In a move that could reshape drug discovery, researchers at Harvard Medical School have designed an artificial intelligence model capable of identifying treatments that reverse disease states in cells.
Unlike traditional approaches that typically test one protein target or drug at a time in hopes of identifying an effective treatment, the new model, called PDGrapher and available for free, focuses on multiple drivers of disease and identifies the genes most likely to revert diseased cells back to healthy function.
The tool also identifies the best single or combined targets for treatments that correct the disease process. The work, described Tuesday in Nature Biomedical Engineering, was supported in part by federal funding.
By zeroing in on the targets most likely to reverse disease, the new approach could speed up drug discovery and design and unlock therapies for conditions that have long eluded traditional methods, the researchers noted.
“Traditional drug discovery resembles tasting hundreds of prepared dishes to find one that happens to taste perfect,” said study senior author Marinka Zitnik, associate professor of biomedical informatics in the Blavatnik Institute at HMS. “PDGrapher works like a master chef who understands what they want the dish to be and exactly how to combine ingredients to achieve the desired flavor.”
The new approach could speed up drug discovery and design and unlock therapies for conditions that have long eluded traditional methods.
The traditional drug-discovery approach — which focuses on activating or inhibiting a single protein — has succeeded with treatments such as kinase inhibitors, drugs that block certain proteins used by cancer cells to grow and divide. However, Zitnik noted, this discovery paradigm can fall short when diseases are fueled by the interplay of multiple signaling pathways and genes. For example, many breakthrough drugs discovered in recent decades — think immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cell therapies — work by targeting disease processes in cells.
The approach enabled by PDGrapher, Zitnik said, looks at the bigger picture to find compounds that can actually reverse signs of disease in cells, even if scientists don’t yet know exactly which molecules those compounds may be acting on.
How PDGrapher works: Mapping complex linkages and effects
PDGrapher is a type of artificial intelligence tool called a graph neural network. This tool doesn’t just look at individual data points but at the connections that exist between these data points and the effects they have on one another.
In the context of biology and drug discovery, this approach is used to map the relationship between various genes, proteins, and signaling pathways inside cells and predict the best combination of therapies that would correct the underlying dysfunction of a cell to restore healthy cell behavior. Instead of exhaustively testing compounds from large drug databases, the new model focuses on drug combinations that are most likely to reverse disease.
PDGrapher points to parts of the cell that might be driving disease. Next, it simulates what happens if these cellular parts were turned off or dialed down. The AI model then offers an answer as to whether a diseased cell would happen if certain targets were “hit.”
“Instead of testing every possible recipe, PDGrapher asks: ‘Which mix of ingredients will turn this bland or overly salty dish into a perfectly balanced meal?’” Zitnik said.
Advantages of the new model
The researchers trained the tool on a dataset of diseased cells before and after treatment so that it could figure out which genes to target to shift cells from a diseased state to a healthy one.
Next, they tested it on 19 datasets spanning 11 types of cancer, using both genetic and drug-based experiments, asking the tool to predict various treatment options for cell samples it had not seen before and for cancer types it had not encountered.
The tool accurately predicted drug targets already known to work but that were deliberately excluded during training to ensure the model did not simply recall the right answers. It also identified additional candidates supported by emerging evidence. The model also highlighted KDR (VEGFR2) as a target for non-small cell lung cancer, aligning with clinical evidence. It also identified TOP2A — an enzyme already targeted by approved chemotherapies — as a treatment target in certain tumors, adding to evidence from recent preclinical studies that TOP2A inhibition may be used to curb the spread of metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.
The model showed superior accuracy and efficiency, compared with other similar tools. In previously unseen datasets, it ranked the correct therapeutic targets up to 35 percent higher than other models did and delivered results up to 25 times faster than comparable AI approaches.
What this AI advance spells for the future of medicine
The new approach could optimize the way new drugs are designed, the researchers said. This is because instead of trying to predict how every possible change would affect a cell and then looking for a useful drug, PDGrapher right away seeks which specific targets can reverse a disease trait. This makes it faster to test ideas and lets researchers focus on fewer promising targets.
“Our ultimate goal is to create a clear road map of possible ways to reverse disease at the cellular level.”
Marinka Zitnik, Blavatnik Institute
This tool could be especially useful for complex diseases fueled by multiple pathways, such as cancer, in which tumors can outsmart drugs that hit just one target. Because PDGrapher identifies multiple targets involved in a disease, it could help circumvent this problem.
Additionally, the researchers said that after careful testing to validate the model, it could one day be used to analyze a patient’s cellular profile and help design individualized treatment combinations.
Finally, because PDGrapher identifies cause-effect biological drivers of disease, it could help researchers understand why certain drug combinations work — offering new biological insights that could propel biomedical discovery even further.
The team is currently using this model to tackle brain diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, looking at how cells behave in disease and spotting genes that could help restore them to health. The researchers are also collaborating with colleagues at the Center for XDP at Massachusetts General Hospital to identify new drug targets and map which genes or pairs of genes could be affected by treatments for X-linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism, a rare inherited neurodegenerative disorder.
“Our ultimate goal is to create a clear road map of possible ways to reverse disease at the cellular level,” Zitnik said.
The work was funded in part by federal grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation CAREER Program, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the ARPA-H Biomedical Data Fabric program, as well as awards from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the Gates Foundation, Amazon Faculty Research, Google Research Scholar Program, AstraZeneca Research, Roche Alliance with Distinguished Scientists, Sanofi iDEA-iTECH, Pfizer Research, John and Virginia Kaneb Fellowship at HMS, Biswas Computational Biology Initiative in partnership with the Milken Institute, HMS Dean’s Innovation Awards for the Use of Artificial Intelligence, Harvard Data Science Initiative, and the Kempner Institute for the Study of Natural and Artificial Intelligence at Harvard University. Partial support was received from the Summer Institute in Biomedical Informatics at HMS and from the ERC-Consolidator Grant.
Research from Lenovo reveals that 96% of retail sector AI deployments are meeting or exceeding expectations – outpacing other industries. While finance and healthcare are investing heavily, their results show mixed returns, highlighting sharp differences in how AI is being applied across sectors.
Lenovo research has demonstrated a huge rise in AI investments across the retail, healthcare and financial services sectors.
The CIO Playbook 2025, Lenovo’s study of EMEA IT leaders in partnership with IDC, uncovers sharply different attitudes, investment strategies, and outcomes across the Healthcare, Retail, and, Banking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI) industries.
Caution Pays Off for EMEA BFSI and Retail sectors
Of all the sectors analysed, BFSI stands out for its caution. Potentially reflecting the highly regulated nature of the industry, only 7% of organisations have adopted AI, and just 38% of AI budgets allocated to Generative AI (GenAI) in 2025 – the lowest across all sectors surveyed.
While the industry is taking a necessarily measured approach to innovation, the strategy appears to be paying dividends: BFSI companies reported the highest rate of AI projects exceeding expectations (33%), suggesting that when AI is deployed, it’s well-aligned with specific needs and workloads.
A similar pattern is visible in Retail, where 61% of organisations are still in the pilot phase. Despite below-average projected spending growth (97%), the sector reported a remarkable 96% of AI deployments to date either meeting or exceeding expectations, the highest combined satisfaction score among all industries surveyed.
Healthcare: Rapid Investment, Uneven Results
In contrast, the healthcare sector is moving quickly to catch up, planning a 169% increase in AI spending over 2025, the largest increase of any industry. But spend doesn’t directly translate to success. Healthcare currently has the lowest AI adoption rate and the highest proportion of organisations reporting that AI fell short of expectations.
This disconnect suggests that, while the industry is investing heavily, it may lack the internal expertise or strategy needed to implement AI effectively and may require stronger external support and guidance to ensure success.
One Technology, Many Journeys
“These findings confirm that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to AI,” said Simone Larsson, Head of Enterprise AI, Lenovo. “Whether businesses are looking to take a bold leap with AI, or a more measured step-by-step approach, every industry faces unique challenges and opportunities. Regardless of these factors, identification of business challenges and opportunity areas followed by the development of a robust plan provides a foundation on which to build a successful AI deployment.”
The CIO Playbook 2025 is designed to help IT leaders benchmark their progress and learn from peers across industries and geographies. The report provides actionable insights on AI strategy, infrastructure, and transformation priorities in 2025 and beyond. The full CIO Playbook 2025 report for EMEA can be downloaded here.
Europe and Middle East CIO Playbook 2025, It’s Time for AI-nomics features research from IDC, commissioned by Lenovo, which surveyed 620 IT decision-makers in nine markets, [Denmark, Eastern Europe, France, Germany, Italy, Middle East, Netherlands, Spain and United Kingdom]. Fieldwork was conducted in November 2024.
Explore the full EMEA Lenovo AInomics Report here.
Augment raised $85 million in a Series A funding round to accelerate the development of its artificial intelligence teammate for logistics, Augie.
The company will use the new capital to hire more than 50 engineers to “push the frontier of agentic AI” and to expand Augie into more logistics workflows for shippers, brokers, carriers and distributors, according to a Sept. 4press release.
Augie performs tasks in quoting, dispatch, tracking, appointment scheduling, document collection and billing, the release said. It understands the context of every shipment and acts across email, phone, TMS, portals and chat.
“Logistics runs on millions of decisions—under pressure, across fragmented systems and with too many tabs open,” Augment co-founder and CEO Harish Abbott said in the release. “Augie doesn’t just assist. It takes ownership.”
Augment launched out of stealth five months ago, and the Series A funding brings its total capital raised to $110 million, according to the release.
When announcing the company’s launch in a March 18blog post, Abbott said Augie does all the tedious work so that staff can focus on more important tasks.
“What exactly does Augie do?” Abbott said in the post. “Augie can read/write documents, respond to emails, make calls and receive calls, log into systems, do data entry and document uploads.”
Augie is now used by dozens of third-party logistics providers and shippers and supports more than $35 billion in freight under management, per the Sept. 4 press release.
Customers have reported a 40% reduction in invoice delays, an eight-day acceleration in billing cycles, 5% or greater gross margin recovery per load and, across all customers, millions of dollars in track and trace payroll savings, the release said.
Jacob Effron, managing director at Redpoint Ventures, which led the funding round, said in the release that Augment is “creating the system of work the logistics industry has always needed.”
“Customers consistently highlight Augment’s speed, deeply collaborative approach and transformative impact on productivity,” Effron said.
In another development in the space, Authenticasaid Tuesday (Sept. 9) that it launched an AI platform designed to deliver real-time supply chain visibility and automate compliance.
In May, AI logistics software startup Pallet raised $27 million in a Series B funding round.
For all PYMNTS B2B coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B Newsletter.
WASHINGTON (TNND) — The United States is experiencing a significant increase in electricity demand due to the rapid growth of artificial intelligence technologies. According to an analysis from Berkeley Lab, data centers currently consume about 4.4% of all U.S. electricity, a figure expected to rise sharply as AI models require more power. By 2028, over half of this consumption could be attributed to AI alone, equivalent to powering 22% of all U.S. households.
Most of this electricity is generated from fossil fuels, with data centers operating on grids that emit 48% more carbon than the national average, said a report from MIT Technology Review. While companies like Meta and Microsoft are investing in nuclear power, natural gas remains the primary energy source.
In response to the growing demand, President Donald Trump signed an executive order in April directing the Department of Energy to expedite emergency approvals for power plants to operate at full capacity during peak demand. The order also mandates the development of a uniform methodology to assess reserve margins and identify critical power plants essential for grid reliability.
Despite these measures, concerns remain about the U.S.’s ability to provide the 24/7 power required by AI, especially as China implements plans to ensure reliable electricity for data centers. According to reporting from Forbes, “the U.S. does not have a coherent and continuing energy plan of any type. China’s central planning allows for development and sustainability, while the U.S. approach to energy changes every four years”.