Tools & Platforms
‘Your Work Now Shapes Your Life Decades Ahead’: Anna Gagarina, Career Expert, on Using AI to Land the Right Professional Path

By the end of 2025, the AI market in HR is set to reach nearly $7 billion—almost a billion more than in 2024. Global corporations are ready to invest heavily in technology to attract top talent. But amid the surge of AI adoption, recruitment is going through turbulent times. What was once a predominantly manual process has transformed into a high-tech operation—both for candidates and employers—so much so that the market sometimes finds AI competing not with humans, but with other AI systems.
Understanding these new trends has become crucial both for career consultants and job seekers. How to avoid missing out on promising positions in an algorithm-driven world, where to find your place in the evolving tech landscape, and how to turn AI to your advantage—all of this is explained by Anna Gagarina, career development expert, founder of Job Mentor, an AI platform for career guidance.
Anna, before you began guiding others in effective job searching, you went through an extensive personal journey exploring different countries and careers. When and how did that journey begin?
I often joke that I’m the classic millennial from the memes—the one who had no clue what she wanted to be when she grew up. My career choice was entirely spontaneous: I didn’t go into business or technology; I studied history. I dedicated seven years of my life to it, winning competitions, publishing academic papers, and presenting at conferences—but even during university, I realised that teaching probably wasn’t for me. Then I wondered: who needs all this?
This personal crisis coincided with my first encounter with the business world. I had no prior experience—neither personal nor family-related. Everything started from scratch: I studied the profession, explored case studies, and observed people and companies. I took short courses in sales and marketing, and my head was bursting with information so different from the academic world I was used to. But it was during an internship at an educational company that I truly discovered a new world. I think that was my first real breakthrough in mindset—a step onto the career path I’ve been following for over 11 years.
The relocations were truly pivotal moments for me. In 2020, I was invited to work in Ireland, where I first met families who had been running their businesses for generations. That experience gave me a key insight: “It’s possible to build a business for the long term, creating a legacy and a community around it.”
Another breakthrough came to me after moving to the U.S. Here, I saw what real competition for talent looks like, how to plan a career strategically, and how to consciously and methodically build a path to success, brick by brick. In Russia, decisions are often made with a “just don’t miss out” mindset; here, people follow the principle: “Your career today is an investment in your wealth 50 years from now.”
And so much depends on your ability to build relationships—and how you do it. You can be extremely talented, but if you can’t forge connections, your talent alone won’t take you far.
At what point did you decide to focus on AI when it comes to attracting top talent?
Honestly, I’m not an early adopter or a tech evangelist.
By nature—both personally and professionally—I’ve always been a bit of a conservative. The real turning point came when I started working with companies from Silicon Valley. At first, I didn’t even handle ChatGPT very well—but I quickly learned, and then it hit me: “If even a total tech novice like me can master this, it’s clear this technology is going to change the world.”
From there, client demand pushed me further. I began to see exactly which talents the market needed, where investments were flowing, and what new opportunities and roles were emerging as these technologies advanced. That’s when I realised: as a career consultant, I simply had to move toward AI and emerging tech—because they are shaping the near future of careers.
My first large-scale experiments with AI tools started in the corporate space. As a recruiter, for example, AI-driven sourcing lets me identify more than 100 candidates a day for leading startups and draft over 50 personalized professional emails—even in a language that isn’t my own. This proactive approach helps companies hire high-quality, high-potential talent, where the balance of time and quality is impossible to overstate: every day without a qualified employee can cost a company tens of thousands of dollars. AI also delivers another critical edge—speed. With it, I can create extensive training programs, learning materials, and simulations in just hours instead of months.
You’ve developed over 40 corporate programs and advised more than 1000 HR professionals. Which project was a true breakthrough for you?
I’d say it was a project tied to an employee career management course, where I worked with HR specialists from large companies. A single 20-minute consultation with me could evolve into a full-scale project that was later implemented across companies with 10,000 or even 20,000 employees. This fundamentally changed my mindset: as an individual consultant, you work one-on-one with a client. But when your idea scales within a company of thousands, you’re genuinely influencing the system.
One outcome of this realization was the creation of my project, Job Mentor. The idea stemmed from a very personal challenge: I ran into the classic consulting problem—my resources were limited by my time and expertise. Gradually, I began automating processes, starting with reports, content, and analytics.
Over the past two years, I’ve guided more than 200 career consultations, integrating AI into every step—from defining career paths to refining résumés and identifying the right opportunities. What started as an experiment has grown into a structured system: I begin by introducing clients to AI tools, then provide customized agents that help automate job searches and self-reflection. The result is tangible: I save hours of work, while clients gain something even more valuable—time they can spend with family instead of navigating endless applications. And this was only the first stage of the transition.
At some point, I asked myself: “Could I replace myself entirely?” That’s how the idea for a service where my calendar and 15 hours of individual work aren’t needed was born. Instead, users get a ready-made solution in just 30 minutes of interacting with the system. This drastically lowers the cost of the service and makes it accessible to a much wider audience.
Traditional career coaching doesn’t come cheap. In the U.S., an hour with a consultant averages around $400, while full-service packages often range from $2,000 to $3,000.
By contrast, an AI-powered consultation costs about $100. Of course, no algorithm can fully replace the human connection—but what if you need urgent career support and can’t afford traditional fees? For some, a job is a matter of survival; for others, it’s the chance to unlock potential and achieve a breakthrough in their field. Ultimately, expanding access to career guidance means creating a labor market that is fairer and more transparent for everyone.
How exactly do you replace your involvement? Which AI technologies and tools do you integrate into your work with clients and companies?
We’re a fully AI-based agency, so you could say that almost all of our core technologies fall under the AI umbrella. This includes agents that help automate routine tasks, notetakers that analyse and organise information, as well as tools like Perplexity for deep research and handling large volumes of data.
Such automation brings measurable business results. For example, by reducing the need for manual data processing and admin tasks, we save around $8,000–10,000 per month in operational costs (which would otherwise require 1–2 full‑time specialists). It also significantly reduces classic risks associated with consulting and recruiting businesses, such as knowledge gaps when team members leave, or over-dependency on individual experts.
Additionally, AI allows us to continuously collect and structure career data from 100+ client interactions. Most of this is unstructured information — recorded consultations that often include tens of thousands of words with low repetition and very few clear patterns. Instead of requiring consultants to manually revisit and decode these conversations, our AI instantly analyzes the material, extracts actionable insights, and organizes it for further use.
Thanks to this capability, our consultant can conduct 20–30% more career sessions per month, raising both the speed and the depth of expertise at each stage of the client journey.
Can you share an example of when AI completely transformed recruitment outcomes?
Absolutely—but like any story, there are two sides to the coin: impressive wins and some unexpected headaches.
On the positive side, today’s notetakers do much more than just record interviews like in the old Zoom days—they gather data, take smart notes, and, crucially, learn from company-specific information. This supercharges the recruitment process: from crafting job posts and writing emails to analysing candidates and enhancing communication. For example, emails and text content can now be generated automatically, slashing the recruiter’s time on routine tasks. Natural language sourcing tools allow you to describe your ideal candidate and instantly get relevant profiles—something that used to require complex Boolean searches.
But there’s a flip side. AI has dramatically increased the number of low-quality applications, including spam, making it easy for strong candidates to get lost in the noise. Candidates are using AI to whip up instant responses and cover letters, which only amplifies the flood. Recruiters who used to handle dozens of applications now face hundreds—or even thousands—forcing them to sift, filter, and compete in a whole new landscape. In a sense, AI-driven candidates and AI-powered recruiters are now battling it out on the same field.
How will these changes—AI and automation—impact the global job market in the coming years?
You can roughly divide today’s professions into three groups. The first is non-human: jobs that are already automated or will be soon. Think heavy, dangerous, or repetitive mechanical work—tasks based on algorithmic, repeatable movements. Robots are already taking over these roles, from automated warehouse workers and bartenders to delivery drivers, taxi drivers, and even nail technicians.
The second group is human + AI copilot. These are roles where systems and platforms collect, organise, and analyse data—in medicine, logistics, sales, finance, and education—but the final decision is still made by a human.
Finally, the third group is purely human: top management roles—tasks only a person can perform, overseeing both non-human and human + AI copilot teams.
Technological changes are reshaping all three groups. Essentially, a profession is becoming a platform reflecting your education and professional expertise—the foundation on which everything else, including technology, is built. For example, being an engineer is a profession, but acquiring a more specialised skill set and integrating certain technologies can turn you into, say, a machine learning operations (MLOps) engineer.
Training and learning methods are bound to change. We need to find ways to quickly acquire in-demand skills, specialise, and understand the realities of the modern workplace. AI copilots already help accelerate the junior phase, enabling professionals to move faster into human + AI copilot roles—and eventually reach purely human-level positions.
Yes, lately, we’ve seen waves of layoffs, especially among junior employees, as AI takes over. How can companies balance automation with keeping jobs?
It’s a tricky question. In practice, companies will automate wherever it makes economic sense. If robots or AI can produce a product cheaper than a human, businesses will naturally go for the cost cut. Without regulations or mandatory limits, there’s very little to slow automation down.
Yet the reality is more nuanced. Jobs stick around as long as automating a role costs more than keeping a human. Take giants like Amazon—they pour billions into warehouse and logistics automation, yet remain among the biggest employers in the sector because some tasks are simply cheaper to do by hand.
The future of work is all about reskilling and the shift to gig and project-based careers. Lifelong employment at a single company is disappearing—and the traditional idea of permanent work is fading too. More people will become small independent “businesses,” managing careers like a portfolio of projects and tasks. It’s a world of opportunity, but it demands flexibility, constant upskilling, and the ability to pivot quickly.
What’s the number-one piece of advice you’d give to someone worried that AI will take over their job?
Every time a person frees up time, it gets filled with something new. That’s how new sectors, fields of knowledge, and professions emerge. My advice would be to ask yourself: where do you want to go next? In a year, two, five, ten—and strategically, throughout your life? Where will your mind, creativity, skills, and resources create value and help solve real problems for people?
Which skills will define “new literacy” in the next 10 years?
Even sooner than a decade from now, being literate will mean knowing how to work effectively with AI as a tool. Everyone will need to grasp how these technologies function, what they can—and can’t—do, and how to craft the right prompts—a skill surprisingly few people master today.
Equally crucial will be the ability to design systems and automate routine tasks, orchestrating different agents and tools to maximise efficiency. Basic programming will no longer be just for coders—it will become a must-have for anyone building AI-powered products and services.
The ability to structure information visually and create clear, compelling designs will also be essential, helping ideas and results cut through the noise.
And, of course, critical thinking and the capacity to filter massive streams of information will be indispensable. We’ll need to digest enormous amounts of data and make smart decisions in a constantly shifting landscape. Curiosity, experimentation, and adaptability—being ready to try new approaches and pivot quickly—will become the hallmarks of both professional and personal growth.
Tools & Platforms
TECNO Showcases Slim Smartphones and AI-Powered Laptops at IFA 2025

With a 6mm-thick smartphone and a sub-900g AI laptop, TECNO is trying to show IFA that thin doesn’t mean underpowered.
TECNO is set to take centre stage at this year’s IFA ShowStoppers in Berlin with a showcase that highlights both design finesse and artificial intelligence integration. Under the theme “The Thinnest Power Duo,” the company will present its ultra-slim smartphone, the Tecno Slim, first shown at MWC 2025, alongside the featherlight Megabook S14 AI laptop.
The TECNO Slim builds on the excitement generated when attendees first went hands-on with the device at Mobile World Congress. Now arriving in its mass-production form, it is ready to hit the market. Measuring under 6 mm thick, the phone is billed as the world’s slimmest 3D-curved device, promising to balance its sleek body with a large-capacity battery and strong performance. The handset features a high-end display and AI-driven functions, targeting users who want both elegance and substance without compromise.
TECNO Showcases Slim Smartphones and AI-Powered Laptops at IFA 2025
Having played around with the TECNO Slim in Barcelona, I am eager to see how it fares in real-world use. With its lightweight and thin design, it is hard not to be excited to see if it can hold up against modern flagship phones.
On the computing front, TECNO’s Megabook S14 makes its debut as the lightest 14-inch OLED AI laptop at just 899 grams. The device is powered by either Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite or Intel’s Core Ultra 9, offering strong performance both online and offline. Among its integrated AI tools are real-time meeting transcription, presentation drafting and intelligent photo management.
“We are excited to join IFA ShowStoppers with products that challenge industry conventions,” said Jack Guo, General Manager of TECNO. “The TECNO Slim and MEGABOOK S14 represent our commitment to delivering meaningful innovation – proving that consumers no longer need to choose between elegant design and powerful performance.”

TECNO Showcases Slim Smartphones and AI-Powered Laptops at IFA 2025
Beyond the headlines, TECNO is also unveiling its ever-expanding AI-powered ecosystem. The brand will showcase a lineup that includes the Megapad Pro tablet for students and professionals, True 2 AI earbuds with noise cancellation and spatial audio, the Watch GT AI smartwatch, and the AI Glasses Pro — the first eyewear to integrate a 50-megapixel imaging system. The Megabook K Series laptops, already available in Spain and France, will also feature as part of Tecno’s push into broader European markets.
Visitors attending ShowStoppers on Sept. 4 at Berlin Messe will have the opportunity to test these new devices firsthand at TECNO’s booth at Table 21. The company says hands-on demos will highlight both AI features and the seamless ecosystem connectivity that continue to define its “Stop At Nothing” philosophy. Stay tuned to CGMagazine for all the news out of IFA and beyond.
Tools & Platforms
Leadership and trust still matter as AI drives business change – The Times
Tools & Platforms
Nvidia Is Not Happy With the Gain AI Act, Says As Much

In a move drawing considerable attention across the tech industry, Nvidia Corporation has publicly critiqued the recently proposed Gain AI Act, emphasizing its potential to stifle competition in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence sector.
The GAIN AI Act, which stands for Guaranteeing Access and Innovation for National Artificial Intelligence Act, was introduced as part of the U.S. National Defense Authorization Act, with the goal of ensuring that the United States is the dominant market force for AI.
It has not yet passed and remains a hotly debated policy topic both here and abroad because of the restrictions it looks to enact.
Backers say it aims to protect American market interests by prioritizing domestic orders for advanced AI chips and processors, as well as secure supply chains for critical AI hardware, and theoretically reduce our reliance on foreign manufacturers.
So it’s no huge surprise that Nvidia, a Chinese corporation and currently the world’s biggest company, would take aim at a law that might potentially restrict the competitiveness of foreign technology.
The company said as much during a recent industry forum.
“We never deprive American customers in order to serve the rest of the world. In trying to solve a problem that does not exist, the proposed bill would restrict competition worldwide in any industry that uses mainstream computing chips,” an Nvidia spokesperson said.
Is the Gain AI Act a good idea for innovation?
It depends on who you ask.
Essentially, the law seeks to strengthen national security and economic competitiveness by ensuring that key AI components remain accessible to American companies and government agencies before they are supplied abroad.
Its language takes a hard line on what the priority should be for the United States government.
“It should be the policy of the United States and the Department of Commerce to deny licenses for the export of the most powerful AI chips, including such chips with total processing power of 4,800 or above and to restrict the export of advanced artificial intelligence chips to foreign entities so long as United States entities are waiting and unable to acquire those same chips,” the legislation reads.
Nvidia’s critique reflects broader industry anxieties about regulatory environments that might hinder innovation. As global competition intensifies, particularly with formidable advances in AI from regions such as China, firms like Nvidia are closely watching how regulatory frameworks are taking shape abroad.
But it’s not just foreign companies. American market players, too, have said it could hit many domestic operations hard.
“Advanced AI chips are the jet engine that is going to enable the U.S. AI industry to lead for the next decade,” Brad Carson, president of Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI), a lobbying group for the AI industry, said in a widely distributed statement.
“Globally, these chips are currently supply-constrained, which means that every advanced chip sold abroad is a chip the U.S. cannot use to accelerate American R&D and economic growth,” Carson said. “As we compete to lead on this dual-use technology, including the GAIN AI Act in the NDAA would be a major win for U.S. economic competitiveness and national security.”
‘Doomer science fiction’
Nvidia didn’t stop there. It then took aim at an earlier attempt to make the U.S. more competitive in the chipmaker market, a policy called the AI Diffusion Rule, which ultimately failed.
The company minced no words in a follow-up statement, saying that the past attempts by legislators to control market forces based on protectionist policies was ultimately a bad idea.
“The AI Diffusion Rule was a self-defeating policy, based on doomer science fiction, and should not be revived,” it read.
“Our sales to customers worldwide do not deprive U.S. customers of anything—and in fact expand the market for many U.S. businesses and industries,” it said. “The pundits feeding fake news to Congress about chip supply are attempting to overturn President Trump’s AI Action Plan and surrender America’s chance to lead in AI and computing worldwide.”
The challenge will be creating laws that are as dynamic as the technologies they aim to govern, fostering a climate where innovation and ethical accountability are not mutually exclusive, but rather mutually reinforcing.
We’ve tried this before
Nvidia’s mention of the AI Diffusion rule was no accident. That ill-fated policy had many of the same political goals but ultimately stumbled at the finish line and was a relatively toothless attempt to rein in some of the world’s most competitive companies.
The Biden administration’s AI Diffusion rule, enacted in January 2025, represented a significant shift in U.S. export controls targeting cutting-edge artificial intelligence technology.
Designed to curb the spread of advanced AI tools to rival nations, the regulation mandated licensing for the sale of high-end AI chips and imposed strict caps on computing power accessible to foreign recipients. Its goal was to slow the diffusion of sensitive AI capabilities that could enhance military or strategic applications abroad.
However, the Trump-era approach to export controls, which focused on a more targeted, bilateral framework, was poised to replace the Biden administration’s broader strategy.
President Trump had announced plans to rescind the AI Diffusion rule, criticizing it as overly bureaucratic and potentially hindering U.S. innovation. Instead, his administration favored engaging in country-specific agreements to control export practices, aiming for a more adaptable, case-by-case approach.
Though the AI Diffusion rule was ultimately rolled back, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) signaled a renewed emphasis on enforcing existing regulations. The agency issued a notice reinforcing actions against companies with a “high probability” of violations, warning that increased scrutiny would be applied to entities with knowledge of potential breaches.
Whether this latest attempt to advance American interests meets a similar fate remains to be seen.
-
Business1 week ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms4 weeks ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy1 month ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers2 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Education2 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Education2 months ago
Macron says UK and France have duty to tackle illegal migration ‘with humanity, solidarity and firmness’ – UK politics live | Politics
-
Funding & Business2 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi