreed” to the deposition and the requested extension because of the lead-up to her new album, there was silence from Baldoni’s camp after Liman’s order dropped. Reps for Baldoni did not respond to a request for comment.
For that matter, reps for the recently engaged Swift also did not reply, but that isn’t much of a surprise based on what her side said earlier in the day.
“My client did not agree to a deposition, but if she is forced into a deposition, we advised (after first hearing about the deposition just three days ago) that her schedule would accommodate the time required during the week of October 20 if the parties were able to work out their disputes,” attorney Douglas Baldridge wrote to Liman on Friday afternoon.
With the trial date of March 9, 2026 looming for Lively’s action against Baldoni and Wayfarer over what actually occurred on the set of IEWU and the so-called smear campaign that erupted around the Sony-distributed film’s premiere, it is unclear whether this will be the last we hear of Swift in the case. In May, Baldoni’s lead lawyer Bryan Freedman tried to subpoena Swift, but as Liman noted today, they put the kibosh on their action after a days-long media frenzy. Later, the Wayfarer team said it got what they needed voluntarily from Swift — who may or may not be on the outs with her old pal Lively. An assertion that Swift’s Baldridge later contested.
Earlier today, Lively’s lawyers called Team Baldoni’s desire to get IEWU soundtrack contributor Swift in the thick of the case just another move to “fuel their relentless media strategy.”
In that context, today was a success for Baldoni, who is now facing other accusations of verbal abuse and harassment from another woman. However, in a very rudimentary approach, the day belongs to Lively, who got what she wanted on all levels, at least this time.
Top Stories
Canelo vs Crawford: ‘Terence Crawford is the new face of boxing’

Alvarez arrived at the news conference marked up but unbowed. “I’m going to continue,” he said, swiftly putting to bed any suggestion he might call it a day.
As a teenager, the flame-haired fighter would ride Guadalajara’s city buses for hours, peddling ice creams just to help his family get by.
His first paydays in the ring were scarcely better – a few dollars here, a handful of ticket sales there.
In Vegas Alvarez was counting a reported purse of $150m (£111m). A man who once sold ice creams now earns fortunes big enough to buy factories.
Yet with superstardom comes scrutiny. Critics point to grey areas in his career: the debatable scorecards against Erislandy Lara and at least one of his trilogy bouts with Gennady Golovkin, fights that many felt should have gone the other way.
Others still refuse to move past his six-month ban in 2018 after failing two drugs tests, something Alvarez says was caused by contaminated meat.
Questions now linger over whether Alvarez is fading. His last outing against William Scull was a rather below-par performance, and his own words hint at the struggle.
“Sometimes you try and your body cannot go – that’s the frustration. I try it and my body does not let me go. You need to accept it,” he said.
Asked what troubled him most about Crawford, Alvarez said: “Everything. He has everything.”
Top Stories
Canelo Alvarez vs. Terence Crawford fight: Results, winners, highlights, fight card, complete guide

Terence Crawford is crowding the history books. On Saturday, Crawford became the first three-division undisputed boxing champion of the four-belt era, overcoming his status as a marginal underdog to beat super middleweight champ Canelo Alvarez.
Crawford moved up two weight classes to pursue greatness. The added muscle did not hamper him. Crawford implemented his signature speed and elusiveness with expert precision, dodging Alvarez’s bombs and returning fire in combinations. Crawford fearlessly took momentum back each time it seemed Alvarez was building towards something. The outcome: a unanimous decision win for “Bud.”
Crawford is already the inaugural two-division undisputed boxing champion, a feat since accomplished by Naoya Inoue and Oleksandr Usyk. Crawford once again set himself apart from his contemporaries by becoming the only person to achieve undisputed status in three weight classes. Beating Alvarez eclipsed his acclaimed 2023 win over Errol Spence Jr. Boxing politics often interfered in Crawford’s ability to secure major fights, but he scored a legacy-boosting box office win in Las Vegas.
Saturday’s undercard featured a memorable WBC interim super middleweight title clash between Christian M’billi and Lester Martinez. They brawled tooth-and-nail for 10 rounds. Their memorable performance ended in a draw, spurring anticipation for a rematch. The co-main event saw Callum Walsh improve to 15-0 against Fernando Vargas Jr.
CBS Sports was with you throughout fight week with the latest news, in-depth features and betting advice to consider. Thanks for stopping by.
Canelo vs. Crawford fight card, results
- Terence Crawford def. Canelo Alvarez (c) via unanimous decision (116-112, 115-113, 115-113)
- Callum Walsh def. Fernando Vargas Jr. via unanimous decision (99-91, 99-91, 100-90)
- Christian M’billi (c) vs. Lester Martinez ends in a split draw (93-97, 96-94, 95-95)
- Mohammed Alakel def. Travis Crawford via unanimous decision (99-91, 99-91 98-92)
Canelo vs. Crawford info
- Date: Sept. 13
- Location: Allegiant Stadium — Las Vegas
- Start time: 9 p.m. ET (Main card)
- How to watch: Netflix (subscription required)
Canelo vs. Crawford countdown
Top Stories
No. 16 Texas A&M survives slugfest vs. No. 8 Notre Dame with game-winning drive: Takeaways

By Ralph Russo, Pete Sampson and David Ubben
Nate Boerkircher hauled in an 11-yard touchdown pass from Marcel Reed with 13 seconds left, and No. 16 Texas A&M took advantage of No. 8 Notre Dame’s botched extra point to survive 41-40 on Saturday night at Notre Dame Stadium.
Facing a ranked opponent for the second time early this season, the Fighting Irish (0-2) found themselves in another game that went down to the final possessions. Notre Dame lost 27-24 at Miami in Week 1.
Texas A&M (3-0) beat a ranked opponent on the road for the first time since late in the 2014 season, when the Aggies knocked off No. 3 Auburn.
INSANITY! TEXAS A&M SCORES THE WINNER ON 4TH AND GOAL! 🤯 pic.twitter.com/iHtgqqkKwq
— NBC Sports (@NBCSports) September 14, 2025
Notre Dame running back Jeremiyah Love ran for a 12-yard touchdown with 2:53 left in the fourth quarter to cap a methodical 75-yard drive that included a fourth-and-1 conversion in field-goal range and gave Notre Dame a 40-34 lead. But holder Tyler Buchner dropped what looked like a solid snap, and the point after failed with an incomplete pass into the end zone by the backup quarterback.
A&M looked as if it answered immediately with Terry Bussey returning the ensuing kickoff for a touchdown, but a holding penalty on A&M brought it back and instead put the Aggies at their own 26 to start the drive with 2:41 left. They quickly drove into Notre Dame territory, and a holding penalty on Irish cornerback Christian Gray set up the Aggies with a first-and-goal at the 10 with 39 seconds left in regulation.
Three bad downs then set up fourth-and-goal from the 11 with 19 seconds left.
After a Notre Dame timeout, and with the home crowd blaring, Reed calmly bought some time and floated a pass to Boerkicher, who made the contested catch. A&M’s PAT was perfect, and Notre Dame didn’t have enough time to answer.
Notre Dame fell to 14-8 against ranked opponents under coach Marcus Freeman.
Marcel Reed’s flourishment
Texas A&M didn’t just win a game, it learned a lot about its offense and quarterback.
Last season, first-year starter Reed’s production spiked late in the season after a slow start. He looks like a much more developed passer in his second season.
Reed racked up a career-high 360 yards on 17-of-37 passing for his first career 300-yard game in the win against the nation’s runner-up a season ago, boasting two of the nation’s top corners in Leonard Moore and Gray. No completion was bigger than Reed’s scrambling touchdown pass — his second of the night — to tight end Boerkircher that gave the Aggies the win.
Reed was showing anticipation, throwing with accuracy and hitting throws he rarely hit consistently last year. And it helps that he’s got an upgraded group of speedy receivers in KC Concepcion from NC State, Mario Craver from Mississippi State and Bussey. Craver hauled in an 86-yard catch and run in the first half from Reed, who completed the pass rolling left. Craver’s seven-catch, 207-yard night made him the Aggies’ first 200-yard receiver since Mike Evans in 2013. That can’t happen with an improved passer like Reed.
Moore and Gray were battling injuries, but Reed is showing the kind of growth that gives A&M an offense balanced enough to contend for the SEC. — David Ubben, college football writer
And Notre Dame’s defensive decline
Notre Dame built last year’s run to the national championship game around its defense under coordinator Al Golden and a veteran spine that included two sixth-year seniors and a two-time All-American. It’s proving much harder to replace all that than Marcus Freeman would have expected.
The Irish were picked apart by Reed, who put Notre Dame in unfamiliar and uncomfortable territory. By halftime, the Irish defense allowed the same number of touchdowns through six quarters (seven) as it did in the first six games of last season. Apparent injuries to cornerbacks Moore and Gray didn’t help. Neither did the Aggies’ speed at wide receiver, which got behind the Irish secondary all game.
The shock of Notre Dame’s defense taking this big of a step back this quickly should send up alarm bells, as first-year coordinator Chris Ash has yet to find the right formula for a defense expected to pick up where last year’s left off. The Irish didn’t sack Reed after taking down Carson Beck just once in the loss at Miami. Notre Dame forced its first turnover of the season but finished with just the Moore interception. And the Irish posted just two tackles for loss all night.
Notre Dame’s defense won’t be tested by speed like Texas A&M for the next month, perhaps not until USC visits on Oct. 18. But with a defense that’s putting some vexing material on tape, it’s not clear how much Notre Dame can rely on its defense moving forward.
Once a known quantity, the Irish defense is now a riddle that Ash needs to solve as soon as possible. Notre Dame won’t make the College Football Playoff unless he does. — Pete Sampson, Notre Dame beat writer
An offensive battle
Texas A&M coach Mike Elko was back at Notre Dame for the first time since he was the defensive coordinator for the Fighting Irish under Brian Kelly in 2017. He wasn’t happy with his Aggies in the first half, slinging a folding chair and lighting into his players on the bench after a Notre Dame touchdown to make it 14-7.
After a Notre Dame touchdown, Texas A&M coach Mike Elko tossed a chair while yelling at his defense.
Noah Eagle: That chair, we’re gonna have to check on. Because the well-being doesn’t appear to be super high. pic.twitter.com/ebwLITWkx9
— Awful Announcing (@awfulannouncing) September 14, 2025
It didn’t get much better for either defense. The Aggies and Irish combined for 917 yards.
The first game of this home-and-home between the Irish and Aggies was a slugfest in College Station last year, too, won 23-13 by Notre Dame after Love broke off a late, long TD run.
In Texas A&M’s first trip to South Bend since 2000 on Saturday, the teams combined for 52 points in the first half, including three short rushing touchdowns by Le’Veon Moss that put the Aggies up 28-24.
Notre Dame opened the scoring by pulling out a trick it perfected last season: the blocked kick. Loghan Thomas smothered a punt on the first possession of the game, and Tae Johnson grabbed the bouncing ball in stride for a 20-yard touchdown return to begin what would be a heated offensive battle. — Ralph Russo, college football writer
(Photo: Joe Robbins / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)
-
Business2 weeks ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms1 month ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy2 months ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers3 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Education2 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Education2 months ago
Macron says UK and France have duty to tackle illegal migration ‘with humanity, solidarity and firmness’ – UK politics live | Politics
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi
-
Funding & Business3 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries