Connect with us

Education

Artificial intelligence is here to stay, so let’s teach it in class

Published

on


Editor’s Note: This article was written for Mosaic, an independent journalism training program for high school students who report and photograph stories under the guidance of professional journalists.

As a 16-year-old high school student living in the Bay Area, I notice artificial intelligence being used around me daily. At my school, I’ve seen students submitting AI-generated work as their own, rather than taking the time to research, write and truly understand content.

Teachers see this and fear that students will go out in the real world and not know how to think critically without consulting a machine first. They see how it has already created an overreliance on shortcuts, weaker problem-solving skills and lower writing ability in their students. In response, many teachers have banned AI from their classrooms.

I’ll be honest: sometimes I use AI in school, too. By asking ChatGPT to help me explain the meaning of a piece of text or asking it to identify flaws in my writing, I intentionally use AI to help me learn. But when some of my peers use it to generate their entire assignments, it leads teachers to see any use of AI — whether it be productive or exploitative — as a lazy way to cheat, and it makes me feel guilty to use it at all.

It’s understandable why many educators feel this way, and researchers agree. For example, in a 2024 study published by the journal Societies, a sampling of 666 people showed that younger participants reported a higher use of AI tools but displayed lower critical-thinking skills.

However, AI isn’t going away. Other studies show that the use of AI in the workplace and in education is rising. A 2025 Gallup poll of U.S. employees showed those who frequently use AI multiple times a week nearly doubled, from 11% to 19% in two years. It’s only becoming more integrated in the world we live in, and without being taught AI literacy in school, the future feels uncertain.

Completely wiping AI out from classrooms doesn’t work in the long term, because students still find ways to move around it and misuse it for their assignments. It’s easy for them to adapt by using content humanizers like Bypass GPT or AIHumanize to avoid being detected. Banning it does not solve the problem.

A ban also erases the opportunities that AI can give students to do better in school. For example, an English teacher might have students generate an essay using AI, then have them critique its writing style and argument, or compare it to their own essay to identify areas that can be improved.

Khanmigo, an AI platform developed by Khan Academy, can give students more practice problems in math when they struggle with a particular concept, and can work with them to learn, rather than handing them answers.

This is a chance for educators to teach students how to use AI responsibly — not as a substitute for creative and critical thought, but as a tool to support them in academics instead. AI is still a developing technology that presents ethical issues, like its substantial environmental impact and potential biases that can be introduced by algorithms. It’s also known to not always be reliable for credible information and research.

But I rarely see these issues being discussed around me — it’s a missed opportunity for teachers to encourage digital literacy and for students to engage with a technology that will ultimately shape our world.

Sophie Luo is a member of the class of 2027 at Irvington High School in Fremont.

Originally Published:



Source link

Education

Why Hotels Struggle with Tech Adoption, And How AI + Education Can Drive Digital Transformation

Published

on


Ask any hotelier what frustrates them about technology, and you’ll hear a familiar refrain:

“Why does our industry lag so far behind in digital transformation and AI?”

Compared to retail, travel tech, and even restaurants, hotels adopt operational technology at a crawl.

We know the common reasons:

  • Past tech projects that didn’t deliver ROI.
  • Solutions that felt designed in boardrooms, not lobbies.
  • Budgets stretched thinly by OTAs and rising costs.

All true. But in my 15+ years in hospitality tech, I’ve seen a deeper barrier, one that explains why even when budgets are available, adoption still stalls.

🚨 The biggest barrier is hoteliers’ lack of clear understanding about the quantifiable value of technology, especially AI-driven tools, in daily operations.

Understanding Before Adoption

Hospitality is a pragmatic business. Owners and GMs don’t adopt tools because they’re trendy; they adopt when they understand:

  • WHAT is the solution and the problem it solves,
  • HOW it works in a hotel context,
  • WHY is it the right fit for their specific operation.

Without this clarity, skepticism wins. And digital transformation and AI stalls.

AI in Hospitality: Marketing vs Operations

Right now, most AI adoption in hotels is happening at the guest-facing edge:

  • Chatbots for direct booking,
  • Automated email offers,
  • Upselling engines.

These feel safe: they’re visible, promise revenue, and rarely touch core operations.

But the bigger opportunity lies in operational AI:

  • Scheduling staff with fairness and efficiency,
  • Assigning rooms based on readiness and preferences,
  • Optimizing energy usage,
  • Predicting maintenance before breakdowns.

The irony? These are the areas where AI delivers the fastest ROI. Yet adoption is lowest because hoteliers don’t clearly see the value until it’s proven in their own P&L.

Why Digital Transformation Stalls Without Education

The word “digital transformation” can intimidate smaller properties. It sounds like a multimillion-dollar IT overhaul.

But when explained simply, it’s not about technology replacing hospitality, it’s about using AI and digital tools to remove friction from staff and guests alike.

The real obstacle isn’t the tech. It’s the education gap:

  • Vendors pitch features instead of explaining workflows.
  • Hoteliers hear jargon instead of ROI.
  • The conversation skips the basics, the WHAT, HOW, and WHY.

From Confusion to Confidence: The WHAT, HOW, WHY Framework

If we want adoption, we need to reset the conversation.

WHAT→ Define the category in plain terms (RMS, CRM, AI scheduler).

HOW→ Show how it integrates into hotel life without disruption.

WHY → Share specific, quantifiable ROI proven by peers.

This is how we move hoteliers from fear to trust, and from hesitation to adoption.

Quick Wins: The Proof Hotels Need

Digital transformation doesn’t need to begin with massive projects. It can start with quick AI wins that build confidence:

  • Staff Scheduling AI → Cuts overtime, reduces turnover, shows ROI in 2–3 payrolls.
  • Room Assignment AI → Prevents “not-ready” complaints, improves guest satisfaction.
  • Energy Optimization AI → Lowers bills immediately; frees budget for guest-facing upgrades.
  • Predictive Maintenance AI → Avoids costly outages, extending asset life.

Each of these is a small but powerful step that makes digital transformation feel real , not theoretical.

A Real Case Study: DoubleTree by Hilton Dartford Bridge

One striking example comes from the DoubleTree by Hilton Dartford Bridge a 170-room hotel in East London. Struggling under steep energy costs and system inefficiencies, the hotel partnered with Spacewell Energy and GETGEN to transform its infrastructure with AI-enhanced systems, without compromising guest comfort. Spacewell | A Nemetschek Company

What they did:

  • Conducted a feasibility study of energy systems and identified inefficiencies in their Building Management System (BMS).
  • Installed a purpose-built energy center with three Combined Heat & Power (CHP) units supplying electricity and hot water more efficiently.
  • Upgraded controls via a modern Tridium BMS, added variable speed drives, and optimized system controls across guest areas. Spacewell | A Nemetschek Company

Results achieved within 12 months:

  • Energy cost reduction: 65%, saving approximately £376,911
  • Operational and sustainability uplift: advanced integration ready for predictive maintenance and further efficiencies Spacewell | A Nemetschek Company

Why This Matters for Smaller Hotels

Hospitality is under pressure. Labor shortages. Rising costs. Fierce OTA competition.

Hotels that delay digital transformation risk more than inefficiency. They risk irrelevance.

But hotels that adopt AI-powered operational tools strategically, with education and trust, can:

  • lower costs,
  • improve staff morale,
  • and deliver smoother guest experiences.

That’s not just transformation. That’s a competitive advantage.

While large chains like Hilton can pilot and scale AI-enhanced systems, many small and mid-size hotels are still running technology in silos, a PMS here, a booking engine there, housekeeping schedules in Excel, energy systems on manual control. The result? Data stays fragmented, processes remain manual, and managers lack a single view of performance.

The good news is that cloud delivery has changed the economics of digital transformation. What once required servers, IT staff, and multi-year rollouts can now be deployed modularly, paid for as a subscription, and scaled with occupancy.

That’s why now, not “someday”, is the moment for independents and mid-size hotels to step forward. The cloud makes it possible to unify operations, start with one AI-powered quick win, and expand without heavy risk or capital investment.

Enter: The AIDURIX Compass

This is exactly why we built the AIDURIX Compass, not as another tech product, but as a navigation system for hoteliers starting their digital journey.

The Compass is designed to help hotels:

  • Identify the biggest operational friction points,
  • Understand the WHAT, HOW, and WHY available AI tools,
  • Choose quick-win pilots that prove ROI fast,
  • Build confidence to scale transformation step by step.

Because here’s the truth: digital transformation in hospitality isn’t a giant leap. It’s a guided journey. And every journey needs a compass.

The Call to Vendors

If you’re a tech vendor: stop overselling features. Start overeducating the market. When hoteliers understand categories, they buy confidently.

The Call to Hoteliers

If you’re a hotel leader: don’t fear “digital transformation.” Start small. Pick one AI-powered quick win. Track ROI. Build momentum.

But don’t chart the journey blind. That’s why we created the AIDURIX Compass — a navigation tool to help you spot operational friction points, explore AI solutions, and design a transformation path that fits your property’s size, staff, and goals.

🚀 Ready to see it in action? Test-drive the interactive demo here: AIDURIX Compass Demo



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

Empowering Educators: Unveiling AI's Role in Modern Classrooms – Devdiscourse

Published

on



Empowering Educators: Unveiling AI’s Role in Modern Classrooms  Devdiscourse



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

Students, schools race to save clean energy projects in face of Trump deadline

Published

on


Tanish Doshi was in high school when he pushed the Tucson Unified School District to take on an ambitious plan to reduce its climate footprint. In Oct. 2024, the availability of federal tax credits encouraged the district to adopt the $900 million plan, which involves goals of achieving net-zero emissions and zero waste by 2040, along with adding a climate curriculum to schools.

Now, access to those funds is disappearing, leaving Tucson and other school systems across the country scrambling to find ways to cover the costs of clean energy projects.

The Arizona school district, which did not want to impose an economic burden on its low-income population by increasing bonds or taxes, had expected to rely in part on federal dollars provided by the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, Doshi said. 

But under HR1, or the “one big, beautiful bill,” passed on July 4, Tucson schools will not be able to receive all of the expected federal funding in time for their upcoming clean energy projects. The law discontinues many clean energy tax credits, including those used by schools for solar power and electric vehicles, created under the IRA. When schools and other tax-exempt organizations receive these credits, they come in the form of a direct cash reimbursement.

At the same time, Tucson and thousands of districts across the country that were planning to develop solar and wind power projects are now forced to decide between accelerating them to try to meet HR1’s fast-approaching “commence construction” deadline of June 2026, finding other sources of funding or hitting pause on their plans. Tina Cook, energy project manager for Tucson schools, said the district might have to scale back some of its projects unless it could find local sources of funding. 

“Phasing out the tax credits for wind and solar energy is going to make a huge, huge difference,” said Doshi, 18, now a first-year college student. “It ends a lot of investments in poor and minority communities. You really get rid of any notion of environmental justice that the IRA had advanced.”

Emma Weber leads a chant at a Colorado state capitol rally in support of “The Green New Deal for Colorado Schools.” Credit: Courtesy of Emma Weber

The tax credits in the IRA, the largest legislative investment in climate projects in U.S. history, had marked a major opportunity for schools and colleges to reduce their impact on the environment. Educational institutions are significant contributors to climate change: K-12 school infrastructure, for example, releases at least 41 million metric tons of emissions per year, according to a paper from the Annenberg Institute at Brown University. The K-12 school system’s buses — some 480,000 — and meals also produce significant emissions and waste. Clean energy projects supported by the IRA were helping schools not only to limit their climate toll but also to save money on energy costs over the long term and improve student health, advocates said.

As a result, many students, consultants and sustainability leaders said, they have no plans to abandon clean energy projects. They said they want to keep working to cut emissions, even though that may be more difficult now.

Related: Become a lifelong learner. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter featuring the most important stories in education. 

Sara Ross, cofounder of UndauntedK12, which helps school districts green their operations, divided HR1’s fallout on schools into three categories: the good, the bad and the ugly. 

On the bright side, she said, schools can still get up to 50 percent off for installing ground source heat pumps — those credits will continue — to more efficiently heat schools. The network of pipes in a ground source pump cycles heat from the shallow earth into buildings.

In the “bad” category, any electric vehicle acquired after Sept. 30 of this year will not be eligible for tax credits — drastically accelerating the IRA’s phase-out timeline by seven years. That applies to electric school buses as well as electric vehicle charging stations at schools. EPA’s Clean School Bus Program still exists for two more years and covers two-thirds of the funding for all electric school buses districts acquire in that time. The remaining one-third, however, was to be covered by federal and state tax credits. 

The expiration of the federal tax credits could cost a district up to $40,000 more per vehicle, estimated Sue Gander, director of the Electric School Bus Initiative run by the nonprofit World Resources Institute. 

Related: So much for saving the planet. Climate jobs, and many others, evaporate for 2025 grads

Solar projects will see the most “ugly” effects of HR1, Ross said. 

Los Angeles Unified School District is planning to build 21 solar projects on roofs, carports and other structures, plus 13 electric vehicle charging sites, as part of an effort to reduce energy costs and achieve 100 percent renewable energy by 2040. The district anticipated receiving around $25 million in federal tax credits to help pay for the $90 million contract, said Christos Chrysiliou, chief eco-sustainability officer for the district. With the tight deadlines imposed by HR1, the district can no longer count on receiving that money. 

“It’s disappointing,” Chrysiliou said. “It’s nice to be able to have that funding in place to meet the goals and objectives that we have.”

Emma Weber, at left, trains student leaders at Sunrise Movement’s “summer intensive” in Illinois this year. Credit: Courtesy of Emma Weber

LAUSD is looking at a small portion of a $9 billion bond measure passed last year, as well as utility rebates, third-party financing and grants from the California Energy Commission, to help make up for some of the gaps in funding.

Many California State University campuses are in a similar position as they work to install solar to meet the system’s goal of carbon neutrality by 2045, said Lindsey Rowell, CSU’s chief energy, sustainability and transportation officer. 

Tariffs on solar panel materials from overseas and the early sunsetting of tax credits mean that “the cost of these projects are becoming prohibitive for campuses,” Rowell said. 

Sweeps of undocumented immigrants in California may also lead to labor shortages that could slow the pace of construction, Rowell added. “Limiting the labor force in any way is only going to result in an increased cost, so those changes are frightening as well,” she said. 

New Treasury Department guidance, issued Aug. 15, made it much harder for projects to meet  the threshold needed to qualify for the tax credits. Renewable energy projects previously qualified for credits once a developer spent 5 percent of a project’s cost. But the guidelines have been tightened — now, larger projects must pass a “physical work test,” meaning “significant physical labor has begun on a site,” before they can qualify for credits. With the construction commencement deadline looming next June, these will likely leave many projects ineligible for credits.

“The rules are new, complex [and] not widely understood,” Ross said. “We’re really concerned about schools’ ability to continue to do solar projects and be able to effectively navigate these new rules.” 

Schools without “fancy legal teams” may struggle to understand how the new tax credit changes in HR1 will affect their finances and future projects, she added.

Some universities were just starting to understand how the IRA tax credits could help them fund projects. Lily Strehlow, campus sustainability coordinator at the University of Wisconsin, Eau-Claire, said the planning cycle for clean energy projects at the school can take ten years. The university is in the process of adding solar to the roof of a large science building, and depending on the date of completion, the project “might or might not” qualify for the credits, she said. 

“At this point, everybody’s holding their breath,” said Rick Brown, founder of California-based TerraVerde Energy, a clean energy consultant to schools and agencies. 

Brown said that none of his company’s projects are in a position where they’re not going to get done, but the company may end up seeing fewer new projects due to a higher cost of equipment. 

Tim Carter, president of Second Nature, which supports climate work in education, added that colleges and universities are in a broader period of uncertainty, due to larger attacks from the Trump administration, and are not likely to make additional investments at this time: “We’re definitely in a wait and see.”

Related: A government website teachers rely on is in peril 

For youth activists, the fallout from HR1 is “disheartening,” Doshi said. 

Emma and Molly Weber, climate activists since eighth grade, said they are frustrated. The Colorado-based twins, who will start college this fall, helped secure the first “Green New Deal for Schools” resolution in the nation in the Boulder Valley School District. Its goals include working toward a goal of Zero Net Energy by 2050, making school buildings greener, creating pathways to green jobs and expanding climate change education. 

Emma, far left, and Molly Weber, far right, work with climate leaders from the Boulder Valley School District’s Sunrise Movement to prepare for Colorado’s legislative session. Credit: Courtesy of Emma Weber

“It feels very demoralizing to see something you’ve been working so hard at get slashed back, especially since I’ve spoken to so many students from all over the country about these clean energy tax credits, being like, ‘These are the things that are available to you, and this is how you can help convince your school board to work on this,’” Emma Weber said.

The Webers started thinking about other creative ways to pay for the clean energy transition and have settled on advocating for state-level legislation in the form of a climate superfund, where major polluters in a community would be responsible for contributing dollars to sustainability initiatives. 

Consultants and sustainability coordinators said that they don’t see the demand for renewable energy going away. “Solar is the cheapest form of energy. It makes sense to put it on every rooftop that we can. And that’s true with or without tax credits,” Strehlow said. 

Contact editor Caroline Preston at 212-870-8965, via Signal at CarolineP.83 or on email at preston@hechingerreport.org

This story about tax credits was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for the Hechinger newsletter.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn’t mean it’s free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending