Connect with us

AI Insights

Companies Rehire Human Workers to Fix Artificial Intelligence Generated Content After Mass Layoffs

Published

on


IN A NUTSHELL
  • 🤖 Companies increasingly use AI to replace human workers, highlighting the trend of automation.
  • 🔄 Many businesses find that AI outputs lack quality, leading to a return to human expertise.
  • 👥 Freelancers like Lisa Carstens and Harsh Kumar are rehired to fix AI-generated content.
  • 💼 The evolving landscape poses questions about fair compensation for human improvements to AI work.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into workplaces has become a prevalent trend, often at the expense of human employees. This shift, while aiming to optimize efficiency and cut costs, has exposed the limitations of relying solely on AI. As companies increasingly replace human roles with AI, they encounter unforeseen challenges that highlight the irreplaceable value of human expertise. The journey reveals the complex dynamics between technology adoption and workforce sustainability, raising important questions about the future of work and the role of AI in it.

AI’s Shortcomings Lead to Reemployment

While AI promises to revolutionize industries by automating tasks, its execution often falls short, leading companies to reconsider their human workforce. AI-generated outputs frequently lack the nuance and precision that human creativity and expertise bring. For instance, textual content may appear repetitive, designs might lack clarity, and AI-generated code could result in unstable applications. These deficiencies compel businesses to turn back to the very employees they had previously let go.

Lisa Carstens, an independent illustrator and designer, experienced firsthand the limitations of AI. Based in Spain, Carstens found herself rehired to fix AI-generated visuals that were, at best, superficially appealing and, at worst, unusable. She noted that many companies assumed AI could operate without human intervention, only to realize the opposite.

“ChatGPT Crushes All Competition”: OpenAI’s Bot Gets 46.6 Billion Visits While Controlling 83% of Global AI Traffic Right Now

“There are people who understand AI’s imperfections and those who become frustrated when it doesn’t perform as expected,” Carstens explains, highlighting the delicate balance freelancers must maintain when rectifying AI’s mistakes.

The Emergence of a New Freelance Economy

AI has inadvertently given rise to a new type of freelance work focused on improving AI-generated content. Developers like Harsh Kumar, based in India, have seen a resurgence in demand for their skills as AI’s limitations become apparent. Clients who invested heavily in AI coding tools often found the results to be unsatisfactory, leading them to seek human expertise to salvage projects.

“We Built A Walking Robot From Just 18 Metal Parts”: Tokyo Engineers Create Open-Source Bipedal Robot That Anyone Can Assemble At Home

Kumar echoes the sentiment that AI can enhance productivity but cannot entirely replace human input. “Humans will remain essential for long-term projects,” he asserts, emphasizing that AI, created by humans, still requires human oversight. While work is plentiful, the nature of assignments has evolved, with a focus on refining and iterating upon AI’s initial attempts at content creation.

The Challenges of Human-AI Collaboration

The dynamic between AI and human workers is not without its challenges. While companies that over-relied on AI often seek to rehire their former employees, they also attempt to reduce compensation for these roles. The justification is that the work now involves refining existing AI-generated content rather than creating it from scratch.

“Robotic Arms Move Like Dancers”: AI System Choreographs Factory Robots That Solve 40 Tasks In Seconds While Traditional Programming Takes Hours Of Human Work

This shift highlights a more integrated human-machine collaboration where both entities contribute uniquely to the final product. However, it also raises questions about fair compensation and the value of human expertise in a world increasingly influenced by AI. As companies attempt to balance cost-cutting with quality assurance, the debate over appropriate remuneration for freelance revisions of AI work continues.

AI in the Workplace: A Double-Edged Sword

While AI offers numerous advantages, such as increased efficiency and cost savings, it also presents significant challenges. Businesses must navigate the delicate balance between adopting AI technologies and maintaining a skilled human workforce. The experiences of freelancers like Carstens and Kumar underline the necessity of human oversight in ensuring AI-generated content meets industry standards.

As AI continues to evolve, companies must critically assess its role in their operations. The initial allure of AI-driven cost reductions must be weighed against the potential for subpar results and the subsequent need for human intervention. This ongoing evaluation highlights the importance of strategic planning in technology adoption, ensuring that businesses maximize AI’s benefits without compromising quality.

As AI becomes further entrenched in workplaces, companies must decide how best to leverage technology while valuing human contributions. The need for skilled professionals to enhance AI outputs underscores the irreplaceable nature of human expertise. Will businesses find a sustainable model that harmonizes technological advancements with human creativity and skill, or will the pendulum swing back toward a more human-centric approach?

This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies.

Did you like it? 4.5/5 (24)



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI Insights

Artificial intelligence helps break barriers for Hispanic homeownership | Business

Published

on



























Artificial intelligence helps break barriers for Hispanic homeownership | Business | journalgazette.net


We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which
enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time.

For any issues, contact jgnews@jg.net or call 260-461-8773.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Insights

UW lab spinoff focused on AI-enabled protein design cancer treatments

Published

on


A Seattle startup company has inked a deal with Eli Lilly to develop AI powered cancer treatments. The team at Lila Biologics says they’re pioneering the translation of AI design proteins for therapeutic applications. Anindya Roy is the company’s co-founder and chief scientist. He told KUOW’s Paige Browning about their work.

This interview has been edited for clarity.

Paige Browning: Tell us about Lila Biologics. You spun out of UW Professor David Baker’s protein design lab. What’s Lila’s origin story?

Anindya Roy: I moved to David Baker’s group as a postdoctoral scientist, where I was working on some of the molecules that we are currently developing at Lila. It is an absolutely fantastic place to work. It was one of the coolest experiences of my career.

The Institute for Protein Design has a program called the Translational Investigator Program, which incubates promising technologies before it spins them out. I was part of that program for four or five years where I was generating some of the translational data. I met Jake Kraft, the CEO of Lila Biologics, at IPD, and we decided to team up in 2023 to spin out Lila.

You got a huge boost recently, a collaboration with Eli Lilly, one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies. What are you hoping to achieve together, and what’s your timeline?

The current collaboration is one year, and then there are other targets that we can work on. We are really excited to be partnering with Lilly, mainly because, as you mentioned, it is one of the top pharma companies in the US. We are excited to learn from each other, as well as leverage their amazing clinical developmental team to actually develop medicine for patients who don’t have that many options currently.

You are using artificial intelligence and machine learning to create cancer treatments. What exactly are you developing?

Lila Biologics is a pre-clinical stage company. We use machine learning to design novel drugs. We have mainly two different interests. One is to develop targeted radiotherapy to treat solid tumors, and the second is developing long acting injectables for lung and heart diseases. What I mean by long acting injectables is something that you take every three or six months.

Tell me a little bit more about the type of tumors that you are focusing on.

We have a wide variety of solid tumors that we are going for, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer. That’s something that we are really focused on.

And tell me a little bit about the partnership you have with Eli Lilly. What are you creating there when it comes to cancers?

The collaboration is mainly centered around targeted radiotherapy for treating solid tumors, and it’s a multi-target research collaboration. Lila Biologics is responsible for giving Lilly a development candidate, which is basically an optimized drug molecule that is ready for FDA filing. Lilly will take over after we give them the optimized molecule for the clinical development and taking those molecules through clinical trials.

Why use AI for this? What edge is that giving you, or what opportunities does it have that human intelligence can’t accomplish?

In the last couple of years, artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed how we actually design proteins. For example, in last five years, the success rate of designing protein in the computer has gone from around one to 2% to 10% or more. With that unprecedented success rate, we do believe we can bring a lot of drugs needed for the patients, especially for cancer and cardiovascular diseases.

In general, drug design is a very, very difficult problem, and it has really, really high failure rates. So, for example, 90% of the drugs that actually enter the clinic actually fail, mainly due to you cannot make them in scale, or some toxicity issues. When we first started Lila, we thought we can take a holistic approach, where we can actually include some of this downstream risk in the computational design part. So, we asked, can machine learning help us designing proteins that scale well? Meaning, can we make them in large scale, or they’re stable on the benchtop for months, so we don’t face those costly downstream failures? And so far, it’s looking really promising.

When did you realize you might be able to use machine learning and AI to treat cancer?

When we actually looked at this problem, we were thinking whether we can actually increase the clinical success rate. That has been one of the main bottlenecks of drug design. As I mentioned before, 90% of the drugs that actually enter the clinic fail. So, we are really hoping we can actually change that in next five to 10 years, where you can actually confidently predict the clinical properties of a molecule. In other words, what I’m trying to say is that can you predict how a molecule will behave in a living system. And if we can do that confidently, that will increase the success rate of drug development. And we are really optimistic, and we’ll see how it turns out in the next five to 10 years.

Beyond treating hard to tackle tumors at Lila, are there other challenges you hope to take on in the future?

Yeah. It is a really difficult problem to predict how a molecule will behave in a living system. Meaning, we are really good at designing molecules that behave in a certain way, bind to a protein in a certain way, but the moment you try to put that molecule in a human, it’s really hard to predict how that molecule will behave, or whether the molecule is going to the place of the disease, or the tissue of the disease. And that is one of the main reasons there is a 90% failure in drug development.

I think the whole field is moving towards this predictability of biological properties of a molecule, where you can actually predict how this molecule will behave in a human system, or how long it will stay in the body. I think when the computational tools become good enough, when we can predict these properties really well, I think that’s where the fun begins, and we can actually generate molecules with a really high success rate in a really short period of time.

Listen to the interview by clicking the play button above.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Insights

California governor facing balancing act as AI bills head to his desk | MLex

Published

on


By Amy Miller ( September 13, 2025, 00:43 GMT | Comment) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom is facing a balancing act as more than a dozen bills aimed at regulating artificial intelligence tools in a wide range of settings head to his desk for approval. He could approve bills to push back on the Trump administration’s industry-friendly avoidance of AI regulation and make California a model for other states — or he could nix bills to please wealthy Silicon Valley companies and their lobbyists.California Gov. Gavin Newsom is facing a balancing act as more than a dozen bills aimed at regulating artificial intelligence tools in a wide range of settings head to his desk for approval….

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.

Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending