Connect with us

Top Stories

They want a COVID shot to protect their health or at-risk family. They can’t get it : Shots

Published

on


Therese McRae with her daughter (left), Stephan Neidenbach (upper right, with his wife Jennifer, and their children) and Jason Mitton (lower right) all want the COVID vaccine and are having trouble getting it.

Therese McRae; Stephan Neidenbach; and Jason Mitton


hide caption

toggle caption

Therese McRae; Stephan Neidenbach; and Jason Mitton

Jason Mitton wanted one of the new COVID-19 vaccines before leaving on a business trip. But the pharmacists at a drug store near his home in Austin, Texas, refused.

“He’s like: ‘Do you have a doctor’s note?’ I said: ‘No, I don’t.’ He said: ‘Well, the FDA standards say that you don’t qualify. And our policy is that we won’t administer it unless you qualify,'” says Mitton.

Mitton, who’s 55 and says he has high blood pressure and high cholesterol that’s controlled by medication, plans to keep trying to get vaccinated.

“I think it’s ridiculous,” Mitton says. “I think it should be a person’s right to get the vaccine or not. So I’m very angry.”

The same goes for Cheryl Huges, 64, who lives outside Cleveland. She was planning to get another shot as soon as the updated versions became available. But, she’s not eligible.

“I’m furious,” says Hughes. “Who wants to get sick?”

For the first time, COVID vaccines aren’t available to anyone ages 6 months and older to obtain simply by walking into a pharmacy and asking to get inoculated.

In a major departure, the Food and Drug Administration only approved the shots for those at greatest risk for getting seriously ill from COVID because they’re at least 65 years old or have another health issue that makes them highly vulnerable.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other Trump administration health officials argue that most otherwise healthy, younger people have so much immunity that they don’t necessarily need annual boosters anymore.

But many Americans who don’t meet the new criteria do still want to get vaccinated to avoid getting sick or spreading the virus to vulnerable family members.

And independent medical organizations like the Infectious Disease Society of America argue that everyone should have the option to get vaccinated because there is convincing evidence that the vaccines reduce the risk of serious complications, including hospitalization and death, even for people who are otherwise healthy.

Hughes wants to remain healthy so she can care for her husband, who has dementia. She’s his only caretaker.

“If I get sick, my husband might have to go into a care facility. I could lose my job. It would be terrible,” Hughes says.

What it takes to get the shot

Secretary Kennedy has repeatedly claimed the new rules won’t prevent anyone from getting vaccinated if they want to. But many people have told NPR that they are having trouble.

In principle, you can still get vaccinated if you meet the criteria, get a doctor to prescribe a shot, or if you “self attest” that you’re eligible by telling the pharmacist you meet the criteria.

But sometimes people are turned away because supplies of the reformulated shots haven’t arrived yet. Sometimes it’s because they didn’t meet the new criteria. Or they’re told they can get a shot if they get a prescription first, only to be inexplicably rejected anyway when they return with a doctor’s order.

Some people describe hunting for a shot from pharmacy to pharmacy and doctor’s office to doctor’s office — even sometimes seeking one out of state.

The companies that make the shots, Moderna, Pfizer and Novavax, didn’t say exactly how many doses they were making this year, given the narrower FDA approvals. But Pfizer says it is preparing “similar volumes” as last year, and that it’s confident it will meet demand. It also says millions of doses have already shipped.

Claire Hannan, the executive director of the Association of Immunization Managers, says she doesn’t expect vaccine supply to be a problem. She says pharmacies are able to order the COVID shots and they’ve been shipped out.

“I think it’s going to be harder to access,” she says. “But I think anybody that wants it, you know, will be able to get it. But they’re just going to have to work hard to find it.”

But some clinics and pharmacies haven’t received the supplies they’ve ordered yet. And some doctors’ offices, including pediatricians, and clinics may decide not to stock the shots this year if they don’t expect enough demand.

If you’re trying to find one, Pfizer and Moderna both have vaccine-finder websites up and running.

Waiting for the CDC’s guidance

One major snag is that pharmacists in some states are prohibited from administering the shots until the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issues specific recommendations for who should get vaccinated.

In past years, those recommendations came in the spring. But Kennedy fired the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the independent group that formulates those recommendations, and replaced the members with his own advisers.

Kennedy’s new committee is finally scheduled to meet next week about the COVID vaccines and other issues. That could alleviate some of the problems, including hesitancy that some pharmacists and doctors have because of the changing rules and confusion.

But it remains unclear what the advisers will do. They could make it easier, or harder, for people to get a shot. Many of the committee’s new members share Kennedy’s anti-vaccine views.

Either way, until the committee meeting happens, the shots that are part of the Vaccines for Children Program won’t ship, says Hannan, who explained that people haven’t been able to order them yet. About half of kids in the U.S. are eligible for free vaccines through the program.

Health insurance coverage could also prove tricky. Although Aetna and United Healthcare told NPR they will cover the COVID shot with no cost sharing for people with fully insured plans — even for people outside the FDA’s narrower approval — it’s not clear what other insurance companies will do. And even people who have Aetna or United could have other kinds of plans that don’t cover the shot, which could set patients back around $200.

Fears for vulnerable family members, kids

In the meantime, many Americans have been scrambling to try to figure out how to still get vaccinated.

“I’m very angry, frustrated,” says Allison Cote, 32, of Bristol, Conn.

Cote wants to stay well to protect her father, who has heart failure, other family members who have diabetes, and one relative who recently got a kidney transplant.

She’s also concerned about her 16-month-old son. He’s not eligible to get vaccinated either this year, even though COVID can be very dangerous for babies. The new shots are only approved for children who have conditions that put them at high risk.

In fact, the CDC this spring dropped recommendations that children and pregnant women routinely get vaccinated. For children, the agency recommends parents talk to their doctors first about vaccinating their children.

“It’s just really upsetting,” Cote says. “Why do I have to jump through hoops to do this? It’s kind of scary.”

If she has to, Cote says she may do what some people are doing: just say she’s eligible. But she doesn’t feel great about that. And she has no idea how to get a shot for her baby boy.

“It’s hard to watch this play out and know that there are so many lives at risk — and potentially my son’s life is at risk too,” Cote says.

Stephan Neidenbach, 45, a public school teacher from Annapolis, Md., is frustrated and angry too. He’s worried about getting sick and spreading the virus to his students, his elderly parents or his mother-in-law, who has lung problems.

“I would feel horrible if I did get it and if I passed it off to someone that I cared about. It’s terrifying,” Neidenbach says.

He’s considering fibbing about his eligibility to get a shot too.

Therese McRae, 37, of Sandy, Utah, also wants to get vaccinated. Her main motivation is to protect her 4-year-old daughter, who has Type 1 diabetes, which puts her at risk for serious complications.

“Being a parent of a young child with a complex medical diagnosis is hard enough,” McRae says. “Having folks around her not being able to be vaccinated increases her risk. It’s just very overwhelming. It’s scary.”

Karen Lambey, 43, who lives near Richmond, Va., desperately wants a vaccine too. She says she became immunocompromised after developing long COVID. Her pharmacist told her she needed a prescription to get the shot and she hasn’t been able to find a doctor to give her one.

“Any sort of flu, COVID, would set me back significantly,” Lambey says. “These are all extra hurdles that keep adding up. I feel disappointed because this is something that is important to my health.”

And Lambey’s parents are immune compromised too. She’s afraid of spreading the virus to them. “That could potentially be life-threatening for them,” she says. “I couldn’t live with that.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Stories

Farm Aid on as University of Minnesota, Teamsters reach deal to end strike

Published

on


Sources familiar with negotiations said Gov. Tim Walz’s office got involved late in the game to help reach a deal after Nelson’s call.

On Friday night, Nelson posted on X that he spoke to Walz and appreciated his involvement: “We both know that ultimately, it’s up to the university to do the right thing, and soon, so that Farm Aid 40 can go forward.”

In response, Gov. Walz posted on X around midnight: “We’ll get ‘er done, Willie.”

The university had not added new information to its strike update website and did not respond to requests for comment Saturday morning.

“I was happy to walk the picket line with the U of MN Teamsters. They deserve respect and fair wages for their work at the university,” Regent Robyn Gulley said Saturday, speaking as an individual Regent. “This strike is a lesson on the power of solidarity for working class families. Everyone should have a union.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Trump says he’s ready to put ‘major sanctions’ on Russia if NATO nations do the same

Published

on


President Donald Trump said Saturday he is “ready to do major Sanctions on Russia” once all NATO countries have started “to do the same thing” and pause their purchases of oil from Moscow.

He also urged NATO countries to impose “50% to 100% TARIFFS ON CHINA,” which he said should be withdrawn after the Russia-Ukraine war has concluded.

“China has a strong control, and even grip, over Russia, and these powerful Tariffs will break that grip,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post, which he said was the text of a letter sent to all NATO nations and “the world.”

Trump has repeatedly threatened to impose sanctions on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, but has so far held off from doing so.

Earlier this month, the president said he was prepared to move towards a second phase of sanctioning Russia, but has not yet imposed the levies.

Part of Trump’s reluctance to impose the strict economic punishments may be in part because he hopes he can broker a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, analysts previously told CNBC.

“The second reason … is there is a sense that if Russia is defeated … then it has no choice but to go even further all-in with China, and that potentially then would strengthen China’s position,” Chris Weafer, the chief executive of Moscow-based Macro-Advisory, told CNBC earlier this month.

Trump’s Saturday post underscores that he is shifting his focus to NATO nations to put pressure on Russia to end its war.

“As you know, NATO’S commitment to WIN has been far less than 100%, and the purchase of Russian Oil, by some, has been shocking!” Trump wrote in the post.

“It greatly weakens your negotiating position, and bargaining power, over Russia,” he continued.

Hungary and Slovakia have continued to buy Russian fossil fuels, drawing criticism from Trump officials.

“We want to displace all Russian gas. President Trump, America, and all the nations of the EU, we want to end the Russian-Ukraine war,” U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said Friday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

College football Week 3 best bets: Will Darian Mensah put up a big game against his former team?

Published

on


“Sometimes it’s best to be lucky” sums up last week’s best bets from my College Football Projection Model. The model churned out a winning week, but the way that two of the winners got home was impressive.

Louisville and Syracuse, both favorites, somehow managed to cover by the hook (the final half-point of a spread) in games that I wasn’t even sure they were going to win. So yeah, it pays to be lucky. If there is a lesson, though, it’s that both games won by the hook, but if you didn’t bet them at the number that I bet during publish, you either pushed or lost. Even my worst price to bet would have gone 1-0-1 but the closing line would have gone 0-1-1. I say it every week, but getting the best of the number is vital to long-term success.

Last week’s record: 3-2, +0.80 units
Season record: 5-4, +0.60 units, 6.0% ROI

Five bets to kick off Week 3, and at least three that are a half-point off from getting onto the card, so stay tuned there. Hopefully we can have a big week, but I’ll settle for a modest winning one like last week. As always, shop around for the best price and good luck!

College football Week 3 best bets

Colorado +4.5 (-110) at Houston

I don’t like this bet one bit, but the numbers are what they are. I think Houston is improved and Colorado is trending down, but this is a bit too much for my taste. This seems like a buy-low spot on Colorado and a sell-high spot on Houston. My numbers actually have this game closer to a pick ’em, so getting 4.5 is a must-buy.

Worst price to bet: Colorado +4 (-110)

Arkansas at Ole Miss under 61.5 (-110)

Well, both of these teams like to play at a lightning pace and have scored 50-plus points in three of the four games they’ve played so far this season. Arkansas hasn’t played anybody good yet, and Ole Miss played Kentucky in their only game against solid competition. The total points in that game ended up being 53. I’m not saying we will see this game go into the low 50s, but I’m not as scared of the pace if I believe you’re going to struggle to find consistent offense down to down.

Worst price to bet: Under 61 (-110)

South Alabama at Auburn under 55.5 (-115)

Maybe I’m overrating the Auburn defense, but I think South Alabama is going to have loads of problems in this matchup. I also have an edge on Auburn against the spread here, but don’t really care to get involved in such a big spread. Similarly to the game above, South Alabama will want to play at a fast pace, but it doesn’t matter too much when you’re not able to move the ball. My only worry here is Auburn scoring a ton, but with two consecutive ranked road games on deck to precede a stretch of four ranked opponents in five weeks, I think they’ll want to get in and out with a clean bill of health.

Worst price to bet: Under 54.5 (-110)

Western Michigan at Illinois over 50.5 (-110)

The pace won’t be anything to get excited about here, but I think Western Michigan will play faster than expected. Last week against North Texas, the Broncos played incredibly slowly, but they were in the lead for the majority of the game. They’ll likely be trailing in this matchup, and their pace will likely match closer to their game against Michigan State. They’ll still need to find a way to move the ball, but my number on this total is in the mid-50s.

Worst price to bet: Over 51 (-110)

Duke at Tulane under 54.5 (-105)

BetMGM is giving us the best price in the market by a considerable margin here, so I’ll gladly scoop this up. Tulane is good, but I think the Duke defense will have a talent advantage to slow them down and keep this a lower-scoring game. Sure, some will say Duke quarterback Darian Mensah will want to put up a big game against his former team, but I’m not buying into that narrative. Let’s keep the fireworks to a minimum here, please.

Worst price to bet: Under 52.5 (-110)

New bets added Friday

South Carolina -3 (-110) vs. Vanderbilt

Worst price to bet: South Carolina -3 (-115)

(Photo of Darian Mensah: Lance King / Getty Images)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending